First Look: 2013 Offense Comment Count

Brian January 3rd, 2013 at 3:14 PM


denard-robinson-full-flight-osubilde[1]Roy Roundtree Illinois v Michigan UgChzRnSSall[1]

goodnight sweet prince

  1. QB Denard Robinson. Michigan's career leader for yards per carry (6.3, tied with Jon Vaughn, would best it if sacks were accounted for properly). All-time national record-holder for most rushing yards by a quarterback. Three-year starter. Only player who could run for more than two inches per carry behind last year's offensive line. Kind of a big deal. Did not start last five games at QB, which mitigates blow significantly since Gardner was a revelation.
  2. LT Taylor Lewan [assumed]. Future first-round pick was near flawless in pass pro his last two years. Penalties returned after refinement as a sophomore; got beat painfully against OSU, but nearly shut out Clowney in the bowl game.
  3. WR Roy Roundtree. Never really recovered his prominence after rampant 2010. Did bounce up to 31 catches as a senior at a nice YPC clip. Had clearly become the #2 option by the end of the year.
  4. OG Patrick Omameh. Four year starter was probably Michigan's best interior OL. Lacked desired power for manball run game. Pass protection was solid. Probably replaceable. Probably not getting drafted.
  5. TE Mike Kwiatkowski. Don't-call-him-a-walk-on tight end was Michigan's most effective blocker at the spot; not targeted much in the pass game.
  6. OC Elliott Mealer. Last minute switch to center didn't smooth over issues; seemed to mess up a bunch of line calls starting in the Nebraska game; graded out as an extensive downgrade from Molk.
  7. OG Ricky Barnum. Not very good. Got run over a lot.
  8. RB Vincent Smith. Throwback screen merchant and pass-protector extraordinaire was never a great runner but leaves a hole at third down back. Admirably managed to not dissolve into component atoms after Clowney hit.
    [end contributors]
  9. FB Stephen Hopkins. Seemed to lose his job to Joe Kerridge and left the team after the OSU game.
  10. TE Brandon Moore. Barely played.



we gon' throw

  1. QB Devin Gardner. Blew in from wide receiver after Nebraska debacle to start final five games of the season, completing nearly 60% of his passes for 9.7 yards a pop with 11 TDs and 5 INTs. Added a couple hundred yards on the ground, sacks excluded. Those were mostly on scrambles. Fluctuating accuracy a concern.
  2. WR Jeremy Gallon. Gardner's favorite target was on pace for 80 catches and 1300 yards once Denard hurt his elbow. Diminutive but capable of leaping past defensive backs; quick enough to get open against almost anyone.
  3. RB Fitzgerald Toussaint. Gruesome break of both bones in his leg should actually be healed by fall. If available, Michigan needs the 2011 version of him badly.
  4. LT (presumably) Michael Schofield. Early struggles as he transitioned back to tackle did not last; established himself a good pass protector and adequate run blocker. With freshmen populating the depth chart everywhere on the OL, will likely move over to Gardner's blindside, allowing a burlier kid to play RT.
  5. TE Devin Funchess. After breakout Air Force game use steadily declined; he finished with only 15 catches for 234 yards. Did lead the team in receiving TDs with five. Passing game priority one needs to be getting the Devins on the same page.
  6. WR Drew Dileo. Sticky-fingered Louisiana gnome should have been targeted more. Catches quickly, gets upfield, small target but extremely reliable.
  7. TE AJ Williams. High school tackle was supposed to be Michigan's blocking TE but displayed horrendous technique and probably would have redshirted if Michigan had any options. Needs a big step forward with Kwiatkowski out the door.
  8. FB Joe Kerridge. Thumping fullback of the walk-on variety will be frequently used as Michigan transitions back to pro-style.
  9. RB Thomas Rawls. Flashed some tackle-breaking power in garbage time against Purdue and Illinois; proceeded to average under two yards a carry once forced into the lineup late in the year. Passed by Justice Hayes in bowl game and will likely fall behind freshmen when they arrive on campus.
  10. WR Jeremy Jackson. Lumbering possession receiver can't get separation from DBs.



