Rawls if he can hang onto it, I'd guesss
WickedWolv
History
- Member for
- 2 years 47 weeks
Karma
- Current value
- 2
Recent Comments
| Date | Title | Body |
|---|---|---|
| 26 weeks 4 days ago | 2006 D |
2006 D was talented, but played poorly the last two games vs. osu and usc.
|
| 42 weeks 1 day ago | When it comes to Aliens I |
When it comes to Aliens I take a completely neutral approach.
1. Could there be ETs? Well, billions of planets in a galaxy, billions of galaxies? Sure. 2. Government have them locked up in Area 51? Maybe. Some people say yes, some say no (purported government officials). Why would they lie? Do they want attention? Do they want to publish a book to make money? Who the hell knows!? 3. I did find it quite odd a former high ranking member of the Canadian government said there's definitely ETs.
I'm torn. I'd be an idiot to dismiss either claim especially by high ranking officials (what's motivating them to lie or truly disclose the truth?). As of now, there's no clear evidence to say ETs are real. However, the possibility definitely exists. Again, if you're a math whiz you'd be foolish to completely rule out the possibility. |
| 42 weeks 1 day ago | re: |
A conspiracy is merely two or more people plotting to carry out an illegal act/action. The term "conspiracy theory" is a perversion of the true meaning (curious to know when this term was coined and by whom). Nonetheless, governments have versions of conspiracies while individuals have their own versions. It's simply a matter of what verison makes sense. Do I think governments are totally forthcoming with information? Absolutely not! Do I think individuals have all the answers after examining an "event"? Nope.
An illegal action by individuals, groups, etc. is nothing out of the ordinary. Are there conspiracy theories, which are completely out of whack? Absolutely. Are there conspiracy theories, which may have credence? Absolutely.
Examining history it would be foolish to conclude there are no "conspiracies". Powerful people have a tendency to manipulate the masses (unfortunate result of human nature e.g., sacrifice your first born so it will rain). This begs the question: Will there EVER be enough evidence to prove one side or another? Probably not. You mentioned the Germans and Russians spreading to what accounts as falsehoods. Don't you think your government is spreading falsehoods, which you might interpret as the truth? Don't be so quick to dismiss rationale conversation you deem a "conspiracy". There's a lot of information I've read the last few years--not read by most of the populace--confirming there's more than meets the eye. Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley and/or The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley is a good start (Bill Clinton's mentor). I was quite amused when in the preface he tells you flat out this is what I know and this is how I procured this information. Good stuff.
|
| 42 weeks 1 day ago | Absolutely |
If people don't have questions regarding ANY event or events after researching the facts and inconsistencies then we truly aren't doing our job as educated Americans. The pavlovian response is to yell "conspiracy theorist" or "tin foil hat". On average, 2/3 of the population, regardless of intelligence, will accept an authority figure(s) response, answer, or commands.
In my mind, there's nothing wrong questioning an event, which has many unanswered questions.
|
| 2 years 40 weeks ago | Robinson's height |
Location: Miami Interesting commentary on Dernard's size (noted observation). |
| 2 years 45 weeks ago | I do agree with the QB concern, but... |
many people seem to underestimate the running game. RR's offense is based on the running game (better OL, more RB options, etc.), therefore if Tate displays better decisions, ability, than last years QBs, UofM should see a minimum of 6 wins--even with the questionable D. |
