to play football, not to play trumpet
- Member for
- 5 years 47 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|1 day 22 hours ago||Does anyone know where his||
Does anyone know where his lacrosse offers came from? Did Michigan lacrosse recruit him?
|5 days 2 hours ago||If we're inviting someone||
If we're inviting someone from the poker world, then I'd be 100% in support of Norman Chad. But he has to commentate the event. That I would watch.
|2 weeks 1 day ago||Agree with all except the||
Agree with all except the weak schedule part. SOS has been very high all of the first few years. MUCH higher than any of the other newer programs. The wins have mostly come against lower ranked opponents, and there are no big name wins yet, but the losses have mostly come against very good teams.
|2 weeks 1 day ago||Even better, watch this. His||
Even better, watch this. His freshman year football highlights.
|2 weeks 1 day ago||They've only been around 4||
They've only been around 4 years, so define "awhile." Until this year, they still had club guys on the roster. This is the first year with four recruiting classes, and none of those classes was considered elite by anyone. They have one guy (King) that was considered a top 50 kind of player out of high school. They have developed guys like Schlosser, Jackson and Logan, none of whom were on any recruiting lists. They still haven't had anyone make any better than honrable mention all-conference. And who has left? I can't think of anyone.
Last year they came a goal away from making the Big Ten tournament against teams that have been around forever. The year before they made the ECAC tournament with half of the roster being club guys. I'd say they are tracking pretty well, and this level of recruiting coming in the future bodes really well.
|2 weeks 1 day ago||Looking at these classes||
Looking at these classes compared to the programs they have to compete against (Hopkins, Maryland, etc) in order to achieve "serious winning" I'd say the 2018 class is the first one that gets the talent here that is comparable. They will need a few of those classes at Michigan to be even. So probably another 4 or 5 years. If you can take a program from club to varsity and be competing with the big boys (Hopkins has like 50 national championships or something ridiculous) in only 9 or 10 years, that's pretty good.
I think it's impressive they are getting these kinds of commitments without even having facilities yet. I've been in the trailer where the lacrosse offices are. Yes it's Michigan, a lot of lacrosse people doubted they would be stealing east coast kids from the established powers so fast.
|8 weeks 3 days ago||Remember that they did it||
Remember that they did it pretty differently than many of those others you mention, plus they've played a much tougher schedule, starting in year one, than most new programs do. As a club team alum I'm thankful they did it the way they did. I feel included. I'm confident that in a few years, with the recruiting they are doing (they are putting together elite classes that will start arriving in a couple of years according to many in the coaching world) and the new facilities finally completed that they will leapfrog some of those other new programs you mention. They are going to have to. None of those other teams are playing in the Big Ten.
|8 weeks 3 days ago||WD, Nice work. Did you put||
WD, Nice work. Did you put this together from the schedules released by everyone else? JP sent out the schedule to alums a few weeks ago and indicated it would be released soon. Wondering what the holdup has been. I imagine this kind of thing will be eased when they have their own facility. It has to be more difficult to put all of this together when you are using shared facilities.
Last year the team was on TV quite a bit, especially down the stretch. Any idea what the TV schedule will be?
Those first three games are going to be tough. We'll see early how much the team has improved.
My sense is this team has all of the pieces necessary to compete this year except for an elite faceoff specialist. That's a big hole though. That and goalie are arguably the two most important factors. I'm not saying they match up with Hopkins and Maryland and the like yet. They don't have a single preseason AA and those teams are loaded with them. But they can play with them. Even with some glaring weaknesses they came within a goal of beating Penn State to make the Big Ten tournament last year. I'm sure they'll be picked by everyone to finish 5th or last, but it's not out of the question to sneak into that 4th spot. I'd feel a bit more comfortable if it was last year's schedule with PSU, OSU and RU at home.
|11 weeks 4 days ago||According to this article and||
According to the article below and some other things I've read Michigan is definitely making some noise in recruiting now. Being included in a top 5 class list with the likes of North Carolina, Duke, Virginia and Johns Hopkins is rarified air. (Grain of salt disclaimer: the 2018 class is still 2 1/2 years from getting to college.)