The offensive line. With Lewan taking his twosie to the next level, Michigan is left with Michael Schofield and a bunch of guys who haven't seen the field. Two fellows seem like locks to start:

  • Redshirt sophomore Jack Miller at center. It's possible Blake Bars moves over to challenge, and vaguely possible that Patrick Kugler—son of former Steelers OL coach and new UTEP head coach Sean—enters ready to play on day one. Miller has to be considered the heavy favorite. The coaches love his nasty, Molk-like disposition; they may not love his Molk-like size. He does have the asset of being a center from the get go, unlike the candidates in 2012.
  • Redshirt freshman Kyle Kalis at guard. I bet if Michigan had to do it over they would have put Kalis in the mix to start from day one. Instead they preserved a year of eligibility for him, which will benefit them down the road. If Kalis, a proverbially nasty road grader, doesn't win a job with ease, it's time to start worrying about living up to the hype.

A third is not quite a lock but has a healthy lead in my head:

  • Redshirt freshman Ben Braden at right tackle. Braden is a mountain of a man better suited to crubberate people off the ball than classmate Erik Magnuson, who's more of a left tackle type. Scuttlebutt reaching my ears is that the coaches are extremely high on him. Magnuson does have a shot.

The fourth is up in the air between these folk:

  • Redshirt sophomore Chris Bryant, who remains a 320, 330-pound mauler. He missed the season with a leg fracture. Availability in spring will be key.
  • Redshirt freshman Blake Bars, who's a lot smaller than Bryant and will probably have to wait a bit longer for a shot at the starting job. He was a 3/4 star borderline kid.
  • True freshman Kyle Bosch, this year's edition of Kalis. While he's not quite as hyped, he's enrolling early and should find himself on the two-deep immediately. He could push through.
  • Redshirt junior Joey Burzynski. I'd be surprised if a 6'1" kid can move past the aforementioned trio and into the starting lineup. That said, he's got the most on-field experience in this grouping.

Breaking in four new OL, three of them likely to be freshmen, is scary. On the other hand, it's not like they can be worse at run blocking.

A dang running back who can run the dang ball. Maybe this is Toussaint. It seems more likely it's either DeVeon Smith or Derrick Green, particularly the latter guy if he does indeed end up in Ann Arbor like it seems the world expects him to. Running backs don't need a lot of seasoning, and Green is college-sized and then some.

Also here's my candle for Dennis Norfleet, third down back kthx. Get some Muck in you, kid, and there's a job waiting.

African refugee wide receivers. Amarah Darboh pointlessly burned a redshirt; Jehu Chesson kept his. With no immediate help from this WR class likely, last year's folk will have to break in. I was pretty high on both those dudes, with Chesson a co-MGoBlog Sleeper of the Year with Braden. They both provide relatively big targets, and Chesson might have deep speed.


Gardner to Gallon. As mentioned above, that connection was red-hot over the last five games of the season, and not just against tomato cans. Gallon's best game of the year was the nine-catch, 145-yard, two-TD outing against a top-shelf SEC defense in the bowl game. Those guys are in tune.

Just running one offense, thanks. No longer will Michigan be at war with itself about what it wants to do. A section a bit later in this post hopes they'll run the QB some; this should not detract from the fact that Michigan moves from a system Borges never quite got the hang of to his bread and butter. Gallon's performance once Michigan had a quarterback who could stand in the pocket and deliver entices.

Presumably large improvement from the tight ends. Devin Funchess and AJ Williams got thrown into the fire a year too early; now they can add 20 pounds each and learn how to block and add a couple new guys in the hopes of Stanfordizing this offense.

Funchess seemed like a matchup issue last year, but if you were a defensive coordinator considering him a wide receiver, how wrong would you have been? Not very. Getting him to a point where he is a credible blocker is what'll get him open on seams and whatnot.


Offensive line depth x2. This isn't quite as bad as it was last year, when there were essentially no backups—the sixth OL was a walk-on. It is still not good. If you make the reasonable assumptions that the freshman class redshirts and Bryant wins the other guard job, Michigan has Burzynski, Bars, and Magnuson available. Freshmen and that walk-on. Suboptimal.

But hey at least next year this problem goes away: Schofield's gone; everyone else returns.

Offensive line starters, probably. Four new ones; asking a lot for all of them to be good from day one.

WR depth? I'm not entirely sure this is a huge problem with Gallon stepping up and Dileo presumably establishing himself an excellent slot option. But they need some other guys; the incoming class provides little immediate help, so then it's down to Darboh and Chesson. Either or both could break out—Michigan needs one to.

QB depth. Bellomy or a true freshman.


