this may be of some local interest
- Member for
- 5 years 31 weeks
|2 years 39 weeks ago||Notion that Hoke was solely responsible for Sugar Bowl win is||
Hoke defenders can't have it both ways -- you can't say, Hoke isn't winning and hasn't had the chance with his own players and, oh by the way, did you see what he did in year 1? Won a Sugar Bowl. Yeah, that's right, Michigan did, with players recruited by Rich Rodriguez and, while I will admit that the defense was much improved, there is little doubt that had Rodriguez been permitted to stay, a condition would have been the complete dismantling of his defensive staff. It is not a stretch to conclude that new staff would have improved Michigan's defensive performance as well. So at the end of the day, you have Hoke winning the Sugar Bowl with talent recruited by Rich Rodriguez and he has done absolutely nothing in the 2 years since. If anything, the skill players he has at his disposal are playing worse in year 3 than they played in year 2. Exhibit A - Devin Gardner.
|2 years 39 weeks ago||Ah yes Pride goeth before the fall.||
And our Michigan Man now says "fergodsakes". What a step up?
|2 years 39 weeks ago||BTW Arizona 28 Oregon 9 before halftime||
Boy, I'd could sure go for some of Rita's dip right about now. Arizona would SMOKE Michigan right now.
|2 years 39 weeks ago||This is on Brandon.||
So tired of the excuses. Hoke's stream of excuses is every bit as annoying as RR's. And if I hear we just didn't execute one more time. Well. But ultimately this is on Brandon. And he better start delivering a product or that stadium's going to get awfully tough to fill. If that means firing the HC or insisting that someone else go, then that's what needs to be done. And this Michigan man BS had better be canned. Pride goeth before the fall. How's that Chicken Dance sounding now?