The Good, The Bad, The Bigs: Hoops At The Halfway Point Comment Count

Ace

Michigan crossed the halfway mark of 2015-16 Thursday at Purdue in a game that unfortunately encapsulated much of the season thus far: a shorthanded Wolverine squad turned in a strong offensive performance (accounting for context here) that fell short of covering for their defensive shortcomings against a quality opponent.

While it hasn't been a bad year—Michigan is 12-4; they were 10-6 at this point last season with two awful losses—it hasn't been the bounce-back many expected. The Wolverines have beaten the teams they should beat, but they've yet to take down a top-50 KenPom opponent in four tries, and that'll have to change if they want to make a tourney run.

So what's gone well, what hasn't, and what will swing this season one way or the other?

WHAT'S LIL WAYNE 2005-09


All photos: Patrick Barron/MGoBlog

Caris LeVert. Aside from a woeful performance at SMU, LeVert has been one of the best and most consistent players in the country. He boasts the third-best offensive rating among players who use at least 24% of their team's possessions, per KenPom. His drives are more productive than ever before; instead of snaking his way towards the basket, LeVert is getting there more directly, finishing at the highest rate of his career (77.4% at the rim, per hoop-math), and posting the assist-to-turnover rate of a good point guard—which he functions as for this team, something equally evident in his absence as his presence.

When healthy, LeVert has looked like the potential All-American we hoped he'd become, a triple-double threat any time he steps on the court. Unfortunately, the "when healthy" caveat is now required; I'll cover that in another section.

Duncan Robinson. This is Robinson's definitely-not-altered shot chart from Shot Analytics:

One could leave it at that and conclude Robinson has exceeded expectations. In the beginning of the season, there wouldn't have been much more to say anyway; through the first four games he attempted 16 three-pointers and four two-pointers while failing to tally an assist. Robinson has at least one assist in ten of the 12 games since that point, however, and he's used the threat of his outside shot to generate opportunities for himself and others closer to the tin.

Robinson is quietly improving defensively, too, though he set the bar quite low to start the year. His lethal efficiency on offense more than makes up for that; it's hard to complain about a player who's first nationally in ORtg, eFG%, and True Shooting %.

Muhammad-Ali Abdur Rahkman. The bright spot in an otherwise dreadful game at Purdue, Rahk was the only Wolverine who could get to the hoop and finish in LeVert's absence. In the two games since LeVert's injury, Rahk is 11/15 on two-pointers, 4/8 on threes, 5/6 from the line, and he hasn't recorded a turnover. While it'd be great to see Rahk pass the, um, rock a little more—only Aubrey Dawkins has a lower assist rate among non-centers—his ability to generate buckets on his own is huge coming off the bench, and as his outside shots develops (11/29 this season) he could carve out a huge role for himself.

Three-point shooting. Michigan is shooting 43% from beyond the arc as a team. Four high-volume shooters—Robinson, LeVert, Dawkins, and Derrick Walton—are making 45% or better. It boggles the mind to consider where the team's numbers would be if Zak Irvin (15/59) had been shooting like he did as an underclassman.

[Hit THE JUMP for the bad and the we're-not-sure-yet.]

WHAT'S LIL WAYNE 2010-PRESENT


Photos L to R: Campredon/Barron/Fuller

The bigs. Everyone expected center to be the weakest spot in the lineup, but the degree to which it's hampered Michigan on both ends of the floor may be the story of the year thus far. Until the Purdue game, M had been overwhelmed on the boards in each of their losses, and the Boilermakers' size gave the bigs plenty of trouble anyway—AJ Hammons and Isaac Haas went a combined 10/15 from the floor.

Mark Donnal's two-game run against Illinois and Penn State provided some hope, but until someone establishes themselves as a consistent pick-and-roll threat, the offense won't reach its potential. The only guy out of the four centers who looks like much of a rim protector is DJ Wilson, who still plays the game like a wing in a big's body. Ricky Doyle can't hang onto the ball. Moe Wagner isn't ready yet.

Until this group gets it going (if they do, of course), Michigan will be even more of a live-by-the-three, die-by-the-three team than ever, which is saying something with John Beilein at the helm.

