[Bryan Fuller]

A Funeral For Geese Comment Count

Brian September 23rd, 2019 at 12:48 PM

9/21/2019 – Michigan 14, Wisconsin 35 – 2-1, 0-1 Big Ten

The End of the Tour, a movie about Rolling Stone writer David Lipsky glomming on to David Foster Wallace at the end of his Infinite Jest book tour, is immediately good. The first sensory experience the movie gives you is the ultra-deep cut instrumental from REM's Automatic For the People:

This is a song with no oboes in it that sounds like nothing but oboes. It is weird, lilting, and mournful, a funeral for geese. The opening scene of the movie is Lipsky getting a call from someone trying to confirm a rumor that Wallace has committed suicide, because Lipsky once spent a few days on the road with him.

Wallace has. Lipsky goes through his tapes.

[After THE JUMP: marshmallows!]

The rest of the movie is a flashback to those few days on the road. Two highbrow white guys talk to each other about stuff. Mostly about how they are precarious and alone, the guy with the critic-melting novel and the other guy with a novel who also writes for Rolling Stone. Sometimes they bluff. The introduction of a woman, any woman, is cause for a tiff. Jason Segel, the guy who's inserted by default as Affable Stoner in every Judd Apatow movie, plays DFW.

I know, okay? I know. It sat in our Netflix queue for months, looming, more a threat than a promise. But you watch it for a bit and questions surface. Questions like:

  • How did this get made?
  • How is it good?
  • When will my wife stop watching it?

At press time answers were not available for any of these questions, and only the third has even the distant prospect of resolution. I played two seconds of "New Orleans Instrumental No. 1" to confirm it was indeed the song used and she popped her head out of the office. "Ooh," I project she thought.

But anyway because of your living situation this thing has been on a lot. And when you're a guy who writes about Michigan the aftermath-of-spirit-crushing defeat mine has been well and truly depleted. Do you want chipper ha-ha that was weird? Done. Talking people off the ledge? Done. Outright nihilism? Done. Columns about buying a mattress? Done.

So when it's time to write something about a game that Michigan spiritually lost 35-0 after being favored by a touchdown preseason the goose funeral music follows you around. It is my theory that I can get it to stop following me around by loosing it on you, the reader.

-----------------------

In the aftermath of Wallace's demise there are two great unfortunate things. The first is the relegation of Infinite Jest into the category of intellectual bro-novel that sites like The Toast use as a stand-in for a particular sort of bearded quasi-intellectual who is the seething insecurity the End of the Tour protagonists are enduring minus any offsets like having a face-melting novel or writing for Rolling Stone.

I dunno, I wasn't a woman on a train in Brooklyn in 2013. I'm sure if I'd been subject to hordes of slavering women trying to butter me up with copies of Beloved I'd be pretty negative about Beloved. But this would not make Beloved any less of a banger, as the kids say. IJ's status is increasingly as a punchline in an unfunny joke about the patriarchy of hipster dudebros, and that sucks.

This is painful to me for many reasons. Foremost amongst them is that it says a bunch of things I think everyone should take to heart about entertaining themselves to death. The title is literal: the book weaves back and forth in time and ends abruptly, seemingly unfinished. It was only after I'd gone back to the beginning to try to piece together some plot points that I realized I was re-reading the thing. It was a loop, a literally infinite jest.

The second unfortunate thing is the Hallmark-ization of Wallace's commencement speech to Kenyon College. Titled "This Is Water," it became a minor sensation and became the kind of small book you give to someone at a juncture when they are getting all the small books. The way the thing is discussed is the opposite of ASMR. Your skin crawls backwards into the primordial ooze:

This is Water by David Foster Wallace (Full Transcript and Audio)

David Foster Wallace‘s 2005 commencement speech to the graduating class at Kenyon College, is a timeless trove of wisdom — right up there with Hunter Thompson on finding your purpose and living a meaningful life.

I feel like I shouldn't have to explain this? But I have to anyway? Holy hopping death, following up "a timeless trove of wisdom" with a link to "Hunter Thompson," no S, on finding your purpose: both of these people murdered themselves and now I know why. It's you, FS dot blog. You did it. Give Thompson his S back.

