Purdue game wrap (with pics!)

Purdue game wrap (with pics!)

Submitted by SFBayAreaBlue on November 1st, 2011 at 7:17 PM

Maybe it won't be like last time...

 

(edit: Embed fail http://youtu.be/Qpux-Drk6EY?t=37s)

And even if it is, maybe that's not such a bad thing. Ok? ... Ok.

There was something rather familiar about Saturdays' game against Purdue. For the first time in a long time, that felt like "Michigan fergodsakes!" There was just something about the way we dominated and put the game away.  It brought back my idealized memories of how Michigan would roll over the rabble of the big ten in year's past.

I enrolled at Michigan in the fall of 1995, Lloyd Carr's first year. And of the 40 odd games that I've attended in person, all but 2 were under his direction.  

This wasn't cupcake nonconference, this wasn't baby seal U, this wasn't even one of the worst Minnesota teams in the last half century.  This was a normal, lower tier big ten team that was coming off a victory over a previously ranked team.  And they had maybe 4 or 5 good plays against us all game.  (the screen TD, Denard's INT, the transcontinental to Siller, and maybe you count the final TD and their QB scramble).  

The game wasn't as close as the score.  Take away their garbage time TD, and give us another 11 points if we execute a little better on the goal line and we're talking about a 40 point blow out.  

But it's not just the score that made me reminisce on the Lloyd days. It was the way we did it; we just had better athletes.  And we used that advantage to make  the game boring.  Even though the lead was only 3 possessions, by the middle of the 3rd quarter there was absolutely no drama left that we might blow the game.  And it's been a long time since I've felt that way when we've played a bigten team.  I guess the Minnesota game didn't make me feel that because they didn't feel like a bigten team, and we were still scoring points. By the time the 4th quarter started on Saturday,  I was thinking we'd only get 2 more possessions since we were grinding the clock out so fast.  

I actually fell asleep before the game finished, (granted that was about 4 am local time and my BAC was significant).  When I woke up, I had the rest of the day to ponder, 'do I like boring old Michiganfergodsakes?'

Was it really so bad?

Towards the end of the Lloyd years, we had grown accustomed to 9 and 10 win seasons and a bowl loss.  And frankly we were bored with them.  We had become frustrated with having a roster full of NFL talent that would only call dive plays once we had a double digit lead.  And then 7-5 came, and we called it "the year of infinite pain".  Oh summer child, what did we know of pain?  Little did we know that Richrod was coming.  

After the Horror, it was pretty clear that Lloyd's retirement was somewhat of a mutual split between him and the fanbase.  I freely admit that I was fed up, and wanted change.  You can count me amongst those that wanted RR to succeed.

In a way, I loved Lloyd.  I still think he's a great role model.  If I ever have a son, I would point at Lloyd as someone he should look up to. But toward's the end, I thought that his risk aversion and gameday decision making was impairing our ability to win big games.  

There's been a lot of harsh words directed at Lloyd in light of the revelations in John Bacon's book.  I don't believe he acted maliciously. I hope not, anyway. I just think Lloyd was just being Lloyd.  He never liked the spotlight, and he resented the media.  This was apparent from his first news conference (which, if anyone has video of this, I'd love to see it again) in the wake of Moeller's firing.  

I like to believe that he was just trying to be loyal to his players.  From a program perspective, that might have been a mistake.  Ok, it was definitely bad for the program.  And the program needed someone to be like Bo, to be the face of the university, to force people to work things out.  But that's not who Lloyd was, it just wasn't in his DNA.  

The details seem to get lost in history.  People forget that things started kinda shaky in '95 and '96.  We lost 4 games both years (just one less than the 'year of infinite pain').  And then came the miracle year of 97, and Lloyd could never live up to that standard again.  It's like when poor married couples go on an expensive, once in a lifetime honeymoon, all the sex after that just seems a little bit pale in comparison.  

Do we really want to go down that road again?

