Mike Barwis New Show "American Muscle" premiers July 9

Mike Barwis New Show "American Muscle" premiers July 9

Submitted by umhero on June 12th, 2014 at 11:47 AM

Mike Barwis has a new reality show premiering on the Discovery Channel next month.

At the Barwis Methods Training Center, Mike Barwis and his staff of dedicated, blue collar trainers take on everyone from NFL players, to Wild West bull riders, to paraplegics looking to walk again.

This season on AMERICAN MUSCLE, Barwis and his team of trainers will be working with several professional athletes at the top of their respective fields, including: Richard Sherman (Seattle Seahawks), Nick Swisher (Cleveland Indians), Rashad Evans (UFC), Ndamukong Suh (Detroit Lions), DeAndre Jordan (Los Angeles Clippers), Pierre Garcon (Washington Redskins), Shawne Merriman (former NFL player),  Baron Davis (former NBA player), and many more.

It should be fun to watch. It will be fun to hear that gravelly voice again. Do you think his wolves will make an appearance?


OT: Pro Bowl selections: Detroit Lions

OT: Pro Bowl selections: Detroit Lions

Submitted by The Barwis Effect on December 28th, 2013 at 12:31 AM

Simply assinine...

He had the best season of his career, led the NFL in interceptions a good portion of the season and week after week made plays for the Detroit Lions

Yet DeAndre Levy saw Friday night come and go without what would have been a Pro Bowl selection, something that seemed likely throughout the season. 

Only two Lions are definite Pro Bowlers this season, as receiver Calvin Johnson and defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh were picked. What is more surprising is the players who were named alternates -- and those who weren't. 

That's where the real surprise of Levy comes into play. He wasn't even named as an alternate despite having career bests in interceptions (six) and tackles this season. He was also a main component of why the Lions were among the top run defenses in the league and was a constant screen snuffer-outer. 

Equally surprising to Levy not being included were two other snubs as alternates -- rookie guard Larry Warford and center Dominic Raiola. Raiola had the best season of his career and Warford was considered by Pro Football Focus as one of the top five guards in the league -- period -- and one of the top rookies in his entire class.

There is the case of quarterback Matthew Stafford, another alternate. Stafford had an elite first half of the season and a terrible second half of the year, yet could end up in Hawaii. 

Through the first half of the season, he completed 62.4 percent of his passes, 16 touchdowns and only six interceptions. Then came the second half, when he completed only 52.5 percent of his passes, 12 touchdowns and 13 interceptions. And in that, the Lions skidded from 6-3 to out of the playoffs at 7-8 entering the final week of the season. 

But he has a chance to go to Hawaii.



OT(???): Sports Science

OT(???): Sports Science

Submitted by jhackney on December 27th, 2010 at 3:15 PM

With the doldrums between X-mas and the Gator Bowl upon us, I thought I would share this. I just saw Tony Gonzalez on ESPN Sports Science and was blown away at the bit. ESPN should do it more.

After perusing on YouTube for any players relevant to the Michigan sports arena. I found Jahvid Best and Ndamukong Suh. This is when they were about to enter the NFL. I wonder how much their recorded times and measurements have improved since the videos were made. I now see how a inconspicuous hit to me watching could create a serious concussion to a QB or others receiving.

Then I imagined Brandon Graham, Mike Martin, Wheatley, and Biakabutku in the same settings. Then I drooled. Thoughts on Michigan greats being able to be in this segment would be welcomed.

Obviously I didn't look long or hard enough. Thanks to DreadlocksFast for the tip on Lamarr Woodley:

OT: Ndamukong Suh for Heisman

OT: Ndamukong Suh for Heisman

Submitted by Tim on December 8th, 2009 at 12:17 PM

Opening disclaimer: I already thought Rittenberg was... non-thorough, this is but the latest confirmation. If there was a chance Brandon Graham was in this discussion, I would be doing such an analysis for him, too. Graph credit to EDSBS.


I've been beating this drum for a little while, but a recent post by ESPN's Big Ten blogger Adam Rittenberg really steamed me, so I can't help but post about it. Forgive me. Here's the offending passage:

Ingram and Spiller sparkled in the spotlight Saturday, and both men have had huge performances all season long. Nebraska defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh also stepped up in the biggest game of his season, and it was great to see him get an invite to New York City. But in the end, my decision came down to the player who consistently produced week in and week out against top competition.

We'll ignore the fact that Ingram wasn't even always the best back on his team (he was pulled from a couple contests for lack of production, and Trent Richardson had to step in), and look at the accusation of Suh.

