Member for

14 years 7 months
Points
9.00

Recent Comments

Date Title Body
(No subject)

28-6 M 28, Illinois 6
I vote for "Michigan Stadium" I vote for "Michigan Stadium" like the old press box.
34-10 M

34-10 M

Implied multiplication

For those of you who think this is so obvious:

Let a=48, b=2, c=12.

What is a/bc?

I think there is some argument to be made that the implied multiplication (bc) has higher precedence than the division.  Interestingly, Wolfram Alpha interprets 48/2(9+3) as 288 but a/bc, and also a/b(c), as a/(bc). In any real situation this expression should be clarified; it's just poorly written as is and there's no need to establish a correct interpretation.

Suggestion

A way to incorporate the idea of "strong wins" into your first set of rankings: give the edges weights inversely proportional to margin of victory (so blowout wins are "shorter" than close wins) and then look for the shortest path.

CK jinx Note that 3/4 of those teams actually were victims of the CK Award jinx.
imo... OSU Iowa PSU Michigan Wisconsin MSU Indiana Minnesota Purdue Northwestern Illinois
Win +EV v. points +EV While it is true that we always want to make the most +EV choice, in the case of a football team, the EV in question is not yards gained or points scored, but games won. We can choose a play that does not maximize our yardage EV, but does maximize the chance of winning the game. (This is where the analogy of tournament poker comes in; we want to maximize chances of winning the tournament, not our chip EV.) A completely obvious example of this is a late-game scenario. It's 4th and goal on the 1 with 5 seconds left in the game, and the team trails by 2 points. Our points EV is maximized by going for the touchdown, but clearly the right choice is to kick a field goal, since the goal of a football team is to win games, not score as many points as possible.