I admit it, I wanted the hot young model.  I think Jim Harbaugh would have been very successful as a head coach here.  He would have been fiery, and dramatic, and when we finally score 48 points on OSU, he'd have gone for 2.  But Harbaugh probably would have gotten bored with us and ran off to the pro's while he still had his looks.  So maybe it's better this way.  Maybe someday he'll get tired of that and be ready to settle into a comfy college job.  

Until then we've got Hoke.  Brady Hoke and his magical golden poop.  (From top to bottom, I can't remember the bigten ever being weaker.  Bigten teams are going to get smashed come bowl time.)  Hoke fits like a comfortable old shoe.  But he's not the old shoe.  He's not kicking field goals on 4th and inches.  He's like that old shoe, but back when it had fresh treads.  

And then I realized, it's not about da shoes.  The thing that changed was me.  I'm ready to go back to 9-3 season's again.  I'm willing to tolerate 8-4 years if they're balanced with 10-2.  I might even be able to stomach the very infrequent 7-5 year if it's offset with a couple 11-1's and 12-0's.  And I don't need last second comeback drives against Indiana to be entertained.  Saturday's stomping of Purdue was boring, and entertaining, and filled with more satisfaction than I've felt in years.

Play it again, Sam. 

So it's week 9, the 8th game of the year, and we're starting to develop some patterns.  If you were to blindfold me and make me predict what's going to happen next week, I could just think about this week and rattle off:

  • Mike Martin makes a big play
  • Craig Roh makes a mistake, but then makes a big play
  • Kovacs makes a big play
  • Jake Ryan has a mental breakdown and loses contain
  • Jake Ryan blows someone up in the backfield
  • A CB misses a tackle
  • Molk makes a great block
  • Denard has a sweet run
  • Denard has a horrible interception
  • XXXX receiver fights for a jump ball or adjusts to the under thrown bomb
  • Vincent is wide open for a throwback screen. 
  • The defense causes a couple of flukeyish takeaways. 

And you could probably run that against most of our games this year and not be very far off.  The lack of a Vincent screen and a successful jumpball against MSU could easily be blamed for the score deficit of two weeks ago.  

The major differences this week were the reverses and the excellent production from the Tailback position.  

Let's see that again. 

Bad Roh, Good Roh

I've been bitching about our lack of a bubblescreen, because it's a simple fucking play, that works.  Especially if you get a favorable matchup with personnel. 

Rohbubblescreen

On Purdue's first drive, they've got Craig Roh lined up against the slot man.  Even though he's into the boundary, he's not going to win a footrace to the sideline. 

Rohbubblescreen2

They only need 3 yards for the first down, and with the Corner playing 8 yards off, the bubble screen is a nearly automatic 5 yards unless the man in Roh's position has a lot more speed in space than Craig.  

Rohbubblescreen3

He's thinking about his flat responsibility in the zone, but what he should be thinking is that he's got to get out to that 2nd man and ignore the blocker.  

Rohbubblescreen4

JT Floyd, doesn't use his hands well enough and lets the blocker get into his body, Roh is almost in position to make a play, but he's taking a bad angle.  

Rohbubblescreen5

Defensive snapshots where more than one defender is on the ground and the ball carrier is hopping past them, are never good for the defense. Morgan is also taking a bad angle and is barely there in time to escort the WR out of bounds after a huge gain. 

But when Purdue tried to come back to it on their next drive, we played it much better.

rohbubblescreenadjust

Here's our first appearance of golden poop.  We're futzing around with flip-flopping the D-line and Roh is getting a late start.  But because he's still running to get in position when the ball is snapped, he's got momentum built up and quickly gets out on the receivers.

rohbubblescreenadjust2

This time Floyd does a better job of taking on the blocker and forcing the play back inside. 

rohbubblescreenadjust3

With Roh in position and Floyd not getting knocked on his ass, the pursuit closes off any cutbacks and the ballcarrier has no place to go.  

