mgoO

November 28th, 2013 at 10:36 AM ^

All of you applauding Dave Brandon...do you enjoy being lied to like a politician begging for votes?

I understand why this blog was written but the execution is miserable.  A short, direct, statement of support would have been fine and served it's purpose.  Instead we get Brandon's deceptive comments and weird commentary regarding past coaching standards.

This is a man that is completely insecure because he knows he hired a cheerleader that no other BCS team would ever have.  Then, he pays him like he's coveted by the NFL because Brandon made his useless comments about how Michigan needs to pay for the best to get the best.

Do you really think it was in ANY WAY necessary to pay Brady Hoke more than RR?

It's literally only so fans can't point to his salary and say Brandon was being cheap.

Beyond that, he had the nerve to compare this season with NICK SABAN at Alabama in his 4th year.  Saban won the NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP IN YEAR 3.  Are you kidding?  And in his "down" year he was 10-3.  

Those 3 losses were against a ranked South Carolina team, #10 LSU, and Auburn.  With Cam Newton.  The eventual NATIONAL CHAMPIONS.

Sounds just like this year with Hoke.  

Now that I think about it, we're really not being fair to Hoke.  Sure this year has sucked but we did win the National Championship and go undefeated last year just like Nick Saban at Alabama so everyone just quiet down.  Nothing to see here.

 

cp4three2

November 28th, 2013 at 2:02 PM ^

Brandon acts as if Hoke has the same track record as Nick Saban (or even Harbaugh). Nick Saban had already won a national championship went to Alabama. He was considered one of the best college coaches, hence Bama paying him.

 

Hoke has no track record of winning championships. 

State Street

November 27th, 2013 at 7:52 PM ^

I like Dave Brandon.  I don't blame him for trying to maximize profits.  I think he loves this University and is great at his job.

That being said, fuck Dave Brandon for the blatant omission of Rich Rodriguez in that blog post.  What a chickenshit comment, praising "Carr's" recruits.  

LSAClassOf2000

November 27th, 2013 at 7:53 PM ^

"They are only trying to hurt the program and the progress our coaches and student-athletes are fighting to make on Saturdays. Sometimes that progress takes a little bit longer than we all like, but we know the long-term success that it's going to bring."

It is a rather interestingly phrased statement (I'll put it that way), but I do like how he addresses this in particular regarding recent unfounded rumblings, if you will. It seems to me that sometimes the people who clamor and carry on about the need for progress end up being the very people who sabotage it in the end. Clearly, patience is being called for and I don't necessarily have a problem with giving it personally. 

PurpleStuff

November 27th, 2013 at 7:58 PM ^

If people on message boards are hurting the program, what was Brandon doing when he was telling recruits he didn't know who the head coach would be three years ago?  Or when he blatantly stated that a recruiting class wasn't as important as overpaying for a guy with a career losing record that no other major program ever would have hired?

PurpleStuff

November 27th, 2013 at 8:16 PM ^

1.  He didn't have to sabotage the recruiting class for months (he could have done what he just did to supposedly salvage a recruiting class rather than telling kids he had no idea who their coach would be and wouldn't have any idea until after the bowl game). 

2.  He didn't hire the right coach. 

WolvinLA2

November 27th, 2013 at 8:22 PM ^

Your second point is obviously debateable, because we don't know who else was interested in taking the job or how well they would have done up to this point.  As to your first point, i don't really disagree but hindsight is 20/20.  If he was 100% sure he was going to fire him, then you're probably right.  But it seemed to me like he was on the fence, and the ugly bowl game pushed him over the edge.  I'm also not sure he said the things you're saying he said.  

MileHighWolverine

November 28th, 2013 at 10:40 AM ^

But how do you fire your current coach without knowing who is interested? He either got played by Harbaugh, which I doubt, or he knew he wanted Hoke and that was it. I get the feeling, more and more, that DB is the college version of Jerry Jones, including the meddling and micromanagement, and that he will cost us top talent in coaching because who wants to work for that guy?

Louie C

November 28th, 2013 at 1:11 PM ^

s Your third paragraph is 100% spot on. His incessant meddling and ego is unsettling to me because you're right, what elite level coach would here with that clown breathing down his neck and sitting in on film sessions? I like Hoke and really want him to succeed here, but I'm starting to think he was hired because Brandon is stuck on that tired Michigan man shit, and also because Hoke was the most passive and least polarizing of the Michigan man candidates.

Bodogblog

November 27th, 2013 at 8:24 PM ^

there are many ways to handle that mess of a situation (one RR helped create), hindsight solves all missteps of the moment, and when you rig the assumptions in your favor, anyone can "prove" their way of doing it would have been correct. On your second point, I disagree 100%.

SalvatoreQuattro

November 27th, 2013 at 9:31 PM ^

the internet. You are defending a guy who achieved ONE winning record(and NO wins vs MSU and OSU) while castigating a guy who has had a winning all three years(and who has actually beaten MSU and OSU). 

 

One would have to tried to real hard to write posts that are as poorly thought out as yours.

westwardwolverine

November 28th, 2013 at 11:19 AM ^

Why do people act like RR and Hoke took over the exact same rosters and played three seasons? And that with those exact same rosters, Hoke has his record and RR had his?