The offensive line can't be worse, right? The running backs didn't help sure but when you return a thousand-yard rusher and his YPC average dips almost two yards a carry, the finger points squarely at the blocking. Lewan will be missed. The other guys are replaceable.

But replacing them is not a great thing. Michigan needs an upgrade.

How accurate is Devin really, and how much progress can he make in one offseason as the man? The overall numbers are good; his last two games left a bit to be desired. Hopefully he can refine down those misses by 20-30%, at which point Michigan is in the proverbial business.

How hard are we jamming the pro-style pedal down? Petrified at the prospect of having Gardner go down when it seemed like the alternative was Jack Kennedy, Michigan all but dumped quarterback runs from its playbook once Gardner entered the game. Was that circumstance or preference? And if it was the former, how comfortable will Michigan be incorporating Gardner's legs as an intentional part of the gameplan if the alternative is Shane Morris?

We won't know that until fall. I'm hoping Michigan keeps the inverted veer around, because that's a pretty good play.

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD CAN ANYONE OTHER THAN DENARD ROBINSON PICK UP THREE FEET ON THE GROUND? Freshmen will get opportunities, yes. Toussaint may be back. The youngsters will be a bit older, and at least Hayes and Norfleet came with some scatback hype—though I wouldn't be entirely surprised to see Hayes move to slot receiver since there's no one on the roster who won't be a senior next year. Only the seeming likelihood that Michigan acquires Derrick Green prevents this from going in the Rod Stewart 2013 category.


Improvement as long as Gardner stays on the field. This edition of Michigan limped to middling numbers everywhere. Next year's offense figures to have a better fit with the offensive coordinator, a better offensive line if only because of reversion to the mean and having non-walk-on options outside of the starters, and at least equivalent playmakers at the skill positions with an outside shot at much better if the running back situation gets an injection of talent.

So then, how are you feeling about Denard Robinson's legs versus Devin Gardner's arm+legs? I'm thinking that's a push once turnovers are accounted for and we bake in an offseason of Gardner improvement. Guy was the #1 dual threat QB of his class, after all, and displayed some excellent potential on the ground in his tenure as a starter. And in a Borges offense, there's no comparison in the passing game*.

A lot rides on Jack Miller and the tackles; I figure the guards will be an upgrade. I'd guess we see an improvement—not that it'll take much to get that with Alabama sliding off the schedule and hopefully not having a half against Nebraska where the offense goes to die. Gardner bails Michigan out from some tough times.

*[Let's say we had that argument about the spread 'n' shred and not have it, okay?]



January 3rd, 2013 at 4:50 PM ^

Lets hope this kid had mono.....or floaters in his eyes during the Nebraska game. He was a complete 'deer in the headlights'. I have a feeling we will need him at some point.


January 3rd, 2013 at 9:47 PM ^

I think he'll be a tolerable back-up by next year. He was clearly frazzled early and hurt by the blitzing, not open receivers and dropped passes. After the mess, he looked decent on his last drive. He'll have another year of practice to get better. I do see an issue in that I see him more as a game manager than a playmaker. Given our lack of difference makers, we need a playmaker at qb in 2013. By 2014, the Oline is probably good enough he could hand off and make enough plays in the passing game in a pinch.


January 3rd, 2013 at 4:54 PM ^

What makes you so sure this is in the cards? Aside from a power run game, what does the Gulf Coast Offense share with Harbaugh/Shaw/Hamilton's multi-tight end pro-style looks?

In case this sounds snarky, I'm asking because I honestly don't know.

Gulo Gulo Luscus

January 4th, 2013 at 9:04 PM ^

I think "Stanfordizing" in this context means having players at a position who compliment one another to exploit mismatches on the defense.  At TE the example is Funchess as pass catcher (but needs to learn to block) and AJ Williams as mauler (who hopefully can catch from the H-back spot).  Tough to defend a pair of 6-6 TEs when one is 240 and the other is 290, especially if they can competently fill the opposite role.

Another example cited by Brian in a recruiting profile was Dennis Norfleet:

Dennis Norfleet is another guy who Michigan can plug into their offense to jar opponents out of comfort zones and exploit weaknesses. Whipsaw, Swiss army knife, etc., the null offense, whatever you want to call it, Norfleet is a guy who fulfills a role. He is a specialist.

