i would find this more credible if it was about Tom Crean
- Member for
- 3 years 19 weeks
|2 years 36 weeks ago||Oops, not allowed to criticize.||
How was my post trolling? Did I not make valid points, or attack anyone? I understand your sig phrase. (I twice)
On the chart, only ND is not B1G. The only way UM is #1 is quantity. If criteria for #1 is a combination, it would be more clear to state that.
If I said Go Badgers, would that be more cheezy?
|2 years 36 weeks ago||My 2 cents||
I'm 100% UM blue, but I'd like to make 3 comments about the chart.
1, I don't like ND included in the ranking. I understand the regional interest, so put them after/under the 12 B1G teams. not ranked 13, just "I" for independant or Interest or Information, whatever.
2, I don't believe that the top criteria should be quantity. Either total points or average rating would be better, IMHO.
3, I wouldn't include Punters, Kickers, and LSs, as their actual value far exceeds their star rating.
Great information! I couldn't/wouldn't do all that work. But I can criticize! LOL!
Thanks! Go Blue!
|3 years 19 weeks ago||Probably have to do a||
Probably have to do a redshirt to acclimate him to B1G. So really looking at 2013, IMO