Student Government releases findings about Gibbons case

Student Government releases findings about Gibbons case

Submitted by TheDirtyD on April 14th, 2014 at 10:18 AM

Mlive Article

Student Government's Link

"The university was regularly missing its 60-day deadline to investigate sexual misconduct," Proppe said Sunday night. "The main reason, at least initially when the moved to the new policy, was that the university didn't have the bandwidth to handle all these investigations. They took about a year to hire a second investigator to look into this.

"So that was probably the most surprising and most concerning finding, that the delay in the Gibbons case was really not an exception but kind of the norm with these investigations."


Per the CSG's report, the task force claimed that athletic department officials did not believe the OIE or OSCR failed to notify the department "when a student athlete was accused of sexual misconduct." As a result of that finding, the task force concluded that "Brady Hoke knowingly issued false statements in December 2013 concerning the status of Gibbons."


The CSG's task force did not work in concert with officials from the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights, which will be on campus this week to launch its own investigation into the university's sexual misconduct policy.


Quoting MLive

ESPN article about Michigan Football and Nussmeier Hire

ESPN article about Michigan Football and Nussmeier Hire

Submitted by 502sezGoBlue on April 4th, 2014 at 8:40 PM

Interesting ESPN article touching on the state of Michigan football and how Nussmeier hire was the right move. Definitely highlights our O-line, leadership, and inconsistency concerns for next year. All I'm saying is bring me that Michigan Football season, we'll be great.



Jason Whitlock and Jonathan Chait Discussion on Brady Hoke, Gardner, Program

Jason Whitlock and Jonathan Chait Discussion on Brady Hoke, Gardner, Program

Submitted by alum96 on April 3rd, 2014 at 10:28 AM

Here is a radio interview between the 2 men that I found interesting, specifically as Whitlock dominated the conversation and has ties to Hoke.   The interview re: Hoke starts around 30:45. 

For TL;DTR - Chait is of the view this is a make or break year for Hoke. He believes Hoke runs an antiquated system and is stuck in the early 90s.  Big Gardner supporter, thought he was stuck on an island behind awful OL and no running game. 

Whitlock has too many views to be concise but he has been confused by the lack of development of UM players that he saw from Hoke at Ball State and SDSU.  He also said last year's MSU game was a punch to the face to Brady Hoke, and that perhaps Hoke got comfortable once he got to UM and thought with the talent he got other things would be easier.  He disagrees with Chait on Hoke's viewpoints of stuck in old school football.  Raises questions of leadership re: Gardner.

Longer version:

  • Whitlock - Hoke's strength at Ball State/SDSU was player development - physically and mentally.   Would take 2 stars and make them 2.5-3s, would take 3s, make them 4s.  Lauds strength coach/program he had at those schools.
  • Whitlock - I have not seen any of that Brady Hoke at UM. 
  • Whitlock - Fears Brady subconsciously lost focus on development due to talent he has been able to get to Michigan.
  • Whitlock - Not a big Devin Gardner fan - doesn't handle adversity well.  Small throw of Shane under the bus in throwaway comment.
  • Chait - Disagree on Gardner.
  • Whitlock - Due to QB situation / schedule not sure if work off the field this offseason will be reflected in increased wins but they are now doing the work necessary.
  • Whitlock - After ND game last year, I texted Wojo and said they'd be lucky to win 3-4 more games next year due to both the OL and DL being horrible.
  • Chait - Hoke has antiquated ideas i.e. spread vs non spread; spread makes you soft, etc.  Says OSU game proved otherwise.   Hoke wants to go back to early 90s.
  • Whitlock - Disagree on those points, but can understand the view.  
  • Whitlock - Mentioned last year Lewan was not a leader.  Did not get that from inside information, just from watching the team.  I was proven right despite the hate at the time I received.
  • Whitlock - I've surrendered my relationship with Brady Hoke to give him distance so I can do my job.
  • Whitlock - Green came in very soft last year.  Someone should have seen that and rectified it.  I saw this kid dive at a LBs feet rather than block.
  • Chait - makes negative comment on Fred Jackson as RB coach in terms of development of RBs.
  • Whitlock - doesn't disagree on Jackson without explicitly saying it.
  • Chait - defends Gardner more due to summer camps where gurus say he would be a star.
  • Whitlock - some truth in that but cites a play vs MSU where Gardner fell 1 yard short vs MSU as a signal of things you can't do.  Leaders don't do that.
  • Chait - disagrees, and cites Gardner sacrificing body all year. 
  • Whitlock - agrees to a degree but still thinks Gardner is lacking in key areas.  Whitlock compares Devin to Denard, and says he loved Denard's heart ... but had decision making issues.
  • Rest of call is fluff and worshiping Beilein.

