If Potential Michigan Coaches Were Chicks
Rich Rodriguez
Rodrguez is the Drunk Lion's Chick. Great body and a total hottie (Awesome Offense), but you best watch yourself or you might get cursed out and hit by a thrown beer bottle or batteries (Defense is defiantly a problem).
Chris Peterson
A hot Catholic Schoolgirl is what Chris Peterson is. Great body (Awesome Offensive ) and you'd definitely want to hook up with her (wins a lot of football games). She is the hottest by far out of all her friends but is untouchable.
Jim Harbaugh
Jim Harbaugh is the girl that you'd give up body organs to sleep with (perfect fit for Michigan football coach?) but who constantly plays you like a fiddle because she knows you'll do anything to get with her. Unfortunately for you, the ball is in her court with all her options.
Les Miles
Yep, Les Miles is the "Let go" chick. She started out as an absolutely hottie when you first started dating (2007 coaching search?), but damn is she letting herself go now that you've been married awhile (football is slipping and you’re not getting any younger).
Brady Hoke
Yep, you are the butterface of the bunch Brady. Don't get me wrong, you have some great assets (good football coach), but you don't have a very appealing face (Is your resume better than RR’s was 3 years ago?).
Pat Fitzgerald
Fitzgerald is the hot nerdy girl. She is a total nerd (academics) but has a banging body (done well as a head football coach at a school like Northwestern). Is that good enough for Michigan?
Jon Gruden
Ah Gruden. You are most certainly the "Legendary Cougar" of the potential coaches. The Legendary Cougar is still hot (lot of NFL people want him as a head coach), but the glory days are slowly drifting further and further away (NFL champ 8 years ago but average results thereafter). You have been out of coaching for 2 years, but who wouldn't want to hook up with her?
January 4th, 2011 at 10:24 AM ^
come on now guys..
January 4th, 2011 at 10:26 AM ^
Were you expecting baby chickens when you clicked on it?
January 4th, 2011 at 10:30 AM ^
I think the RR situation is more like Shallow hal. We were totally decieved....
January 4th, 2011 at 10:31 AM ^
great analogy dude...i gotta roll with you on that one
January 4th, 2011 at 10:43 AM ^
NSFKoss
January 4th, 2011 at 10:24 AM ^
Well done!
January 4th, 2011 at 11:01 AM ^
But anyways
Charlie Weis
January 4th, 2011 at 10:26 AM ^
Made me lol. You seriously need a job or something because this is too much. You have too much time on your hands.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:26 AM ^
I'm not at work, so I love this.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:26 AM ^
If that were the case, I'd take Peterson.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:35 AM ^
January 4th, 2011 at 10:26 AM ^
January 4th, 2011 at 10:27 AM ^
Heeeeeeeeeeeey there Pat Fitzgerald
January 4th, 2011 at 10:38 AM ^
January 4th, 2011 at 10:31 AM ^
Brady Hoke's tits are actually twice as big as that.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:34 AM ^
I might need to scrub the inside of my eyes with steel wool to remove that.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:31 AM ^
this is great....i would even do the buttaface chick...with the lights on!!
January 4th, 2011 at 10:39 AM ^
... that made me smile in the past 24 hours.
Also I'm glad that Joe Paterno is not on this thread
January 4th, 2011 at 10:34 AM ^
What are we, fourteen?
/humorless
January 4th, 2011 at 10:46 AM ^
All men are 14. It is what it is.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:35 AM ^
A new low for the casual sexism that has come to dominate a once-classy forum.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:43 AM ^
When will people figure out that broads don't like to be called "chicks"?
January 4th, 2011 at 10:45 AM ^
Interesting, as I sent this to a few female UM grads and they all thought it was hilarious.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:50 AM ^
Ah, the old "it's not sexism if I can find a woman who thinks it's funny" trick. Works every time! Also, try out "some of my best friends are _______." I tell ya, these are like Kryptonite to someone who thinks they've pointed out something patently offensive.
January 4th, 2011 at 11:02 AM ^
That's fair, but the "it must be offensive because I am offended and I don't care if no one else is" isn't real bulletproof either.
Men are very interested in sports. Men are very interested in women. Sometimes they come together (see: cheerleaders).
January 4th, 2011 at 11:11 AM ^
I hate cheerleaders. All they do is promote sexism.
January 4th, 2011 at 11:14 AM ^
It depends on where you work but that's actually how it works in a lot of places. It only takes 1 person being offended even if it doesn't pass any common sense test. Anyone can be offended about anything anymore and it doesn't matter if it doesn't pass this "seriously?" test.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:45 PM ^
Some men are interested in sports. Some men are interested in women. Some men don't think a football discussion needs to devolve into objectification, body snark, and hideously sexist terminology like "butterface."