Mike Martin : Bruce Banner mode

The difference between a good athlete and a great football player is understanding the game. Mike Martin destroys this outside zone read because he recognizes the blocking assignments.

martinzoneread

If you haven't watched the excellent (if somewhat corny) video by fishduck, you should check it out. The RB is next to QB so this should be an outside zone play.  The O-line all slant to the wideside of the field.  If the RB can get to the corner, he should get about 7-10 yards with good blocking as everyone is accounted for except the deep safety. Martin has seen this in practice about a zillion times from the Richrod days and beats his man to the spot and gets penetration. For Oregon, this is no problem, because the cutback is just as good as the designed play.  

martinzoneread2

But Martin sees the cutback and tosses his man to the side so he can come back underneath and make the tackle.   Our LB's are actually a little slow to react and would have been in trouble if the RB had continued to bounce it outside.  

martinzoneread3

If it weren't for Martin, this play has a decent design to pick up lots of yards.  The guards are scraping off their initial reach blocks and releasing to the 2nd level.  Roh is unblocked because it's expected that the QB fake will hold him in position.  If the center and left tackle had gotten better blocks, this play gets an easy first down.  But Heimerdinger beats his block too. 

martinzoneread4

So the three of them converge to make the gang tackle.  

Mike Martin: Getting Angry...

martinsafety

On the safety, Martin had to fight through a hold to get the sack.  (and a bit of facemask)

Mike Martin: Hulk Smash! mode

Before we even get to halftime its apparent that the Boiler's can't block Martin one on one, so they keep in the RB to help out.

hulksmash

Martin uses his hands so well.  He does an outside move on the left guard and gets by him easily.

hulksmash2

The RB sees him come free and moves to pick him up.

hulksmash3

When you're a little guy, trying to block a much bigger man, they teach you to go low. 

hulksmash4

Because this is what happens if you don't go low. 

hulksmash5

You get sent airborne. 

hulksmash6

and knocked back 4 yards, (or more if those other guys hadn't been there)

hulksmash7

This other angle shows how badly off balance this guy gets knocked back.  

Bad Tackling, Good Tackling

Late in the 4th quarter, both starting cornerbacks were in the game when most other starters had left the field.  You gotta think that's partly because of a lack of depth at DB, and partly because they both weren't very great at run support or tackling.  

On the long screen for a TD, Countess was the only man with a chance to make the play, and he missed. 

RPSscreen

But I don't really blame him.  We got caught in a blitz.  This play was always going to be a touchdown unless one of the blockers completely whiffed.  

RPSscreen2

Which almost happened. Blake does a good job to slip the block. 

RPSscreen3

But the blocker had gotten just enough of him to prevent him from making the shoestring tackle.  They say football is a game of inches. There's about 6 inches standing between a 5 yard gain and a 50 yard TD. 

There's better examples of DB's (mostly Floyd) not breaking down to make the tackle, or not coming up aggressively enough in run support.  By I'd rather show them an example of what you're supposed to do.

morgankickoff

On this kickoff, Morgan does a great job of taking on the blocker

morgankickoff2

And then he disengages to make the tackle.

morgankickoff3

He hits the ball carrier right in the midsection with perfect form and wraps up and holds on until help arrives. 

I'll take "improved running game" for $100, Alex

So, it's just Purdue, but that's what I call manball. And it started with our first play from scrimmage. 

1stplay

Purdue has an alignment problem because they didn't pick up the unbalanced line.  This might be the first time we've used it extensively this year.  

1stplay2

The end is left unblocked because he has to respect Denard on the bootleg.  This is fine as long as the guy isn't fast enough to tackle Denard before he can make the handoff (like what MSU did to TSIO). So we've got two pulling lineman and a fullback giving us a huge numbers advantage on the play side.

1stplay3

We get a good kickout block, and Molk does an excellent job of peeling back to get the linebacker.  Hopkins is leading through the hole like any good fullback. 