Derrick Walton. This may be an overreaction to Walton's ugly start to conference play, but an ugly start it is: in three B1G games he's made 3/15 two-pointers with five assists against ten turnovers while playing some terrible perimeter defense. It was fine for Walton to take a back seat in the offense earlier in the season when LeVert was healthy and creating much of the offense; it's troublesome how little Walton has been able to assert himself when LeVert isn't on the court.

Most worrisome is Walton making a team-low 50% of his shots at the rim. Michigan needs him to be able to score off the dribble, and while it was easy to dismiss his poor finishing last season as a byproduct of injury, that excuse doesn't apply anymore. While Walton's been a superlative spot-up shooter and consistently productive defensive rebounder, he hasn't been much more than that. We keep expecting the patented LaVall Jordan Point Guard Breakout; thus far for Walton, that hasn't happened.

Kam Chatman. There's not much to say here except Chatman can't get significant minutes for a team that could use a player with his size and skill-set, and that's a bad sign for a heralded prospect in year two.

Injuries. This passage from the season preview turned out to be unfortunately prescient:

It's quite easy, therefore, to project an immediate and full recovery. LeVert and Walton should be better than ever, Zak Irvin rounded out his game in their absence, the large sophomore class should take a big step forward, and the addition of Duncan Robinson could turn the offense into a juggernaut.

But it isn't that easy. The center position is still a major question mark. There are several players in line for possible breakout seasons—Doyle, Dawkins, Chatman, Wilson, even Irvin—but none are guarantees. Irvin and Spike Albrecht are battling injuries that shouldn't affect them during the meat of the season, but with back and hip issues, respectively, there's good reason for trepidation. The fact of the matter remains that this group still hasn't a chance to play with each other at full strength.

Irvin's all-around game picked up from where he left it at the end of last season, but whether due to physical or mental repercussions (or both) from his back procedure, he looked uncomfortable shooting the ball until the last couple weeks, and that's reflected in the stats. Albrecht, of course, had to end his year—and quite possibly his career—early because of the pain in his hips. Now LeVert is dealing with a murky ankle or foot issue that's kept him out of the last two games and will likely prevent him from suiting up tomorrow night agaisnt Maryland. Injuries haven't hit the squad as hard as they did in 2014-15, but they've still played a significant role.

WHAT'S LIL WAYNE'S BRIEF MOMENTS OF LUCIDITY


Bryan Fuller/MGoBlog

Zak Irvin. Irvin is so close to being really dang good. He's getting to the rim, creating for teammates, pulling down boards, holding his own defensively against bigger players—just about everything we saw from him to end last season. The issue, of course, is he hadn't been able to hit a jumper until Christmas, and even since he floundered as the primary offensive option against Purdue. If his shot is really back, that last game should be more of an anomaly than anything else; if it isn't, he could be exposed in conference play as opponents force the offense to run through him. Even including center play, there's no bigger X-factor for Michigan as the season goes along.

Aubrey Dawkins. The numbers look great. Dawkins is making 62% of his twos and 46% of his threes on a team that doesn't need him to be more than a finisher and three-point gunner on offense. So what's the problem? Beilein handed Dawkins' starting job to Robinson because Dawkins couldn't play better defense than a D-III transfer, and at that point there's little benefit to having Dawkins in the game instead of Robinson.

Dawkins still needs to figure it out on that end or his minutes will vary depending on the matchup. While he's a great bench scorer to have in the rotation, the recent emergence of MAAR—who's scoring well and playing better defense—could eat into his playing time even though they don't play the exact same spot; Beilein has the lineup flexibilty to make it work with whoever gives the team a better chance to win, and right now that's Rahk.

Comments

AC1997

January 11th, 2016 at 4:53 PM ^

Ace - 

I was always nervous about the optimism you and Brian had toward Walton since I had never seen him be a great playmaker and more of a glue guy.  He was always shaky in the ball screen game, he was a great finisher on the break but not in the half court, and he didn't get to the line.  Injury was the simple justification.....which hasn't proven to be the case.  His issues have been magnified without Spike to offer an alternative at times. 

But here's my question for you - Do you have examples of his "terrible defense" that you could share?  This is the second time you've offered that as a fact.  I don't think he's been great (no one on this team has) but I don't think he's been particularly terrible.  I actually think he's a victim of the Centers also since their ability to defend the ball screen affects how Walton has to fight through or around them.  