Despite this, the Kenyon college speech is also good. Its key passage is Wallace envisioning a dreary trip to a mausoleum of a supermarket as part of another routinely long day. There are traffic and lines. This doesn't resonate with my personal experience of shopping, in which I take DRC to Busch's and people there recognize us and he attempts to push the cart at supersonic velocities while cleaning the place out of marshmallows. There one specific domain, however, in which the mental state he describes does apply:

… the traffic jams and crowded aisles and long checkout lines give me time to think, and if I don’t make a conscious decision about how to think and what to pay attention to, I’m gonna be pissed and miserable every time I have to shop. Because my natural default setting is the certainty that situations like this are really all about me. About MY hungriness and MY fatigue and MY desire to just get home, and it’s going to seem for all the world like everybody else is just in my way. And who are all these people in my way? And look at how repulsive most of them are, and how stupid and cow-like and dead-eyed and nonhuman they seem in the checkout line, or at how annoying and rude it is that people are talking loudly on cell phones in the middle of the line. And look at how deeply and personally unfair this is.

I can't tell you I'm any good at shaping my attention in this regard. Offseason projects to walk more and drink less have been drilled between the eyes just three games in. But if there is a way out it's probably through that door.

----------------------------

48778632052_30cc666141_k

[Patrick Barron]

The nice thing about a game like Saturday's is that you blaze through the Kubler-Ross stages in a half and are left at acceptance. (Maybe you're still in depression.) This is probably it for the foreseeable future. It's not what we hoped for when Michigan hired Jim Harbaugh and his astonishing track record.

Instead: this. Michigan's SP+ rankings under Harbaugh: 10, 6, 13, 10. Michigan's currently 26 and sinking like a brick. Prior to this year that's remarkably consistent in the face of some difficulties like not having any quarterbacks. It's not what it needs to be for Michigan to be a consistent challenger to Ohio State. It's good enough to make the idea of trying to hire someone else absurd. OSU just hired a short-term coordinator with no head coaching experience; all coach hires except Urban Meyer are crapshoots.

So this is it: pretty good, sabotaged by an instability inherent in the head coach. It is not Infinite Jest's Entertainment, so appealing as to be lethal. Maybe at some point we'll turn a game on and it'll be a nice time. If it's not, oh well. It's time to adapt to the temperature of the water.

BRIC-A-BRAC

is cancelled this week; UFR will address the actual game parts. To be perfectly frank I wasn't paying the usual level of attention.

Comments

InterM

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:42 PM ^

I mean -- it kind of *is* about Brian?  The point of coming to MGoBlog and reading a game column is to see what this particular guy made of this particular game-type substance.  Ideally, he draws your attention to meta-type things you might not have noticed or thought of.  If you're just looking for a blow-by-blow of what happened in the game, this isn't your go-to source.

The UFRs, on the other hand, are supposed to be objective measures of what happened in the game.  I think that there are things that can be learned from that sort of study of the Wisconsin game -- e.g., the OL seemed not-so-great in real time, but does that prove true in closer analysis and, if so, why did Michigan's seemingly-good OL perform poorly in this game?  Here's hoping Brian can fight through the malaise, roll up his sleeves, and dig into the game film.  I don't envy him that task, but I sure hope he does it anyway.

momo

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:50 PM ^

I don't disagree with you except that IMO the Monday columns usually have a fair amount of insightful analysis - I don't find them to be particularly meta. Obviously the analysis is based on initial impressions but that's what makes them interesting in relation to the UFR's.

As for "I don't envy him that task", whatever - it's his job, and we're talking about re-watching a football game here, not something serious like being a teacher or a nurse. We beat Wisconsin by almost exactly the same score last year.

 

huntmich

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:48 PM ^

First, it's not just that the team isn't so good. It's that they looked lost, disinterested, and poorly coached. This isn't about not having talent. It's about that talent not being a team.

 

Second, there are players who were lights out last year who are now mediocre to bad. Many of them. How can half of a team's starters regress season by season?

 

It's starting to look like 2017 wasn't an aberration. It should be expected to be a regular occurrence from here on out. And for a coach constantly pulling in top 10 recruiting classes, that is troubling, and just not good enough.

michgoblue

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:27 PM ^

Perfect analysis.  Teams lose, even good teams.  Teams occasionally throw up a clunker.  This was not that. The entire team looked lost and confused and disinterested.  And, it's not the first time.  This happens in pretty much every big game, especially on the road.  Something just ain't right.  We may have holes in the team, and perhaps we are not playoff caliber, but we should be way better than what we saw against Wisco.  And against Army.  And even against MSTU.  And in our bowl game debacle.  Any against OSU.  And even against Indiana the week before OSU, where we played like ass.  

Something is just way off.

michgoblue

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:27 PM ^

Perfect analysis.  Teams lose, even good teams.  Teams occasionally throw up a clunker.  This was not that. The entire team looked lost and confused and disinterested.  And, it's not the first time.  This happens in pretty much every big game, especially on the road.  Something just ain't right.  We may have holes in the team, and perhaps we are not playoff caliber, but we should be way better than what we saw against Wisco.  And against Army.  And even against MSTU.  And in our bowl game debacle.  Any against OSU.  And even against Indiana the week before OSU, where we played like ass.  