From that class, one complimentary counterpoint to Norfleet's electricity will be Sione Houma's power. Again, to cite the recruiting profile:

...I can understand this one as part of Michigan assembling a Swiss Army Knife roster for Borges to do diabolical things with.

Bottom line is that the personnel needs to bring a variety of skill sets to allow the offense to bring diverse formations and packages.


January 3rd, 2013 at 5:00 PM ^

How much of a difference is there between a redshirt freshman starting and a true freshman? My assumption is that is a fairly major difference. Does someone have any ideas/know? A redshirt freshman will have been through 2 fall practices and a spring. If they were an early enrollee they would have 2 springs in the system. So they may not have game experience, but they do have experience in the system. And the true freshman will only have a fall's worth of practice in te system. Personally I feel that the O-line will be better than last year. There will be growing pains early, but I feel that at the start of the conference games it will be clicking. Hoke and his staff seem to "get" line recruiting and appear to evaluate prospects very well, in my opinion from the praise we read online about some of our players as recruits. Obviously this fall will be the first time they will see game time, and we'll find out how good the coaches actually did.


January 3rd, 2013 at 5:04 PM ^

Weight training and technique. Skill guys can enter college with speed and moves, but OL players need strength that, as a teenager, they still haven't fully developed yet. And they need technique to cope with their first real challenge: competition against players whom they no longer exceed in size in strength.


January 3rd, 2013 at 5:02 PM ^

Sunshine, Lollipops, and Rainbows:

Devin Gardner is now the man, and will have a full offseason and spring to develop his technique and improve as a passer. While Denard's numbers didn't show it, I felt like he actually made strides in the passing game this year (Brian, at times, did as well) and I think Devin has more potential to do so. Having an offense engineered for Devin's strengths will be a plus, too.

Young OLs can work. Insert obligatory 1997 comparison here, but youth doesn't mean that there isn't potential for the unit to gel.

Jeremy Gallon's ability to get open and Devin's ability to get him the ball make me feel a bit better about our receivers for next year. Roy was a good player but without RR running things his production just isn't a significant blow.

Funchess, with a year of practice, could really emerge as an every-down passing threat, and he plays a position Borges likes to use properly.

Talk me down from the Ledge:

Devin Gardner has had three years of instruction, two of it under Al Borges, and still makes headscratchingly bad throws. And while he's a good scrambler, I am pessimistic that Al will incorporate the burgeoning number of packages used in college in the NFL that take advantage of a quarterback's speed. There will be two teams in Maryland playing an NFL playoff game with read option plays in their playbook--seems silly for Michigan to shelve a play that creates such great space for its offense.

All these young offensive linemen we are counting on were on the bench this year when Michigan could barely gain a yard with a running back. I know, blahblahblah Kalis Redshirt and all, but you'd think some of these guys could get on the field at least. The interior line this season was a disaster, and as Mat darkly noted, it's quite possible that they could be worse next year.

Recruiting has done a good job of stockpiling OL prospects and defensive players; offensive skill position players have yet to make an appearance. This is a recipe for disaster in today's college game, where even neanderthal offenses like LSU and Alabama have NFL talent available to make their plays work. OSU will continue to be our measuring stick for success, and Michigan is going to need to score points to beat them, and without skill players at RB or WR it's going to be tough sledding.

I'm not convinced Al Borges can cut it. I hope I'm wrong, and he's not useless, but I'm not convinced. 


It all hangs on Devin. If he is as good as he has shown he has the potential to be, he can make throws that are caught by our undertalented receivers, make first downs by scrambling, and score enough points for our defense to win the game. And Michigan could have two shots at Pasadena. 

If he can't, it's going to be a long year.

snarling wolverine

January 3rd, 2013 at 5:30 PM ^

Devin Gardner has had three years of instruction, two of it under Al Borges, and still makes headscratchingly bad throws. And while he's a good scrambler, I am pessimistic that Al will incorporate the burgeoning number of packages used in college in the NFL that take advantage of a quarterback's speed.

Yeah, but there is no substitute for game experience, especially experience against a future top 10 NFL DE (Clowney). I think he got a little jumpy at times and rushed some of his passes, but this was true of many QBs that faced SCar this year. Even so, he made many clutch plays (including that beautiful throw in a tight window on 3rd and 13 to give us the lead). He has it in him. He'll settle down with experience.