Brady Hoke NFF keynote speaker Toledo and Kovacs guest speaker 3/10

Brady Hoke NFF keynote speaker Toledo and Kovacs guest speaker 3/10

Submitted by preed1 on March 11th, 2014 at 1:07 AM

Brady Hoke was the keynote speaker at the National Football Foundation’s 52nd Annual Scholar-Athlete Dinner put on by the Toledo Wistert Chapert of the NFF. The Toledo Wistert Chaper of the NFF acknowledges the exceptional accomplishments of selected senior football players from the area. The criteria to be chosen in three-fold: The player must be at least All-League, have a GPA of at least 3.2 and be involved in his school and community away from football.

The evening for me started out with an hour long private reception where there were beverages and only about eight tables.  Coach Hoke went up to each table for pictures and got a chance to talk to people.  He came up to our table and introduced himself, "Hi my name is Brady  Hoke", which I though was pretty cool he thought he would have to introduce himself.  After taking a picture with him we talked about the excitment for team 135 and his favorite pizza joint in town, Gino's.

Kovacs came in and told the whole group a story.  He was having lunch with his girlfriend when he got a text from Hoke, "COME SEE ME AT NOON".  Jordan didn't get a chance to eat his lunch before leaving his girlfriend as it was 11:45.  After running across campus worrying that somthing had to be wrong for him to want to see him so quickly he finally got to Hoke.  Hoke then asked him how he felt about wearing #11 to honor the Wistert brothers to which Jordan responded "this couldn't wait 30 minutes!".

After the reception Kovacs introduced Brady Hoke at the awards dinner, but not before letting everyone know about Hoke. 1. He always txt's in caps. 2. On gameday he wakes up the d-line by body slamming their beds.  3.  He though Kovacs was an accountant until senior year he told Coach that he was a Kinesiology major 4. Hoke does not eat on gameday and he gets "butterflies" in his stomach to which he added must have been some big tasty butterflies. 5. He points A LOT and even mentioned  He finished off with a joke saying that although it's a step down from last years speaker who was Brian Kelly, Brady Hoke is not chicken.

Hoke then came up and talked about his years at Ball State and how he had too much fun and was there to play football for his two years and was not until his Coach, Dwight Wallace got him to get his act together.  He graduated with a degree in crimal justice and aspired to be a secret service agent.  After having a job in his field of study he was asked to Coach a high school football team and took it up.  After a couple of games he told his wife this is what I want to do, help young men grown like my coach did for me at Ball State. 

Hoke said he has three things he always talks to recruits when he is on the the recruitng trail.  1.  You have to have commitment, accountablity, respect and trust for you and for your team.  2.  Honor your name on the back of your jersey. 3. Have in mind what you want to do once you earn your degree at the University of Michigan. 

Hail Mary

Hail Mary

Submitted by Ron Utah on February 26th, 2014 at 3:26 PM

This is our off-season strategy, and I love it

It's easy to forget that the "Hail Mary" is not just a football play, but also a prayer.  While Brady Hoke's desired scheme is more Lloyd Carr than Rich Rodriguez, his coaching approach is certainly closer to Art Briles' play-calling than Mike DeBord's.

So what the hell does that mean?

I love--as I believe most do--Hoke's aggressiveness on fourth down.  But we've learned quite a bit more about his willingness to go "all in" this off-season, and the result will be a 2014 team that looks drastically different from its predecessor.  No less than six position changes that could affect the starting line-up, a new offensive coordinator, and significant scheme change on defense.  This is the "Hail Mary" off-season: it is both a long, risky pass, and a prayer.

2013, to me, was The Season of Infinite Pain.  It wasn't just the losing, it was the way we lost.  The go-backwards offense that decided four downs were just too many combined with a defense that seemed to know exactly when to self-destruct made for a season that was excrutiatingly painful to watch, and I believe that the manner in which we lost (and won) was even more of a factor in our recruiting death spiral than the record itself.  In the few games where the offense did click (Notre Dame, Indiana, Ohio) the defense couldn't keep-up, and the offensive line was never even close to adequate.

