Draftageddon 2015: It Starts! You Cannot Prevent It! Comment Count

Brian July 21st, 2015 at 11:37 AM

Four_Horsemen_by_MarkWilkinson1

Well... crap. We have this tradition where we seek to irritate every last one of our readers. We could not do that, but then the readers win. The readers cannot win. We are the only site on the internet. We have them in the palm of our hand. We must crush them.

So let's draftageddon again.

You are not going to be happy about this. Let's just state that going in.

RULES

Everyone drafts a team from available Big Ten players consisting of

  • A QB, five OL, and six skill players on offense. Usually this breaks down in to a RB, three WR, a TE, and a wild card but things tend to get weird.
  • 4 DL, 3 LB, 2 CB, 2 S and one wild card on defense.
  • A punter and a kicker.

Standard serpentine fantasy draft.

Once three teams have filled a position group the final team must do so at most three rounds later. This is mostly intended to prevent someone from waiting on a QB until the end of the draft and occasionally results in hilarious things like "Nathan Scheelhaase goes in round 8".

Seth will take an injured Northwestern player over any available Heisman contender.

Everyone will make fun of me for an excellent pick that ends up going in the middle rounds of the NFL draft.

The winner will be the person with the most impressive team.

As randomly determined by RANDOM.ORG the order is

Adam
Seth
Ace
Brian

Adam, you are on the clock. BryMac is on the email chain to throw out haymakers randomly.

BRYMAC: KURTIS DRUMMOND

-----------------------------------------

ADAM - Round 1, Pick 1: J.T. Barrett, QB, Ohio State

jt-barrett-8e81b92eff44cfcf[1]

"Will I even play" is an interesting question to ask the TOP PICK IN THE DRAFT

OFFENSE: JT Barrett (OSU).

ADAM: I'll play Buckeye roulette against my better judgement. Picking a quarterback who has a 33% chance of starting is terrifying for a risk-averse person such as myself, but that 33% is assuming all of OSU's quarterbacks have an equal chance of winning the job.

Braxton Miller returns, but he's coming off of multiple shoulder injuries and already had a tendency to turn into Delmon Young when he had to throw deep. Circling back to the risk-averse thing, that gets a big "nooope" from me. Cardale Jones was superb during OSU's playoff run, but he's reportedly behind Miller and Barrett as of now. Silly though it may be to put much weight on an imaginary July depth chart, it's enough for me to look in a different direction.

That leaves Barrett, who completed 64.6% of his passes while averaging 9.0 YPA. On top of that, he brings the dual threat capabilities I'm looking for; in 2014 he ran 14.25 times per game and averaged 5.49 YPC. Overall, Barrett accounted for 7.78 yards per play while throwing 34 touchdowns and rushing for 11 more. It's easy to see why he was named the 2014 Big Ten Quarterback and Freshman of the Year.  Now I just have to hope he actually plays.

-----------------------------------------

SETH - Round 1, Pick 2: Connor Cook, QB, Michigan State

17544431-mmmain[1]

SETH: I am committed to not doing the insane things this year, among which I include filling the most important position with a guy who's 67% likely to not start. And hell, if Cook played for the other rival, maybe we're be talking about the "next Alex Smith" instead of guessing which of the three stooges gets to drive Urban's war machine to New York.

When Connor took over in 2013 the State offense went from laughable to good enough/safe. When they took the apron strings off in the Big Ten Championship, the INT rate went from 1.41% (best in the country) to 2.12% (Tom Brady), while his YPA shot up to eight against Ohio State and Stanford. Yet I remained a skeptic, until Cook repeated those numbers over an entire season, capped by beating Baylor in a shootout. All told, MSU finished 6th nationally last year in pass S&P+, 10th in YPA, and 11th in turnover rate. Everybody else in range ran a vicious spread or had access to elite talent; Cook did this while working for Jim Bollman.

