a nightmare

a nightmare

Submitted by varsity on January 4th, 2011 at 3:12 PM

now this has no origins in coaching rumor, or inside sources, just something that came to mind as i was walking to get my mail a few minutes ago.   say richrod ends up and uconn, lets just say, and he ends up taking denard with him.  denard sits out next year, has a junior year in 2012 with rich's first full class, and in 2013 as a senior, with 2 full years of richrod recruits, takes on a visiting michigan team early in the season......ahhhhh

Hello Brady Hoke?

Hello Brady Hoke?

Submitted by Sobinator on January 4th, 2011 at 3:09 PM

Same guy that broke the story that RR fired is now saying Hoke to be named coach.

Here we go.

Edit: Additional information - Ryan Ermanni (Fox 2 Detroit) reports on ESPN 96.1 that Brady Hoke will be hired as next coach, and Harbaugh was never seriously considered.

Thank You Rich Rodriguez

Thank You Rich Rodriguez

Submitted by Geaux_Blue on January 4th, 2011 at 2:42 PM

You showed us a new brand of football that was exciting and, at times, breath-taking. While factors both in and out of your control have led to this day, your ability to handle the myriad of circumstances that came about with class and dignity show a Michigan Man is not about Wins and Losses but, rather, character.

For that I am grateful.

The Best of Luck in your future endeavors.

Dienhart: DB's meetig with RR was scheduled to start at 2:00

Dienhart: DB's meetig with RR was scheduled to start at 2:00

Submitted by michgoblue on January 4th, 2011 at 2:23 PM

Per Dienhart's Twitter:

TomDienhart Michigan AD David Brandon will meet with Rich Rodriguez today at 2:00 p.m. ET and a meeting with players has been set for 7 ET.

We all knew about the meeting but thought that some would want to know when this afternoon it started so that they could start hitting "refresh" every 5 seconds like I plan to do.

Also, the players meeting was already set before this.

 

http://twitter.com/hansensouthbend

CC: Contrarian, yet plausible view, on our situation w/ JH

CC: Contrarian, yet plausible view, on our situation w/ JH

Submitted by iawolve on January 4th, 2011 at 1:21 PM

 

While I realize I can believe nothing being speculated, the abrupt turn of the messaging regarding our #1 coaching target is at the very least somewhat troubling considering the desire for a smooth transition whatever direction we go. However, I don’t see JH as dead in the water for a few reasons if you look at DB’s previous actions/experience and including the concept that people typically do not act irrationally.

First, as a Regent, booster and former player, I assume he witnessed the Martin coaching search disaster up close. I can’t possibility believe that he watched the Miles-to-UM debacle unfold in the media only to repeat that very scenario. Granted, he has never said JH was a coaching candidate, but everybody else had without a denial from DB. Hence, his silence is acceptance of the message that he his replacement in mind so this puts us back to “Miles and a boat” by default.

Second, DB has shown a propensity to float an idea, get the fan base off their ass/into a frenzy and already have everyone’s first choice secured. He did this with the UM/OSU game, effectively creating  fire storm to pressure his other ADs in the conference, and could be doing this with JH to secure broad support across the base for the guy. Adding some drama at the end will have everyone clamoring for JH, essentially clearing the deck for him. This sucks us into the decision more closely and ensures buy in. This is a tactic used in business and politics, remember DB has considered politics for his second career.

Third, DB fancies himself as a marketer. While I have has this debate regarding my stance that I don’t necessarily feel “any publicity is good publicity”, the drama has put Michigan in more TV segments, analyst discussions, twitter feeds, blogs, newspaper articles, etc than winning any bowl game could have. This talk is dominating the bowl season at this point which gets the Michigan name out there. HOWEVER, this is very risky if he does not deliver JH since there is too much light on the situation IMHO and DB + Michigan comes out on the bad end of this.

Fourth, DB has not fired his current coach. For this reason, I actually believe speculation today that JH has not been “offered the job” on paper since there is no official job opening.  That does not mean terms have been already discussed, but not having it on paper actually would not be surprising. I don’t see this as the terrible sign that others are interpreting it to be.

Fifth, by not backing his current coach and not landing the consensus #1 guy, DB would have immortalized himself in FAIL lore by sticking to some principled evaluation period while every other school moved around you securing coaches as you stood still. I would assume this would be known as a “Pulling a Brandon” and I can’t imagine that DB would knowing allow that to be his legacy after just accepting the job.

Again, there are just my dumbass opinions. Maybe they make sense, maybe they don’t. I still have a feeling JH is coming home and this is just an exercise in chumming the water since I don’t for a minute believe that DB has entrusted any real information to persona non gratta types like Rosenberg.

Barwis

Barwis

Submitted by rdlwolverine on January 4th, 2011 at 1:18 PM

So, what is the verdict on Barwis?  When RR first arrived, one of the most promising developments was supposedly the replacement of the obsolete Gittleson strength and conditioning regime with the modern and superenergized Barwis regime.  Is there any empirical evidence of improved performance on the field with Barwis?  Would we have been even worse with a Gittleson approach?

I have not crunched any numbers, but it seems to me that we have consistently performed worse in the second half of games; 4th quarter even worse than 3rd quarter.  Clearly, we have performed better earlier in the season than late in the season. These observations do not seem consistent with the concept that Barwis will make the team the team physically stronger and with better endurance.

CC: Why not Tom Bradley if JH says no?

CC: Why not Tom Bradley if JH says no?

Submitted by DesHow21 on January 4th, 2011 at 1:09 PM

He would be infinitely more palatable to the masses than Hoke. He's got great recruiting ties to a state that should be a prime location for us. He basically has HC experience at a MAJOR univ without actually having the title and is squeaky clean ( personal life) as far as I can tell. 

 

Please not Brady Hoke...pretty please?