UMofTwoSchools

History

Member for

3 years 46 weeks

Karma

Current value

Recent Comments

Date	Title	Body
3 years 45 weeks ago	nice job glossing over my	nice job glossing over my question as to why some athletes chose to plead guilty.  I assume that you must have loved the rich rod paying WVU fiasco too, because rich left his options open by denying he had to pay, that seems to be the right way to handle everything.
3 years 45 weeks ago	GCS and dex	Please get your panties out of a twist.  Do I know why he chose to enter not guilty over just accepting guilt?  No, I'm waiting to see the piece on his reasoning, so its understandable that i didnt take your words as facts and said i didnt know.  Your explanation of a plea bargain didnt fully answer the question.    As far as im concerend PLENTY of athletes do not plead 'not guilty'.   Since it is such standard procedure, why does the tennesee kicker chose to plead guilty?  http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3476814 There are many other examples of athletes just accepting the guilt.  And still, it is my opinion, that it seems flimsy to me, even if this is the standard procedure to lower your sentencing.
3 years 45 weeks ago	Punishment	There had been a lot of previous posts on what the standard punishment should be for Grady. Whether it be one game, six games, or just booted off the team. I must say that without any previous offenses, I felt his decision to drive drunk could have warranted 2-3 games of suspension. But that was before he decided to plead 'not guilty'. I don't know the details of his reasoning behind pleading not guilty, but if he's genuinely trying to pretend as though he isn't to blame for what happened, I personally feel his punishment should be increased. As of now, after his pleading not guilty, I feel theres a bit of mistrust in him. I now feel that the appropriate punishment should be half a season if he is found guilty.
3 years 45 weeks ago	FIRST	FIRST
3 years 45 weeks ago	Ambiguity of Compete	What does that even mean, we will compete? You could lose every game by one touchdown, and call that competing. Theres a big difference between competing, and actually winning. I saw that in the michigan vs wisconsin game of last year. I am treating next season very safely, seeing as we lost many players on offense, including the head of the offense, the QB. I think its premature and overly zealous to believe we will be just as strong as ever. I want to be fair to myself, and my emotions next season by feeling that it wouldn't be unreasonable to be 7-5.
3 years 46 weeks ago	3-9 to 9-3	First off notre dame i don't like at all but lets look at the schedule to see if this claim is even possible.... SDSU - possible win Michigan - no way in hell Michigan State - 50/50, michigan state likes to choke against ND Purdue - most likely loss  Stanford -possible win North Carolina - possible win, UNC always sucks Washington - most likely loss Pittsburgh -50/50, i never pay attention to this team but who knows Boston College - 50/50, they lost their star qb Navy - 50/50, lost to them last year Syracuse - possible win, Syracuse can be counted on to suck year in and year out USC - clear loss Even giving them some benefit of the doubt, I don't see where they come out with 9 wins. They more likely will win 6 times
3 years 46 weeks ago	Great	What does grady do in wyoming?