He won't have Lippett to make him look good this year but Cook made even State's pedestrian receivers look Lippett-esque--Keith Mumphery had 11 yards per target last year; Macgarrett Kings had nine. Arm accuracy is merely good, but it's functionally extraordinary because of a lightning release. His legs aren't up to "dual threat" level but they're enough to extends plays, and State even added a zone-read veer to the playbook last year. I think I've found my quarterback. And despite the ugly green/chrome/bronze/hellenistic helmet, I think Harbaugh would approve.

-----------------------------------------

ACE - Round 1, Pick 3: Joey Bosa, DE, Ohio State

maxresdefault[1]

Looks like Joe Dirt, plays like Mean Joe Green

OFFENSE:
DEFENSE: Joey Bosa (OSU).

ACE: With the two elite quarterbacks off the board, assuming Barrett wins the OSU job (which I think he will, or I'd be bringing the snark much more heavily), I'll happily take the guy projected higher on most early NFL draft mocks than he went here. I don't need to spend much time or effort justifying this selection. Bosa had 21 TFLs and 13.5 sacks last season; both marks led the conference by a healthy margin. He earned unanimous first-team All-American honors. A lengthy section of his official OSU profile is dedicated to the 37 points the Buckeyes scored as a result of Bosa forcing or recovering fumbles last year; 30 of those points came after Bosa forced a fumble on the opposing quarterback. He did all this as a true sophomore.

On top of all that, Bosa is a solid run defender, already able to two-gap blockers to shut down rushes to his side. So, sure, I guess I'll build my defense around the best player in the conference.

[After THE JUMP: A lot more Buckeyes. Sorry.]

-----------------------------------------

BRIAN - Round 1, Pick 4: Taylor Decker, OT, Ohio State
Round 2, Pick 1: Ezekiel Elliott, RB, Ohio State

taylor-decker-alabama-elliott--daae3af1fc3cdf95[1]

Upside: can fit both in one picture. Downside: 4 of first 5 picks Buckeyes

OFFENSE: RB Ezekiel Elliot (OSU), OL Taylor Decker (OSU).
DEFENSE:

BRIAN: This is a very depressing first set of picks for Michigan fans, but they are undeniable if you put aside the confusion about which Ohio State quarterback gets a crack at the Heisman. Decker is a 6'8", 320-pound senior who has anchored OSU's offensive line for the past three years. He projects as a mid first-round pick, if not higher, in the upcoming draft and OSU's run game production is nuts. They put up 5.75 yards a carry.

That's not quite as good as Wisconsin and Indiana last year, but Wisconsin and Indiana didn't end the season by playing Alabama and Oregon--and when Wisconsin feebly opposed OSU in the Big Ten championship game the end result was a walkover: 59-0, with the godly Melvin Gordon held to 71 yards while Ezekiel Elliot going for 220. OSU ended the season much better than it started it, and I'm banking that will--sigh--continue.

Speaking of OSU's running game, I'm going to grab the sole returnee from last year's incredibly stacked Big Ten running back corps. Ezekiel Elliott was the beneficiary of Decker's blocking and the vicious choices Urban Meyer's offense imposes on opponents, and he took authoritative advantage with 1878(!) rushing yards at 6.9(!!!) yards a carry. Nice. With Gordon, Abdullah, Coleman, Langford, and Cobb gone Elliott is head and shoulders the best available tailback.

-----------------------------------------

ACE - Round 2, Pick 2: Darron Lee, OLB, OSU

darron-lee-michigan-spread-arms-2014-9b32748537b4b507[1]

sigh

OFFENSE:
DEFENSE: DE Joey Bosa (OSU), OLB Darron Lee (OSU)

ACE: I won't be breaking this rather upsetting trend. Darron Lee was a terror as the linebacker tasked with playing in space and doing a little bit (or a lot) of everything for the Buckeyes last year. He consistently set the edge and hauled down ballcarriers in space; 54 of his 81 tackles were unassisted, and nine of his TFLs came against the run. He proved an adept blitzer, tallying 7.5 sacks. He also made his mark in coverage, breaking up three passes and intercepting two more. For good measure, he forced a fumble and returned two others for touchdowns. He did all this as a redshirt freshman.