Something is just way off.

michgoblue

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:27 PM ^

Perfect analysis.  Teams lose, even good teams.  Teams occasionally throw up a clunker.  This was not that. The entire team looked lost and confused and disinterested.  And, it's not the first time.  This happens in pretty much every big game, especially on the road.  Something just ain't right.  We may have holes in the team, and perhaps we are not playoff caliber, but we should be way better than what we saw against Wisco.  And against Army.  And even against MSTU.  And in our bowl game debacle.  Any against OSU.  And even against Indiana the week before OSU, where we played like ass.  

Something is just way off.

NeverPunt

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:26 PM ^

Came for the explanation of how an experience and talent-laden offensive line, senior qb, 5-star RB, and NFL wide receivers managed to score 0 points and not even really threaten outside of one play in the first half. Stayed for the meandering musings on cinema and literature.  Five stars, would read again.

Brodie

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:40 PM ^

He said Harbaugh was inherently unstable but produced too good of results to be fired as of now. Isn't that critical enough? Does he need to be tarred and feathered? 

He's a coach who is just good enough to keep his job. As such, he will keep his job until such a time as he produces truly bad results. Not "UNACCEPTABLE FOR MICHIGAN" hot take results, but real deal bad results of the sort that generally lead to firings. 

Brian Griese

September 23rd, 2019 at 3:28 PM ^

Is ‘unstable’ really what quantifies to you as a detailed critique? The writers of this blog manage to devote something 3x a week about paying the players, crapping on Delaney and the NCAA but with Harbaugh in year 5 this is the extent of their critiques:

  • a couple of passing lines about him running an unstable program with no further dive into it
  • one column about the ‘ghosting’ of recruits
  • A brief paragraph in the post Florida bowl game (part 2) column about his terrible time management 

The team just got splattered and the arrow is pointed down on Harbaugh’s tenure and we get a discussion about movies. Brian owes me nothing and Harbaugh shouldn’t be tarred, feathered or even fired right this second, but I expected more of an analysis about the state of the program right now than this, because all the Wisconsin game did was basically highlight every problem this program has.

 

 

 

mGrowOld

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:27 PM ^

My youngest son had a cross country meet so I recorded the game and didnt sit down to watch it until about 4ish.  I had purposively not looked at my phone during the meet but I noticed that both my oldest sons had sent me multiple texts between about 1:30 - 2:15 real time.

Before the game even started for me I told my wife "we're going to get killed.  Chris & Evan never text with good news in-game, only bad."  Didnt take long for me to realize just HOW bad.

So i drank a couple of beers and went outside to make a bonfire.  I didnt give a shit about the game once it hit 28-0 nor did i care about any other college game that day.

ijohnb

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:32 PM ^

Your last point there is actually what is becoming the most bothersome for me right now.  I used to like college football, generally.  Now my ability to watch and enjoy college football is intrinsically related to what is happening with Michigan.  I wanted to watch Notre Dame v. Georgia on Saturday before the Michigan game.  I did not care about it by 2:00 PM and didn't watch another down of football the entire day.

robpollard

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:50 PM ^

I used to be that way, but I got past it relatively recently. Not that the two are really comparable, but I'm a Lions fan. About 5 years ago I decided I wasn't going to waste much precious football wasting time on them -- if they were good, I'd hop aboard the (lose in the first round) bandwagon and watch regular season games; if not, I'd spend my team elsewhere, watching actual competent teams play.

For example, the Eagle-Falcons game last Sunday night was really good -- very hard hitting (for today's NFL) with some top notch plays (e.g., Julio Jones breaking a 4th down short yardage play for a TD). I was glad I watched it. And it was only possible b/c I didn't spend much time on the ugly 13-10 Lions win earlier in the day.

Same with ND vs Georgia. While Georgia was better, ND hung with them. It was enjoyable to watch teams correctly diagnose and snuff out screens; it was impressive watching Georgia RB Swift run over & through people. I was glad I watched it (and as a bonus, ND lost).

This was made possible by me (like many above) DVR'ing the UM game and after UW's 1st drive (and unfortunately expected paving) and UM's 1st drive (typical of our season -- big play; missed pass to big-time WR; inexplicable fumble by a FB with two hands on the ball) I fast-forwarded through most of the rest. Took up about 45 min of my time, and didn't leave too much of mark (about the season's prospects? Sure. But the game in particular, besides the vicious his on DCaff? No.)

I'm not thrilled it's this way. But I can't change it. I'm not going to let our inexplicable inability to utilize our big WRs and our even more inexplicable underperforming OL (to name just two issues) ruin my day.