I just wondered if you could offer specifics.  Also, if the team continues the trend of winning the games they should, how do you see the season finish?

trueblueintexas

January 11th, 2016 at 5:00 PM ^

Not a direct answer to your question, but there are two components of being a good defender. 1) Knowing where to be and rotating properly. 

2) Once your man has the ball, how do you prevent them from initiating offense. 

Walton's biggest weakness is issue 2. He does not do a good job of closing off passing lanes or preventing dribble penetration. I saw this multiple times in the Purdue game and other games this season. 

What he understands is where to be, unfortunately, this is a weakness of many other players. Often you will see Walton talking to another player after a bad rotation breakdown telling them what they should have done. As mentioned, the list of players who have problems with this is pretty big and it includes Irvin, Dawkins, Robinson and Wilson. This is one of the many reasons Wilson is not playing more. There are far too many blown assingments. 

Ace

January 11th, 2016 at 5:01 PM ^

But if you look back at the Purdue game, Walton gets blown by without offering much resistance to his man time and again. I don't have an explanation for it; he's just having a hard time staying in front of people, and that tends to set off chaos with rotations among the other defenders, too.

Blue Durham

January 11th, 2016 at 9:22 PM ^

But I think stopping dribble penetration has been a problem for the past number of years. To really prevent drives, a very important component has to be present, and that is a willingness to be called for a foul, particularly (but not exclusively) blocking. Absent that, only token resistance is going to be offered. That is what we have pretty much seeing for the past number of years. The 2 foul and sit for the rest of the 1st half is part of it. For good or bad, that is Beilein's philosophy, and it is what it is. Love that he is our coach, but yeah, I don't agree with this aspect of his coaching.

Blue Durham

January 11th, 2016 at 9:48 PM ^

is that due to a failure of recruiting, or due to a similar philosophy of foul avoidance? Yeah, fouls are "bad" but can serve a purpose. When was the last time an opposing player experienced a "hard foul" from a Michigan center when driving into the lane? Probably when Mitch McGary played. Like in pitching in baseball, throwing inside and occasionally hitting a batter serves a purpose. Failing to do so gutlessly yields a large part of the plate to the batter, dooms the pitcher and puts undue pressure on the pitcher's own offense. Just like Michigan basketball.

TrueBlue2003

January 11th, 2016 at 9:39 PM ^

and immediately several plays came to mind from Purdue, checked out the highlights and sure enough almost every Purdue score on the BTN highlights showed Walton as the guy (or one of the guys) making a bad defensive play.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsV7BjPVZJU

1) First play approx 0:08 sec mark, Walton gets lost in no man's land as the ball gets reversed and his guy has an easy catch and throw to Hammons who is sealing off his guy, which is super easy to do when the ball is reversed so easily. #1 rule in man-to-man defense when off the ball is to be in full denial of the passing lane if your guy is one pass away from from the ball.  He either falls asleep or he's too slow to play this the way he should for fear of getting backdoored or driven on. Either way, he's the reason for the breakdown.  We obviously don't have good post defenders so you have to at least give them a chance.

2) Next play approx. 0:18 sec mark, Walton gives up an and1 on the break.  Nit picking a little as it would take a great defensive play to keep this from a score, but either don't foul at all or foul such that this isn't an easy layup anyway.

3) Next approx 0:23 sec mark, Walton gets caught in the paint about 3/4 of the way to the guy that drove on Irvin (on whom Irvin played excellent defense). Irvin wasn't beat, this isn't Hammons or Haas down low so he shouldn't have rotated this far away from his guy who is a 40% 3pt shooter.

I realize these are highilghts so it's cherry-picking good Purdue plays, which in most cases means a bad M defensive play but Walton was the prime culprit or at least could have done a lot better on all three of the first plays here.

jsquigg

January 11th, 2016 at 4:55 PM ^

One thing that frustrates me is that this team seems to lack energy at times.  They have the depth, so there's no reason everyone out there shouldn't be going balls to the wall.  MAAR plays that way, but I don't know if anyone else does consistently.  This may be a byproduct of recruiting shooters and otherwise cerebral players, but every team needs a balance.  I do wonder why Kam Chatman can't get more run.  I get that you don't want him shooting much (or at all), but you would think he could at least get some run as someone who can bring energy and has shown brief glimpses of defense, rebounding, passing, etc.

somewittyname

January 11th, 2016 at 5:02 PM ^

Chatman doesn't get any run because he can't shoot the 3. I hope for his sake he considers a transfer because I think he could be successful in another program that doesn't value the 3 ball above all else.