Lee's versatility is what sold me on this pick. As he proved throughout OSU's title run, he's equally comfortable playing in the box against pro-style teams or moving over the slot against spread outfits. The Buckeye defense finished second nationally in S&P+ last year; my defense now features their two best returning pieces.

-----------------------------------------

SETH - Round 2, Pick 3: Jabrill Peppers, HSP/SS, Michigan

bilde[1]

OFFENSE: QB Connor Cook (MSU)
DEFENSE: HSP Jabrill Peppers (Mich)

SETH: It's starting to look more red and green than Christmas at the top of this draft. Well the Bucks stop here. If this seems high to take a freshman, at least it's a redshirt freshman whom Michigan is designing its defense around. I have a whole article on this in HTTV: the best counter anyone's found so far to spreads--at all levels--is to fill all that extra space with a guy who can handle it.

Chris Brown's theory of football is your offense should be whatever you're good at, and your defense should be whatever you can get away with. Like Michigan, I'm going to gamble that this freshman's linebacker skills are good enough to corral the Big Ten's surfeit of slots and slotbacks in space, and trust his athleticism to take anyone deep.
Go Blue!

BRYMAC: For the record, last year you accused Ace and I of, and I quote, "Heiko[ing] up the 13th round" by taking Connor Cook and Jabrill Peppers with the 50th and 51st overall selections. This year, you took those same two guys with the 2nd and 7th overall selections. And in the case of Peppers, you're doing so on the strength of seeing him play about 6 quarters of college football.

So which is it, Senator? Were you wrong then, or are you wrong now?

ACE: Let's not rule out the possibility of "both" so quickly.

BRIAN: To be fair, I had begun the Heiko by taking Christian Hackenberg as my wild card QB.

SETH:  Man if Cook turns out to be turrible or, as I thought last year, just Brian Griese, I am SOOOOOOO okay with that. Universe: do your worst.

If something happens to Peppers, I promise to send a carrier across the dangerous wastelands between my barricaded post-apocalyptic neighborhood to you or your surviving relatives in the city state of Ann Arbaugh. And in case our dialects are not longer mutually comprehensible, I tell you now that whatever it says means "Sorry."

-----------------------------------------

ADAM - Round 2, Pick 4: Shilique Calhoun, DE, Michigan State
Round 3, Pick 1: Adolphus Washington, DT, Ohio State

960x540[1]adolphus-washington-vs-illinois-54bd559088bf9c28[1]

double sigh

OFFENSE: QB J.T. Barrett (OSU)
DEFENSE: DE Shilique Calhoun (MSU), DT Adolphus Washington (OSU)

ADAM: I get two consecutive picks, have no one for Barrett to hand or throw the ball to, and have no hesitation picking two linemen. None. Big Tennnnnnnnnn.

Calhoun led Michigan State in TFLs (12.5) and sacks (8.0) in 2014 while averaging three tackles per game for the defense that ranked first in Rushing Success Rate+ and Opportunity Rate. MSU's run defense should be similarly solid thanks in part to the return of Ed Davis, Lawrence Thomas, Joel Heath, and Malik McDowell et al., which means Calhoun should again have extensive access to opposing back fields. He's incredibly quick and will frequently beat tackles off the edge; this has also led to him relying on speed rushing too frequently. If he can add a pass-rush move or two (spin move, please) he'll be deadly. 

Next to Calhoun on my speed-rushing line of doom (to clarify: for opponents, not me) is Washington. Though less impressive than Anthony Zettel from a purely statistical standpoint, Washington (48 tackles, 10.5 TFL, 4.5 sacks in 2014) is going to benefit from a move down the line. He spent most of last season taking on double teams but will finally be able to show off his speed in 2015 as he moves from nose tackle to three tech. He was already a terror for poorly executed double teams- now imagine putting him in position to regularly do this.

BRIAN: This draft is very depressing and I think we should stop now. What's that noise?

...

That appears to be the entire readership of MGoBlog strenuously agreeing.

