Rankings Roundup after Week 9: CFP, AP, SP+ 

Submitted by Blue@LSU on November 1st, 2023 at 1:02 PM

I usually try to post this on Monday, but I wanted to wait for the CFP rankings to come out last night. With the CFP rankings on Tuesday nights, I’ll probably be posting this on Wednesday from now on. So anyway, here are the numbers after week 9.

COMPARING CFP, AP, AND SP+ (RANKINGS)

Astute observers will recognize that I replaced the Coaches Poll with the CFP. I didn’t want the graphs to be too cluttered and, well, the Coaches Poll sucks anyway. 

The CFP committee has decided to buck the trend and put the Buckeyes at #1. IMO they haven’t really passed the eye test to be the #1 team in the country, but I’m fine with it. It’ll all work itself out in the end. 

There were, however, two people that were up in arms about the CFP rankings. It wasn’t about OSU being #1 or Georgia being snubbed at the #2 position. No, their beef was about something else entirely. 

How dare the CFP not consider the integrity of the game!

SP+ OFFENSE & DEFENSE (RANKINGS)

Focusing on the SP+ …

6 weeks at #1 and counting.

And now, if anyone is wondering about good matchups according to SP+ next week:

  • #13 Kansas State @ #5 Texas
  • #17 Texas A&M @ #16 Ole Miss
  • #9 Notre Dame @ #21 Clemson
  • #20 Missouri @ #2 Georgia
  • #11 Oklahoma @ #33 Oklahoma State
  • #7 Washington @ #14 USC
  • #12 LSU @ #6 Alabama

Meanwhile, in the B1G…

Good shit, Iowa!

TRENDS (RAW SP+ SCORES)

Here are the weekly changes in the SP+ top 25 from the preseason through Week 9

SP+ OFFENSE AND DEFENSE (RAW SP+ SCORES)

Standard interpretation applies:

  • Top-right: Good at offense and defense
  • Bottom-right: Good defense, below-average offense
  • Top-left: Good offense, below-average defense
  • Bottom-left: Not so good at football

Recall that these are standardized coefficients, not raw SP+ scores. Each team’s offensive and defensive score represents the number of standard above/below the mean that category. For example, Michigan is 1.4 standard deviations above the mean from the average SP+ offense, and 2.1 standard deviations below the mean (this is good) from the average SP+ defense.   

Michigan, Georgia, and Texas are now the only two teams that are more than 1 standard deviation from the mean (in the right direction) on both offense and defense. Michigan and Iowa are basically bunk mates, and Iowa drew the bottom bunk. They better hope, like all of us, that Michigan doesn’t shit the bed this week.

Speaking of this weekend’s opponent, Purdue is…not Michigan.

SP+ RANKINGS BY CONFERENCE (RAW SP+ SCORES)

Horizontal lines are the average (mean) SP+ scores for each conference. Notre Dame is now excluded from the ACC. Thanks for the comments/suggestions on this. 

And because some readers asked for it, here’s the graph after conference realignment.

Anything you find interesting? Want me to explore in the future?

Thanks for reading. 

Go Blue!

NittanyFan

November 1st, 2023 at 4:18 PM ^

The Penn State offense ------ I am married to a "2", but at least she is extremely predictable*.  I know what she's doing and there's a 0% chance she's going to run away to a foreign country right after emptying our bank account**.

---------------

* It's kind of incredible, actually - it took 31 1/2 quarters of football for PSU to throw their first interception of the season (late last week vs Indiana).

** Back in my 20s, I had a friend who DID marry a woman - who, within 3 months of their marriage, emptied their bank account and left him a note that she was on a plane to Fiji.  He ran off and found her, they "reconciled", then she had an affair within 2 months and they got divorced.  She was extremely attractive, but yikes - a literal 9/10 on the hot/crazy scale.

BuckeyeChuck

November 1st, 2023 at 2:00 PM ^

...and this one compares the five P5 undefeated teams:

Michigan - Dominated every opponent but haven't faced anybody good yet
FSU - Biggest green dot victory, best avg opponent strength
Ohio State - 2 green wins!
Washington - farthest right green dot, tho a small one. Less dominant lately.
Georgia - Weakest resumè, maybe best team pic.twitter.com/jU97jprE57

— Nate Manzo (@cfbNate) November 1, 2023

umfan83

November 1st, 2023 at 2:03 PM ^

Definitely don't mind OSU being number 1 even if they aren't the best team.  If the number 3 team crushes the number 1 team, they should then be number 1 right?   Then again, Georgia has played a similar SOS and has been less dominant than Michigan and is still number 2 so clearly their brand name and recent history has some appeal to the CFP.

BoFan

November 1st, 2023 at 2:28 PM ^

This is great.  Keep up the good work.  
 

I would just eliminate the toughness mark.  That joke is way too old.  Your stalions/cheeting joke can also go.  We don’t need to be reminded of that every time we open a post.  
 

Thanks

M-Dog

November 1st, 2023 at 2:58 PM ^

It is bad that I can look at the far-outlying SP+ Offense blue O's, and the far-outlying SP+ Defense red X's, and know what team it is without even reading the legend?

I'm looking at teams like you, USC and LSU, and you, Iowa and Penn State.