[Bryan Fuller]

A Funeral For Geese Comment Count

Brian September 23rd, 2019 at 12:48 PM

9/21/2019 – Michigan 14, Wisconsin 35 – 2-1, 0-1 Big Ten

The End of the Tour, a movie about Rolling Stone writer David Lipsky glomming on to David Foster Wallace at the end of his Infinite Jest book tour, is immediately good. The first sensory experience the movie gives you is the ultra-deep cut instrumental from REM's Automatic For the People:

This is a song with no oboes in it that sounds like nothing but oboes. It is weird, lilting, and mournful, a funeral for geese. The opening scene of the movie is Lipsky getting a call from someone trying to confirm a rumor that Wallace has committed suicide, because Lipsky once spent a few days on the road with him.

Wallace has. Lipsky goes through his tapes.

[After THE JUMP: marshmallows!]

The rest of the movie is a flashback to those few days on the road. Two highbrow white guys talk to each other about stuff. Mostly about how they are precarious and alone, the guy with the critic-melting novel and the other guy with a novel who also writes for Rolling Stone. Sometimes they bluff. The introduction of a woman, any woman, is cause for a tiff. Jason Segel, the guy who's inserted by default as Affable Stoner in every Judd Apatow movie, plays DFW.

I know, okay? I know. It sat in our Netflix queue for months, looming, more a threat than a promise. But you watch it for a bit and questions surface. Questions like:

  • How did this get made?
  • How is it good?
  • When will my wife stop watching it?

At press time answers were not available for any of these questions, and only the third has even the distant prospect of resolution. I played two seconds of "New Orleans Instrumental No. 1" to confirm it was indeed the song used and she popped her head out of the office. "Ooh," I project she thought.

But anyway because of your living situation this thing has been on a lot. And when you're a guy who writes about Michigan the aftermath-of-spirit-crushing defeat mine has been well and truly depleted. Do you want chipper ha-ha that was weird? Done. Talking people off the ledge? Done. Outright nihilism? Done. Columns about buying a mattress? Done.

So when it's time to write something about a game that Michigan spiritually lost 35-0 after being favored by a touchdown preseason the goose funeral music follows you around. It is my theory that I can get it to stop following me around by loosing it on you, the reader.

-----------------------

In the aftermath of Wallace's demise there are two great unfortunate things. The first is the relegation of Infinite Jest into the category of intellectual bro-novel that sites like The Toast use as a stand-in for a particular sort of bearded quasi-intellectual who is the seething insecurity the End of the Tour protagonists are enduring minus any offsets like having a face-melting novel or writing for Rolling Stone.

I dunno, I wasn't a woman on a train in Brooklyn in 2013. I'm sure if I'd been subject to hordes of slavering women trying to butter me up with copies of Beloved I'd be pretty negative about Beloved. But this would not make Beloved any less of a banger, as the kids say. IJ's status is increasingly as a punchline in an unfunny joke about the patriarchy of hipster dudebros, and that sucks.

This is painful to me for many reasons. Foremost amongst them is that it says a bunch of things I think everyone should take to heart about entertaining themselves to death. The title is literal: the book weaves back and forth in time and ends abruptly, seemingly unfinished. It was only after I'd gone back to the beginning to try to piece together some plot points that I realized I was re-reading the thing. It was a loop, a literally infinite jest.

The second unfortunate thing is the Hallmark-ization of Wallace's commencement speech to Kenyon College. Titled "This Is Water," it became a minor sensation and became the kind of small book you give to someone at a juncture when they are getting all the small books. The way the thing is discussed is the opposite of ASMR. Your skin crawls backwards into the primordial ooze:

This is Water by David Foster Wallace (Full Transcript and Audio)

David Foster Wallace‘s 2005 commencement speech to the graduating class at Kenyon College, is a timeless trove of wisdom — right up there with Hunter Thompson on finding your purpose and living a meaningful life.

I feel like I shouldn't have to explain this? But I have to anyway? Holy hopping death, following up "a timeless trove of wisdom" with a link to "Hunter Thompson," no S, on finding your purpose: both of these people murdered themselves and now I know why. It's you, FS dot blog. You did it. Give Thompson his S back.

