- Member for
- 7 years 20 weeks
- View recent blog entries
- Skill == starting experience + recruiting profile + previous perfomace
- Support == surrounding talent + experience (RBs, WRs, OL)
- System == offensive scheme + regime tenure
- Schedule == expected quality of defenses that will be faced
- Work In Progress: 130 and under; historically roughly 60% of QBs with at leat 100 attempts
- Solid QB: 135; 10%
- Good QB: 140; 10%
- Great QB: 145+; 20%
- two position switches
- carries the cross of 9-effin-8
- sacrificed his body behind a poorly developed O Line
- tried to develop his passing skills despite lacking a actual positon coach
- learning a different scheme with new responsibilities....again
- I'd like to see if there's a link between about "roster integrity" and "turnaround time". If I recall correcty Saban had a pretty nice roster waiting for him at Bama and he did well pretty quickly. Michigan has a ready made roster for quick takeoff, IMO.
- What about doing the Bill O'Brien / Pete Carol thing and bringing in a career NFL guy as a replacement? If Mike Tomlin somehow becomes available I would do just about anything to get him. He'd be so awesome I wouldnt even know where to start quaching my excitement. I'd put him up there with Harbaugh in terms of attactive options for Michigan to consider. I also wonder how a guy like Jim Swartz or Josh McDaniels would do as a College Head Coach. Greg Roman would also get a look from me. Jack Del Rio? Schiano? Cut me some slack here, they cant all be gems.
- Also, what about sniping a guy from another bigger school and let them sweat all this stuff out? I know its a cliche thing for fans to do but Michigan's pockets run deep, yo. I'd holler at Jim Mora and Kyle Whittingham for sure. Guys like that.
|5 weeks 5 days ago||I demand this tee shirt||
"I aint talkin facts, I'm talkin gettin lucky. #mgoblog"
Take my money.
Can we at least get an off season tag line out of this?
|13 weeks 2 days ago||Michigan QB||
for continuity's sake I feel compelled to put a number on my prediction. I'm going 140 based on the outside weapons, respectable running game, and playcalling.
|13 weeks 2 days ago||MURDA!||
murda was the case that they gave me #snoopdogg
|13 weeks 3 days ago||I wish I could upvote this||
I wish I could upvote this twice. Good luck.
|13 weeks 6 days ago||Rain down on me sweet, sweet||
Rain down on me sweet, sweet koolaid!
|17 weeks 2 days ago||Fuck Cancer||
|29 weeks 4 days ago||Jay Harbaugh's Diary||
Can we make this a thing? That's good stuff right there
|30 weeks 6 days ago||Another Jourdan Lewis?||
|45 weeks 2 days ago||that;s actually a shot of||
that;s actually a shot of gin, man. Which begs the question: just, how effed up *are* you?
|45 weeks 2 days ago||Dirty Martini||
Beefeater cuz its an actual legit London Dry. Wanna spend more? Fine. But, why would you do that? It's London Dry Gin, fella; don't get cute. Side note: Vodka is for pussies.
Vermouth: I actually am not a hater but mind your proportions, homie 'cause....yeah, it can make the deal go south and quick. I certainly don't think ZERO is the answer. Folks say zero 'cause they're afraid of getting in wrong. In other words, they're pussies.
Olives: Gimme big mofos. Like, real big. And a lot of them. Say, *at least* equal parts by weight solids to liquid. 16 ounce mininmum, please. Anythiing less is for pussies.
Stuff In the Olives: the only acceptable stuff is blue cheese 'cause we're Michigan fans aint we? But, try to stuff an olive and you'll quickly find that to be some high effort isht, bruh. You'll get the same effect by keeping some blue cheese crumbles dry and near by. In summary, stuffing those little effers is too much maintencance, so screw all that. And you know what being high maintenance is for...that's right, pussies.
How dirty?: Filthy, man. Obviously. Dont be a pussy.