Ford is a legit prospect. His finalists were reportedly UM, UNC and ND. But I would hope that the Michigan staff could land a Ford at Michigan. Seems like a no-brainer decision unless he didn't want to deal with being a legacy, no?
|13 weeks 2 days ago||Cool maybe, but I always hate||
Cool maybe, but I always hate lacrosse lines over football lines. Plus, Michigan stadium, as cool as it is, is just too big a space for lacrosse. Even if they get 10,000 fans, it still would feel empty.
There are others that regularly play in football stadiums. Ohio State does. So does Harvard. I'm sure those programs would all love their own facilities like Michigan is building though. Huge recruiting sell.
I also wonder about the logistics of sharing anything with football. I would assume that football has priority 100% of the time, which they should. That has to be a challenge. I also assume this new facility will put things like team locker room, coaches office, meeting rooms and stuff like that all in the same place, which has to help in planning daily schedules.
|13 weeks 2 days ago||2000 is definitely on the||
2000 is definitely on the small side for lacrosse, but I don't know that it's too small for Michigan right now. Those bigger stadiums are all out east where lacrosse has more of a fan base. Hopefully they are planning to expand it if crowd sizes here get consistently bigger.
Notre Dame's stadium seats 2500, but they can fit 4500 if they seat people on the berm and bring in temporary bleachers.
Denver's stadium seats 2000 plus standing room areas.
In contrast Homewood Field at Johns Hopkins seats 8500, and Virginia's Klockner Stadium seats 3500 in the grandstands and another 3600 on the hillside. Ridley at Loyola seats around 6000.
|20 weeks 1 day ago||My guess is that it has||
My guess is that it has occured to people for a lot of Michigan promo videos. Michigan has always promoted the fact that JEJ is an alum. Perhaps it just took Harbaugh's celebrity to make it happen. The story here isn't that they thought of it (who hasn't?). It's that they did it.
A quick google turned up this:
I've always wanted to play Michigan football, and now i want to go to the dental school too.
I seem to recall a promotional video for the university (not just football) with his voice, but I can't find it.
|20 weeks 2 days ago||I am no soccer expert, but I||
I am no soccer expert, but I enjoy watching the sport from time to time. It seems from the stats that Michigan dominated play, but came up short anyway. In a low scoring game like soccer, is that unusual?
All it takes is one bad goal or a hot goalie on the other end, and it seems like that could swing a game despite controlling play. I think of hockey, where a hot goalie or a bunch of pipes or a fluke goal off a skate can make a lopsided looking game go the opposite way from how it looks.
I also wonder how much of a let-down game this was after coming so close on the road to Maryland. Obviously you hope that never happens, but the reality is it does to everyone at some point.
|24 weeks 3 days ago||More of this. I enjoy the||
More of this. I enjoy the football and basketball stuff on the site as much as the next guy, but hearing about other Michigan sports (even aside from my sport, lacrosse) is always welcome. Thank you. Hope to make it to a game or two this year.
|24 weeks 3 days ago||It has to be "Aussie Aussie||
It has to be "Aussie Aussie Aussie Oi Oi Oi" doesn't it?
|25 weeks 3 days ago||The decision was easy for me.||
The decision was easy for me. NFL Sunday Ticket = DirectTV. If they didn't have the monopoly on that I'd shop around.
The heavy rain issue is annoying, but it doesn't happen enough to make we want to trade it in and lose access to Sunday Ticket. We did have a crazy snowstorm a couple of winters ago that buried the dish, and it's at a spot on the roof that was too tough to get to. So we lost the signal for a week. That sucked, but it hasn't happened any other time.
|26 weeks 3 days ago||I guess time will tell. It's||
I guess time will tell. It's pretty hard to compare when you don't have the same talent level. There is one great offensive player on the Michigan roster, King, and he was injured for a big chunk of the season (and still led them in scoring). They have some nice midfielders, especially Jackson and Schlosser. Conor Ford is their third offensive coordinator in four years (first one is now a D1 head coach, and second one left for a national club outfit I'm assuming for a lot more money and less pressure). Ford did great things at Drexel and was an All-American at Hopkins himself. Let's see what he does with a year under his belt and more talent coming.
Last year, by the way, their goals per game went up despite no impact freshmen and a lower faceoff percentage. That tells me the offense improved quite a bit.