Despite this, the Kenyon college speech is also good. Its key passage is Wallace envisioning a dreary trip to a mausoleum of a supermarket as part of another routinely long day. There are traffic and lines. This doesn't resonate with my personal experience of shopping, in which I take DRC to Busch's and people there recognize us and he attempts to push the cart at supersonic velocities while cleaning the place out of marshmallows. There one specific domain, however, in which the mental state he describes does apply:

… the traffic jams and crowded aisles and long checkout lines give me time to think, and if I don’t make a conscious decision about how to think and what to pay attention to, I’m gonna be pissed and miserable every time I have to shop. Because my natural default setting is the certainty that situations like this are really all about me. About MY hungriness and MY fatigue and MY desire to just get home, and it’s going to seem for all the world like everybody else is just in my way. And who are all these people in my way? And look at how repulsive most of them are, and how stupid and cow-like and dead-eyed and nonhuman they seem in the checkout line, or at how annoying and rude it is that people are talking loudly on cell phones in the middle of the line. And look at how deeply and personally unfair this is.

I can't tell you I'm any good at shaping my attention in this regard. Offseason projects to walk more and drink less have been drilled between the eyes just three games in. But if there is a way out it's probably through that door.

----------------------------

48778632052_30cc666141_k

[Patrick Barron]

The nice thing about a game like Saturday's is that you blaze through the Kubler-Ross stages in a half and are left at acceptance. (Maybe you're still in depression.) This is probably it for the foreseeable future. It's not what we hoped for when Michigan hired Jim Harbaugh and his astonishing track record.

Instead: this. Michigan's SP+ rankings under Harbaugh: 10, 6, 13, 10. Michigan's currently 26 and sinking like a brick. Prior to this year that's remarkably consistent in the face of some difficulties like not having any quarterbacks. It's not what it needs to be for Michigan to be a consistent challenger to Ohio State. It's good enough to make the idea of trying to hire someone else absurd. OSU just hired a short-term coordinator with no head coaching experience; all coach hires except Urban Meyer are crapshoots.

So this is it: pretty good, sabotaged by an instability inherent in the head coach. It is not Infinite Jest's Entertainment, so appealing as to be lethal. Maybe at some point we'll turn a game on and it'll be a nice time. If it's not, oh well. It's time to adapt to the temperature of the water.

BRIC-A-BRAC

is cancelled this week; UFR will address the actual game parts. To be perfectly frank I wasn't paying the usual level of attention.

Comments

True Blue Grit

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:14 PM ^

Generally, I never turned a game off, partly because for so many years there was almost always a chance Michigan would come back.  The only time prior to RR though was the first half of the Michigan-Syracuse game in 1998 when McNabb was shredding our defense.  After that, I've stopped watching during some of the OSU game blowouts and the bowl game against Mississippi State.

JCass

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:29 PM ^

How is Link's Awakening? I played the original years ago. I'm on the fence buying it again.

I mowed the lawn in record time, played Octopath Traveler and then went out with my wife (about an hour earlier than we originally planned). It turned into a nice Saturday afternoon.

WGoNerd

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:44 PM ^

It is very much the same game, which is a good thing. The game is stunning and the visuals make it look like you're playing in a diorama. They've made a lot of good quality of life improvements to the game (the sword, shield, and pegasus boots have dedicated buttons and then your two items slots so you aren't having to constantly pause to swap items), but the core game and story is the same. It's shocking how much I'm remembering as I play, like I walked into the Bottle Grotto and had a strong sense of nostalgia.

Worth the price if you ask me.

WGoNerd

September 23rd, 2019 at 3:02 PM ^

If I may live up to my username for a moment...*pushes glasses up his nose*

When the game was first in development the team's goal was to port LttP to the Gameboy, instead they made something wholly original. In the greater Zelda timeline of course this is the same Link from LttP and it takes place after that game.

kurpit

September 23rd, 2019 at 3:21 PM ^

I have never even attempted to understand the idea of an ongoing Zelda timeline because the games seem so independent and disjointed from eachother. I just play the games thinking of them as different tellings of stories from a past world centered around most of the same characters.

mgoaggie

September 23rd, 2019 at 5:05 PM ^

The problem with trying to canonize the series is that there are different eras that aren't explicit. Especially as new games come out, they have to try to figure out where they fit in the grand scheme (that loosely exists), and it ends up turning the rest of the previous theory on its' head. With the new Link's Awakening, introducing Dampe from OoT? I mean, come on. 