I'm looking forward to UM-Rutgers next week, because I root for UM and I'm interested to see if they can turn it around. But if they can't? It will not ruin football for me. Try to get to that place, if you can.

UM Indy

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:00 PM ^

I had the opposite - but equally alarming - reaction.  After our ass beating, I said to myself, self the only thing that's going to make you feel better is watching Notre Dame get its ass beat by Georgia.  There are several problems with this.  Number one, cheering for a SEC team is wrong.  Number two, Notre Dame might not in fact get its ass beat.  Number three, why does another team losing make Michigan losing any better?  Long story short, I watched without truly committing to cheering for Georgia and didn't get the result I was looking for anyway.  Notre Dame acquitted itself very well in a game we would've lost by 50.  

momo

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:06 PM ^

The experience of watching college football is dogshit due to commercials. Talk about killing the goose, golden egg etc. My kids are very into sports and won't watch it for this exact reason.

I have little time for FIFA but for the 1994 World Cup (my understanding is that) the US networks wanted to have in-game commercial time and FIFA said no way. Smartest decision ever in the history of sports-as-a-business.

stephenrjking

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:10 PM ^

Right with both of you and I hate it. College football is our greatest sport. There's nothing like it.

But when our team stinks, it's really hard to enjoy. I barely watched after the beat-down, and in fact I've watched far less college football so far this year in general. 

There's precedent for this: My interest in the NCAA tournament was considerably reduced during Michigan's long period of basketball irrelevance. With the basketball team's sustained success, I have been more plugged in to college basketball and general and more able to enjoy the NCAA tournament, even when Michigan is not involved. 

College football is better. But when the sport is a reminder of how deeply disappointing my team is, it is a hard thing to watch. 

When my team in a sport, or especially multiple teams, have a really bad day, I will occasionally dust off an old lame joke of mine. Take a weekend like this, where the Tigers are in the basement and Michigan got trounced. Imagine that the Lions lost as well (actually not true this week, but you know what I mean). It goes like this: "You know what's a great sport? Golf." Insert name of odd, uninteresting sport here.

But it's not so much a joke. I'm starting to look for other sports to follow. College football just isn't fun right now, because Michigan isn't fun. What did I actually enjoy following on Saturday? The Baja 400. True story. 

Winchester Wolverine

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:54 PM ^

2016 was the best college football watching year for me right up until the end of the OSU game. The stakes, CFP implications, former opponents, future opponents, etc. The Iowa loss was a heartbreaker, and at the time, it was the lowest dip in the emotional rollercoaster. I was convinced Michigan would beat OSU for that emotional peak. I remember waking up at 5 AM that Saturday morning like it was Christmas. #2 vs #3. We're back, baby. 

That was peak college football watching. Up until it wasn't. 

Now, I'm stuck with a love that, doesn't just not love me back, but fucking hates me. A part of me desperately wants out. But I know deep down inside that I'll never let this game, or this program, go. Despite all the heartache and stress and bullshit that I've continued to go through since I fell in love with Michigan football in 2006.

I'm a hopeless football romantic, I guess. And I fucking hate it.

gmoney41

September 23rd, 2019 at 3:11 PM ^

Agree,  as I get older and more responsibilities are on my plate, I don’t have the time for games all day Saturday.  I usually watch my soccer team, Manchester City at 9 then settle in for the Michigan game, then I’m free the rest of the day.  Well last Saturday was a complete contrast.  I watched man city thoroughly destroy a decent team in every way I desire Michigan to play, entertaining, efficient, and satisfying.  Then the Michigan game came on, and what I got was abysmal, ineffective, inefficient, boring Michigan.  I wasn’t too upset because I figured we’d lose, but to get dominated in the same fashion that my soccer team dominated was depressing and sad.  That is Michigan football, depressing and sad. Well at least I have great soccer to watch. 

The Fugitive

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:28 PM ^

I shut the game off to go golfing knowing full well it was going to pour on us. It did and that was infinitely better than sitting inside and watching Wisconsin bash their brains in.

kehnonymous

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:18 PM ^

Yes - and I only remember that because it was my own personal "eff it, i'm out" moment for the Hoke era.  The best/worst of all that is that if you'd asked 40 other M fans what their personal breaking point was, you'd have gotten 40 different replies, and no one could really disagree with any of the 40 other different takes.

Mercury Hayes

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:48 PM ^

Or negative energy. 

 

I love football more than the next guy, but everything is always so negative. It ruins my day. I enjoy taking my dog for a walk and the kid to the park. It has a better payoff and I won't die from the building rage inside my body.

For this reason I am starting to like basketball more. Loved the title runs, but could you imagine if this were football? FIRE BEILEIN HE CAN'T WIN THE BIG ONE!