I hope we're all still smiling in December

So what did Brady Hoke do about this?  He fired his friend and Offensive Coordinator--with whom he'd had lots of success.  He made wholesale changes to the positions the defensive staff coaches, and removed himself as a position coach.  He will be instituting a new scheme on both sides of the ball--completely new on offense, and moving from a 4-3 Under to a 4-3 Over on defense.  Make no mistake about it, this change on defense is almost as significant as moving from a 3-4 to a 4-3 (but not as significant as going to a 3-3-5).  On top of that, Hoke is reshuffling a slew of starters and key back-ups.

Here's what I love about this:

  • It's all on Hoke.  If this season ends in disaster, the J. Ira and Blah Blah Blah Coach will be the last place for the finger to point.  It's mostly his roster, the coaching staff has been rebuilt, player positions have been changed.  The answer to the question, "Can Brady Hoke coach?" is now clearly: "See 2014 season."
  • The courage to change.  I get Brian's negativity about some of the changes.  A new OC?  A new scheme on defense?  Changing the position of your best player on defense (maybe the best player on the team)?  It all smacks of desperation.  That's scary as hell, and should make you nervous.  It makes me nervous.  But last year was awful, and here is a coach saying, "You know what?  We have to make significant changes.  Tweaks aren't going to do it."  He's admitting the failure--not just through coachspeak--and making changes that could turn things around.
  • Win or lose, this should be better to watch.  Devin Gardner called it "a new style of practice."  We know that Nussmeier at least practiced the no huddle at Alabama.  Whether or not we see U-M stopping for a group chat between every play this season, I would expect the offense to move more quickly and the QBs to have more time at the line.  I can damn near guarantee you'll see some of the constraint plays many on this board have been clamoring for, since Nuss' has always used WR screens and extended hand-offs.  And we now know that Devin Funchess will be playing "on the outside."  Nussmeier has always used a balanced attack that focuses on getting the ball in the hands of his playmakers and scoring points.  Even if our offense doesn't set records this year, it should be a lot more fun to watch.
  • Defense, too.  The Tampa Two defenses that were en vogue in the NLF in the early '00's (and longer for the Lions) proved that "bend-but-don't-break" defense could work.  Forcing the offense to plod towards the end zone and use all their downs increases the chances of a mistake and forces an offense to be more precise.  I have two problems with that: 1) It's much harder to do against a no-huddle offense, since you can't rotate your D-Line as much, which MUST get pressure.  2) It's not as fun to watch.  Last season, it often seemed like Mattison's "Keep the ball inside and in front" mantra mostly meant, "If you want a first down passing over the middle, we're happy to give it to you."  Compounding that frustration was the snake-bitten (or gypsy-cursed) outside coverage that always seemed to be in the right place at the right time but didn't make the play.  Even though we produced 17 INTs and nearly as many turnovers as we did in 2011 (when we recovered a ridiculous 20 fumbles) it never felt like a game-changing or play-making defense, mostly because there were far too many times when we let teams like Akron, Penn State, Indiana, 2nd-half Iowa, Ohio State, and Kansas State move the ball seemingly at will.  Too many times, when it mattered most, our defense whiffed.  Hoke says NO MORE!  The changes that have been made public about positions and scheme strongly suggest we are moving to a high-pressure, in your face defense closer to MSU's style than Monte Kiffin's.  I expect more blitzing, more play-making, and more TFLs.  Might we get torched more often?  Maybe, but I'd rather watch that brand of football, and I think players (and recruits) would rather play that way.
  • Musical chairs on defense.  Moving Keith Heitzman to TE is a virtual no-lose change: here's a guy who had been passed by younger players at SDE, switching to a position he played in high school where we need toughness and depth.  But moving your best defender (and maybe player) to MLB from what was closer to a 3-4 OLB?  It's a gamble, and not a small one.  The upside is huge: if you go right, Jake Ryan is there; if you go left, JMFR is there.  Starting from the middle, he has the potential to be involved in every play.  But what if he's not very good at his new job?  What if JRIII gets put on his ass by opposing TEs?  What if Desmond Morgan is too slow to play the WILL in a 4-3 Over?  Hoke took his deepest, most experienced position group on the entire team and changed everything.  If it works, it could be beautiful.  If it doesn't, he could be fired.  But Jake Ryan went from 6.8 tackles/game to 3.7 and, even more alarming, from 1.27 TFLs/game to 0.56.  Sure, some of that is the injury, but some of that is opposing teams saying, "We're not letting him beat us."  Now?  Defensive coordinators will have to fool Ryan to beat him, because we already know he can shed blocks and move sideline-to-sideline.  If he can diagnose plays, he's going to kick some serious ass in 2014.  And now Mattison is his position coach.

