Harvest Wain

October 15th, 2010 at 12:49 AM ^

It was sort of a trend to mute vibrant colors.  Especially by turning yellow to shiny gold.  The St. Louis Rams did it, and so did the Pittsburgh Penguins.  I just don't get it.  Be proud of your colors.

ThisGuyGisCrazy

October 14th, 2010 at 10:00 PM ^

Those are not that hot. However, I still prefer Nike jerseys to anything else.. They're about to start making NFL jerseys again I believe in 2012.. Hopefully sometime down the road we go back to them. It's clear that Phil Knight owns my soul. BOOM!

mgokev

October 14th, 2010 at 10:07 PM ^

The jerseys are so similar that I don't really have a preference.  I do like how adidas has the writing on the inside of the jersey.  It's unique, anyway.  I think the biggest draw for me with Nike has always been the official apparel.  I felt it all had a more "bad-ass" quality about it, for lack of a better term, while adidas has more of a "track and field" feel to it.  It's difficult to describe I guess.

Zvornik Bosna

October 14th, 2010 at 11:31 PM ^

Those things are some garbage. What I hate most about them is how Nike executives try to make it seem like they do it to embrace the culture of the state or a group of people the team might represent. They try to disguise it as this instead of saying they're doing it for money and exposure/uniform sales. Things like saying the WV pro combat uniforms symbolize the coal miners and the Pitt uniforms are made to symbolize the steel industry of Pitt. Give me a break (http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/09/01/behold-nike-pro-combat-uniforms-unveiled-in-new-york/) /rant haha