January 5th, 2011 at 8:14 PM ^
I agree that I don't want MGoBlog to turn into "Tits Tits Titis" or the shit they put on Bleacher Report articles, but this was one thread and it was aptly titled. Based on what you've said, you probably knew you'd be offended, but you clicked through anyway. Like much of the internet, if you know it's not for you, stay away.
And butterface is not a hideously sexist term. A dude can totally be a butterface. In fact, I'm pretty sure WifeinLA2 has called Paulie D a butterface before.
January 5th, 2011 at 8:32 PM ^
Now you got me thinking, and I don't think "butterface" is even a put down. Basically, you're saying, "The part of your appearance that you can control looks pretty damn good."
January 4th, 2011 at 12:20 PM ^
go away with your polically correct, I'm offended at everything crap. How are you possibly offended by pictures like these. Weird man, just weird.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:26 PM ^
You are baffled that someone might be offended?
I'm not offended; I'm in the "rolling my eyes, shrugging" camp. But I'm surprised that you think no sane MGoBlogger could possibly object to photos being posted solely because they feature nice tits, with the occasional comment about how un-bangable the chick is given her wide ass or the mismatch between her barely-acceptable face and her primo funbags. On a board that prides itself on being known for its intellectual & witty analysis of college football.
Fact is, some people would cock an eyebrow over it. or even feel offended, or label if sexist. Not all of them tomatoes with funbags of their own! That's the "weird," "politically correct" world we live in, go figure.
January 18th, 2011 at 7:43 PM ^
primo funbags.
Yes.
January 4th, 2011 at 1:18 PM ^
to your post, with the 's' standing for sanctimonious.
Reactions like this are what give legitimate 'PC' concerns a bad name. Not everything is offensive and not everyone is offended by the same content.
There is room for humor, try it out sometime. People are people. As long as there have been human beings there have been girls that seek attention by wearing skimpy clothes and presenting themselves in a fashion that they believe will attract guys. Does that mean that all women are or should be like that? No. Does the post indicate that all women are and should be like that? No.
Your knee-jerk reaction to a simple post that takes a humored approach to comparing coaches to types of pretty girls, as if it was somehow offensive is exactly what makes it more difficult for people that are trying to actually make legitimate changes in people's perceptions. You take things too far and create an overall view of 'PC' as humorless, ridiculous and completely out of touch with reality.
In short:
-Changing terms from things like handicapped/disabled, or retarded, or whatever to something else, or perhaps not labeling them at all = good.
-Removing real systemic terms and biases to women and minorities = good
-overreacting to any and everything that is potentially offrensive to some group of people somewhere = bad
January 4th, 2011 at 11:18 AM ^
lighten up. it's a joke. i hate when people rail against obvious light hearted humor when there are real examples of sexism in the world. let me put it this way, richard pryor joking about white or black people isn't racist but beating up or killing someone because of their race is. just like not hiring a woman or paying her less or treating her as inferior is sexist and this post isn't. it's a joke, laugh a little.
January 4th, 2011 at 11:20 AM ^
lighten up. it's a joke. i hate when people rail against obvious light hearted humor when there are real examples of sexism in the world. let me put it this way, richard pryor joking about white or black people isn't racist but beating up or killing someone because of their race is. just like not hiring a woman or paying her less or treating her as inferior is sexist and this post isn't. it's a joke, laugh a little.
January 18th, 2011 at 6:35 PM ^
Nevermind.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:35 AM ^
is more like crazy Lindsay Lohan.
I expect him to enter rehab soon for grass issues.
"Toke 'em... er, I mean chew 'em if you got 'em boys!"
January 4th, 2011 at 10:36 AM ^
Also, the "Brady Hoke" woman isn't even ugly.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:45 AM ^
You must be a student.
January 4th, 2011 at 11:46 AM ^
OK, He's getting ridiculous. I'll get the bottle of Jack from him and you grab his keys. We cannot let him out of this house until this is over.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:39 AM ^
although I'd do 'em all (not the actual coaches, their representative hotties!).
Any thread featuring hotties without a lot of threads is a good one.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:42 AM ^
RR is like Ari's wife at the beginning of Entourage. She gets a lot hotter every season.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:44 AM ^
we end up with this:
January 4th, 2011 at 10:46 AM ^
The Comic Con girl (Fitzgerald) is a close second. Nothing against Megan Fox but I like those two better.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:56 AM ^
Nerdy but naughty at the same time... (does that mean NCAA violations?)
January 4th, 2011 at 11:03 AM ^
I don't know why, but I really really really hope we hire Pat Fitzgerald now...
That's a lie. I know exactly why.
January 4th, 2011 at 12:26 PM ^
any of the words
January 4th, 2011 at 12:29 PM ^
Shit, I'd take that nerdy girl any day.
Actually after this thread I'll just stay with the girl I already have(RR) and not risk getting shut down by the others to only have no one.
January 4th, 2011 at 2:32 PM ^
FITZ! FITZ! FITZ!