Do these changes make me nervous?  Of course.  These are huge changes, and change always brings risk.  But, to me, these changes seem to directly address the issues--both in terms of success and enjoyment--that made 2013 so damn unwatchable.  And win or lose, we'll know what we have in a head coach.

What it all boils down to is this: it's Hoke's fourth season, and very much the fourth quarter in a game he's losing to stay on as Michigan's blah blah blah Head Coach.  And he's not calling the safe, conservative I-form off tackle play, or even the single-back play-action post; while it may require some help from the heavens, he's calling the fucking Hail Mary.

We'll just have to pray it works.

Old John Beilein Article - 2010

Old John Beilein Article - 2010

Submitted by PeterKlima on February 25th, 2014 at 10:03 AM

This seems like a perfect opportunity for a history lesson.

As you remember, John Beilein was on the hot seat to start his fourth year at Michigan. 

He had one season of success in his first three years, but that was with players recruited by the former coach.

HIs third year was supposed to be good, but at the begining of 2010 ......

Michigan may very well have been the most underachieving team in the entire nation, and it has now lost its two most talented players.....

Yeah, but what about that NCAA berth, you say? Well, Beilein rode a tandem of stars with very little around them ... and they were both recruited by Amaker. So you have a coach who has only had success based on using two players, and he didn't recruit either one of them.

To start his fourth year, things looked BLEAK.  Article here.

Of course, Michigan is a current Division 1 team which is supposed to be competing in a power conference.

And the coach who was supposed to be turning this program around is entering his fourth season.....

Basically, Beilein is not the answer Michigan thought it had last year at this time. The sooner the administration realizes it, the sooner it can begin to rebuild the program. Again.

Interesting?  And, isnt it supposed to be easier to turn around a baskebtall program quicker (kids play earlier, etc.)?

If you are looking for an example of a football coach who looked lost after three years, look no further than Pat Narduzzi heading into his fourth year:

Pat Narduzzi, Michigan State defensive coordinator: Offense was hardly a problem for the Spartans in 2009. At 29.7 points per game, they ranked second in the Big Ten in scoring. However, the Spartans allowed 26.3 points per game, which ranked in the lower half of the conference. They weren’t much better last season on defense. The root of the problem has been a porous pass defense, one that allowed a league-high 267.6 yards per game. The Spartans have the offense, led by quarterback Kirk Cousins, to make a run at a league title, but questions remain on whether the defense improve enough to alleviate some of the pressure on the offense. If the defense can’t, head coach Mark Dantonio could be looking for a new defensive coordinator.

McDowell told Marshall he would pick UM (pre-announcement)

McDowell told Marshall he would pick UM (pre-announcement)

Submitted by Wee-Bey Brice on February 6th, 2014 at 3:34 PM

As if the recruitment of Malik McDowell needed anymore "Wait... What?!" moments, TheWolverine released an interview with Lawrence Marshall earlier that included a pretty shocking quote:

"I told him he should go there if he wanted to - I'm happy for him at MSU," Marshall said. That was the school he wanted to go to. But he came to school today and was basically telling me he was going to Michigan. When the letter was on the table and he signed it, I thought he was going to Michigan.

When I first got there this morning he was leaning toward Michigan and telling me he was going to Michigan, so when he announced it, I was shocked."

Wait...WHAT?! I am now trapped in a glass case of emotion. It should be noted that McDowell's LOI is still not in, so who knows where he will end up.



Submitted by His Dudeness on January 23rd, 2014 at 2:55 PM

Hi friends,

To preface - I am a Rivals guy. That is to say I get my crootin' info from Rivals.

I got to thinking how the meme on Hoke aside from the actual play on the football field has been "well at least he is killing it on the recruiting trail." I took a quick look at the class rankings...

RR hired 2007

RR responsible for classes 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011

              2008      2009      2010      2011     

UM           10            8             20          21    

OSU         4              3             25          11                   


Hoke hired 2011

Hoke responsible for classes 2012, 2013 and 2014

              2012      2013      2014

UM           7             5            27 

OSU        4              2             2

It is 2014 and all, but sorry we aren't really doing that well on the recruiting trail  : (  



What is the formula?