So, he didn't step up "against top competition," eh? That's thinly veiled code for "A team that loses 4 games should not produce the Heisman winner." While that may occasionally be true, it's not like any of Nebraska's 4 losses were really Suh's fault. Here they are:

Virginia Tech 16, Nebraska 15

In their home stadium, the Hokies were held to 278 total yards, and would have lost but for a miracle 81-yard pass late in the game that Suh cannot be held accountable for. Only Alabama and North Carolina held the Hokies to fewer offensive yards. Without that pass, Virginia Tech is held to 197 yards, and Nebraska starts the season 5-0.

In that game, Suh had 8 total tackles, including 1 sack. He also broke up 4 passes (this is a defensive tackle, people!).

Texas Tech 31, Nebraska 10

The Red Raiders were the only team to score more than 20 points on the Huskers. In scoring 31, however, they were held to just 259 total offensive yards, as Nebraska was the only team to hold them below 350 yards offense, and one of a select few to hold them below 400 (something Texas couldn't do). In that game, Nebraska fumbled inside the Texas Tech red zone, and the Red Raiders returned it for a score. That's a 10-14 point swing on a single play, and with the momentum it created (Texas Tech led 21-0 before Nebraska scored a single point), it could have meant the difference in the game. The Huskers also missed a field goal in this game, in addition to their 2 turnovers.

In that game, Suh had 4 total tackles, including 2 for loss. Every stop he made was solo. He also added 4 QB hurries.

Iowa State 9, Nebraska 7

The Cyclones notched only 239 yards of total offense, but won the game due to 8 turnovers for the Nebraska offense. The Cyclones' scoring drives covered 4 and 83 total yards. Without a 4-yard scoring drive for the opponent, Nebraska wins this game. If Nebraska doesn't fumble the ball on the opponent's 38-, GOAL-, GOAL-, and 5-yard lines (yes, they fumbled into the endzone twice, and another time in the redzone), or even throw picks on three possessions, including one in the red zone, the Huskers should have run away with this game. It is CLEARLY Suh's fault that Nebraska lost.

In that game, Suh had 8 total tackles, including a solo sack for a 6-yard loss. He also hurried the quarterback 3 times, and blocked 2 FUCKING KICKS IN ONE GAME.

Texas 13, Nebraska 12

This game was like, 3 days ago, so it should be fresh in all of our minds. Texas gained 202 yards, by far their season-low offensive output. But for an unfortunate kick out of bounds and a horse collar penalty on the final Texas drive, Nebraska would have knocked the Longhorns out of the National Championship discussion. This is clearly not what Rittenberg meant by performing against top competition.

In that game, Suh had 12 total tackles (10 of them solo). He made 4 solo tackles for a loss and assisted on 2 others, for a total of 22 yards. He made 4 solo sacks and assisted on another, for a loss of 21 yards.

The Whole Package

Utah Utes.gifFor the year, Suh made 50 solo tackles and 82 total tackles, leading the team. He is a defensive tackle. He led the team in total tackles. He plays on the interior of the defensive line. I will keep repeating this until it gets in Adam Rittenberg's unintelligent little brain. He made 19.5 tackles for loss (tied for 14th in the nation), and 12 total sacks (9th in the nation). He made an interception. He defended 10 passes (from the defensive tackle spot, people!), forced a fumble, hurried the quarterback 21 times(!), and blocked 3 kicks. None of Nebraska's losses, except maaaybe the Texas Tech game, can be attributed to some deficiency by the Huskers' defense that Suh could have prevented.

He obviously did this against inferior competition, as well. Let's look at Nebraska's opponents this year:

  • Florida International: #22 nationally in total offense (held to 3 points)
  • Arkansas State: #95 nationally in total offense
  • Virginia Tech: #55 nationally in total offense
  • Louisiana-Lafayette: #74 nationally in total offense
  • Missouri: #32 nationally in total offense (held to 12 points)
  • Texas Tech: #7 nationally in total offense
  • Iowa State: #75 nationally in total offense
  • Baylor: #86 nationally in total offense
  • Oklahoma: #28 nationally in total offense (held to 3 points)
  • Kansas: #26 nationally in total offense (held to 17 points)
  • Kansas State: #86 nationally in total offense
  • Colorado: #105 nationally in total offense
  • Texas: #20 nationally in total offense (held to 13 points)

Nebraska's defense was #11 nationally against the run, #3 nationally in pass efficiency, #9 in total defense, and #2 in scoring defense. Suh was its unquestioned star. If you wonder about his role in the #3 pass defense, remember his 10 PBUs, 12 sacks, and 21 QB hurries.

What does a guy have to do to earn the Heisman defensively, Rittenberg? And why do you make an argument ("production against top competition") that is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what the truth is?

last, and most importantly, his name is HOUSE OF MOTHERFUCKING SPEARS.