Brad Hawkins prep school update
Brad Hawkins had 14 receptions for 208 yards in Suffold's most recent 48-41 OT win.
He had 2 TDs. Here was his quote on being asked about his status
Link to the article where an NJ.com fool thinks some bottom-feeder in NJ will steal him.
"Right now, I'm still committed. I'm still committed to Michigan, right now. Things are going well with them," he said. "So nothing has changed. I'm still committed, I'm still loyal to them."
But Hawkins is still, at least, open to hearing from the multiple suitors to come through Suffield. And he admits that Rutgers is the team recruiting him hardest.
"They are just saying they would love to have me and they need receivers," said Hawkins.
Hawkins says he's contacted by Rutgers wide receivers coach Jafar Williams every other day, while he hears from Iowa and Michigan coaches a couple times per week.
According to Hawkins, Michigan will still take him despite him not qualifying initially. Hence, when he speaks to passing game coordinator and wide receivers coach Jedd Fisch, they discuss other things.
"I already know where I stand," said Hawkins. "That's been discussed, so we just talk about how I'm doing."
October 5th, 2016 at 9:15 AM ^
didn't he send one in?
how does this work - if we still want him and he goes elsewhere does he sit out?
October 5th, 2016 at 9:34 AM ^
He did sign. Dytarious did not, but from what I've heard Dytarious is definitely coming here in January.
He's not even playing football right now, just taking classes at a prep school for the semester.
October 5th, 2016 at 9:16 AM ^
In regards to our NJ WR's Rutgers trying to be like.... Good luck with that!
October 5th, 2016 at 9:21 AM ^
"...that's why we didn't want him."
October 5th, 2016 at 9:26 AM ^
Someone yesterday said no chance he comes to Michigan, but this seems to contradict that heavily. If Fisch is still in touch with him I imagine there's something there. That said, it could also be to make sure Hawkins and his family and HS coaches don't think we flat out bailed on the kid. Who knows, hope he lands here or somewhere else good (not Rutgers).
October 5th, 2016 at 9:40 AM ^
Mr. Yost posted this yesterday re: Hawkins coming to Michigan (link):
From what I understand...you and I have just as much of a chance. 0%.
Can you elaborate, Mr. Yost?
October 5th, 2016 at 9:53 AM ^
There it is. Would like some more info from Mr. Yost if he has any.
October 5th, 2016 at 10:22 AM ^
Who are you going to believe here? This Hawkins guy who claims to have some "insider information" on who's talking to him or our own Mr Yost?
Seems pretty clear to me that Yost has the scoop on what's going down. I wouldn't listen to a word this Hawkins fellow says. What does he know?
October 5th, 2016 at 10:40 AM ^
I've got to believe that Mr. Hawkins is much too young to even know what Counter Strike is. Mr. Yost has got to have the best info.
October 5th, 2016 at 12:45 PM ^
October 5th, 2016 at 10:32 AM ^
October 5th, 2016 at 9:43 AM ^
October 5th, 2016 at 10:04 AM ^
I quoted his post above. Not sure where he heard that as I haven't seen anything about Hawkins on Rivals.
BTW, if people think this place is dysfunctional and delusional sometimes then don't even bother reading The Fort.
October 5th, 2016 at 11:44 AM ^
October 5th, 2016 at 12:19 PM ^
Mr. Yost, sources or it didn't happen.
October 5th, 2016 at 9:27 AM ^
five star performance. Hope he stays Blue and comes aboard.
October 5th, 2016 at 9:37 AM ^
October 5th, 2016 at 9:44 AM ^
right now if he wanted to...at MSU.
October 5th, 2016 at 9:46 AM ^
Come on.
He's making the extra effort to come HERE by taking the hard way and going to prep school, when he could've just went somewhere else that doesn't have our standards and probably played this Fall.
Let's not mock him.
October 5th, 2016 at 10:27 AM ^
That was strictly intended as an MSU jab, but reading it again I guess I can see how it was taken. I don't know what his grades are...I assumed he was coming along fine.
October 5th, 2016 at 5:34 PM ^
October 5th, 2016 at 9:59 AM ^
I'm not sure where this straw man keeps coming from, but Michigan uses the NCAA minimum requirements for admissions. (Yes, it bugs me as an alumnus). He wouldn't have been allowed at MSU either.
October 5th, 2016 at 10:12 AM ^
I'm pretty sure he comes from Oz.
October 5th, 2016 at 10:51 AM ^
It's simply not true. There are multiple examples of recruits denied admission that were qualified and enrolled elsewhere. There are many more who our coaches had to back off from because they wouldn't make it past admissions. Michigan grants a limited number of waivers, allowing coaches to take some kids whose scores fall on the low range of NCAA of qualifying. They do require more core classes than the NCAA minimum and I don't believe they waive that. Wisconsin and ND do the same thing. That's why Wisconsin lost a signee to MSU a couple of years ago.
