A monkey could win 9 games with this team and schedule next year. Especially when all of the fake buckeyes leave for the draft so they don't miss half a year, and msu's luck runs out. for some reason Nebraska is the only game that scares me.
These are the same "c'mon Lloyd" shouters. If I recall they would boo every time Lloyd punted a football. This year though, was a whole 'notha level, at least in my section. I almost got in a fight with a Michigan "fan" in the stands this year.
This program has become a behemoth that just ate itself. it's now become WIN so that we can support the program, rather than support the program so that we can WIN. This is a bigger embarassment to the school than any of the RR losses. I will sit in the stands next year and berate the coaching staff for every stupid little thing just to make everyone's experience around me as terrible as mine was this season at EVERY game. People in the stands wearing the Maize and Blue were being worse than the opposing teams fans in jeering the coaching staff. I think we have possibly the worst fans in college football, the ones who support the program because of the winning. these are the people who:
Can't figure out what color maize is
the only word to the fight song they know is "hail"
can't figure out how to put thier hands together to make noise
find the seats at the stadium comfortable
leave the game with 5 minutes left to beat the line
say "forcier would have made that throw" on obvious DROPPED passes
BOO THE TEAM WHEN THEY HEAD INTO THE TUNNEL AT HALF!!!!!!!!!!!!!
with turnovers or missed field goals is zero. The breakdown above would be interesting with turnovers factored in, seems to me the most are occuring in first and second quarter of the game - situationally I think they are all happening when the game is "in doubt", I also think that 10 points is not a comfortable lead for any DC that we face - I don't see prevent when the opponent goes up by ten.
It's the turnovers that made the difference in all of the losses except Wiscy. We put up more yards in the first half than the second against MSU, about the same yards in each half on Penn State, and 100 "crazy" additional yards in the second half on Iowa. If this offense doesn't turn over the ball or miss lots of field goals we win 2 of those three - defense notwithstanding. We are not piling up yardage in Garbage time as you suggest.
Pretty sure "we" could also be 8-4 and have a chance to WIN a bowl game in year 3. Last time I checked. Seems like you don't realize that year 3 isn't over yet.
seeing he had such immediate results @ Stanford...
Coaching Career
Year
School/Team
Assignment
1994-2001
Western Kentucky
Volunteer Assistant Coach
2002-03
Oakland Raiders
Quarterbacks Coach
2004-06
San Diego
Head Coach
2007-10
Stanford
Head Coach
Stanford Total
17-20-0 (3 seasons)
Career Total
46-26-0 (6 seasons)
2009: 8-5 (Finishes tied for second in league and leads Stanford to first bowl appearance in eight years) 2008: 5-7 (Stanford finishes second in the Pac-10 in rushing offense) 2007: 4-8 (Victories over #2 ranked USC and defending Pac-10 Conference co-champion Cal)
Recent Comments
A monkey could win 9 games with this team and schedule next year. Especially when all of the fake buckeyes leave for the draft so they don't miss half a year, and msu's luck runs out. for some reason Nebraska is the only game that scares me.
loves them some donuts.
the original post was fail
dude cried today, so do I.
Wins 9 games with this team and schedule next year.*
*this team includes Denard Robinson at QB.
pretty sure that this is why RR doesn't get year 4, because he was set up to succeed, and we couldn't have that happen.
He will stay.
your uninformed post about RR running mallett out makes you fail the test. You think Mallett made the wrong choice for Mallett?
These are the same "c'mon Lloyd" shouters. If I recall they would boo every time Lloyd punted a football. This year though, was a whole 'notha level, at least in my section. I almost got in a fight with a Michigan "fan" in the stands this year.
This program has become a behemoth that just ate itself. it's now become WIN so that we can support the program, rather than support the program so that we can WIN. This is a bigger embarassment to the school than any of the RR losses. I will sit in the stands next year and berate the coaching staff for every stupid little thing just to make everyone's experience around me as terrible as mine was this season at EVERY game. People in the stands wearing the Maize and Blue were being worse than the opposing teams fans in jeering the coaching staff. I think we have possibly the worst fans in college football, the ones who support the program because of the winning. these are the people who:
Bo is in a casket six feet under. Just like the program.
"this"
would he make centaur babies?
It's a legitimate question.
so here it is:
Jim Harbaugh
Does charlie daniels play a mean fiddle?
with turnovers or missed field goals is zero. The breakdown above would be interesting with turnovers factored in, seems to me the most are occuring in first and second quarter of the game - situationally I think they are all happening when the game is "in doubt", I also think that 10 points is not a comfortable lead for any DC that we face - I don't see prevent when the opponent goes up by ten.
It's the turnovers that made the difference in all of the losses except Wiscy. We put up more yards in the first half than the second against MSU, about the same yards in each half on Penn State, and 100 "crazy" additional yards in the second half on Iowa. If this offense doesn't turn over the ball or miss lots of field goals we win 2 of those three - defense notwithstanding. We are not piling up yardage in Garbage time as you suggest.
sounds like crazy talk.
If you want to know what the meaning of the word is... is, ask that dude that monica blew, because he said "it depends."
I hope that clears things up.
they were all really scared of us after we let App State blow us up in our house.
Pretty sure "we" could also be 8-4 and have a chance to WIN a bowl game in year 3. Last time I checked. Seems like you don't realize that year 3 isn't over yet.
on my toilet paper.
seeing he had such immediate results @ Stanford...
Coaching Career
2009: 8-5 (Finishes tied for second in league and leads Stanford to first bowl appearance in eight years)
2008: 5-7 (Stanford finishes second in the Pac-10 in rushing offense)
2007: 4-8 (Victories over #2 ranked USC and defending Pac-10 Conference co-champion Cal)
I will go burn a couch.
It's why I am here.