Wolverine0056

March 23rd, 2011 at 9:48 AM ^

I was hoping for a more in depth video, but it will do for now to feed my football needs. I love the competition between players like RVB and Denard. Stuff like that makes you better and we definitely need that, especially on defense.

lbpeley

March 23rd, 2011 at 9:50 AM ^

White practice pants! AAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!! I hate Adidas!!!

 

/s

 

EDIT: Dammit, Tripp!

In reply to by lbpeley

exmtroj

March 23rd, 2011 at 12:03 PM ^

Well, with Nike we could have a pro combat uni with claws exploding out the shoulder and a steel-colored winged helmet to reflect the regions auto-producing heritage. We're missing out.

BlockM

March 23rd, 2011 at 9:54 AM ^

They know the fanbase all too well. How many emails do you think the athletic department will get from people who were so outraged that they turned the video off before they explained the pants? Over under set at 50.

GoBlueInNYC

March 23rd, 2011 at 10:11 AM ^

Wasn't there a comment from a lineman before the 2009 Iowa game about never wanting to wear white pants? I can't remember who said it, but it was something along the lines of "some of us lineman already have body issues, and you want us to put on white pants on national TV? There's no way we're ever doing that."

MazenBlue4ever

March 23rd, 2011 at 10:42 AM ^

Its a Good Sign that the D-Line is applying pressure to the qb's but is that a bad sign for the O-Line not protecting the qb long enough or not strong enough? I cant wait until the media can go to a practice and watch so we can get more information about who has improved and what may need improving over the summer.

 

GO Blue!!!!!

JDVan

March 23rd, 2011 at 1:14 PM ^

Denard was sacked in that clip due to the pressure first applied by Martin that he side stepped. I would not be worried that Mike "Beastly" Martin is beating Khoury.

If anything I was impressed with Denard side stepping the DT rush and inserting himself back in the pocket.

FeelinBlue

March 23rd, 2011 at 1:41 PM ^

adidas didnt even have michigan in their new ad.

guess whos in it instead. ND.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jE9wbeJSqIc&feature=pyv&ad=8341816907&kw=adidas

o one more thing. they put a clip of Kyle Rudolph TD against Mich. o wait...didnt mich win that game? yes thats right adidas. highest paid sponsor deserve more love and better products plz?

FeelinBlue

March 23rd, 2011 at 1:41 PM ^

adidas didnt even have michigan in their new ad.

guess whos in it instead. ND.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jE9wbeJSqIc&feature=pyv&ad=8341816907&kw=adidas

o one more thing. they put a clip of Kyle Rudolph TD against Mich. o wait...didnt mich win that game? yes thats right adidas. highest paid sponsor deserve more love and better products plz?

RagingBean

March 23rd, 2011 at 11:43 AM ^

If having Addidas means that we will never have  "combat" uniforms for us then I will never say a word against them.

 

Also, love Denard and RVB arguing over sacks!

The Baughz

March 23rd, 2011 at 12:15 PM ^

Im with you. I love white pants. Dont really care what other people think. All white would look sweet. Not saying to wear that every road game, but still, theres nothing wrong switching the style up once in a while.

trussll12

March 23rd, 2011 at 2:11 PM ^

Great -- considering that we tied for 10th in the country (and tied for 1st in the Big Ten) in sacks allowed last year, cannot wait to see that go "downhill."  Reminds me of that article about how RR's offense sometimes resulted in wide receivers being wide open -- as if that is a bad thing.  (In fairness to Hoke-Borges, SDSU was tied for 5th in country in sacks allowed, althought I'm wracking my brain to think of all those stout MWC defenses they faced.)

maizeandblue21

March 23rd, 2011 at 6:11 PM ^

deal back in 08 i may be wrong on the length but it should end in 2016. I'm hoping they put an option to opt out of the contract 3 years before so we can go back to Nike though.