Spring Game tentatively scheduled for April 14

It no doubt is an issue, but one that Peters started working on over a year ago. The width of a football field is about 53 yards. With your QB in the center of that his voice must carry at least half that. So I'd say the 55 yards is a bit of a stretch but your point is valid.

John Navarre was much better than us fans, I was guilty too, wanted to give him credit for. It's the coaches job to play the guys that give them the best chance to win and the majority of the time they do so correctly. I think you are overstating the lack of vocals from Peters. I find it hard to believe he all of a sudden become loud enough by the Rutgers game to play but couldn't be heard well enough to play before that. Other factors we don't know had to of played the biggest role here.

Is our playbook bigger with Speight or O'Korn...most definitely! Does that mean the offense was better with Speight or O'Korn...no. Dantonio even mocked how many plays/formations we ran after beating us. The pros and cons were this;

With Speight and O'Korn you have better knowledge of the playbook. You can call anything you want. You'd expect less delay of games, burned time outs, broken plays, and incorrect formations. With the less talented guy in however you are more likely to have the QB make a terrible play despite a perfect play call. Example: Speight leading us to 1/10 in red zone TD% against 3 teams who never even became bowl eligible. Maizeandbrew show his stats as 1 completion on 14 called pass plays in this span for a total of -1 yards. Example 2: Re-watch O'Korn vs osu...open guys all over the place and O'Korn throwing to none of them. The QB talent level was too low with these guys. Too much value on full playbook vs lack of talent to take advantage of said playbook.

With Peters you may only run 20 plays but do so with a guy who is solid at those 20 plays. Our playbook was clearly limited with Peters but if you watched the games you could also see the execution/results were much better than a less talented QB running 100 plays.

I believe we over-estimated Speight's talent based on last year when the talent around Speight carried him, not Speight carrying the offense. This year most of that talent left and Speight was expected to pick up the slack but simply wasn't good enough to do so with such a young team. In turn, we under-estimated Peters ability to lead us based on Speight hope and Peter's "lack of command" of the offense. O'Korn should have never been #2, thats just a straight up coaching mistake. Seeing him everyday in practice for a couple years should have made him a known quantity to coaches. If Peters doesn't get bumped to #3 and stays at least #2 he would of learned the offense faster with actual meaninful practice reps rather than 3rd string playing with walk on reps.

If I coached I'd have the Keep It Simple Stupid approach until I knew my team could handle more and also to maximize the talent I can keep on the field. Speight gives you the best chance to win if he can execute the plays he already knows, which he did not execute well. He opened with a 11-25, 181 yard, 1TD - 2 INT TDs stat line. Could Peters at minimal match that, even with a possible vocal problem? Or was he already loud enough to play this game? The speed of growth Peters could/should have received this year from playing earlier would have been immensely beneficial.

Speight starting against Florida made sense. Peters, the most talented QB, seeing no action despite Speight's continued struggles through 3 games make no sense. Mastering 20 plays as an offense with Peters playing early would have given us 40-70? well executed plays by osu (if he stayed healthy). 

Peters with a limted playbook and his higher talent level > than Speight/O'Korn with a full playbook.

With the poster with whom you were quarreling now apparently banished, this has a poetic "Garfield Without Garfield" quality to it.

That, or the deletion makes you look like you're having auditory/visual hallucinations.  Either way, I approve!