Shaken or Stirred?: I hesitate to legitimize the question. Let's just say James Bond is a pussy.
Dont mess this up, fellas. Its acutally pretty simple.
|50 weeks 5 days ago||What if Leavitt does get hired?||
I guess I understand the concerns many are expressing over the circumstances of Leavitt's termination at USF. What I dont understand is the certainty with which those positions are held. The people who will make the hiring decision will have much more information than we regarding what actually happened and we have no reason to question their judgement.
Spinning it forward, if Leavitt does become DC and he does as good a job as Harbaugh expects, would all the people turrning their nose up at Leavitt now do the same then? I doubt it.
|1 year 14 weeks ago||hallelujah!||
It has begun!!!
|1 year 14 weeks ago||slippery slope||
Many valid points on both sides have been raised but my intial reaction is that I dont like this. Does the U report all violations of the law to the parents? I dont know but I dont think so. regadless, why stop here? Why not keep parents appraised of the student's academic standing...etc. Basically, I'm concerned about the slippery slope.
|1 year 14 weeks ago||Word||
I understand what you're saying but I don't think we're on the same page as to what my intentions are. My goal isn't to go out on a limb, it's to be accurate while also being plausible. I want to categorize guys into expected tiers based on what I think history has shown given what I think I know about the player today. I dont want to bag these guys I just want to size up their skill and their context. Indeed, I'm generally expecting guys to be better than they were last year because that what I think happens when a player gets more experience and development time. Its cool that you disagree and I'd like to hear more about why that is.
Known Unknowns: Future events
Unknown Unknowns: I don't know
Predicting worse than 130 is just mean and that's not a goal of mine. A perfomrance at or below level requires an unskilled player or a lot of bad things to stack on each other. Either way I dont expect the guy to be a significant threat. I simply reference those things in the thesis about my expectation. Likewise predicting over 145 takes a really good situation. Precision beyond this is just asking to be wrong.
Adjacent tiers overlap which I think makes sense. Can we REALLY tell the difference between 136 and 139? Probably not. 136 vs 141? I think so.
Hope this helps you understand what I think this this is and what it isnt. Thanks for reading and for the feedback.
Where do you think these guys will end up?
|1 year 14 weeks ago||Good stuff||
Bill Connolly at Football Studyhall has a good metric for rating RBs. I believe Green beat out Drake in that metric with Smith hanging out near average territory. Ty Isaac's lay available rating (2013) is the best of all.
Sounds like it's a dogfight in camp so we should have good depth.
|1 year 14 weeks ago||Welp, that's embarrassing||
I should have just gone with a picture of Harbaugh. I'm'a just leave so as to remind myself: when in doubt, Harbaugh.
|2 years 6 weeks ago||I don't expect it to happen either but||
MSU have up 14 to EMU and Wyoming. Purdue scored 31. Maybe State tris a little harder to shut us out or whatever but that defense gives up plays. It's all on Devin.
Cooks efficiency against not Jacksonville state, EMU, and Wyoming is also not that spectacular.
Our guys have a non zero chance.
|2 years 9 weeks ago||Thunder and Blazes||
aka Entry of the Gladiators. It's the "Adults" not the "Kids"
|2 years 9 weeks ago||Yep||
Also: Thunder and Blazes
|2 years 9 weeks ago||Gary Nova||
"I think their quarterback is a very, very good football player. "
Surely, he can't be talking about Gary "These Throws Aint Loyal" Nova. Someone please confirm.
|2 years 10 weeks ago||Fred Jackson||
So, our RBs dont understand the plays they're running and stuggle in pass protection. What is it that Fred does again?
|2 years 10 weeks ago||Identity||
The Ivy league shools chose their identity and Michigan chose to make a competitive football program part if its own identity a *long* time ago. That was a deliberate choice, not an accident. Sure, we can always change it but I like the identity we have and see nothing problematic about keeping it. What reason is there to shy away from high level competition other than "because it's hard"?