Rivals Rating points + Rivals250 Bonus Points = Total Points

Rivals Rating (RR) Scale (Top 20 rated commitments)

(Rivals Rating = Points)

6.1 = 150 points
6.0 = 135 points
5.9 = 120 points
5.8 = 105 points
5.7 = 90 points
5.6 = 75 points
5.5 = 60 points
5.4 = 45 points
5.3 = 30 points
5.2 = 15 points

*Prospects without an assigned rating will count for no points. All FBS committed prospects will have a rating once evaluated and rankings are updated.


Coaching question D-LIne edition

Coaching question D-LIne edition

Submitted by mark5750 on January 3rd, 2014 at 12:39 AM

A lot has been made on the board lately about the struggles of the Michigan defensive line.  My question is about disbursement of coaches and how it impacts player development.  When Jerry Montgomery left for Oklahoma we hired Roy Manning to coach linebackers and the joke was consistent prior to Montgomery leaving that he was in the Beyonce coaching position.  However, with Mattison have DC responsibilities and Hoke having HC responsibilities and no dedicated D-Line coach are those players getting enough individual or position group attention to develop like other positions or am I overthinking the importance of having dedicated position coaches?

2013 Wrap: Bowl aftermath

2013 Wrap: Bowl aftermath

Submitted by Ron Utah on December 30th, 2013 at 3:09 PM

My favorite album of all-time...sadly fitting for the 2013 football season

I'm taking a brief break from grading the position groups to comment vent about the Copper Bowl and the program in general.  Brian's post today was alarmingly similar to my feelings (usually he is far more emo than I am) about the game and the program in general.

What Brady Hoke and his supporters (myself included) has always been able to hang his hat on is that his teams play hard.  They don't always play well, but they do play hard.  Always.

Until now.

The Copper Bowl was not just a failure to play defense (we allowed 6.56 yds/play and let KSU covert 7 of 11 third downs) or score TDs despite a surprisingly efficient first-half offense (finished the game at 4.92 yds/play...but only had 53 plays), but it was a failure to show-up.

This sums-up our 2013 season

After spending the entire season trying really hard and not getting good results due to a variety of factors (youth, play-calling, missed assignments, etc) the team was in too much pain to try to crack another coconut.  Brady Hoke and Greg Mattison's defense--for the first time--simply didn't appear to have the will to put up another fight.

Those who believe the guillotine would be too kind of a punishment for Al Borges after this season might not want to admit it, but the offensive gameplan was pretty effective. Shane Morris has an unbelievable arm and can make throws that no Michigan QB since Drew Henson could even think about, but his decision-making isn't there yet, as evidenced by what happened late when he was asked to read the whole field and make throws into 8-man coverages.  Borges understood this and designed a screen game that let shane make throws but avoided forcing him to pick which guy to throw to.  We moved the ball and even tried a fade to Funchess in the endzone...but couldn't score a TD.  The offense appeared to be giving effort for at least a few drives, but couldn't get it done.  Then they gave-up too: we didn't even hurry when we were down 24-6 with 8:06 remaining.

For the first time in Brady Hoke's tenure, the team simply didn't appear to try.  This is sad, alarming, and needs to be addressed.  Obviously, Greg Mattison did not become a bad coach between the Ohio game and this debacle.  And Hoke did not lose his powers of motivation.  But what is clear is that if you give your full effort over-and-over and get nothing but pain, at some point, your body might just say, "not today."

I am someone who believes in looking at the whole picture.  The 2013 season's failures are not on the shoulders of just one person (or even two or three) in my estimation; rather a confluence of many unfortunate factors fused into a nuclear disaster.  And while there are many reasons for the meltdown, there must be some accountability for what happened in that bowl game.

All that said, if we put together a 10-win season in 2014 and win one of the MSU/OSU games (or both) we will be right back in the hunt as a B1G contender, and the positive momentum could push closer to our goal or returning to national prominence.  On the other hand, if we slog to an eight-win (or worse) total in 2014, we risk becoming solidified as a second-tier team...until we re-build again.

Make no mistake about it: that bowl game showing has very real consequences.  For the first time, a Brady Hoke team didn't even show-up.  And that means 2014 just became even more important to the future of this program and the job-security of everyone on the staff.