The characters are the same in name and purpose, but think of it like 21st Century Link, Zelda, Ganon is just an iteration of the previous century Link, Zelda, Ganon, etc.

UP to LA

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:49 PM ^

The thing is, the pit really only exists to the extent that you harbor plausible expectations of climbing out of it. When you realize at halftime that everything sucks and just go to the gym, the pit's walls cease to exist. Brian did the correct write-up.

Newton Gimmick

September 24th, 2019 at 11:19 AM ^

BPONE stands for Black Pit Of Negative Expectations, IIRC

What I see most reflected in the anger and/or depression here, is betrayal.

The problem is I don't think most fans here had *enough* negative expectations going into the Wisconsin game.  On WTKA, Brian absurdly picked Michigan to win, even after doing the offense's UFRs against Army.

It's pretty clear now this is a quasi-rebuild year.  I have no expectations on individual games -- positive, negative, or otherwise -- until maybe November.

If you see it that way, you won't feel betrayed if this happens again against Iowa or Penn State.

michgoblue

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:33 PM ^

On the one hand, none of us are paying for this blog (other than those of us that do the beveled guilt thing, which I have over the years), so we can't complaint.

On the other hand, if this blog is to be considered the premier Michigan sports blog on the interwebs, not writing about one of the worst, most humiliating losses of the Harbaugh era (coming shortly on the heals of perhaps the worst loss to OSU in recent history, the most humiliating bowl loss in recent history, and significant struggles over the prior two games) just seems wrong.  

There is a ton to say on this topic, and having no real analysis from this blog invites the constant snowflake-like threads that have been appearing all week.

UP to LA

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:57 PM ^

On the one hand, I think honest critiques are fair, regardless of who pays for what.

On the other hand, I disagree with the substance of the critique. We're still getting the UFRs, and I'm sure we'll getting many of thousands of thoughtful words on the state and trajectory of the program. But one of the things I love about this blog is the way that it digs into the subjective experience of fandom. And part of that experience is disengaging when things really suck. 

08mms

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:52 PM ^

We will get those with and after the UFRs.  This was something fundamentally broken on top of the soul-crushing nature of it, and probably best to let the feelings sort themselves out for a couple days before trying to figure out whats wrong and if it can be fixed on any reasonable timeline.  I read this blog both to learn about the team and to share feelings with a community of fans (and one particular fan whose analysis and writing have inspired us all to gather here), and I'm down with wallowing the feelings side of fandom on this one for a bit.

michgoblue

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:17 PM ^

I acknowledged that the blog is free.  But, you are wrong that unless you hit the beveled guilt for several hundred dollar a year, this blog is a gift.  This blog is a profit venture.  For those blogs that are profitable (which I have to assume MGoBlog is, since this is Brian's livelihood), the overwhelming majority of the income is derived from ad revenue.  Add revenue is directly based upon readership (both number of visits and unique visitors).  For those of us that obsessively check the blog every 30 minutes or so, and who post, comment, etc., we are directly contributing to the revenue stream of this blog.  

This is no different than using Google as your search engine.  Google is free.  The more people use it, the more they can charge for ads.  

Salinger

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:33 PM ^

What would you have Brian say? Here, I'll offer my best effort for you:

========================

They couldn't run the ball at all.

They couldn't pass the ball at all.

They couldn't defend the run at all.

They couldn't defend the pass at all.

Special Teams didn't look great.

There was a lot of bad, needless penalties.

========================

There.

How's that for analysis. Do you feel satiated now?

blueinuk

September 23rd, 2019 at 1:55 PM ^

Honest question:  What is there to analyze?  

There have been thousands of words written over the weekend on the message board, other websites and probably even newspapers trying to figure out why things are the way they are.  Harbaugh - at least for now - doesn't seem to be able to do what we thought he could do.  The answers to why things are this way lie behind doors none of us are invited to pass through.

No amount of game analysis is going to provide these answers.  So our only choice is to stop caring, stop watching or wait to see how things pan out.

michgoblue

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:22 PM ^

There have been a ton of words written.  Mostly hot takes by us insane fans.  Fire Harbaugh!  Fire Gattis!  Calls for calm!  Bench Shea.