-----------------------------------------

SETH - Round 3, Pick 2:  Corey Clement, RB, Wisconsin

5222a6482b758.preview-620[1]

When in doubt, "Wisconsin tailback" is always a winner

OFFENSE: QB Connor Cook (MSU), RB Corey Clement (WIS)
DEFENSE: HSP Jabrill Peppers (Mich)

SETH: Last year's ridiculous conference depth at DE and RB has left us a paucity of proven stars at both for this season. Since the two great ends are off the board, I'll grab the last of the great RBs. I did a little dance when I got Clement last year and I love that I have him again. I love his 6.5 YPC, his almost 1000 yards on 147 touches, his 9 TDs, his zero fumbles, and that he threw a pass to himself.

I also love that he's not Justin Jackson (4.8 YPC and subject to Northwestern's OL) nor Josh Ferguson, who fumbles if you breathe on him, nor a UAB transfer, nor the the pedestrians who litter the rest of the league. Wisconsin's starting RB, no matter who's coaching, is just about the surest bet in the Big Ten after "Mark Dantonio will get offended by something," but for once there isn't an obvious No. 2, and there certainly isn't a passing game, so this guy could get 1500 or 2,000 yards.

Or like...all the yards:

-----------------------------------------

ACE - Round 3, Pick 3: Michael Thomas, WR, OSU

michael-thomas-ohio-state-slant-2014-ff093add217d0863[1]

okay, but he's running away from an MSU player, at least?

OFFENSE: WR Michael Thomas (OSU)
DEFENSE: DE Joey Bosa (OSU), OLB Darron Lee (OSU)

ACE: I'm sorry. I fully planned on jump-starting my offense with Rutgers wideout Leonte Carroo, the conference's leading returning receiver by some margin. After a closer look at both the numbers and the highlights, however, I found a few reasons to expect Thomas to be the more productive receiver in 2015:

  • Thomas will catch his passes from whoever wins the OSU quarterback derby. Carroo will be targeted by the winner of the sweepstakes to replace Gary Nova. After the spring, the favorite is sophomore Chris Laviano, who went 2/12 for 17 yards against Wisconsin in his most extensive time on the field last year. Advantage: Thomas.
  • A lot of Carroo's production last year came on broken plays after Nova escaped significant pressure. Laviano has some mobility, but he probably doesn't possess (I can't believe I'm about to type this) Nova's pocket presence yet, and that could cut out a significant portion of Carroo's big plays.
  • While both Carroo and Thomas were the most-targeted receivers on their team, Carroo was targeted on a whopping 27.8% of Rutgers' passes—a figure surpassed only by Wisconsin's Alex Erickson in the Big Ten—and Thomas carried a much smaller load at 19.6%. Carroo should reprise the same role with a worse quarterback. Thomas, however, should get more opportunities, especially downfield, now that Devin Smith has moved on to the NFL.

Thomas does have to make up a significant gap in yards per catch (19.7 for Carroo, 14.8 for Thomas), but he's got far more reliable hands (72.0% catch rate to Carroo's 58.5%). He can also do this:

Sure, I'll take that. Boo if you must.

BRIAN: /huddles in corner repeating "24-12" to himself

BRYMAC: /jumps into draft unexpectedly, WWE-stye

Round 3, Pick 3.5: NIKE, #Brand, Oregon

How is Nike still on the board? Depth at this position is shockingly thin. Once you get past the swoosh, you have a couple of unreliable hacks; Adidas is prone to literally fall apart under the slightest tension, and Under Armour can't even spell its name correctly. And after them, who is left? Keds? UGG?

Nike isn't flawless, but they have a history as a game-manager type company. They won't put your team out there in freaking bumble bee stripes, and you can assume that all the numbers will be legible. Plus, as a bonus, they're bring Jordan with them. And when you can grab a G.O.A.T., you don't mess around.

-----------------------------------------

BRIAN - Round 1, Pick 4: Anthony Zettel, DT/DE, Penn State
Round 2, Pick 1: Maliek Collins, DT, Nebraska

mantacklestree_xsbkpy[1]532ba6aaba55e.preview-620[1]

OFFENSE: RB Ezekiel Elliot (OSU), OL Taylor Decker (OSU).
DEFENSE: DT Anthony Zettel (PSU), DT Maliek Collins (Neb).