The NCAA now allows "academic redshirts". Those are recruits who fall somewhat below qualifying. They must redshirt as freshmen. You can be sure that MSU will take some and I highly doubt we ever will.
October 5th, 2016 at 11:15 AM ^
I was specifically thinking of Hawkins case, although I didn't state it. He was denied eligibility by the NCAA Clearinghouse, not UM so he would not have been allowed to play at any FBS/FCS school.
Michigan uses the NCAA for admissions, and the Big Ten for GPA metrics as a policy. These are not higher than any other school in the conference.
That being said, it is a lot harder to maintain the minimum GPA at UM than say MSU because the courses are more difficult and they don't inflate grades like other schools.
So basically, if an athlete shows red-flags that they may not be able to maintain eligibility they could be denied admissions on an individual basis, although that's not "the written policy". The university has a set number of "non-standard" (basically high risk) that they will allow. This number is not made public, because it allows for some gray area. At the end of the day, it all depends on the quality of the athlete.
October 5th, 2016 at 11:30 AM ^
wanted to come to Michigan, but did not meet requirements? But was allowed at MSU?
October 5th, 2016 at 11:46 AM ^
That was the rumor, but that was also in 2011. New NCAA eligibility rules went into effect Jan 1st of this year. They are much stricter than before, and are on par with what UM's personal policy threshold used to be in regards to core classes required, GPA, and test scores. That is why the NCAA policy is used now.
http://www.ncaa.com/news/ncaa/article/2012-04-26/new-eligibility-standa…
October 5th, 2016 at 2:49 PM ^
Could you link me to your source for the policy that Michigan admissions now "uses the NCAA?" I'm not saying that i doubt you, but I am saying that the way you word your claims makes no sense. Linking to a four-year-old news article doesn't help at all.
October 5th, 2016 at 11:47 AM ^
October 5th, 2016 at 1:04 PM ^
would qualify. Hoke didn't want to accept a commitment from him because of that. As it turned out, he finally qualified months after LOI day.
October 5th, 2016 at 9:46 AM ^
Obviously he seems like he is a take but wouldn't he and dytarious johnson count against this class in terms of numbers? Because it seems like we are already tight on numbers and now you are adding in two more commits and I'm just not sure how the math is going to work out unless a bunch of guys drop out of the class or we finish really dissapointingly with the guys we are in on.
October 5th, 2016 at 9:54 AM ^
How does he compare skill wise to the 4 main targets Michigan has focused on? With this year's freshman class and pretty solid with DPJ, Collins, Black and Oliver (if I remember correctly), that would be a lot of WRs.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 5th, 2016 at 12:00 PM ^
October 5th, 2016 at 10:06 AM ^
October 5th, 2016 at 10:20 AM ^
October 5th, 2016 at 10:41 AM ^
to have a ballhawk on the backend of our pressure D. I'm proud of the kid and hope he ends up in AA.
October 5th, 2016 at 10:18 AM ^
Nice numbers, but still prep school. I still think at the next level he's best suited to bulk up and become more of a move TE or a safety. We'll see where he ends up though. He could end up as an outside WR in more of a spread system.
October 5th, 2016 at 10:19 AM ^
You can be close to home and the HC used to be on good Ohio State teams?
October 5th, 2016 at 10:23 AM ^
October 6th, 2016 at 12:12 AM ^
October 5th, 2016 at 10:59 AM ^
What's Rutgers recruiting pitch going to be after Harbaugh shoves it so far down Rutgers throat they have to visit the proctologist on Sunday?
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 5th, 2016 at 11:31 AM ^
no other competition
October 5th, 2016 at 11:43 AM ^
I remember playing NCAA 2005 for the GameCube. Unlike the more complex Dynasty mode in later versions, you had to pick one of about five recruiting pitches for each recruit. It was kind of fun starting out as a really crappy team, because you could pitch immediate playing time to everyone and have a decent chance at success.
October 5th, 2016 at 10:34 AM ^
Good luck to the young man. Tough situation be in. Hopefully it works out for him. The 2017 WR crop is going to be very deep though.
October 5th, 2016 at 12:43 PM ^
Sure, McDoom and Crawford are getting in on some plays and jet sweeps, but when Darboh, Butt and Chesson walk out the door in January, I'd say more than 75% of this year's receiving production will be walking out with them.
We'll have a talented receiving corps to say the least, but unless we see these guys getting in a lot more this year (which they very well may), they'll all have a lot to prove next Fall.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
October 5th, 2016 at 10:36 AM ^
Boy is that an understatement. And QB's, and LB's, and RB's, and.......
October 5th, 2016 at 10:57 AM ^
Why don't we just list what they don't need....
...Bueller? Bueller?
October 5th, 2016 at 12:40 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad