Michigan up to 7th in both Coaches Poll and AP Poll
Clemson is 2nd over Oklahoma by exactly one point. Also of interest is Penn State falling to 5th, Ohio State falling to 9th, and Wisconsin falling to 12th. Based on the "Others Receiving Votes" Maryland is 31st, one spot ahead of Notre Dame.
AP Poll: http://collegefootball.ap.org/poll
The AP has Oklahoma solidly in 2nd over Clemson. Penn State is 5th, while Ohio State only fell to 8th, and Wisconsin only fell to 10th.
September 10th, 2017 at 1:12 PM ^
Looks good to me except OSU should be down by Auburn.
September 10th, 2017 at 5:51 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 1:14 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 10th, 2017 at 1:23 PM ^
Our defense scored 2 TDs, held the opponent to under 4ypa and under 3ypc, we had over 400yds of offense. A team in front of us lost and the team immediately behind us won a similar game to ours (bad team with a new coach at home) by fewer points.
I'm not sure what you wanted to happen.
September 10th, 2017 at 1:30 PM ^
Duh. When Michigan plays anywhere near our expectations, they are the #1 ranked team. When they fail to meet those expectations by an even slight margin, Michigan falls to #128. This swing can happen week from week...
September 10th, 2017 at 2:04 PM ^
Yeah, this fan base is honestly nuerotic
September 10th, 2017 at 2:39 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 3:33 PM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 1:30 AM ^
representative of the fanbase, and the posters who think we're number 1 one week are totally the same as the ones who think we're 128th the next. Riiiiiggghhhht.
No, it's just that the irrationally exuberant we're-going-undefeated crowd is very vocal after a game like Florida and the skeptical, Speight-hating, Drevno-can't-call-games, we're-too-young 8-4 predictors get very vocal after a game like Cinci.
The fanbase is fairly consistent in its distribution of each fan type and everything in between. But as though we're doing the wave, some sections stand up at certain times while others sit.
September 10th, 2017 at 1:32 PM ^
I wanted a 63-0 game that allowed Peters to get some game experience. I wanted to see the 4th string guys get a chance to play. Considering how badly Cincinnati played against Austin Peay, I don't think that was an unreasonable expectation.
September 10th, 2017 at 1:35 PM ^
Rutgers gave #6 Washington a solid game. Rutgers then turned around and lost to EMU. The game is not a static, fixed point. Stuff happens each week...
September 10th, 2017 at 1:52 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 1:54 PM ^
yep, two most obvious plays yesterday based on week one were Rutgers and Purdue. Of course one held true, and Rutgers shit the bed.
September 10th, 2017 at 1:55 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 2:35 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 4:25 PM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 9:19 AM ^
But the overthrow happened because the QB had to get rid of the ball sooner than he wanted because he was about to get sacked.
September 10th, 2017 at 2:38 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 6:32 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 6:37 PM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 1:33 AM ^
then won the national championship.
Agree, stuff happens each week.
September 10th, 2017 at 1:41 PM ^
Great diary submission, but what does that have to do with what happened in the polls? Based on everything else that happened this week we were not going to fall.
September 10th, 2017 at 1:50 PM ^
Cincinnati wasn't as bad as most thought because they played down to Austin Peay? It happens.
Still, in spite of his stats, I didn't care for the overall sloppiness of Speight's play nor his continued struggle with mid-range accuracy. Gotta get that cleaned up, and I hope Harbaugh and Pep can, but he seems to have regressed some in his execution while growing in his decision making.
Plenty of time before PSU...
September 10th, 2017 at 9:40 PM ^
September 11th, 2017 at 8:47 AM ^
which surprised me (and doesn't bode well for the Shark Humper's future).
September 10th, 2017 at 7:32 PM ^
I can't help but wonder if Cincinnati spent the time they would normally prep for their first week opponenet focusing on UM instead. Austin Peay is the worst team in the FCS; perhaps, UC coaches felt that they could devote some/most of their prep time for UM instead of AP. This could also explain why UC played so poorly against AP the previous week. Meanwhile, UM had to focus extensively on Florida for the first week and experience the not unusual emotional "crash" after playing such a hyped game.
Just a thought that occured to me after the UM/UC game.
September 11th, 2017 at 12:52 AM ^
They still only had 1 week to prepare for our 3-3-5 defense, or whatever we are calling it.
September 10th, 2017 at 9:20 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 1:39 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 10th, 2017 at 4:34 PM ^
17 of 29 for 220 yds w/ 2TDs and 0 INT and a 145 QBR isn't halfway decent? Man, you have some high standards.
EDIT: I am certainly not saying he played great. But, he also didn't play awful. He most assuredly played better than halfway to decent though. Let's call it decent, he played decently.
September 10th, 2017 at 4:50 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 5:35 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 9:55 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 1:43 PM ^
Check his stat line, dummy. He threw 59% completion (with a couple intentional throwaways), 7.5 ypa, 2 tds, 221 yds. That is absolutely fine. If that doesn't show you that he had a decent game, then you need to read a few Intro to American Football books. GTFO.
September 10th, 2017 at 2:07 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 10th, 2017 at 2:11 PM ^
Do you recall Rudock's performances against UNLV and Oregon State? With 2 NFL WRs and an NFL/Mackey Award TE?
September 10th, 2017 at 2:29 PM ^
The difference is that Rudock improved. Speight seems to be a fixed quantity now.
September 10th, 2017 at 2:32 PM ^
And how long had Rudock been playing at Michigan, under Harbaugh, and with those wide receivers? 6-8 weeks?
This is 2.5 years under Harbaugh and it doesn't matter if you've got megatron or john q freshman out there when you are throwing 10 feet over your recievers on wide open passes.
September 10th, 2017 at 2:53 PM ^
Speight finished 3rd in the conference in rating last year. He is beyond good enough to win a conference championship and make the playoff with, the numbers objectively bare that out.
I've accepted that a large chunk of our fans will always hate Speight and find a way to complain no matter what he does. That's fine - it's illogical and wrong - but their mind is made up. When this team wins in Indy in December I hope they congratulate him.
September 10th, 2017 at 3:07 PM ^
One bad game is one thing, more bad games than good is another. If we win the B1G, it’s in speight of him.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 10th, 2017 at 3:23 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 3:23 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 5:27 PM ^
That was Speight's stat line from the Iowa game. That is not going to win you any games on the road. Go back over the missed throws of open receivers in that Iowa game. We lost because we weren't picking up 6 points on those throws, not because we gave up 2 points on a safety to make the score 10-2. That was a bad game for the entire offense, but was really bad game by our QB.
September 10th, 2017 at 7:38 PM ^
1) We lost that game by 1 pt, so yes, giving up 2 points did cost us that game.
2) That was THE game Speight broke his collarbone in.
3) Yes, he missed 4 wide open bombs for TDs, that's not debatable. Chesson also dropped 2 perfect balls, 1 in the endzone ("costing us 6") and the other in the redzone that bounced off him and was picked off, potentially costing us 6. Darboh couldn't catch the ball on the drive to seal the game, Butt also had a drop on a 3rd down.
So yes, Speight was not perfect in the game where he broke a major bone in chest. BUT, if the OL, or Chesson, or Darboh make one routine play, we win that game. Again I say, Speight was good enough to win that game, despite not being great. He is good enough.
September 10th, 2017 at 3:53 PM ^
He was named the starter last year and this year because he is the best QB on the roster and gave/gives us the best chance to win. It's wrong to blame him alone for the final standings last year. Darboh and Chesson both had worse years than they did in 2015, the Ol was inadequate and none of the RBs established himself as a consistent gamebreaker, the way Isaac seems to be doing this year.
That said, you are right that he didn't play at his best in the big games last year and he isn't showing the improvement I expected in his second year as a starter.
September 10th, 2017 at 4:20 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 10th, 2017 at 4:56 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 5:08 PM ^
Also, if Speight hit any one of the 3 passes to receivers who were open behind the defense at Iowa, UM would have won.
September 10th, 2017 at 6:58 PM ^
September 10th, 2017 at 9:58 PM ^