As for Borges taking advantage of his speed, that remains to be seen, but we will hopefully have actual QB depth next year, in the form of a more experienced Bellomy and Morris. This year, after Denard went down, we had no alternatives to Gardner, so we really didn't want him taking many hits.


January 3rd, 2013 at 5:41 PM ^

Fair enough. The problem I saw was that Gardner had a handful of open outs that would have sustained drives that he just whiffed on. I don't know if SC's pressure added to that or not, but they seem like pretty basic throws. He's made some good ones, too, but the inaccuracy hurt us at key times.

I think we all agree that it's just as well that Gardner wasn't exposed as a runner this year; Jack Kennedy was taking backup snaps in warmups for several games. As you say, next year is a questionmark.


January 3rd, 2013 at 6:50 PM ^

The question to me is if you can win with a bad OL and not much talent at RB.  I say yes, but the QB has to be great.  Gardner could be, and I agree he is the key to the offense being successful.

It's hard to envision a strong run game, whether you want to look at the OL or the RBs, it doesn't look very promising.

I think it's probably unfair to label our receivers as "undertalented".  Borges doesn't use that many WRs and between Gallon and Funchess you have 2 players with a good chance of playing in the NFL, with Dileo being a fine complementary college player, and a boatload of recruits coming in.  Plus, expect to see more passes to H-backs and fullbacks next year as Borges spends less of his time worrying about how to incorporate spread stuff (even though it's probably the best fit for Devin to keep many of those elements in place.)

Frankly, it may not matter all that much how good the O is.  They need just to avoid incompetence, if the defense is as good as some of us think it will be.


January 3rd, 2013 at 8:08 PM ^

Especially if you're willing to think the OL recruiting rankings are meaningful and translatable to immediate ability.

MSU is a scary example, especially considering they had Bell, but I think they're an extreme outlier in terms of close games lost.  This might be irrational but here goes; Gardner is a winner - there's no way he let's us down that consistently.

I see losses to ND and OSU as likely, despite being at home, and probably another close loss or two somewhere along the line when our offense fails to convert.  One thing working in our favor is that Gibbons and Wile appear to make up a strong kicking duo.


January 3rd, 2013 at 5:49 PM ^

The Outback implosion and the Denard departure were depressing, but this summary really highlights the lack of departures.

Yes, Denard was the whole rushing O because he could find holes and Taylor was a physical force.  But there must be more talent and productivity in the 2012 and 2013 classes to replace the departures.

A quality WR and RB could make a huge difference but a year of maturity for the rest of the group leaves us better in 2013 than 2012.


January 3rd, 2013 at 6:33 PM ^

Jake Butt seems like a legit pass catcher. Wonder if we don't see him on the field as a true WR if Chesson or Darboh don't step up. I bet Funchess would have lined up as a true receiver if we'd had any TE depth this year. Borge loves him some 6-5 ish targets.


January 3rd, 2013 at 6:54 PM ^

The problem with Funchess was that he couldn't get open against DBs.  That's why he's a TE.  He's going to destroy LBs, but is not a threat if you cover him with a safety.  The key to him becoming an impact player is if he can punish teams by blocking the DBs tasked with defending him into the ground.

Everyone likes a tall receiver who can win jump balls, but it's just not a big part of the offense on a down-to-down basis.  It's more important to get separation from coverage.

Blue boy johnson

January 3rd, 2013 at 6:41 PM ^

Next year is a bizarre schedule and if affords M's young offensive line time to gel and mature.

Only one BIG road game before November (Penn State). Also M has two byes next season and plays only 3 games in October before running the gauntlet in November with 5 tough games. Don't ever remember M playing 5 November games.

Date Opponent
Sept. 14 AKRON
Sept. 21 at Connecticut
Sept. 28 Bye Week
Oct. 12 at Penn State*
Oct. 19 INDIANA*
Oct. 26 Bye Week
Nov. 2 at Michigan State*
Nov. 16 at Northwestern*
Nov. 23 at Iowa*
Dec. 7 Big Ten Championship Game



January 3rd, 2013 at 6:56 PM ^

None of them are a gimmie like Purdue and Minn were this year.  None are sure losses, and Michigan may not even be listed as an underdog in any one of them, but all (with the possible exception of Iowa) are bowl-caliber teams who could pose a stiff challenge on the road.


