who fails upward better: Whitlock, Kiffin, or Brandon?
- Member for
- 7 years 3 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|2 weeks 6 days ago||Telling.||
|3 weeks 5 days ago||It's not a novel.||
It's not a novel.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
|30 weeks 4 days ago||Yeah, that was awesome.||
Yeah, that was awesome.
|32 weeks 4 days ago||The lack of taste was a huge||
The lack of taste was a huge issue. But it seems that DB left with no friends because he treated just about everyone as badly as he could get away with (and often he didn't get away with it--see those emails). That adds up to some species of bad person--surely something less than a parricide or rapist, but whether you'd say "piece of shit" or "asshole" is just splitting hairs.
|32 weeks 4 days ago||His Philippics, I'd say.||
His Philippics, I'd say.
|41 weeks 4 days ago||You think a guy pulling 8||
You think a guy pulling 8 mil. a year is worried about the cost of living?
|41 weeks 4 days ago||Yeah, this is some straight||
Yeah, this is some straight up grave dancin'.
|45 weeks 1 day ago||Dude, port is strictly for||
Dude, port is strictly for after dinner.
I mean, Go Blue!
|46 weeks 2 days ago||7 mil is a bad symbol, but 5||
7 mil is a bad symbol, but 5 is okay? Explain that, please.
|47 weeks 5 days ago||I live in Oakland and I love||
I live in Oakland and I love it. Great town, and much improved over the last 5-10 years. Not that JH would have to live here.
|51 weeks 1 day ago||I agree with just about all||
I agree with just about all of it in principle. But it's not written in a very professional way. Far too many exclamation points, just to start (like a 12-year-old's diary). If the authors want it to be taken seriously they should use a more formal style, whch could still convey the severity of the issue.
|51 weeks 2 days ago||"There's still a chance to||
"There's still a chance to save Hoke!"
|1 year 3 weeks ago||Forcing the defender to push||
Forcing the defender to push through you, and thus slowing him, certainly constitutes at least "a modicum of resistance."
|1 year 5 weeks ago||not on your life ...||
not on your life ...
|1 year 5 weeks ago||Then what does Pam Ward have||
Then what does Pam Ward have to do with anything?
|1 year 6 weeks ago||Shut up. You're far too||
Shut up. You're far too reasonable.
|1 year 7 weeks ago||Dude, that's a cardigan.||
Dude, that's a cardigan.
|1 year 22 weeks ago||I think what many of believe||
I think what many of believe is that by appealing to the die-hard, tradition-obsessed, quasi-purist crowd, the AD might build the "brand" in such a way as to make the experience more appealling to all. You can't compete with TV by being "better" in terms of the visuals and the convenience. You have to be different from TV, the NFL, etc. You have to cultivate what makes (or once made, if only in our imaginations) Michigan special.
It's sad that the sooges in charge of the AD are so tone-deaf that they can't about the "brand" except in narrow, short-sighted way.
|1 year 26 weeks ago||Okak, that could be so. Is||
Okak, that could be so. Is that common knowledge? And is that what the author of the post meant? In the context of this article, it seems like it should have some bearing on Fisher's coaching ability. Still not clear if it's supposed to be a credit or detriment to him.
|1 year 26 weeks ago||"In the aftermath Fisher||
"In the aftermath Fisher decided to take the team to Europe, an experience that was lost on his wards."
I found this a bit puzzling. Does it mean that it was a bad decision to take the trip? That the players didn't appreciate or profit from it? If so, why is that true? I recall Jalen speaking about the trip in the Fab Five documentary, but, if memory serves, he was positive about it, culture-shock notwithstanding.
|1 year 29 weeks ago||Isn't a recruit meeting||
Isn't a recruit meeting Charles Woodson some kind of NCAA violation?
|1 year 31 weeks ago||stream?||
|1 year 32 weeks ago||I agree. I think the rule||
I agree. I think the rule could make an impact because it would give defenses confidence that they could substitute as long as they did it in fewer than 10 secs. The fear of getting burned by a quick snap is lessened, if not removed. That certainty would, I assume, make it easier to practice for facing the hurry-up as well.
|1 year 33 weeks ago||Once the spacecraft had||
Once the spacecraft had landed, wouldn't it have been clear that a person could walk safely?
|1 year 33 weeks ago||Winning there is the best||
Winning there is the best response possible.
|1 year 41 weeks ago||Maybe not likely, but it||
Maybe not likely, but it would be fun to have Orgeron in the B1G.
|1 year 44 weeks ago||Wrong. If your team is bad it||
Wrong. If your team is bad it can't possibly get better for at least two decades. At least that's what I've been hearing lately.
|2 years 1 week ago||"the platonic ideal of your||
"the platonic ideal of your linebackers not understanding"
I don't think there can be a Platonic ideal (or any ideal) of a mistake or ignorance --that's deviation from the ideal.
|2 years 1 week ago||Wow, an excellent suggestion.||
Wow, an excellent suggestion. Does every bit of content need its own comment thread?
|2 years 4 weeks ago||NW looked decent||
The heat? You've obviously not spent any time in the Bay Area.
I saw the game and wasn't terribly impressed with NW, though they do have some speedy guys. Game could have gone to Cal quite easily.