Rawls if he can hang onto it, I'd guesss
Leather D
History
- Member for
- 3 years 37 weeks
Karma
- Current value
Recent Comments
| Date | Title | Body |
|---|---|---|
| 3 years 37 weeks ago | You are forgetting one important point |
It is well known that beating Notre Dame is the exception that proves the CKA rule. Boston College is the anti-Notre Dame (outperforms its pre-season ranking; wins all of its bowl games; trim and humble coach). As such, by combining the associative property, the transitive property, cognative dissonance, and the theory of irrelativity, we can conclude the following: BC winning while under under the CKA curse is equal to any other team beating Notre Dame while under the CKA curse and thus proves the rule holds by fitting within the only known exception. |