BRIAN: Look! Teams that aren't Michigan's biggest conference rivals!

I'm surprised Zettel is still on the board. Capable of playing either interior spot or SDE, he had an absolutely monster 2014. He spent most of his time on the inside, which makes his 8(!) sacks, 15 TFLs, and three interceptions(!!!) truly impressive. He was first team All Big Ten in a loaded year on the DL, and this offseason he's been tackle-murdering trees.

 

How @anthonyzettel trains in the off season

A video posted by @dudas_5 on

He should be a second-round pick at worst in the next NFL draft and his versatility will let me grab either a DE or DT confidently down the road.

Meanwhile, Collins is the truth at DT.

He exploded out of obscurity as a true sophomore to register 14 TFLs, an impressive 45 tackles, and 4.5 sacks. When I UFRed Jake Rudock against Nebraska he leapt off the tape as a consistently disruptive presence. The sack numbers are excellent for a DT but I think they undersell his ability to get to the passer, as Rudock spent large chunks of the day running away from Collins after he blew through Iowa's (admittedly not very good) interior line.

He is violent and does not stay on blocks; he gets to ballcarriers well away from where he should be able to; he's a lot like Mike Martin. A lot. I thought about taking him during my first picks after the ARGH WHY NO section of last year's draft where everyone leapt on my super clever picks earlier than I thought they would; I can't imagine a second team All Big Ten tackle with those numbers (as a sophomore!) is going to last any longer.

SETH: I figured Zettel wouldn't make it around the turn. But you found Maliek. Now I'm depressed.

BRIAN: /resumes muttering "24-12" in corner

-----------------------------------------

 

NEXT TIME

Will someone do something stupid/brilliant with Quarterbacks? ALMOST CERTAINLY! Will we draft fewer Buckeyes? Once they're all gone, probably!

Comments

Bambi

July 21st, 2015 at 11:43 AM ^

The last two picks are mislabeled. Should be Round 3 Pick 4 and Round 4 Pick 1.

Also this was incredibly depressing. I can feel my optimism for next year being sucked away.

Gofor2

July 22nd, 2015 at 8:31 PM ^

Just covers what we already know. That is that over the last 4-8 years while UM was claiming to have recruited better players and have better coaches while losing game after game, that OSU took those ""Scraps" everyone on here would call them, and turned them into the best, most loaded, talented team in America. All while UM would drop to its knees weekly and have its collective mouth filled with a salty goo. OSU = Champions
MSU = Beast
UM = Bitch with salty breath

Jon06

July 21st, 2015 at 11:49 AM ^

Signpost more. A lot more. Tell us who is picking next to the picks. Every time, and don't make us scroll to the commentaryto find it. Format this more consistently. (There are 4 different approaches to saying what your team is so far in the first round.)

I like this feature but it is always nearly impossible to follow because of inconsistent formatting.

ETA: In round 3 you've already stopped telling us who is picking.

Ace

July 21st, 2015 at 12:25 PM ^

Seth just added our names into the headers before picks; should make things much more clear. We're trying to make this a little easier to follow this time around.

Jon06

July 22nd, 2015 at 10:18 AM ^

Hopefully everybody starts to list positions next to each of their players in the offense/defense lists as this goes on. It would also be nice to have a graphical representation of teambuilding progress using the program Seth uses to diagram plays (BryMac could do this, giving commentary and to guess the formations each team is building towards along the way), as well as finding a way to remind us of the draft position of each drafted player with each pick, instead of just in a big chart at the end of each post. (I will try to repost these suggestions early on the next post, where you are likely to see it.)

ScruffyTheJanitor

July 21st, 2015 at 11:50 AM ^

but I love the draftageddon. I was afraid it wouldn't return this year- or that you'd make "Draftaget-it-on", the disturbing adult version of this. 

 

Having said that, this is depressing. 