What I was hoping for was some more detailed analysis of our situation from someone who is likely more plugged into the program (Brian) - even if second hand - than any of us. What I was looking for was Brian's views on such topics as:

* Does our team really come out flat in every big game, and if so, why?

* Has Harbaugh lost the team?  

* Is there some sort of discord between coaches?  Players?  Players and coaches?

* Why does Harbaugh seem to be such a different person that the maniac genius we thought we were hiring?

* Is Harbaugh's seat hot, and if not, would that seat become hot if losses continue to mount, including a loss to OSU?

I know that many of the answers would be "I don't know," but one of the things that I like about Brian's post-game Monday column is that it somewhat takes a step back from the constant hot takes, but it is still close enough to the game that the emotion of the game permeates the analysis.  To me, the UFR may be better detailed analysis, but it is somewhat detached from the visceral emotion of what just transpired.  

mGrowOld

September 23rd, 2019 at 3:19 PM ^

Yeah I was hoping for some of that too.  As a matter of fact the first thing I thought of when the ass-blasting was over was "I wonder how Brian's going to deal with this on Monday/" 

I was pretty sure we'd get something like we did but I, like you, was hoping for something more..  Basically because i value his opinion and he's a hell of a lot closer to whatever in the fuck is going on right now than i am.

AnthonyThomas

September 23rd, 2019 at 7:33 PM ^

What insider information about the program do you expect to be floating around the Monday after a loss? Nobody knows why the coaching staff is failing to maximize the team. That includes players and their parents and alums. If someone knew why historically good football programs and coaches fail, there are about a dozen schools that would pay that person millions for the answers. 

Michigan Arrogance

September 23rd, 2019 at 4:07 PM ^

yep, there's only 2 ways they fire him. 6-6 or less or they lose attendence significantly. 7-5, 8-4 will keep him here if attendence and off the field stuff stays status quo.

We know what we're getting - Lloyd Carr results in a new football world where we have to be top 5 to contend for the division, let a lone a BTT.

It's what I feared when divisions were debated 10+ years ago. With M in the same division as OSU (and PSU), we cannot reasonably expect to win the division more than once every 2-3 years (splitting the east with OSU every other year and PSU on occasion). That leaves at B1G Title every 3-4 years (can't expect to win the BTT game 100% of the time) AT BEST and that's assuming OSU is NOT have the program best 20 year clip they have had.

This is what we will be: PSU. Once every 4-5 years we have everything come together (exp QB and some depth at crucial spots with injury luck and a talent bump/3 star guys hit more than miss, OSU has a down year and MSU/PSU don't also have a great team that can steal a BTT bid from us in that year).

Beat MSU 2/3. go 8-4 or 9-3 most years with a 7-5 in a down year once every 5-6 years and a 10-2/11-2 in a good year every 5-6 years. Still assuming OSU isn't playing at an 85+ win %.

TrueBlue2003

September 23rd, 2019 at 5:35 PM ^

Objectively, it would be an accomplishment to even be as good as PSU, which we aren't/haven't been regularly since the late 90s/early 00s when Paterno was in his twilight years).

They have better in state talent with less competition for that talent, they have lower academic standards and they have all the positives Michigan has: big full stadium, big name, big money, tradition, etc.

mgobaran

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:05 PM ^

Different strokes for different folks I guess. I latched onto this blog for Brian's (and to some extant Ace/Seth's) writing. That's exactly what I needed to read. 

The UFR, the other thing that has always separated this blog from others, will tell the rest of the story. 

In the meantime, the podcast does address a lot of what Brian normally covers in these game recaps. And a million other blogs can tell you what he would have. All of it was bad.

MGoBender

September 23rd, 2019 at 2:08 PM ^

Yeah, but, you see, he DID write about it and he had a pretty harsh, yet realistic take on Harbaugh:

So this is it: pretty good, sabotaged by an instability inherent in the head coach. It is not Infinite Jest's Entertainment, so appealing as to be lethal. Maybe at some point we'll turn a game on and it'll be a nice time. If it's not, oh well. It's time to adapt to the temperature of the water.

Brian, who is the least hot-takey writer we know, calls Harbaugh inherently instable while also saying that his relative success means there's no way you can fire him.

And that's true. "Fire Harbaugh" hot takes are stupid until Harbaugh truly produces an average product (top 10 finishes in S&P are well above average). We can't fire him. We can't do better. We are stuck.