and... i like them? I think I like them.
- Member for
- 4 years 32 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|1 day 5 hours ago||I think most experts think||
I think most experts think he's staying.
|1 day 6 hours ago||The nba drafts on potential||
The nba drafts on potential as much as anything. And Robinson has plenty. I bet he sees the jump Hardaway made into the first round and figures he's got as much or more talent than Tim had. And frankly he'll end up in the first round.
|3 days 12 hours ago||You're right about that||
You're right about that terrible move in which he'd retreat and retreat, then try to 180 around the defense. It worked a few times a year earlier. So that became his safety move -- until teams figured it out, and he'd end up losing 90 yards on the play. But he mostly cleaned that up as the year progressed. And I do think whatever issues he had were greatly exacerbated by the constant onslaught of D-linemen. No QB could have done much with such pressure. He did as well as could be expected.
|3 days 13 hours ago||Really? You had to put this||
Really? You had to put this thread in a Michigan sports site? There's OT and then there's too OT. This counts as the latter. Yes, people can skip this. But threads like this one clutter the page and force down more relevant threads.
|3 days 13 hours ago||Agreed. Given Borges's||
Agreed. Given Borges's confusing schemes, Funk gets a mulligan for last year. He won't get one for this year, though.
|3 days 13 hours ago||People are waaaay too hard on||
People are waaaay too hard on Gardner. Yes, he stumbled mightily during that awkward string following the ND game. But he recovered nicely, throwing only a handful of INTs down the stretch and positively shredding OSU (while hobbling on a badly injured foot/ankle). All of which was done while fleeing for his life behind the worst O-line in school history. Nobody took more hard hits than he did. And it was his first year as a starting QB. All in all, he should be applauded. Also, given that QBs tend to make significant leaps during their second year as a starter, expect bigger things from him this year.
|4 days 15 hours ago||But if Horford is looking for||
But if Horford is looking for a top-notch place to study, that ain't it.
|5 days 11 hours ago||Of course it means he knows||
Of course it means he knows Mitch is staying. Horford wants minutes -- that's his main goal. If Mitch leaves, Horford is a starter. No way he leaves there. Obviously, once he learned Mitch was staying, Horford bolted -- especially since Donnal will eat up a lot of "big" minutes as well. This is a no-brainer. Players aren't that complicated. I can't believe some people think otherwise.
|5 days 15 hours ago||We could show reports in the||
We could show reports in the News, Free Press, and Daily saying that he was looking at less playing time due to the emergence of Donnal and the likely return of McGary. Plus whatever contributions the incoming freshmen made. Now he's behind at least two more talented players, rather than just one. It's a given, dude. He's leaving because of PT. He said as much. So maybe you should calm down and learn to read.
|6 days 5 hours ago||He'd have to pay his way at||
He'd have to pay his way at Harvard. They give assistance -- which really just amounts to low-interest loans. And there's no guarantee he'd start at Stanford. I'm thinking he'd be ten-ten guy at Oberlin.
|6 days 6 hours ago||Perhaps he knows Nik is just||
Perhaps he knows Nik is just puffing.
|6 days 7 hours ago||Agreed. He wouldn't start on||
Agreed. He wouldn't start on most B10 teams. He's got some agility and finesse. But he's also a "big" who can't cover or score against other bigs. He'll thrive in a smaller league.
|6 days 8 hours ago||No. This is being downplayed||
No. This is being downplayed because it's really NOT a big deal. We're talking about an average bench player who stood to play maybe ten minutes a game. And now his place will be taken by players with greater talent. This really isn't a big deal.
|6 days 8 hours ago||Shawn Windsor reports,||
Shawn Windsor reports, accurately: "Horford wasn’t likely to get as much time next season with the ascension of freshman forward Mark Donnal. If Mitch McGary returns, then playing time would have been even scarcer."
|6 days 8 hours ago||Whine on, sis. Doesn't make||
Whine on, sis. Doesn't make her brother look so great.
|6 days 8 hours ago||Just highly unlikely and||
Just highly unlikely and fairly illogical.
|6 days 8 hours ago||He contributed plenty. Truth||
He contributed plenty. Truth is, though, he wasn't a great fit for the system.
|6 days 8 hours ago||For all those who argued that||
For all those who argued that this was a non-basketball decision. Puh-leeze.
|6 days 9 hours ago||Hatch is a likely medical||
Hatch is a likely medical hardship case.
|6 days 9 hours ago||Because as of two weeks ago||
Because as of two weeks ago he had no such academic concerns. Also Michigan has a ton of world-class grad programs. This was a basketball decision, obviously.
|6 days 10 hours ago||You mean besides our||
You mean besides our All-American rebounding-machine center Mitch McGary? See the entire chess-board, please. N
|6 days 10 hours ago||Dude, think about it. Brian||
Dude, think about it. Brian should, too. This is better news that you think. Granted, we could use Horford. But a guy who was looking at starting for a Top 20 team doesn't suddenly transfer to another program for one final year. He does so after determining that he's now stuck behind not one player (Morgan), but two (McGary, Donnal) and maybe even three (the other young bigs). Michigan's front-court will actually be stronger next season. That's good. And that's why Horford left.
|6 days 10 hours ago||No, he was looking at no more||
No, he was looking at no more than his standard 12 minutes per game. Think of it this way. You're subtracting Jordan Morgan but adding both McGary and Donnal. This spells fewer minutes for Horford -- especially so if you consider that a couple other young bigs might also chip away at Horford's time. Horford was okay, and he definitely contributed. But he's also quite replacable.
|6 days 10 hours ago||Just because the guy is into||
Just because the guy is into Taoism doesn't mean his transfer is related to that. If he just wanted a different academic experience, he wouldn't be transferring; he'd just attend grad school somewhere else. But transferring implies that he's switching basketball programs. And, if the guy wants to play -- or play pro ball -- the potential for dimished playing time would be a motivating force. McGary's return, plus an ascendant Donnal, suggests he'd get less PT this year. Not to mention that Horford recently said he'd be back.
|1 week 5 hours ago||You do realize that wrestling||
You do realize that wrestling isn't a sport?
|1 week 7 hours ago||Detroit trading up would be||
Detroit trading up would be ridiculous, especially since they need D far more than they need O. Meeting win Watkins is just gamesmanship.
|1 week 1 day ago||I have to believe that if the||
I have to believe that if the guy was actually in track to start, he wouldn't have transferred to another program. The kid wasn't going to play much this year.
|1 week 1 day ago||If he's actually a beast,||
If he's actually a beast, Beilein would have played him -- especially given our shortfalls in size.
|1 week 2 days ago||The Nik Stauskas of his day.||
The Nik Stauskas of his day. For rednecks.
|1 week 2 days ago||They're doomed for the next 3||
They're doomed for the next 3 years. Everyone knows it.