Blue in Denver

July 21st, 2015 at 3:39 PM ^

This is one of my favorite feature of mgoblog.  An entertaining way to find out more about teams I kind of care about, but only kind of.  

IIRC, Brian originally said (massively paraphrasing from memory here) that the idea was to get his staff to educate themselves better on players across the BIG while making it kind of fun.  For me this is exactly what it achieves and I appreciate it.

1464

July 21st, 2015 at 11:58 AM ^

Winner should be judged by the number of post-season awards the team obtains.  First team B1G = 5 points, 2nd team = 3pts, honorable mention = 1 pt.   Offensive and defensive POY are worth more.  All-Murica worth more, etc.  With only 4 teams drafting, at least half the players should score points.  Add up points.

Let's get scientific up in this bitch.

Ron Utah

July 21st, 2015 at 5:25 PM ^

Loved this approach.

The only problem is that it makes each position have equal value.  BiSB won with this system, but Ace's team would have beaten him in a game, IMO.  Have to look at positional value as well, which is why we have JT Barrett, who may not even start for OSU, as a legitimate #1 pick.

Space Coyote

July 21st, 2015 at 12:11 PM ^

Collins was one of, if not the, favorite defensive player to watch last year in the B1G. Here's where I first noticed him, against Miami in the non-conf:

Maliek Collins I want to start with Ameer Abdullah, because I should start with Ameer Abdullah, but damn, this guy has me excited right now. Here's the essence of my notes with regards to Collins:  

  • #7 DT did a good job on zone stretch of keeping his helmet in front of the guard and pressing into OT to not allow OT to come off block.
  • Maintained the double team, kept LBs clean, then anchored and didn't let play get to sideline. Nice play.
  • Another nice job by #7 holding up to a double. [Makes another play, forcing me to look him up] Ok, Maliek Collins is turning in a good game. He's essentially being doubled every play and isn't giving ground and is keeping LBs clean.
  • OH MY GOD. THEY JUST TRIED TO SINGLE TEAM COLLINS! THEY REALLY JUST TRIED THAT. COLLINS DESTROYED THE ENTIRE BACKFIELD.

Basically, Collins went from a guy off my radar, to being a guy that is firmly on my radar every time I watch Nebraska going forward. He has a great understanding of leverage. He fights with his hands and occupies blockers extremely well. When he gets a one-on-one block, he disposes of blockers with great hand violence. Collins is one of the players I will be watching out for going forward. Ex-state champ wrestler and is only a Soph.

Collins is legit. I'd take him over any DT not named Zettel (who I'd take over Washington, who I think needs to be more consistent). Collins is a great joy to watch. The reference to Mike Martin is legit. Guy just plays and destroys, and it's football at its finest.

Also, Elliott is really good, Clement may be better. That's how good he is. Explosive, great balance, can catch out of the backfield, can break tackles. While the passing game won't clear the box as much as OSU, he's bound to get more carries because for once there isn't a great backup. Gordon was as explosive as any RB in college football last year... and Clement may be as good as any RB Wisconsin has had, which is insanely not even hyperbole.

MGoStrength

July 21st, 2015 at 12:18 PM ^

Sometimes it depresses me how many quality players are on UMs rivals, and how many of them they were ranked similar or lower as recruits than some of the players on UMs roster.  Derrick Green was a highly ranked recruit at RB, yet Elliot has been much more successful.  Shane Morris was a highly ranked recruit, but Barrett and Cook have been more successful.  Bosa was ranked pretty high, but Charlton was no slouch and definetly higher than Calhoun, but both of them have been more successful.  Maybe I'm being short-sighted and have sour grapes, but It makes me wonder if the rankings were justified.  Maybe our guys were not evaluated very well, but many of them were offered by our rivals.  Maybe they just haven't been developed well or maybe the offensive/defensive schemes of our rivals fits them better.  Maybe I'm just beaten down by too many losses to the rivals.  Well, here's to hoping the new coaching staff can get this talent to produce and being thankful we still have Peppers :)

alum96

July 21st, 2015 at 1:06 PM ^

It's called an eye for talent, having your own "draft board", and development.  The only way you can believe all the recruiting services are wrong almost solely on UM players is to live in an alternative maize universe.

