dennisblundon

March 7th, 2011 at 7:24 PM ^

I agree that the sweet pile of cash they gave us to sign was very nice but Nike apparrel is just much better quality in my opinion. The football team even started chanting Nike when Brandon was telling them about future changes. So in short, Adidas money is good, Adidas apparrel is bad.

milla61

March 8th, 2011 at 12:50 AM ^

The problem with the maize outs is that we don't have maize jerseys. Penn States white out is successful because they actually have white jerseys. People don't like spending a minimum of $50 or over a $100 for the authentic jerseys and not wear them when they go to the game.

gbdub

March 7th, 2011 at 7:17 PM ^

I like where they were going with this, but the picture on the front was a poor choice for a single color print. It's muddy and indistinct, and if you didn't already know what it was, you'd be confused. The Big House on the back, on the other hand, looks pretty good. They should ditch the front picture for either a better one or just a block M or helmet or something.

jmblue

March 7th, 2011 at 7:26 PM ^

Why don't we put our program's accomplishments on the back of the shirt anymore?  Any team can put its schedule on there; that's nothing special.  Only we can claim to be #1 all-time in wins/winning percentage.  

MGoSoftball

March 7th, 2011 at 8:01 PM ^

after looking at it for more than 1 minute.   I have to second the earlier post:  i like Adadis money, I hate their designs.  I prefer Nike gear.

 

 

jethro34

March 7th, 2011 at 8:38 PM ^

Hard to tell for sure, but are those pics of the Big House pre-expansion?  An intentional statement saying that UM is going back to how things were pre-RR or just the best pics they had.....or am I seeing the pics all wrong?

Dezzy

March 8th, 2011 at 1:03 AM ^

That's the first thing I noticed at hated about the shirt before looking at everything else and hating it.  I could understand if this were 2008 or 2009 so you wouldn't really want the construction of the buildings on your shirt, but the stadium has already been rededicated.  If they want to be "old school" and use "This is Michigan Football," get a picture of Yost's or Bo's old teams to put on the front of the shirt.

HAILtoBO

March 7th, 2011 at 10:34 PM ^

Players want Nike...Give em what they want. Why is it just the home schedule on the back though? like why not the whole schedule? I like them a lot though.

tdcarl

March 8th, 2011 at 12:31 AM ^

They could have at least used pictures from the renovated Big House...And am I the only person around here who actually liked last year's shirt?

Lancer

March 8th, 2011 at 1:26 AM ^

but the adidas is wack for football, the american one :P. W/e i m sure they offered more cash...just a heads to my fellow sneakerheads, the vintage nike dunk low is coming out this spring in a wolverine colour way. go blue 

BigCat14

March 8th, 2011 at 12:49 PM ^

slap the banner gets me pumped up whether i am in person or watching on tv.  LOVE IT!  are the Bold games under the lights?  i can almost smell the artificial grass, hot dogs, popcorn, hot chocolate, beer and hear the sounds of pads crackalackin and The M fight song.  Hail to the Victors!!!  GO BLUE!!!