all of the people
Papochronopolis
History
- Member for
- 2 years 35 weeks
- Blog
- View recent blog entries
Karma
- Current value
- 1
Recent Comments
| Date | Title | Body |
|---|---|---|
| 10 weeks 9 hours ago | One thing I haven't seen mentioned |
Ohio's tendency to play overaggressive and go for offensive rebounds makes me think we will look to RUN, RUN, RUN. If we can get those easy buckets and not turn the ball over in transition (cough cough Hardaway) I think we will steadily control this game from beginning to end... |
| 12 weeks 1 day ago | I hope OSU loses |
If they lose tonight, and cant get it done in EL, we wont be conference champions, but we would at least most likely not see MSU and OSU until the BTT finals... |
| 15 weeks 1 day ago | You saying this: "Just look |
You saying this: "Just look at Michigan pre-season rank next year, they are/will be ranked lower because of strength of schedule. One loss to shitty team, they will be out like Okie state for any championship consideration no matter how tough their schedule will be." Gives me all the reason to want to support a playoff. One shitty loss shouldn't prevent M from having a shot at the MNC. In regards to voter bias, scheduling bias, etc., if you want to give it back to the voters only, prepare to see the SEC teams winning it every year from here to enternity. You know who is going to take at least 2 of the top 5 spots in the preseason polls. |
| 15 weeks 1 day ago | I disagree: |
Dr. Saturday lays out a solid response to your argument:
"In the first place, it would be impossible for the college football equivalent of a 9-7 NFL team to make the cut in any logistically feasible bracket, even one as large as 16 teams. Compare to the NFL, where more than a third of the league qualifies for the playoffs every year (a much lower number than in the NBA and NHL, which admit a majority), an eight-team playoff in college football would only include 6.5 percent of current FBS programs (8 of 123), the cream of the crop by any standard; a 12-team playoff would include 9.8 percent, still restricting the field to the elite. My pet plan favors a 10-team setup, but the specific number is frankly semantic: A field that included the college football equivalent of a 9-7 NFL team would have to consist of at least 46 teams, a logistical impossibility. And because it would be exceedingly difficult for any college team to make an 8, 10, 12 or 16-team field with more than two losses — or even with only two losses, in an 8 or 10-team field — the gap between the top of the bracket and the bottom would be a) Negligible, and b) Easily closed if the team on the bottom actually won the tournament."
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/york-giants-teach-colleg... |
| 15 weeks 6 days ago | In China it's go Michiga! |
|
| 15 weeks 6 days ago | I look forward to the |
I look forward to the breakdown on Jaron Dukes! |
| 21 weeks 6 days ago | Koger will make him his |
Koger will make him his manchild |
| 23 weeks 5 days ago | Dont mean to thread-jack but |
Dont mean to thread-jack but can someone please explain to me what happened with that CP3 trade getting blocked? Every media outlet's explanation seems to just scratch the surface... |
| 24 weeks 5 days ago | so if Sparty loses but stays |
so if Sparty loses but stays above us and Baylor passes us are we still okay? |
| 28 weeks 5 days ago | What about |
Not being able to adjust to opponents' blitzes? Again Iowa found a way to get through to Denard and for the most part he struggled under pressure. |