I remember all the snark when Green only had a "non commitable" offer to OSU because Meyer wanted other guys.  Us MGoers who live off recruiting rankings could not understand how you dont take the "#1 rb" with no questions asked.  Well obviously there were questions.

Darron Lee?  He was a HS QB/safety.  3 star, #630 overall.  They identified the right position for him and he is already a terror at OLB.  That's coaching, player identification, development, and the foresight to look at a kid in HS and see what he can grow into.  MSU does the same thing.... as does Harbaugh.

Hoke didn't.

By the way UM's problem has not been fidning a 3 star gem here or there (ryan, henry) - it's the loads of 4 stars it whiffs on.  And our uber top end guys (Kalis, Pipkins, Green, Thomas, Morris, Magnuson) are anywhere from average to meh - not league stars.  If even half those Hoke 4 stars were front line 2nd or 3rd team Big 10 type players we wouldnt be having these conversations.  

 

RationalBuckeye

July 22nd, 2015 at 9:54 AM ^

In fairness, I think Green would've been allowed to commit earlier in the process had he wanted to. He was dragging it out despite keeping OSU at #1, and the staff either felt that Elliott was at least an equal talent or he was a guy that they evaluated later as a higher choice; whatever happened, Green's spot was no longer available.
As for Lee, Fickell had to beg Urban to extend an offer in this case, he was the only one on the staff that had the evaluation correct for the kid. Luckily, Meyer trusted Fickell (which is big because he didn't hire him) and it paid off.

Richard75

July 21st, 2015 at 1:46 PM ^

Clearly development has been disastrous. But the quality of Michigan's recruiting classes even at the time was also a bit illusory.

A big number of U-M's elite recruits were OL, the hardest position to project. U-M also was obsessed with big skill players, whose edge is more easily neutralized by college S&C than speed/agility.

One further downside to that focus on size was in the deployment of players once they got here. U-M was never going to figure Josh Furman out because they just couldn't see a guy his size as an LB. They viewed the DE spot the same way. This was despite the fact that MSU and Nebraska terrorized us with such players in recent years. So, there may well be quality players on the roster (or off it, like Justice Hayes) who just haven't surfaced yet.

Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

ST3

July 21st, 2015 at 12:21 PM ^

In the summer of 1969, the good writers at MGoNewspaperColumn decided to have a little fun and they held a draft of Big 10 football players. At that time, there were at least 8 or 9 teams in the Big 10; my memory isn't so good. Rex Kern was the first player taken in the draft. He was quickly followed by Jim Otis and Jack Tatum. A slew of fellow buckeyes followed. (Just like this draft, no Maryland or Rutgers players were selected.) But a funny thing happened on November 22, 1969. 24-12, indeed.

mGrowOld

July 21st, 2015 at 12:29 PM ^

Is to MgoBlog content as...

Pontiac is to the Aztek

McDonalds is to McPizza

Coke is to the New Coke

Apple is to the IWatch

Ford is to the Edsel

But hey I got to tip my hat to you guys for having the balls to stick with it when those other pussy company's dumped the products consumers hated after only a few years.

mGrowOld

July 21st, 2015 at 1:29 PM ^

If we're talking about this particular feature then yes. All other content then no.

In all seriousness I just dont understand it.  I tried the first few years to figure it out but now I've just given up trying and now just join in with the baffled masses.

BiSB

July 21st, 2015 at 1:51 PM ^

The writers have to do a crap-ton of research to prepare for the season, including a deep dive on all of the best players in the conference. There isn't a perfect way to document, share, and compare notes on that, but one way is to create a competitive environment whereby the hundred best players get a few paragraphs written about them, and the writers can compare notes (via snark) on their differing evaluations.

Y'all are just reading the results of that. 

The easiest interpetation is a "100 most important players in the B1G" list where the various writers take turns making entries. It's improv for football bloggers.