1stplay4

Fullback is a deceptively skilled position.  You've got to be able to read the hole like a TB and then be both fast enough to get to the block, and big enough to make the block.  Here, Hopkins has to choose which of the free men to block.  If he picks the linebacker, that ensures a solid gain and puts Fitz one-on-one with the safety with room to make a move.  If he thinks the LB won't make the play then he should block the safety which often leads to long TD runs. 

1stplay5

He chooses to go after the safety, which I think is the right choice.  But without eyes in the back of his head, he doesn't realize that Fitz is making a beeline towards the sideline. 

1stplay6

So he ends up not blocking anybody. 

1stplay7

And he knows he's got to hit SOMEBODY.  That coulda been a TD.(probably not, as the WR didn't sustain his block). 

To the house!

So, did Fitz and Shaw perform a Vulcan mind meld during the bye week?  If so, it worked.  Fitz was bouncing the play outside all day, and Shaw had what I think is his best run of the year by busting through the line.  Someone mentioned that Purdue has a better than average interior D-line (i guess) which would explain some of the bouncing outside.  But who told Shaw he could run through tackles?

Fitzhomerun

On this Denard fake jetsweep counter pitch, the boilers are in good position to stop the play for a moderate gain.  But they've got two guys who are jogging around waiting for the play to develop instead of attacking the LOS. *cough*JTFloyd*cough*. But look at Molk, He's not really designed to be in this play, he's just hustling to make a block.  

Fitzhomerun2

Fitz is reading the play and sees the defenders over-run it, so he cuts back. .  #3 is in pursuit and should close off the cutback. But Molk and now #75 are following the play. 

Fitzhomerun3

Fitz sees the two unblocked defenders and breaks down to make a move.  

Fitzhomerun4

It's just at that moment that Molk catches up and gets a twofer. Schofield is also making himself useful by getting in the way of the pursuit.    

Fitzhomerun5

#2 is in good position to make the stop, but his momentum is in the wrong direction as Fitz is now running against the grain. 

Fitzhomerun6

But here's the amazing part.  When he sees the lane open up in the middle, he just turns on the jets. 

Fitzhomerun7

This is the speed we haven't really seen from Fitz on the field.  Maybe reports of him being dinged up were true and now he's finally healthy. (He should be after having 3 weeks off). 

Shaw's TD came from some improvisation on a simple lead dive. 

shawhomerun

The boiler DT get's a good push up front to disrupt the play. Hopkins has to help block him instead of getting to the free linebacker.  Odoms is coming around for the end around fake that will hold the unblocked end. 

shawhomerun2

Shaw sees that the play side is clogged up, so he cuts back.  So now he has to deal with an unblocked safety instead of an unblocked LB => more yards.  

shawhomerun3

The right guard doesn't get the best of blocks and his man starts coming off of him to make the tackle.  But Shaw sees just enough daylight to make him decide to accelerate through the hole. 

shawhomerun4

Normally, this is where Shaw falls down for a minimal gain, but on this play he keeps his balance.

shawhomerun5

And he shows off a little leg strength to fight through the contact. 

shawhomerun6

Then he does what he does best and shows off his top gear outracing the defender to the pylon.  

I know I've been critical of him on this blog, but that's because he's very frustrating.  Physically he's got all the tools to be a great back, ala Chris Perry.  His vision might be half a notch down, and I haven't seen him much in the passing game.  But he's got the speed, and if he learned how to harness his talents, he could be making runs like this on a regular basis.  Anyway, this was a great run. 

ETC:

  • The defense is playing so much better than last year.  But the last two games have seen waaaaaay too many arm tackles.  I'm not liking that. 
  • One game is not a season.  Playcalling vs. Minnesota, Northwestern, and Purdue was great, creative, and effective.  Playcalling vs. MSU, eh ... not so much. I hope this isn't establishing a trend where we have zany fun stuff against Iowa and Illinois and go into a shell against NE and TSIO. 
  • Rocketman! I didn't notice the helmet on the low quality streams

rocketman

  • The theme for homecoming was something about space, and the wavefield got some love on TV. That wavefield was like a 2nd home for me for 3 years. 

wavefield

  • Obligatory. 

derpderp

Minnesota game wrap (with pics!)

