B1G's Best Asst. Coach Recruiters (Rivals)

B1G's Best Asst. Coach Recruiters (Rivals)

Submitted by Caesar on February 28th, 2013 at 10:07 PM

Here's an interesting Rivals article (link). Highlights!

  • Obviously: OSU and Michigan have the best recruiters. You probably know all about Michigan's body of work, but OSU was admittedly impressive in Texas and Georgia. They secured the #1 Texan and took a 4 star running back wanted by Texas/Oregon. They also beat out 'Bama and Georgia for a 5 star Georgian linebacker. 
  • Also expected: Fred Jackson's recruiting prowess in Detroit is like Nick Saban and Lane Kiffin, but cleaner  (This is almost not an exaggeration.)
  • Greg Mattison's work all over the country gets mentioned. He's credited for securing Poggi from the Crimson Temptress, but you probably knew that already. 
  • I think Indiana's continued recruiting successes are the most noteworthy. They pulled a couple 4 star prospects from the Hoosier State--but also a 4 star out of Georgia.  Indy raiding the SEC is pretty wild.
  • Jerry Montgomery didn't make the list. These things probably vary by year, and I don't think it's a strong indication of anything in particular, but it's a relevant omission for Michigan fans.
  • Frosting should come in two varieties: Chuck E. Cheese-style and the kind made with cream cheese. Also, all pie crusts should be made of graham crackers. 

Lets Get It On: UM hoops vs Indiana, 6:30pm Crisler (B1G Network)

Lets Get It On: UM hoops vs Indiana, 6:30pm Crisler (B1G Network)

Submitted by ClearEyesFullHart on February 1st, 2012 at 8:51 AM

     When last we met:  These teams were #12 and #13.  Then half a B1G schedule happened.  Now you can pretty much add 10 to those rankings.  Indiana beat Michigan by a bucket thanks to 25 points from Christian Whatford and some ridiculous Assembly Hall officiating.

     Now the tables have turned, and Michigan enters the game as 3pt favorites.  The B1G has shaken out as a battle for second, a lot like we thought it would.  And with MSU and Illinois doing their best to set basketball back half a century http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/recap?gameId=320310356  Michigan is shaking out as the favorite for that second spot.   (You can make an argument for Wiscy here too...but I've seen them in person, and to say I came away unimpressed would be an understatement).  But to have a shot to even the score against Ohio, or even to tread water near the top of the B1G standings, Michigan is going to have to win at home.

     Michigan should have the advantage in scoring and rebounding, but the hoosiers are projected to protect the ball a little better.  http://accuscore.com/game-forecast-previews/college-basketball/indiana-michigan/2-1-2012/gameid,4142/   Jon Horford will not play on Wednesday.  Beilein stated that he has been cleared to practice in half court drills, but that Horford has attempted to run full court and "That didn't go well".  Whether this is more of an injury issue or a conditioning issue remains to be seen.

     Predictions: I like Michigan in a squeaker.  Indiana can be a terror when their shots are falling, but I like our defense to irritate them enough at home to put them off their game.  I'm looking for a game in the 60's with double doubles from Morgan and Novak.  Lets go blue!

Mini-Preview & Open Thread: Indiana

Mini-Preview & Open Thread: Indiana

Submitted by Tim on February 12th, 2011 at 11:02 AM

The Essentials

WHAT Michigan v. Indiana
WHERE Ann Arbor, MI
February 12th, 2011
THE LINE Michigan -6.5

If Michigan wants to make the tournament, this game is a must win. Hell, if they want to make the NIT, it's probably a must-win. Take care of business today, and you can worry about bigger goals later. Enough said. 

Tempo-Free Breakdown

With a few games under each team's belt, it's finally reasonable to look at the stats. If you need an explanation of the stats, check out Ken Pomeroy.

Michigan v. Indiana: National Ranks
Category Michigan Rank Indiana Rank Advantage
Mich eFG% v. IU Def eFG% 59 117 M
Mich Def eFG% v. IU eFG% 179 40 II
Mich TO% v. IU Def TO% 25 134 MM
Mich Def TO% v. IU TO% 236 178 I
Mich OReb% v. IU DReb% 308 118 II
Mich DReb% v. IU OReb% 42 135 M
Mich FTR v. IU Opp FTR 344 329 I
Mich Opp FTR v. IU FTR 61 199 MM
Mich AdjO v. IU AdjD 45 91 M
Mich AdjD v. IU AdjO 76 56 I

The Wolverines are having a much better season than the Hoosiers, but the stats are nearly even. Part of that is a tougher schedule for the Wolverines. Though Michigan went down in Bloomington in embarrassing fashion, Indiana has yet to win a game on the road this season.

The Wolverines are playing some of their best ball of the season right now, whereas IU lost to Iowa last week... at home. Two of their most important contributors, Maurice Creek and Christian Watford, are injured and likely to miss today's game.


Pomeroy likes Michigan, 68-63, but I'm a little more optimistic, especially with IU's injury situation. I think Michigan comes away with a 65-53 victory in Crisler.


UMHoops and The Crimson Quarry preview the game. Inside the Hall brings a preview from IU assistant Steve McClain.

