October 28th, 2017 at 3:52 PM ^
all hail harbaugh, all hail peters.
October 28th, 2017 at 4:01 PM ^
"I also suck Brian Cook's...."
Nevermind
/s
October 28th, 2017 at 4:18 PM ^
META: that’s not how /s works
October 28th, 2017 at 9:59 PM ^
Is your name Cali? If it is, then username checks out...
October 28th, 2017 at 4:01 PM ^
"I also suck Brian Cook's...."
Nevermind
/s
October 28th, 2017 at 9:37 PM ^
Do two /s make a not /s?
October 28th, 2017 at 4:03 PM ^
neg me to bolivia
edit: triple post
October 28th, 2017 at 8:48 PM ^
You can't tell me what to do.
Upvote.
October 28th, 2017 at 6:13 PM ^
Harbaugh is a QB coach. If his QB is bad his offense will be bad. Flat out.
October 29th, 2017 at 11:37 AM ^
i can’t recall too many (any?) offenses that are good without a good qb
October 28th, 2017 at 3:54 PM ^
I'm happy about this! But what did the coaches see that America didn't? O'Korn want the answer, prep for next year!
October 28th, 2017 at 3:58 PM ^
I'm glad to see the performance from Peters but he very nearly through what might have been a pick six at the end of the first half and his last throw of the game was about five yards short of his intended target. This was also Rutgers. Let's not just assume QB is solved.
October 28th, 2017 at 4:00 PM ^
No one thought he was going to come in and win the Heisman dude. Everyone here said that Peters was going to have some struggles, and everyone was fine with him learning on the job.
October 28th, 2017 at 4:08 PM ^
Did you mean to respond to me?
October 28th, 2017 at 4:11 PM ^
Because you are complaining about two of Peters throws.
October 28th, 2017 at 4:21 PM ^
Please keep reinventing my comments for your narrative.
October 28th, 2017 at 4:24 PM ^
You were complaining
October 28th, 2017 at 4:26 PM ^
Ok. Analysis of sports on a sports blog is complaining. Got it.
October 28th, 2017 at 4:51 PM ^
Ugh. Some of these new posters really need to go back to lurk mode.
October 28th, 2017 at 5:55 PM ^
Been following this blog since its old domain.
October 28th, 2017 at 6:59 PM ^
lurker means you've been following the blog but not commenting. and he thinks you should go back to lurking.
that being said, i think your original comments were spot on. you may have come across as complaining, but it's really more about whether or not this game projects to future games. there's no real reason to think one way or the other.
October 28th, 2017 at 11:03 PM ^
I think he came off like a dick.
October 28th, 2017 at 11:29 PM ^
Judge not lest ye be judged you dumb cunt
October 29th, 2017 at 12:24 AM ^
Mismo otra nombre
October 29th, 2017 at 2:40 AM ^
You really suck
October 30th, 2017 at 12:50 AM ^
Toughest guy on the internet right here. I'm happy for you.
October 28th, 2017 at 4:52 PM ^
You now understand you were complaining.
October 28th, 2017 at 5:21 PM ^
Yes, you were complaining.
And goddamn, I don't think I like any of you new posters.
October 28th, 2017 at 5:36 PM ^
U r probably the biggest dbag on this whole blog... u definitely got beat up a lot as a kid.
October 28th, 2017 at 6:33 PM ^
Is duly noted
Ever try RCMB?
October 29th, 2017 at 10:41 AM ^
TIM is awful
October 28th, 2017 at 5:46 PM ^
Why does it matter whether or not he's complaining? This is his team, and this is a blog that allows fans to express their feelings of said team.
And goddamn, I don't think I like many of you older posters.
October 28th, 2017 at 5:50 PM ^
Exactly
October 28th, 2017 at 6:11 PM ^
And I simply HATE Caillou. Although maybe gangster Caillou is not as bad.
October 28th, 2017 at 8:35 PM ^
Agreed. He is the worst.
October 28th, 2017 at 9:17 PM ^
Caillou is objectively terrible, but that littl ebitch Daniel Tiger might be worse. I vacillate between which one I despise more wuite often. On balance, at least the Daniel Tiger show has some good lessons mixed in, and doesn't have the obnoxious Grandmother-y omniscient narrator. Thus, as a show, Daniel Tiger is probably better, but as individual charatcers, they're both vomit-inducing.
October 28th, 2017 at 10:03 PM ^
My son was incredulous when he saw Daniel Tiger: "he doesn't even wear pants!"
October 28th, 2017 at 5:57 PM ^
I literally was not. Just waiting for more evidence before I declare a new era.
October 28th, 2017 at 6:01 PM ^
Justify anything with some of these goons on here... if they disagree with your statement, you are wrong and a troll. No tolerance for someone else's opinion.
October 28th, 2017 at 6:30 PM ^
Feel free at any time to.... STFU!
I'll be nice and leave it at that.
October 28th, 2017 at 4:24 PM ^
Quote; "I'm glad to see the performance from Peters but he very nearly through what might have been a pick six at the end of the first half and his last throw of the game was about five yards short of his intended target. This was also Rutgers. Let's not just assume QB is solved."
What exactly have I reinvented? Those are complaints about two of his 14 passes. I replied that no one expected him to be perfect, we expect some mistakes, but as a redshirt freshman most of us expected growth as he played more. I don't think anyone here is now saying we're saved and going to win the NC.
October 28th, 2017 at 4:31 PM ^
Literally my first sentence was saying I was pleased with the Peters performance. Complaining: express dissatisfaction or annoyance about a state of affairs or an event.
October 28th, 2017 at 4:46 PM ^
Your first sentence contains both complaints...
"I'm glad to see the performance from Peters but he very nearly through what might have been a pick six at the end of the first half and his last throw of the game was about five yards short of his intended target."
October 28th, 2017 at 5:09 PM ^
Cmon man you're completely full of shit. He was clearly advising to not get too optimistic this early as he still exhibited some signs of flaws (which he then outlined) and points out quite reasonably that this game was against Rutgers (which draws parallels to O'Korn's appearance against Purdue). You're just being an asshole. You can point out a flaw without it being a complaint. Do you think when Harbaugh goes over mistakes in film he's complaining?
October 28th, 2017 at 5:32 PM ^
Acted like he was taking offense that responded to him/her. After explaining why I responded the way I did they came back at me. I don’t think anything I said came off as me being an asshole, or full of shit. And coming at me like you did probably won’t have the desired effect you want.
October 28th, 2017 at 6:07 PM ^
Just admit you're made of straw.
October 28th, 2017 at 8:52 PM ^
When I read your posts I got that same sense of empty smugness that about 40% of people at the university carry with them. Being difficult for no reason/ the whole "well technically" mentality is just so eye rolling. Not really a big deal one way or another. Shouldn't have called you an asshole.
October 28th, 2017 at 5:52 PM ^
Let's not get caught up in things like objectivity or proper use of language.
October 28th, 2017 at 5:58 PM ^
So long story short, no complaining.