- Member for
- 5 years 19 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|1 day 1 hour ago||Hey man, I thought we were||
Hey man, I thought we were weasel bros.
|4 days 1 hour ago||Living in Madison, I've never||
Living in Madison, I've never heard the term "Wisky" used to refer to UW. The only place I ever hear it is mgoblog. That doesn't mean it's not a legit nickname, but I don't think it's one that badger fans use themselves. I actually like it, because it reminds me of an alcoholic drink. "UW" is used a lot, as well as 'Sconsin (and Wisconsonites are therefore Sconnies). Another thing - people often talk about going to the "badger game", which I find to be a curious bit of nomenclature. In Michigan, we never talked about going to the "wolverine game." Actually, it seems like Michigan doesn't lean on the "wolverine" mascot so hard compared to Wisconsin, where everything is badger this and badger that. Anyway, that's my two cents.
|4 days 1 hour ago||This was just so good for me.||
This was just so good for me. So, so good.
|4 days 22 hours ago||Lol thank you for catching||
Lol thank you for catching that. I wrote some code to scrape the data off the website, so it must have tripped on some formatting.
EDIT: My code was right, ourlads.com had his weight listed as 19 lbs - I'm assuming they just dropped a zero.
|5 days 1 hour ago||I mean ... more or less.||
I mean ... more or less.
|5 days 1 hour ago||I might just add the second||
I might just add the second string on the depth chart together with the first string, because they see significant time on the field too.
|1 week 6 days ago||27 - 14 good guys win||
27 - 14 good guys win
|2 weeks 5 hours ago||Don't I know it! I guess I'm||
Don't I know it! I guess I'm gonna have to finally contribute to Wisconsin in a head-to-head competition against Michigan, which feels weird, but everyone's a winner here.
|2 weeks 2 days ago||Doesn't matter who's right on||
Doesn't matter who's right on this one, as long as people take care of each other just the same.
|3 weeks 21 hours ago||I like how halfway through,||
I like how halfway through, Speight is like "oh crap, I'd better put my helmet on. He's going to hit me in the head."
|24 weeks 2 days ago||Have you heard of (or||
Have you heard of (or watched) The People vs. O.J. Simpson? That's actually the first season in a series called American Crime Story, and the second season will focus on the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. It could go a long way in bringing that particular world to light for many Americans, like myself, who still don't know that much about what happened there.
|26 weeks 1 day ago||I don't even mind watching or||
I don't even mind watching or listening to coverage from the "bad guys'" side - I remember listening to a Notre Dame radio station during a UM-ND game, and it was somehow less annoying to hear them cheering on their team when it was what you expected them to do. Like, it just felt honest. Plus, we won, so I got to enjoy their existential horror.
|26 weeks 3 days ago||Native Michigander and UM||
Native Michigander and UM fan, PhD & postdoc at UW-Madison. Simple!
|33 weeks 1 day ago||Perhaps my favorite clip on||
Perhaps my favorite clip on youtube - note the number of likes & dislikes:
|33 weeks 2 days ago||I used to dislike||
I used to dislike Collinsworth because I thought he came off like a jerk and was sort of negative all the time. But honestly he just diagnoses plays so fast and tells you exactly who screwed up and how that allowed the play to be successful. Now I don't mind his general tone because I appreciate his substance way more.
|35 weeks 2 days ago||Nope!||
|37 weeks 1 day ago||Nice write up!||
Nice write up!
|39 weeks 1 day ago||Let us also take some credit||
Let us also take some credit for recognizing, recruiting, an developing the character of the man. I know, it's imaginative, but let's do it anyway.
|44 weeks 1 day ago||Rest in peace little man.||
Rest in peace little man.
|45 weeks 2 days ago||I'm curious to see how this||
I'm curious to see how this game breaks down. Seems like a bizarro opposite-world scenario for our team, and ... and I don't know what it means. But we won! 8-2 is all right, would love to tack on a few more wins.
|45 weeks 6 days ago||Bless you, Buckeyes. And||
Bless you, Buckeyes. And bless you, Chad Carr. It's wrong that you have to go so soon, but you've made a big difference in your short time on Earth, and that's incredible. You champion.
|46 weeks 23 hours ago||Peppers can run better than||
Peppers can run better than running backs, catch better than receivers, throw better than quarterbacks, and spot the ball better than referees.
|46 weeks 5 days ago||I'll bet I could lose the||
I'll bet I could lose the game for UM if I was quarterbacking. I would find a way. I'd say there would be a 1 in 3 chance every play that I turn the ball over if I'm asked to throw, and only a 1 in 10 chance of an actual completion - deep balls and anything remotely challenging are not on the menu for me. I'm sure Harbaugh would game plan for this and make me hand it off every play, but I would still deliver a sub-optimal handoff probably 3 out of 4 times because I don't know where the RB is going and I'm not used to how quickly the play develops. I'd estimate a 1 in 5 chance of me fumbling the handoff every play. So our offense has become slightly less than 1-dimensional, and our 1 dimension is handicapped significantly. Our blocking and running is decent, but is it enough? If it didn't violate the rules of this thought exercise, I'm sure Harbaugh would have me motion to the receiver position every play and let Peppers take snaps.
|47 weeks 2 days ago||Generally I just trust||
Generally I just trust Harbaugh more than me, but I would be ok playing Speight if Rudock had any nagging injury stuff and we were in control of the game.
|47 weeks 2 days ago||In my mind, Wisconsin,||
In my mind, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan are the true "Great Lakes States" and they have all the nice land and water. You can't beat those ones for sheer prettyness. The more southern states in the Midwest are more boring landscape-wise, but they do have more notable big cities.
|47 weeks 2 days ago||Someone created a helpful map||
Someone created a helpful map for this.
|48 weeks 2 days ago||I agree that you have to||
I agree that you have to allow people to do things they enjoy even if there's some danger involved. I think one fair point is that we should try to make the sport as safe as we can without compromising the nature of the game, but there will be disagreement about how far is too far. Is it good to have concussion protocols? My opinion is yes. Do I think the targeting rule is working? My opinion is no, that seems to be compromising football a bit.
|48 weeks 2 days ago||"Wisco decrribes each as||
"Wisco decrribes each as equally valid comparisons, to which I wholeheartedly disagree."
They are equally valid for the questions they address. I think you're conflating "validity" with "importance.". Do I think one question is more pertinent than the other? I don't know so I won't take a stance on it. The logic of both comparisons is sound, though others have pointed out that we could optimize the stats for accuracy.
|48 weeks 2 days ago||I agree with you 100%, you||
I agree with you 100%, you are flat-out correct on everything you said. I'll add two things that go beyond what we've already talked about when considering how dangerous football is.
One difference between football and driving is that driving (for now) is basically essential - for many people, you just have to drive. Football will always be optional, so the cost-benefit consideration will be different. I don't know what the tipping point would be, at which death rate you'd go "ok this just isn't worth it anymore." I think we're still way below that, but it's subjective.
The second thing is that death rates don't tell the whole story of how dangerous an activity is. We still don't understand the long-term effects of football on the human brain, but I'm certain that more relevant statistics will be those that track outcomes over time.
|48 weeks 2 days ago||Which statistics you want to||
Which statistics you want to compare depends entirely on what question you want to answer. If the question is "is football more dangerous than other sports", then you want to compare the fatality rate of football to that of other sports. If the question is "how dangerous is football in the grand scheme of things", then you compare it to everyday things. Both are equally valid.
Your example of comparing highways to military service, however, is objectively flawed because you chose to compare absolute numbers, rather than fatalities per capita.