We're approaching 150 years and suddenly we're just going to bury that? Cant be serious...
|2 years 10 weeks ago||bull[ogna]||
If Hoke moves Devin to the receiving corps I will lose what little respect for him I have left. Devin has done more for him than anyone else on the team:
Yeah, Devin is struggling but god dammit he's earned the right to end his career on his own terms as the quarterback of this team.
Hoke moving him would be a slap in the face. "Well, Devin, thanks for everything but you just dont have it, kid. We're giving up on you." Morris has shown NOTHING that indicates he would provide an upgrade in performance at the position. Meanwhile everyone else is supposed to beleive they still have a shot at the POS B1G Title.What kind of message would that send to the rest of the team?
|2 years 10 weeks ago||outstanding||
Love the presentation of the context behind the Brown Jug story. Back when I was pumping out diaries like a madman,I ran across an article from the Harvard Crimson circa 1950 and it stopped me dead in my tracks. It prompted one of the diaries I'm most proud of Old Blue: the New Crimson.
I think Michigan can be the white knight but first "we" (those with influence) need to understand what Michigan is, what it isnt, and what we want it to be. Acknowledgement of the problem in the first step towards adressing it.
Lets go, Blue.
|2 years 10 weeks ago||Is It?||
I know what you mean and I agree from a long term perspective. However in the short term, the 2010 squad did not get *dominated* by mediocre teams like this team has so far this year. The defense was putrid but at least the team had a chance to win games against teams that were on their level (Iowa and Penn State). Against the good teams (Michigan State, Wisconsin, Ohio State) yeah it got ugly...do you personally expect a different experience this year? I can't at this point. I'll hope my ass off but that hasn’t been working, Holmes. The saying goes that offense wins games but defense wins championships…we need to win some daggum games, G.
The fact that Brady has assembled high level talent and we're getting embarrassed anyway is a liability rather than an asset at this point. The "youth" line bought him a fourth year, he's out of sand. We should be better than this.
Also, one thing Brady has enjoyed that RichRod didn’t was $1.5M to spend on coordinators. History would be very different if RR had been afforded that same support. Regardless, he failed and was rightfully ejected. But, let’s not act like the program isn’t on fire. If you prefer the hue of these flames over the hue of those, then that’s your prerogative. As for me, I’m sick of melting.
|2 years 10 weeks ago||I love Devin but he looks||
I love Devin but he looks really bad right now. Maybe there's too much thinking going on up there, too afraid to make a mistake. Hell, I dont know. He seems really hesitant to throw at times and I personally wish he'd scramble more often.
I certainly hope he gets back on his game because it would suck to see him go out like this.
|2 years 11 weeks ago||yes||
There are also a surprising number of inconsistencies when cross referencing to other PBP repositories. Nothing that's a show stopper but gotta be careful.
|2 years 11 weeks ago||Unfortunately cfbstats is no||
Unfortunately cfbstats is no longer free. Packages start at $750/year.Historic data costs $1500. I'd be willing to pay for what my man was doing but that is just too steep. I has sad.
Seth was saying that mgoblog had a project going where the the free service cfbstats was providing would reside here. Not sure where that stands though.
[EDIT: here's a USAToday story to what happened to cfbstats. Basically these guys were doing similar things and BIG TIMERS (coaching staffs, etc) were subsribing to their stuff. That data is being provided to the CFB Playoff Selection Committee. So, the gobbled up cfbstats and now they're charging for it. I'd love to be part of an open source project to develop a free parser in python or something. Whatever man, this sucks.]
|2 years 11 weeks ago||Great Diary||
An unfortunate but necessary topic of discussion. Nice Job. Appreciate the link to your data as well. Some things I would like to investigate (or see investigated by someone else):
|2 years 12 weeks ago||12 yard run you say?||
Hmmm, where have I heard that before...
/self high five