- Member for
- 6 years 16 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|6 days 17 hours ago||Gotcha||
So it's just things you imagine in your head rather than reality. Gotcha.
Thanks for clearing that up!
|6 days 19 hours ago||Hmm||
Also, Hoke's tenure was nowhere near as bad as RR's. BCS bowl, kids graduating, and a pretty well stocked team (QB not included) for the next coach.
Lets see, a BCS bowl that we kinda fell into, (and had a lucky ref call go our way to win.) using RRs offensive system and recurits.
I don't recall RR having issues with students graduating, I'm assuming you're referring to the APR while he was here? Or was there an issue there that I'm either forgetting or never knew about?
Hoke did recruit star talent much better than RR did, I can give you that much.
|6 days 19 hours ago||While||
While he may have plenty of offers in the NFL that he can use as leverage. That doesn't mean they're were going to be $8M offers that he could leverage. There is a very large and clear difference there.
I would dismiss the second tweet for different reasons, but I certainly wouldn't do so for the reason you're giving.
|2 weeks 6 days ago||Not so sure||
I'm not so sure about that one. Seems like a decent reach to me, and a situation that Michigan wouldn't really see any benefit from... they can already be pretty damn picky.
Not to mention, that sure is looking at a pretty small portion of the overall situation.
|7 weeks 22 hours ago||What the||
"Lowest risk surgeries=highly rated recruiting classes."
This is probably the worst analogy i've ever read. And boy is that saying something.
|7 weeks 6 days ago||Um||
You're forgetting the UConn Game.
|8 weeks 1 day ago||Code||
"The issues are that Beilein runs a relatively clean program, is focused on grades and character, and doesn't pursue many one and done types.
I'd be willing to bet that his selective criteria eliminates 66-75% of the top 100 recruits from consideration."
This is known as "Speaking the code."
|15 weeks 18 hours ago||Your brother will be Elder Cunningham!!||
And your mission location is..... UGANDA!
|15 weeks 2 days ago||Did||
Did you and I watch a different tape?
|31 weeks 56 min ago||Sharp Knees||
She has sharp knees
|31 weeks 5 days ago||No doubt||
Oh no doubt, he made some sick throws in college. The one I remember the most is actually the Capital One Bowl, pretty sure first touchdown of the game where he rifled it into a super small window between the saftey and corner.
However, consistency was never a strong point of his. Tacopants was a regularly targeted reciever for him.
|31 weeks 5 days ago||Well||
Because it's extremely difficult to be a good QB in the NFL. That's really about it.
Chad was never an amazing QB even while at Michigan. He put up very good numbers and I loved having him as the QB on our team, don't get me wrong. But he was never the star of the offense, and he had a LOT of talent around him too.
He's also played for teams that had average to below average talent, even while at Miami. He's not the type of QB that's going to make everyone around him much better, but he is the type of QB that can play with talent.
He's a solid backup QB in the NFL. That still puts him at the top .01% of QBs in the world. (48% of statistics are made up on the spot BTW)
|31 weeks 5 days ago||Please explain||
Please explain why that is. I'd truly love to hear why.
|31 weeks 5 days ago||Soo||
So, just so I understand your argument here.
You agree that Curry would "dust" Nik because he shot 44% from three while averaging 10+ threes a game (Ignoring that he shot just 38% the following year)
Vs Nik, who shot 44.2% this year (vs curry's %43.9 high) and had a higher career as well at 44.1% vs 41% for curry.
The only advantage for Curry is he jacked up more 3s (9.6/gm vs 5.2/gm)
Don't get me wrong here, I think it would be extremely entertaining and close. However, I do think it's ridiculous to believe curry would "dust" Nik while using those stats as the reason why.
|31 weeks 5 days ago||Eh||
I can see why they would want to be able to say that. But I don't see any reason as to why they should be able to say that.
Who cares what the current school wants, it shouldn't matter at all... especially if these guys are "students"
|31 weeks 6 days ago||I don't||
I don't believe many people have said it's a dumb idea because of unbundling. But because of the clear shift to streaming and a lack of purchasing cable TV all together.
Also, and I may be missing something, that article seems to be a little light on facts and a little heavy on assumptions.
|32 weeks 21 hours ago||Timelines don't match||
The timeline for taking Isaac and getting Damien don't line up. Ty will be making his decision very soon while Damien won't be for almost a year.
That being said, we are certainly closer to home. If we have a shot at him I say we should try to re-light that fire.
|32 weeks 2 days ago||Simply Curious||
Can anyone explain to me the fascination behind mock drafts?
I just don't get it at all. Year after year they're hardly ever even close to being right, but so many people just eat em up. Why?
|33 weeks 5 days ago||Did||
Did any other show take a nose dive in plot and writing and quickly as Heroes?
|35 weeks 6 days ago||Ahh Into the wind||
I completely forgot about that one!
I was thinking about Hillsborough vs Two Escobars for my #1, but man.. Into the wind is up there. That one was great as well.
|35 weeks 6 days ago||I'm still recovering||
I'm still recovering from the 30 for 30 on Hillsborough from Tuesday night.
Great great piece... but man was it difficult to watch sometimes. I honestly think it was the best 30 for 30 yet.
Hopefully this one is a bit more up-beat. :)
|37 weeks 23 hours ago||I'm trying to remember||
I'm trying to remember the last time a "OMG This team really love this player and will trade up for him" where the team actually ended up trading up for that player.
I honestly can't recall it happening.
|37 weeks 1 day ago||"Checks and balances"||
It's actually our version of democracy working as intended.
|37 weeks 2 days ago||I don't||
I don't know if it would go away. But boy would it be one gigantic step in the right direction and would really quiet down a lot of the criticism against the NCAA.
|37 weeks 2 days ago||I disagree||
I disagree, representing the players who played before you is more than consistent with Bo's "the Team" mantra.
I also don't really see how it's any type of a distraction.
|37 weeks 2 days ago||I'm rooting for UConn||
I'll be rooting for UConn, but not really because of this. The Fab 5 have had their time to shine, and they're known for a lot more than being 5 freshmen that did very well.
(Edited to sound less dickish. Since I have a habit of sounding dickish)
|38 weeks 5 days ago||Newbie||
Who you callin a newbie? ;)
I'm a lurker, but my account is older than yours. Therefore, I clearly have a larger ePeen.
|38 weeks 5 days ago||Hey||
Hey, if people want them than by all means ignore me. I just assumed (and we know what happens when one assumes) most people didn't want a topic every time someone ended up declaring as a lot of peeps declare.
Sorry for being "That guy" :)
|38 weeks 5 days ago||I'm not trying to be "that guy"||
But do we really need a topic created for each guy who ends up declaring in college basketball?
|38 weeks 5 days ago||Yeahhhh||
Yeah, decommits after his primary recuriter is fired.
What a quitter... </sarcasm>