January 4th, 2013 at 12:58 PM ^

Its amazing to me that no one mentions Drake Johnson as a possible RB contributor next year, when Hoke & Co have been floating his name out there as having had great after season practices, and florida bowl practices, etc. Kid is big AND fast AND physical.  He ran for almost 3000 yards his senior year in HS, much more then either DeVeon Smith or Derrick Green. He was the ESPN Midwest All American RB and has has a full year in the system. Another note is that Hoke said he prepared them for the MSU game and Leveon Bell.  Bell got 68 yards that game. Guess he did pretty good on the scout team.  Scout team starters on offense go against Michigans STARTING defense, so he got great practice this year to prepare him for next year. The starting offense goes against SCOUT team defense.  Personnally, I thnk Drake got a great shot at significant PT. He is no slouch.   I think DeVeon Smith is a nice prospect, but will probably RS next year. And quite frankly, Derrick Green looks more like fullback than a tailback to me. He doesnt seem to have any wiggle. He doesnt pick up his knees when he runs, so he gets triped up all the time. He doesnt have any runs over 40 yards, and is caught from behind frequently...this spells fullback to me. Drake was a track champion so he has breakaway speed, and from all accounts this year, he is becoming more and more physical tailback.  I think the diamond in the rough is already on campus....

any thoughts??


January 4th, 2013 at 1:18 PM ^

You seem to be really passionate about Drake Johnson but you rarely post, so that makes me think you have some kind of personal interest in his success.

Looking at things objectively, though, Michigan really struggled with running back production this year.  They tried Toussaint, Rawls, Hayes, Smith, and Norfleet, yet none of them produced very much at all.  All of those guys return next year except Smith (and perhaps Norfleet, who might be a cornerback).  If Drake Johnson couldn't beat them out this year, then why would he suddenly be considered a front-runner for the position next year?  I could understand if, say, the #1 and #2 running backs were both graduating and someone was going to need to come out of nowhere, but there's an established pecking order, and Johnson isn't part of it.

I'll also say that the coaches really talked up Russell Bellomy and Nathan Brink.  Neither one did/has done a darn thing.  These coaches seem to praise kids to build confidence and/or maintain "The Fort."  Hoke dropping Drake Johnson's name a couple times really doesn't mean anything at all.


January 4th, 2013 at 4:22 PM ^

I think all the talk about Thomas Rawls has everyone leery of great "practice" running backs. Heck, in the bowl practices we kept hearing things about the freshmen receivers, but I don't recall them doing anything in the bowl game. (Even the one whose redshirt is burned).

Doesn't mean any of them can't still become good players. Just means that we're not going to buy the hype till they perform on the field.


January 4th, 2013 at 1:50 PM ^

I disagree with your assessment, but you are entitled to your opinion. I guess we will have to wait and see what happens on the field and how it all shakes out. I watched Drake play at Pioneer for a couple of years, and I think he is legit.  Time will tell.  I do agree with coaches talking doesnt mean a lot, and sometimes its just a smoke screen. But the great thing about football, is you cant hide on the field play -  this is my opinion as an OLD football coach.  I like the physical way Johnson runs the ball, and think that is what M has to get back to.  I believe with 8 scholarship RB's on the roster at the beginning of the year, the decision was probably made pretty early to RS him. After plays at all in BIg Ten game, his RS is lost, so im not so sure later in the year he didnt develop as much or more than the backs we saw. Even so, the production out of what we had was not exceptional. Sometimes the RS is because the coaches want a 5 year player and not because they arent good enough to crack the lineup, particularly later in the season. Im sure Kyle K was "good enough", but they choose to save him and half the very talented freshman class this year, which was smart. But i dont think it reflects the kids ability, talent and what type of football player they will become for the U of M.

And yes, I do not post often, but I read very often.


January 4th, 2013 at 3:21 PM ^

Delonte Hollowell burned his redshirt last year in about the last third of the season.  I don't think the coaches would have been opposed to playing him late in the year if they thought he could contribute to victories over Nebraska or Ohio State.  Kalis likely didn't play because, as a true freshman, he wouldn't have been an upgrade over Barnum/Omameh; next year those guys will be gone, so the spots are open.  Johnson didn't play this year when they NEEDED production at the spot, and the guys ahead of him will still be on campus (except Vincent Smith).

Johnson might turn out to be the starter in 2013.  Who knows?  But as I guessed, the fact that you watched him at Pioneer for a couple years makes me think that you might be overvaluing him.