Rumeal Robinson Not Attending 1989 Reunion Sunday

That kind of thing can usually be resolved pretty easily, even on short notice. Would be nice to have him back. 

This is correct.  My last name is actually Flanders.

Rumeal Robinson was homeless. A couple took him in. He said thanks by swindling the woman out of her house. I'm sorry but that debt can't be repaid. This wasn't just some misunderstanding. It takes a special kind of scumbag to do something like that.

The closest thing to it was in 1957. North Carolina and Kansas were in triple overtime (!) and UNC's Joe Quigg was fouled with UNC down by one and six seconds on the clock. He sank both free throws to give UNC a one-point lead. But there were six second left, so Kansas's final play was less of a desperation shot than Seton Hall's in 1989 (Quigg broke up a pass to seal the win).

In 1953, Indiana won by one point, a free throw, but that was made with 27 seconds left on the clock.

Pep is sitting in his XFL office reading your post like...

which explains not using proper grammar...."And I am AN Ohio State fan."

The moral indignation—so Penn State had this thing happen that nobody currently there was part of, yet younger a joy out of calling them Ped State because it makes you feel superior, morally. We can also see that you feel intellectually superior by illogically playing out the Kaepernick situation by creating some hypotheticals that fit your worldview. For some reason you equate Group 2 as being made of black people and others, but you forget to mention that Group 1 also is made up of all ethnicities. This is just your way of moving the argument away from what makes you uncomfortable—the ability to focus on the big fault in critiquing Kaepernick:

Your inability to even address his concerns as he has stated them and your desire to move the argument to what outsiders feel he is doing. What you or me or anyone else “feels” or “thinks” his protest is doing—you are not addressing what it was for, in his own words. You want the narrative to be about your interpretation of his actions, not his actual actions and his cause. You’re making about the very outraged white conservative culture who hate dealing with systemic effects of racism.  You try to support your intellect with “black people think he’s wrong, too.” Ouch. Closeted gay Republican Congress folks have openly supported anti-LGBT laws, then get found in a bathroom stall with another man. But this kind of example for just shifts to the topic of your flawed logic, away from the point.

To tell a black man who says he is protesting racism that “No you are not, you are protesting the military” is an act of attempting to dehumanize and invalidate that black man’s argument. Since that action is invalidating a black man’s argument about how black men are treated, you actually are being racist. Anyone, including a black person, can be racist against a marginalized community—even if they are part of one. Racism has nothing to do with only your feelings towards color. Do not equate basic prejudice with racism. Your actions and all of the anti-Kaepernick responses are to nullify his position on what he’s fighting, actually supporting his argument of systemic inability to hear out and investigate the empirical evidence of inequity and inequality.   So for folks like you, you hold some kind of moral and intellectual “pedestal” over others going forward.

There’s no reason to hold Penn State now to such a degree of mockery for the sins of their past, but you do. Yet you cannot seem to understand how your holding on to a stereotype and creating an irrational hatred for an entire set of folks. And you cannot fathom how people hold on to stereotypes of black men and create a narrative that keeps them being prejudiced against more than the majority. You’re doing exactly that kind of speech-, thought-, and physical acts towards Penn State while denying Kaep’s assertions that people do act these ways towards black men. 

And I wonder how you feel about Trump’s despicable behavior in contrast to what Rumeal has done. Or how outraged are you by Jussie  but not the white nationalist Coast Guard with a hit list based on folks who have a different view of how American laws are enforced or impacting citizens based on ideologies and demographics.

This grammar nerd is totally ok with "prolly," not that anybody cares.

yes. i wonder if anywhere in my previous comment i acknowledged that what he did was bad.  

User name checks out

Friedergate!

He got credit for time served.