MBB vs. Indiana Open Thread

MBB vs. Indiana Open Thread

Submitted by MGoShoe on January 15th, 2011 at 7:46 PM

Go Blue, beat IU!


  • Michigan attempts to end its three game losing streak
  • Novak and Douglass return to their home state

Live Stats  |  Live Audio  

• Radio: Michigan Sports Marketing (IMG)
• Detroit: WWJ (950 AM) | Ann Arbor: WWWW (102.9 FM) | WOMC 104.3 FM
• Internet: MGoBlue.com | Sirius: 90 (U-M broadcast) | XM: 143 (IU broadcast)
• U-M Radio: Matt Shepard (p-by-p) & David Merritt (analyst)
• Television Broadcast: Big Ten Network | Eric Collins (p-by-p) & Quinn Buckner (analyst)

After beginning the season 9-2, Tom Crean’s Indiana squad has since hit a slide, dropping its last six contests. After two tough losses at the Las Vegas Classic to Northern Iowa (67-61) and Colorado (78-69), the Hoosiers have lost each of their fi rst four Big Ten contests to Penn State (69-60), Ohio State (85-67), Minnesota (67-63) and Northwestern (93-81). Indiana holds a 9-8 overall record (0-4 Big Ten).

Under John Beilein, the Wolverines are 2-2 against the Hoosiers, with the teams splitting their matchups last season. In 2009-10, Michigan fell at Assembly Hall in their Big Ten opener, 71-65 (Dec. 31), but came away victorious in Ann Arbor, 69-45 (Jan. 14). This season, the Hoosiers are led by sophomore Christian Watford, who leads Indiana with 16.4 points and 5.6 rebounds per game.

  • Michigan will play three of its next four games, and expanding further fi ve of its next seven, on the road, starting with a game at Indiana (Jan. 15). Michigan had played 10 of its last 11 games in Crisler Arena, going 7-3 at home in that stretch.
  • Three of Michigan's six losses this season have come against three of top-fi ve ranked programs in the nation. U-M lost by just three to No. 4 Syracuse (53-50), lost by seven in overtime to No. 3 Kansas (67-60) and by just four to No. 2 Ohio State (68-64).
  • In conference play, Michigan is shooting a league-best 89.2 percent (33-of-37) from the free throw line in Big Ten games and is 47-of-54 (87 percent) over the last five games.
  • Overall, Michigan is second in the Big Ten in free-throw percentage (73.1 percent) and has two players in the top-10 in the conference in free-throw percentage. Tim Hardaway Jr. is eighth in the conference (81.5 percent) while Darius Morris ranks 10th in the league (76.8 percent).
  • U-M coach John Beilein needs to coach 15 more games to reach 1,000 total contests in his 33-year career. At the current pace, the 1,000th game will be the Wolverines' opening game at the 2011 Big Ten Tournament.
  • With 131 three-point fi eld goals, Stu Douglass is eighth all-time at U-M. Douglass needs four to move into seventh (Glen Rice, 135).

UW-IU before Chappell out

UW-IU before Chappell out

Submitted by Rasmus on November 17th, 2010 at 11:54 AM

The score was 17-10 Wisconsin, with Indiana having missed a field goal on Chappell's last drive. The stats:

Indiana: 7 first downs, 95 yards rushing, 62 yards passing (8 of 14, one TD)

Wisconsin: 7 first downs, 93 yards rushing, 46 yards passing (4 of 7)

Even if you count the Wisconsin drive (2 plays, 66 yards) after Chappell got hurt, before his replacement fumbled the first snap, it's still not a total blowout, 24-10 with Indiana moving the ball effectively (that is, 24-17 at the half would have been possible).

In short, Wisconsin is good, but the fact they blew out Indiana and we did not (42-35) probably doesn't mean as much as might seem. If Chappell is in for the whole game, it's much closer, with Wisconsin winning by at most 20.

The Game After Indiana Effect

The Game After Indiana Effect

Submitted by DreadPower on November 14th, 2010 at 11:51 AM

This is an interesting trend for the Big 10 teams the game after playing Indiana:


Oct 2 @ Indiana-  W 42-35

Oct 9 vs. MSU-  L 17-34 (Michigan was a 3 point favorite)

Ohio State

Oct 9 vs. Indiana- W 38-10

Oct 16 @ Wisconsin- L 18-31 (OSU was a 4 point favorite)


Oct 23 vs. Indiana- W 44-13

Oct 30 vs. Purdue- W 44-10


Oct 30 @ Indiana- W 20-17

Nov 6 @ Penn State- L 21-35


Nov 6 @ Indiana- W 18-13

Nov 13 @ Northwestern- L 17-21 (Iowa was a 10.5 point favorite)


Nov 13 vs Indiana- W 83-20

Nov 20 @ Michigan- TBD..


OVERALL: Big 10 teams are 1-4 in the game after they play Indiana, with 3 outright losses by favorites in Vegas. You could also say that Big Ten teams are 0-4 in this game against teams that aren't Purdue. This might not mean anything but let's hope it does and it continues.