Your post shows a total lack of understanding of each regime. All three of Hoke's teams are more complete than any roster RR coached. Hoke's biggest hole in three years? Having to fill in the interior of his OLine with young 4 and 5 star offensive talent while the rest of the offense is surrounded by veteran talent. The offense hasn't even suffered an injury all year and they look abysmal. I'll repeat: Michigan has played a month of offensive football that only 12 other teams in six years have managed to get under.  That's insane. 

Hoke took over a team returning something like 20 starters in year one. Rodriguez I believe had 8,  one on offense. 

And guess what? In year three we're in the EXACT same spot with each coach! Total incompetence on one side of the ball. The only difference is, Hoke has had a relatively easy ride thanks the roster he inherited thanks to Rodriguez/Carr. 

MGoStrength

November 27th, 2013 at 8:06 PM ^

I don't mind having patience as long as the promised land eventually arrives.  But, it becomes increasingly difficult to believe when we watched OSU be better than us for so long while we struggle.  For the record I think Hoke and Mattison should stay and Borges and maybe some other offensive coaches need to go.  I think Hoke's recruiting success alone should give him the right to coach the guys he recruited as upperclassman.  But, there are other signs, or lack there of...mainly the regression over the course of this season, that gives you cause for concern about the guy in charge.  For me that's all it is at this point, cause for concern, but it's nontheless concerning.  Sometimes our passion and frustration get the better of our logic.  If I'm not mistaken the portion of our brains that controls logic has difficulty working when we are acting on emotion because emotion is a more primal drive than logic, which is more recently evolved.

M-Dog

November 27th, 2013 at 8:26 PM ^

Our recruiting gets an A.

Our Defense gets a B+, looking like it's moving toward an A.

Our problems have been on Offense.  If we just had the same mediocre Offense that MSU has, we'd be undefeated or only have 1 close loss.

We don't need to trash our recruiting and our Defense, we just need to fix our Offense.  If Hoke finds someone who can do that (and stays the hell out of his way), then we're on a good path.

That's what I'm hoping for.

michgoblue

November 27th, 2013 at 8:56 PM ^

I agree with the view that the D is a B+ and will likely be an A next year, but I wod grade the offense as an incomplete. Too many factors. First year in a new program, absolute worst 3-year stretch of OL recruiting in both numbers and aggregate talent (yes, I know Lewan is good, that's why I said aggregate), compete lack of TE on roster and aging a true frosh at that position, etc. If I had to guess , next year is a B-

I would personally give al another year, but at the same time if we get a great replacement then in fine with cutting him.

Bilg2.0

November 27th, 2013 at 7:54 PM ^

Now go get Cameron. Double his salary if necessary and match mattison to that level so he knows he is appreciated. Hoke needs to earn his raise with a couple B1G championships

mGrowOld

November 28th, 2013 at 10:26 AM ^

Wait a minute.  That's NOT you?  That's just an avatar?  I thought we had to post pictures of ourselves so people would know what we looked like.  

All this time I thought I was actually debating Brandon Graham yesterday when I had my run in with "Magnus", that Seth actually was a talking hat and people without avatars were invisable people.

This has made me re-think a lot of things.  Plus I'll need to change my avatar real quick!

NFG

November 27th, 2013 at 8:09 PM ^

With the progression Cam Cameron has made with LSU as their OC, I wonder if he'd come back home and take the same position? Mettenberger has looked so much better under his coaching and offense than before.

M-Dog

November 27th, 2013 at 8:44 PM ^

Borges' demeanor during his presser looks like he's come to the same realization.

I did not think that Hoke and the AD would make a move on Borges, given their narrative of youth and inexperience trumping all.  But given Borges' demeanor in his presser and Brandon's carefully worded statement, I'm am beginning to think they are going to move on Borges.

Brandon is anything if not a bottom line guy.  Given the crap home schedule next year, the last thing he needs is fans staying away for yet another reason.  A new OC would inject some interest into a mundane season next year, as opposed to the old OC keeping even more fans away.

 

Bodogblog

November 27th, 2013 at 9:11 PM ^

so many on this blog absolutely convince and reassure themselves that Dave Brandon is a cartoon character, who shuns all forms of life in the pursuit of money and the devouring of delicious brains of the unspoiled innocents, is just astounding. 1) he made a lot more money in private industry, 2) he came back because he loves Michigan

Bodogblog

November 27th, 2013 at 9:42 PM ^

straw man, additional pithy comments to follow, and a deep hatred from many that I suspect has roots in political bias and existed before Brandon ever made a move here. He's raised revenue and prices like everyone else in CFB (except he hasn't put ads in the stadium), he's corporate, he's screwed a few things up, he seems a bit arrogant. In my opinion he's done a great job in the Football hire, and retaining Beilein. Now that it's clear Borges won't cut it, it seems he and Hoke are addressing that as well.

MGoBender

November 27th, 2013 at 10:59 PM ^

My disdain for DB lies in other things.  The things you said are all true and they are the positives of his tenure.

However, DB had very little to do with retaining Beilein.  Beilein wanted to finish his career at Michigan before DB was hired.  DB simply had to draw up the paperwork after it became an obvious decision from the athletic department end.