On The Charge Comment Count

Brian

d0407s3[1]

When you're at a game and then spend an hour and a half walking around aimlessly afterwards because the closest bar to the Georgia Dome is in Alabama and exiting that place is like finding your way through an MC Escher painting, and then you laugh incessantly until they tell you there is no more beer to be had and you go to bed at like 4 AM and spend the next day writing stuff and watching Otto the Orange die over and over again, you can miss some developments in the narrative of said game.

Does that paragraph count as a one-sentence paragraph? I mean technically, sure. But come on. This paragraph is important philosophically because we are talking about block/charge calls. Some things are technically blocks, but come on.

Anyway. After that I caught up on what the rest of the world was saying. I was surprised to find out the play above generated a ton of muttering while I was wandering around Atlanta wondering if the Georgia Dome was in fact part of the city or connected to it by a wormhole I could no longer access. You gotta talk about something, I guess. A block/charge call is as good as anything because nobody in the world knows what a block or charge is anymore, even the refs hopping on one leg 40 times before pointing. Personally, the brain went CHARGE and wasn't even worried about which way the call would go. The ref making the call did not bother with the Cirque De Soleil routine. His body language read "bro you just charged" so matter-of-factly that I fell in love with whoever that guy was and wished we had ejected Ed Hightower into a hyperbolic orbit around the sun.

My favorite view is in fact the Otto-slaying GIF, which is in real time and repeats incessantly. At that speed you can only see Triche's "chest"—in this case a euphemism—plow head on into Morgan's. Even complaints about "sliding under" seem ridiculous since Triche is still on the way up when contact is made.

THE FINGER OF DEATH

But I've seen enough basketball to know that completely random things are decided to be charges and other completely random things are decided to be blocks.

I don't know man. I feel that you don't have much of a complaint when you plow a guy in the dead center of his chest. Feet trembling or not, someone square to you outside the circle is going to get that call almost every time. He got there first, and it's not like he was invisible before you jumped. The only situations in which the jumping complaint seems legit to me are those like that dubious charge McGary took against VCU, where the defender eats contact just as the shooter lands. Any "charge" where they also award the basket should be a block.

Suggestions for making this less of an unsolvable debate:

  1. Charges can only be committed by a shooter who still has the ball. If it's gone, any contact he receives before landing is a block. This may not be entirely fair but it is relatively easy. (Those rare charges that come after a guy has passed the ball still have to be called, I think.)
  2. The main point of determination is how the contact occurs. Forget the feet. Is the defender getting nailed directly in the chest? If yes, charge. If it's glancing, block.
  3. Whether the defender is moving should only be relevant if it changes the impact from head on to glancing. At the moment of contact, is the defender square and getting plowed in the chest? If yes, charge, if no, no charge. Determining motionlessness is basically impossible. If the combined vector of motion is the offensive player's plus or minus 10%, it's a charge.
  4. Outside the circle, obviously.

Right now the charge is some combination of technicality and feel that results in all charge/block calls being debatable because lawyers. It would be nice to move to a world where you could show someone this picture:

d0407s1[1]

has ball, "chest" going into chest of squared up, vertical defender, no debate

And they would have to be like "right, well I'm obviously a twit, carry on." We don't live in that world. We live in one where every charge call gets put under a microscope that anyone can see however they'd like to.

In any case, live that was CHARGE to everyone and it was only once each frame got the Zapruder treatment that anyone other than 'Cuse fans thought otherwise. Therefore Jordan Morgan is cool. The end.

Comments

bronxblue

April 8th, 2013 at 1:02 PM ^

It was a charge, but people will look at the shuffling feet and the fact it was late in the game and not call it.  Of course, an inbound play to Burke a minute earlier featured two guys dry-humping him for 10 seconds without a call.  The refs were not great this game, but this was the right call in the situation.  And I'll admit the Hardaway foul near half-court by MCW was fishy and shouldn't have been called. 

Mannix

April 8th, 2013 at 1:24 PM ^

It seems one thing left unarticulated by the masses is the amount of clutching and grabbing 'Cuse did off the ball during their attempt to get back in the game with the press. It seemed that any and all of the UM players were getting mauled before the inbound.

Bilas was crazy this morning on the radio (ESPN) about this call and how it is really a "75-25 call in favor of the block. It should always start out as a block and only a charge when it is clearly not a block. It's not a 50/50 call".

He's a bitter man about this. Morgan did his job and Triche knew it. He didn't fight it and as others have noted above, he said he should have jump stopped. Yep.

Also, Scoreboard.

 

 

bokee88

April 8th, 2013 at 1:38 PM ^

On ESPN Reece wouldn't let it go. He was as big a problem as anyone. He wasn't even open to the possibility if a debate. He even started asking another guest long after he already debated it with digger, jay, and Seth. I was bothered by him at that moment. Did anyone else see that?

CompleteLunacy

April 8th, 2013 at 1:54 PM ^

Because it was the very first thing he brought up every time they talked about the game, as if it was the only reason why Michigan won.

Michigan won because they soved the zone in the first half and hung on to a lead in the 2nd half. And I don't care how butthurt Gottlieb was that Michigan was "playing not to lose" towards the end, because it worked, and would have worked even better had they made their effing free throws. When you get a double-digit lead on a team like Syracuse, you don't try any crazy things that cause turnovers in the 2nd half. Michigan was conservative because they could be, and it's not a bad idea against a team like Syracuse.

Now I hope they don't do that against Louisville, because Louisville can score and can score fast...no lead is safe against them.

goblue30093

April 8th, 2013 at 4:09 PM ^

Brian how did you manage to not find a place to eat/drink saturday night? did you get lost? I told you to find me man.. you needed a local lol.. hopefully we can find something for you tonight for a celebration :)

 

Go Blue!

Yeoman

April 8th, 2013 at 5:21 PM ^

I watched the game in a room full of coaches, all neutrals (except for me, but I'm also not a coach), and the unanimous response as this happened was "ooh, that's a charge." No discussion, no controversy, no need to see a replay that didn't show anything that wasn't obvious on first viewing anyway.

I think the only reason for controversy here is the cumulative effect of hundreds of tv commentators that don't understand the rule and think "defensive position" = "stationary" and "still moving" = "block". A defender is expected to move laterally to stay in position. Morgan's square to him throughout and he takes it in the chest--there isn't anything more to see.