Lanknows

January 11th, 2016 at 5:40 PM ^

He doesn't have to hit 3s if he brings other contributions to the table. GR3 wasn't a shooter either.  The problem is bigger and more wide ranging for Chatman:  His shot selection has been bad, he rarely drives and when he does he's trying to slink around contact, and his rebounding and defense haven't been forceful enough to offset being a minus on defense.

I'm bullish on Chatman's potential, but he'd really benefit from a red-shirt year and it doesn't look like that is going to happen. He's a talented kid but he's just not assertive/confident/comfortable right now.  Shooting 3s at will doesn't seem to be helping.

He's not anywhere near the long-range shooter that Robinson or even Dawkins are, so it's strange to see him try to follow their approach to playing time.  Maybe he's being coached to play that way, but I'd rather he found other ways to contribute, especially in areas where Robinson and Dawkins aren't strong.

93Grad

January 11th, 2016 at 6:16 PM ^

since watching him in about 10 games last year.  He is a terrible fit for this offense and is deficient in so many areas.  That being said, I also thought he should redshirt this year in case he can be salvaged.  He is still really young so maybe some physical and mental maturity would make him at least a viable bench guy.  Now I wonder if he will even be on the team next year. 

somewittyname

January 11th, 2016 at 6:28 PM ^

I agree that if he were a great all around player but just couldnt shoot from outside, he would see the court at least. Well, he's not a great all around player, certainly not offensively. Still, I think he could carve out a role on other P5 rosters from what I've seen. Also, in comparison to GR3, remember that while certainly wasn't a great shooter he was at least low thirties and could hit from the corner forcing players to guard him out there.

somewittyname

January 11th, 2016 at 6:43 PM ^

Those are all 5s. In Beilein's offense, 1-4 must be a threat from 3. You literally can't find me an example of a 4 man in his offense at Michigan that played real PT and didn't attempt at least 50 3s a season except Jehvon Shepherd and that was back when he still had Amaker players and the overall talent level was awful.  

Stu Daco

January 11th, 2016 at 5:15 PM ^

I never thought I'd see the day when John Beilein would have not one but two severely underperforming 5-star players.

PeteM

January 11th, 2016 at 5:16 PM ^

Last year's team had Dawkins & Rahkman seeing starters' minutes with loss of Walton and Levert, and by the end of the year the team was competitive.  I have faith that Beilein can continue to coach them up throughout the season.

My biggest frustration is Doyle.  I've heard that he works his butt off in practice and on his own time so it's not lack of effort, but he simply needs to get better.  I don't expect him to become dominant but even if he was average and Donnal's progress continued this would be a pretty good team.

AlwaysBlue

January 12th, 2016 at 12:54 AM ^

few games back that after practice and everyone leaving for dinner he heard someone in the gym. He went to see what was going on and he found Doyle, alone, working on his pass catching. That's just one reason I can't stand all the criticism these guys get, particularly on game threads. They work their asses off.

Lanknows

January 11th, 2016 at 5:50 PM ^

Irvin's been really good from everywhere besides 3 point range. Given his track-record and health, that always seemed like a blip.  He's 8 for his last 18, counting Purdue.

Obviously he'd benefit tremendously from having Caris back - even Caris and Nik struggled at times when transitioning to being the focal point of opposing defenses.

I think people are forgetting what the Beilein 4 is asked to do on defense is incredibly tough and requires a selfless player.  We can cut Irvin some slack when he's guarding Swanigen right?

I don't see Irvin as an X-factor at all. He's good and his game is expanding and improving steadily.

TrueBlue2003

January 12th, 2016 at 2:27 AM ^

we scored 70 on the top rated defense in the country (dropped to #3 after the UI game). Rahk going nuts essentially made up for Caris on that end of the floor.  We gave up 87, 52 in the second half (!!) to a mediocre offense.  That was the problem.