Minnesota game wrap (with pics!)

Submitted by SFBayAreaBlue on October 3rd, 2011 at 12:27 PM

Blah, blah, punching bag, blah...

I thought it was going to be easy, I didn't think it was going to be that easy.  And while it might be fun for a little while, by the 2nd half it was kind of embarrassing and pointless; unless you're a second stringer.  We got a glimpse of some of the younger players, so I guess that's good from a program standpoint, if not from a viewer's POV.  

You had me at hello...

Ok, so maybe I hadn't ever heard of you before you got hired, Mr. Borges.  But what you did on Saturday, well, I haven't smiled like that since 1947, and I wasn't even alive in 1947.

You found a way to effectively use two of our best (highest rated) players on the same play.  You sowed confusion and hesitation into opposing players and DC's.  You called a halfback pass that was freaking WIDE OPEN.  

To be true, I was a little worried about some of the playcalling in the first halves of the previous games.  But after demonstrating so much flexibility and creativity in that game, you've won me over.  

My hat is off to you, sir.

It's the simple things ...

At its core, football is really just about blocking and tackling.  Almost anyone can draw up a play (or copy it from someone else). But it really is about how well the players execute that makes the difference between good teams and bad teams.  Of course, it is easier to execute when your guys are bigger, faster, and more talented.  

Denard's first TD was a good playcall, but the blitzing OLB didn't take himself out of the play like he was supposed to.

denardbreaktackle

He almost brings down Denard from behind.

denardbreaktackle2

But I'm really impressed with the increase in Denard's leg strength this year.  He's broken through a lot more arm tackles than last season.   Other than the blitzer, we've got a hat on a hat.  It's up to the QB to make one man miss, and he does, because he's awesome.

denardbreaktackle3

And the highest praise I can give a WR is to note when they sustain blocks downfield.  Here we've got three guys making me think good things about them.

This next play is a type of sprint draw to Shaw

wall

The blocking is setup perfectly by the fake and there's a wall to the outside.

gallonblockshawoops

Unfortunately Shaw misreads this great crackback block by Gallon and dances too much. He loses momentum and gets tackled for a modest gain.  (more on this later)

When your players are too small, or slow, or confused to execute properly, you end up looking like Gophers.  

minnyblocking

The Minny O-line has actually gotten their assignments correct and have a small crease opened up. The pulling linemen has to choose which of the run-blitzers he needs to pick up.

minnyblocking2

He chose ... poorly.  And the rest of our front seven collapse the hole.  

And when you've got guys like Mike Martin and Will Campbell that can just run over people, that's nice.

bwcfree

If you're wondering who was supposed to block BWC, it's that lump of white that RVB is trampling over while he drives his own blocker into the backfield.  

bwcfree2

That looks painful.

So underneath all the fancy chalk talk, it really helps to have guys that can win one on one battles, and go to the correct places. It's all just blocking, tackling, and misdirection. 

Blocking,

vincentchoices

Tackling,

rvbfree

And throwing to guys who are wide open.

dileowideopen

Blocking,

damnref

Tackling,

brinkfumble

And throwing to guys who are wide open.

vincewideopen

Blocking,

shawsweep

Tackling,

countess

And throwing to guys who are wide open.

kogerwideopen

 

The RB Committee. 

At this point in the season, Fitz and Vince have clearly established themselves as options #1 and #2 on the depth chart.  I think Fitz can be that everydown back we need, but we'll have to see how well he holds up against non-laughable bigten defenses.  With his TD trifecta, Vince just proved he's not a runningback.  Vincent Smith is just a football player.  And a damn good one.  

