Nate Silver Predicts the Tournament

Nate Silver Predicts the Tournament

Submitted by cheesheadwolverine on March 15th, 2011 at 1:38 AM

By combining two things I geek out about -- politics and sports statistics -- Nate Silver has become something of a legend in my own mind.  Plus he's from Michigan.  Briefly, he's a baseball statistician who rose to prominance by predicting the 2008 election better than any polls and has since become a sort of pop-statistician for the New York Times doing both election and sports predictions.  He has come out with a bracket largely based on KenPom and similar computer rankings adjusted for injuries, locations and the like (as far as I can tell it hasn't been adjusted for current form, which is why Villanova isn't given a 0% chance of winning their first game).  It picks Tennessee to win, so I'm angry at it right now, but it's worth a look and at least as legit as Joe Lunardi.

http://ncaabracket.nytimes.com/2011/bracket/men/fivethirtyeight-forecast

OT - College Fantasy Football + Michigan Projections

OT - College Fantasy Football + Michigan Projections

Submitted by SEAL Fan on July 30th, 2010 at 11:24 PM

 

Here are the projected fantasy football outcomes for Michigan courtesy of  http://collegefb.cbssports.com/splash/collegefb/spln/single

 

 

Rough estimate of 319 offensive points this season with 20 rushing touchdowns and 20 passing touchdowns.  Obviously, this is not their prediction for the team as a whole this season and only looks at Michigan’s starters.  Additionally, the good people at CBS have severely underestimated Flash Dilithium. 

Finally, post your email if you want to join my college fantasy league over at CBSsports.com.  I’ve never played college fantasy football and want to give it a try. 

 

Tate Forcier -  2400 passing yards, 19 touchdowns and 8 interceptions.  200 rushing yards for 2 touchdowns.

Denard Robinson –  100 passing yards, 1 touchdown.  400 rushing yards and 5 touchdowns….LOL…

Fitzgerald Toussaint – 500 rushing yards, 5 rushing touchdowns and 150 reception yards.

Vincent Smith -  380 rushing yards, 3 touchdowns.  80 reception yards and 1 touchdown.

Michael Cox – 450 rushing yards and 3 touchdowns.

Michael Shaw – 300 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns.

Roy Roundtree – 600 receiving yards and 6 touchdowns.

Junior Hemingway -  400 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns.

Martavious Odoms – 300 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns.

Kevin Koger – 300 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns.

Brendan Gibbons – 13/17 on field goals.

Defense and Special Teams -  16 forced fumbles, 10 interceptions and 18 sacks.  97th ranked defense, Michigan State comes in at 100 and UCONN at 101.

2010 Football, Injuries, & freshmen

2010 Football, Injuries, & freshmen

Submitted by StephenRKass on March 22nd, 2010 at 10:54 AM

I have read a good part of the posts and threads on being dead right and dead wrong on 2010 football. Interesting, and some good points.

I believe we will have a winning season. The experience, seasoning, and continuity with Gerg as the DC will make a difference.

However, there are at least two variable factors that make it impossible to predict whether we have six wins or nine.

First, it is impossible to predict injuries. As we saw with Molk last year, and with the running backs to some degree, critical injuries are especially bad for Michigan, because of our lack of depth. If we largely remain healthy through the season, I believe we will be on the upper end (eight or nine wins.) On the other hand, if we have significant line injuries, if Tate & Denard go down, if our fastest receivers go down, we could be sunk. Of course, our opponents will have to deal with their own injuries, another variable affecting the W-L column.

Second, it is impossible to predict the ability of the incoming freshman class, and even to some degree the red-shirt freshman and early enrollees now going through Spring Practice. We will have a clue after the next month of practice, but only a clue. You just don't know for sure until guys are on the field. For instance, I remember criticism when Mike Hart was recruited and given a scholarship. He definitely proved the naysayers wrong.

If we can survive this year, each subsequent year should improve. The reason is that our depth will improve, and we will be able to bring solid players in off the bench. In fact, even this coming season, if we can make it to at least the half-way point with few injuries, the incoming freshman will be better prepared to step in and contribute. In our secondary last year, the lack of depth was disastrous.

My best guess is 7 or 8 wins. However, if we stay healthy at all the critical positions, if we have a higher success rate among freshman then is typical, if turnovers go down, if one or two of our critical rivals have a devastating injury (or crime spree, etc.) we could go as high as 9 wins, even 10 with miracles. If we have terrible injuries ourself, we could go down to six wins. My hope, even if this happens, is that RR still gets another year. I have felt consistently that 2011 will be the critical year.

After two years with RR, I believe more strongly that the program was not in good health when he arrived. I think it is comparing apples to oranges to compare RR's record at WVa and Tulane to UofM. Because those programs didn't have the high expectations present at Michigan, he was able to make a much larger impact in a shorter amount of time.