Stringer Bell

January 11th, 2016 at 7:58 PM ^

This team has no PG, and with Caris out that leaves Irvin as the only guy capable of creating for others.  Really disappointed in Walton.  No one expected him to fill Trey Burke's shoes but he had to at least become more than a 6 feet tall spot up shooter and defensive rebounder.  This is why Spike's injury is so devastating, and why if there's even the smallest chance that he can play next year that we need to bring him back.  He has full control and mastery of this offense, Walton is the opposite.

Lanknows

January 12th, 2016 at 3:21 PM ^

I did expect Walton to fill Trey's shoes.  Not that I expected him to be the POY but I thought he'd continue the tradition of highly efficient and reliable ball distributors and end up being in the conversation for all-conference.

Still - I think you're being harsh.  Walton is a better overall player than Spike and Spike's never really come close to taking playing time from Walton.

AlwaysBlue

January 12th, 2016 at 1:07 AM ^

comment at the presser sounded ominous. He was asked about protecting Caris' future (basically shutting him down) and he said that they hadn't had that conversation because they hoped he would recover sooner. He then said that it's getting to be that time. I haven't been optimistic since Beilein refused to identify the injury. I am less optimistic now.

alum96

January 12th, 2016 at 1:16 AM ^

sometimes it is just plain bad luck

If Monte Morris had claimed the scholarship that Beilein offered to whichever PG wanted it first we'd have a true PG and floor general and the discussion about this team the pas 2 years would be different.   No offense to Walton but I hope this stops the future hype train about every PG in the Beilein system leaving for the NBA after 2 years because we jsut so happened to have a once in a generation guy in Burke.

Irvin is Irvin - he is geting better as he gets his sea legs back; being out robbed him of practice so first 10 games were like spring training for him.

While I agree no progression from Doyle is a disappointment the biggest 2 fails other than Walton not progressing are a complete miss on a 5 star that we needed to come in and immediately do something similar to GR3 as a freshman.  I don't see the "potential" and never have in Chatman so many seem to be squinting so hard to see.  A blind squirrel will run into a nut over the course of a year and he does that 3-4 games a year.  Other than that he plays decently vs low mid majors which tells me ...that is the level of player he is.  Someone who woud be all conference in the 10th or 11th best conf in the country.  He is not a P5 player.

The other one is Dawkins.  I bought that one hook line and sinker - I thought for a 3 week stretch last February he was playing at 2nd team All Big 10 level and was looking like a diamond in the rough find like Caris but with even faster progression.  He has regressed horribly and with the failure of Chatman you needed someone like Dawkins to come out of the blue and offset that.... that would have been Dawkins.  I still have SOME hope with him unlike Chatman because he has done it in the past - I am hoping he is having that same sophomore slump Hardaway Jr had before a very nice JR year.

Those are the specifics - of course the lack of athleticism up front, and watching mid major big men look like future 2nd round NBA picks against our team has at this point become an institutional problem that doesnt look like it will change with the type of player we insist on recruiting.

pdenner

January 12th, 2016 at 1:34 PM ^

In what way has Dawkins regressed horribly? He's still hitting his shots at a great rate and his defense hasn't dropped much if at all, so I'm unclear on why you're so down on him. I see the only reason why he isn't playing is that Robinson is an A+ shooter whereas Dawkins is an A- shooter and both have at best C defense.

Lanknows

January 12th, 2016 at 3:30 PM ^

He had a bad game.  People around here are forgetting that he's a FAR better player than Spike, Rhak, Dawkins, anyone on this roster beside LeVert and possibly Irvin.

"complete miss"?  off-the-rails crazyness

This team is severly limited by it's big men.  When we get respectable matchups our guards are throwing up triple doubles.  Everyone can shoot.  Other than Robinson the athleticism is solid.  The single biggest problem, by miles, is that center is a huge liability for the 2nd year in a row.

DrewGOBLUE

January 12th, 2016 at 7:11 AM ^

What we've recently seen from MAAR is the brightest of the bright spots, IMO. Assuming he keeps it up, he'll have improved nicely upon two of his deficiencies from last year, which were his somewhat low FG% and tendency to turn the ball over. He also continues to penetrate/finish well and play solid defense.

And without consistent production from our bigs, Rahk's ability to get into the paint is a nice asset for the team, since it adds a little bit more to an otherwise deficient inside game. So if we're mostly living and dying by the three, anything to take some of the opposing teams' defensive focus off the perimeter to help create decent looks is a plus.