Shaw... step into my office son. As a senior, you should be a team leader.  You have track star speed.  Your ball security has dramatically improved from the RR era.  And we can really tell that you run with great effort and determination.  But dude, STOP DANCING.  You're not a dancer.  

You're wasting all that great speed because during the time that you should be accelerating, you're two footing around in the backfield.  You're not setting up and reading your blockers well enough.  And you're still lacking that certain leg strength to run through arm tackles.  

When someone grabs Denard's jersey, he runs so hard that the jersey rips away.  You looked like someone hooked a towing cable to your bumper.  

You've got a lot of potential.  But just cut down on the moves.  Make one cut and get upfield.  Or better yet, make one cut and race fools to the sideline.  Chris Perry made a career of that.  And learn to fall forward fergodsakes.  Instead of trying to dance around the tackler, deliver a blow and fall forward. If we really are going to play man ball, the difference between a 3.3 ypc average and 4.0 ypc average caused by simply falling forward is going to be a big deal.  

And that goes for all the youngsters too. 

Hopkins looks like he might have a bright future as a B.J. Askew-esque FB.  It's just Minnesota, but he got one of those fabled 'double blocks' that all FB's dream about.  And he seems to catch the ball pretty well.  

And we learned a little bit about Rawls, albeit in garbage time.  Early returns show good balance, decent speed, but not terribly explosive or shifty.  He kinda reminds me of Kevin Grady, but not quite as chiseled.  Let's just say he's got a low aspect ratio for a tailback.  Looks pretty strong around the thighs and midsection.  I'm thinking he could eat himself into a starring FB role in a year or two.  

Etc.

  • If Denard is called "Shoelace", maybe Devin can be called "Shoeless"

shoeless

  • The FG kicking is quietly becoming a non-ulcer-inducing facet of our team. 
  • However, the kickoff coverage still sucks, I'm so glad we got to practice 11 of them this game.
  • I really like it when crowd's continue to sing a song after the band/PA system has to cut off.  But there's a time and place for it.  Livin' on a Prayer should be reserved for something like near the end of a close Redwings game where the line "We're halfway there" makes sense. Leading by 40+ in the third quarter calls for something more like "Sweet Caroline" because "Good time never felt so good." (Even if it is cliche') 

Hard to Disagree with Both "Sides"

Hard to Disagree with Both "Sides"

Submitted by snoopblue on November 29th, 2010 at 10:28 PM

Disclaimer: This is my opinion. And for the record, because the decision to keep or fire Rich Rodriguez is completely out of my hands, I no longer have an opinion on the subject. I trust the people in charge and will go with whatever decision they make. Unlike most of these other diaries, this has no statistics. They just aren't my thing. I warn you, this is long. It is basically my rationale for being rational. Take it for what it is worth... Thanks.

 

After the Ohio State beatdown, I was angry and wanted RR fired. Sunday I was too angry about the Wiki Leaks guy so I cooled down a little bit. On Monday, after seeing Denard Robinson win the Big Ten Offensive Player of the Year award, I've cooled down significantly and am looking at things more rationally, but not delusionally by any means.

Rich Rodriguez has done a terrible job coaching this team his first three years. When his WVU DC wasn't coming, he should have kept Ron English because he doesn't know shit about defense and/or the Big Ten. Ron English wasn't the greatest DC, but he was young, had energy and the respect of the kids that we had. RR should have adjusted his offense to Threet's talents, but he either didn't know how or was too stubborn. Then comes Tate, played well but he was a Freshman - what did you expect? Then Denard played flat out amazing but still he was a first year starter (Who won Big Ten OPOY). The defense? Can't honestly say Greg or Shafer are terrible coordinators or RR is a moron for forcing a system and staff upon them (or both). Either way, the entire coaching has failed when it comes to tackling. Every football player needs to know how to tackle with proper form. Offense on turnovers, special teams, and obviously defense. That is a fundamental. RR needs to give up on his defense philosophy and fire his friend Tony Gibson. On special teams, the kicking game is partly RR's fault, but Gibbons was a bust. Hagerup is great. Poor tackling on returns - that is mostly on Tony Gibson and partly on the other coaches for not teaching this fundamental football move. I don't know if they break down special teams film to look at teams blocking schemes on special teams, but uh, it didn't look like it. The injuries in 2010 really hurt, especially on defense and in our run game. Red zone turnovers by a first year starter at QB really killed us in some of those games, too.

