September 1st, 2012 at 11:29 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:30 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:37 PM ^
Everytime You talk I will bring up this.. Please leave
September 1st, 2012 at 11:29 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:30 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:39 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:30 PM ^
This game was scheduled before Dave Brandon took the helm. Can't pin this on him
September 1st, 2012 at 11:43 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:57 PM ^
September 2nd, 2012 at 1:24 AM ^
- Brandon became AD in January 2010 (per Michigan Daily.)
- Michigan-Alabama announced October 2010 (mgoblog), with rumors in August)
September 2nd, 2012 at 8:30 AM ^
Is January before October? And was that still true 2 years ago?
September 2nd, 2012 at 12:27 AM ^
See the story in the freep.
(Edit: Click on "freep" above. Is it too much to ask, after all these years, that links be underlined?)
September 1st, 2012 at 11:30 PM ^
RAGE! MISPLACED ANGER AAAAAARGH!
etc.
September 1st, 2012 at 11:34 PM ^
September 2nd, 2012 at 12:34 AM ^
my faith is GREATLY shaken in Al Borges. Sorry, but that game plan was brutal. Similar to the couple pf debacles from last year where we went all I-Form.
September 1st, 2012 at 11:31 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:31 PM ^
Michigan is recognized as having the best unis in college football. Why F' with your brand?
Obviously the unis didn't affect the game, but I don't understand why he'd mess with brand recognition
September 1st, 2012 at 11:44 PM ^
The same reason every other school has 5000 uniforms now. To sell more jerseys.
However we are 1-2 in special jersey games ... so maybe they are affecting things :)
September 2nd, 2012 at 1:08 AM ^
2-2. Wins: ND & VT. Losses: MSU & Bama
September 1st, 2012 at 11:54 PM ^
I agree. We should have worn the normal home jerseys. BUT, it didn't help or help the game at all. Jerseys are jerseys, man. The team's performance is what should have bothered you!!
September 2nd, 2012 at 12:39 AM ^
You'll be wearing a lot of normal home jerseys when you're...
September 1st, 2012 at 11:31 PM ^
Hey. Better idea: Step away from MGoblog.
September 2nd, 2012 at 7:43 AM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:33 PM ^
Do you disagree? Do it in 2-3 years, fine. This kind of a loss can hurt your brand and recruiting, not to mention the injuries. It was a stupid idea.
September 1st, 2012 at 11:38 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:52 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:58 PM ^
Did anyone even really touch Denard when he hurt himself stretching for a first down? Did anyone even touch Countess when he injured himself trying to tackle the punt returner?
September 2nd, 2012 at 12:02 AM ^
He got clipped/pushed while he was the gunner as he was squaring up. So yes, I doubt that happens vs Western or Rice or whatever patsie we should have been playing.
When other teams are playing nobodies, you should play nobodies too.
September 2nd, 2012 at 12:16 AM ^
Are you saying Rice/Western's players are too little to clip/push people in the back? It's not like he got hit by some mass of humanity that only plays at the Bamas/USCs/LSUs of the world. A high school kid could have caused the same injury. It was a fluke.
September 2nd, 2012 at 12:29 AM ^
IIRC he got wrecked pretty good
September 2nd, 2012 at 7:48 AM ^
What is your proposal than? Play MAC schools and beat our chests while we are beating them by 4 touchdowns? Come on man. We scored more points than LSU did in both games against Alabama. We scored about a much as an SEC team did against Alabama. We were not the better team and we showed fight.
September 2nd, 2012 at 5:57 AM ^
Do you really believe the injuries in the game are why we got embarassed?
September 1st, 2012 at 11:32 PM ^
ohhhh you baby
September 1st, 2012 at 11:32 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:33 PM ^
I can't understand why devin brandon would put devin hoke in a situation like this. Fire all the devins!!
September 1st, 2012 at 11:33 PM ^
its dave's world. we just livin in it
September 2nd, 2012 at 8:59 AM ^
but true.
September 1st, 2012 at 11:33 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:35 PM ^
You would? Why? What is to gain from scheduling great teams? If you run the table in the Big Ten, you're probably going to get a shot at the title game regardless of who you play at the beginning of the year.
September 1st, 2012 at 11:38 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:40 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:40 PM ^
IIRC, this game was scheduled back when RR was struggling, but still considered a top shelf coach, who would be starting his 5th year and would have seniors that were HIS guys and a competitive, if not dominant team. They didn't draw this shit up last tuesday.
September 1st, 2012 at 11:41 PM ^
Whyy? So we can lose by three touchdowns the last game of the season instead of the first? I would hope that this experience helps the team realize where they are at, what they need to improve, and move in that direction. If you are a legitimate title contender it might make sense to shirk away from playing the best in your non-conference schedule, but I think its obvious that we aren't there yet. So how does the loss really hurt us? You really though this team was going 12-0? Even after tonight you think they have a decent shot at running the table?
September 1st, 2012 at 11:47 PM ^
Well, if you win, then there's a lot to gain. Can you imagine the insanity on the board if we would have won? Talk about a season and career-defining win for the Michigan football program. Recruiting, media hype, and all kinds of hooplah. Yes, it sucks we lost. And it's difficult to see any benefits of this game after such a rough defeat, but there are some major potential rewards for scheduling games like these.
September 1st, 2012 at 11:38 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:34 PM ^
now we know how far we have to go to be an elite team. I hope this loss sticks in Hoke's mind for a long time
September 1st, 2012 at 11:35 PM ^
September 1st, 2012 at 11:36 PM ^
For another great topic, who's everybody voting for in November???