 

It's a real conundrum we are in. Fire him and somewhat start over with a new guy, although I think the transition wouldn't be as bad as 2008 with a coach that isn't as stubborn as RR. Or say that for the first time, we have a returning QB that has proved he is electric. A stable of great WRs and RBs, many who are upperclassmen. Solid OL. Solid incoming recruits. Defense returning from an injury plagued year with many young players that had on the job training and game experience that will have an entire new staff running their own that is actually effective in defending Big Ten offenses (that is a MUST if RR stays). If RR can't handle an autonomous defense, then he is not all in for Michigan and should be fired. You want to build the best program in America right? Then bring in the best Defensive Coordinator and Staff you can find and let them do it their way, the same way you do it with your offense.

I pity David Brandon for having to make this decision. It basically makes or breaks his legacy as an AD. (And could have an impact on his political future, who knows.) Fans, media and former players all calling for the coach's head. Does he succumb to their demands? Does he see what I stated above and say "One More Year?" If he gives him another year and we have great season in 2011, he is a genius. T shirts will be made, "Patience is a virtue? No - David Brandon is patience." If we flop, he is a chump with no credibility.

 

In 2008 when Rich Rodriguez was hired, there were people who didn't like him. 3-9? More people didn't like him. First NCAA violations in program history? More. 5-7? More. 7-5 with poundings by Big Ten's elite? Even more. And it's hard to argue against those people, it has not been pretty or fun by any means. And then there are the people who stood by the coach no matter what, because he was the Michigan coach. As long as they always pulled for Michigan to win, these groups are the same - just passionate Michigan fans with strong opinions. And today, there is a supposed divide amongst the Michigan faithful. FIRE HIM NOW and WAIT AND SEE. These groups are also one in the same - one views the glass half full, the other half empty. The WAIT AND SEE group is no doubt angry with the way this coach has mismanaged and poorly coached his way into a hole in the job of a lifetime and straight up dragged Michigan through the mud. With all the drama and losing the past couple years, they still ask for patience because they want to see where this thing goes when some stability is involved (minus the defensive coaches =)..) The FIRE HIM NOW group wants to...well..FIRE HIM NOW. And you can't really blame them for feeling this way after the past few seasons. At the same time, as much as they were saddened, angered and frustrated by watching the games we lost, they can't tell me that they weren't thrilled watching Denard Robinson go apeshit on Notre Dame or the defense coming through in 3OT against Illinois. I know you can argue that all the wins, yards and points came against lesser opponents, a back-up QB at ND and vs. UCONN, Bowling Green. You can argue that we played close games against bad teams. (We did, FCS UMASS 42-37 are you kidding me?) You can argue that we were not even close in any of our losses, and that most yards and points came in on clean-up duty defenses. Once again, you are probably right. You don't even have to argue about the defense. However, you can't argue against the fact that our offense has shown flashes of being unstoppable and that the defense was plagued by freak injuries that forced inexperienced players, young and old, to play in games they had no business seeing the field in. We are stuck between a rock and a hard place. If you want the coach to stay for one more year, you should be able to support him and still agree that he has done a horrendous job thus far and excuses about the cupboard being bare aren't applicable anymore. You should demand he stays away from the defense. If you want him fired now, ask yourself this question. If you could turn the page and take a peek as to what 2011 holds for Michigan Football with Rich Rodriguez, would you be curious enough to take a look? If you would, then maybe your mind isn't as made up as you thought it was.