I agree they definitely need an upgrade in defensive talent, and hopefully that's coming through recruiting.
The 2016 class was ranked in the top 5 at one point by Inside Lacrosse, for what it's worth. Not sure if it's still considered that good, but I'm hearing great things about the 2017 and 2018 classes.
|27 weeks 2 days ago||Does it have any eligibility?||
Does it have any eligibility?
|27 weeks 4 days ago||I agree with Brian. I liked||
I agree with Brian. I liked the concept but thought it could have been executed better.
I do have a few questions...
How long do we predict Michigan football will be around? My assumption is for a long time. So what's the plan when we start running out of numbers?
Also, to the people who thought the legends jerseys were a money grab, how much do you think the athletic department actually made off of them? Assuming they get a small percentage of each sale, they would have to sell hundreds of thousands of them to make enough of a profit to make it purely about money wouldn't they?
|33 weeks 22 hours ago||This video is a year old.||
This video is a year old. They played a shorter version at every game last year.
|36 weeks 4 days ago||While I disagree with you||
While I disagree with you about the potential payoff for lacrosse versus soccer (even this game ended with 15 total goals scored), I do agree this was a boring game. It was bound to happen when two of the slowest pace of play teams in the NCAA played each other on one day of rest. Hopefully more people tuned into the semifinals on Saturday. Both were incredible games with great finishes.
|36 weeks 4 days ago||They didn't say that's where||
They didn't say that's where it NEEDS to happen. They said that's where it is GOING TO happen. We'd all love to see the big football schools add men's lacrosse. That won't happen very frequently for a lot of reasons. In the past 36 years it's happened exactly twice, at Notre Dame and Michigan. Meanwhile a couple of dozen or more smaller D1 schools without football have added men's lacrosse. That will continue to be the trend.
Women's lacrosse will continue to be added at big football schools with regularity. Great Title 9 add.
|36 weeks 4 days ago||How many roster spots does a||
How many roster spots does a men's rowing team have? I just glanced at the Wisconsin roster, and it's huge. You would probably have to add two or maybe even three women's sports to offset those numbers. Can't see that happening.
|38 weeks 5 days ago||Great write up L'Carp. It||
Great write up L'Carp.
It was a really good weekend for the Big Ten. From a conference that struggled a bit through the season and wasn't expected to get more than one bid to having three bids and all three advance to the final 8. Shows the level that Michigan still has to get to, which obviously won't happen overnight.
For me Albany is the team to watch. They play the game the way it's meant to played...fast. It's very entertaining. Reminiscent of lacrosse in the 80s and 90s. I would love to see them beat ND and get to the final four. Tall order though. ND is probably the most balanced team in the tournament.
Hopkins turned a corner when they played Michigan. Earlier in the season they were losing close games to ranked teams, mostly because their goalies couldn't save a beach ball. Their senior starter played really well against Michigan, and since then you could argue they are playing the best lacrosse of anyone in the tournament.
|42 weeks 4 days ago||But is Michigan strong enough||
But is Michigan strong enough yet to take advantage of that weakness? I think so, but I would be a lot more confident if they were winning faceoffs this season.
|42 weeks 4 days ago||As a club team alum I love||
As a club team alum I love this. JP and the athletic department are clearly building the varsity program (Team Four and all that), but they are also making a real effort to honor the past. It's smart. The club alums are the donors and job network for the current players. The guys from my era had a lot of fun and made great friends playing, and the guys from the last few club teams have a lot of pride in the championships they won. And in Michigan's case, which is kind of unique in lacrosse, the D1 program came about in large part because of the way the club team was built.
|42 weeks 5 days ago||Defense is much improved over||
Defense is much improved over the last few weeks. Not sure what people are seeing when they say awful defense. Yes there were a few breakdowns, but overall you can see the improvement. And other than Logan, they are doing it without a single guy who I would call great at that end. No defense, I don't care who you are, can shut down a good offense (and Ohio State has a good, not elite, offense) if the other team has the ball a lot more than you do. Faceoffs are the biggest factor holding this team back. And today there were a few untimely turnovers, both on offense and on clears, that didn't help. I loved the scrap in the first half. Diving for loose balls and flying around.
They just played a muderers row of faceoff guys between Maryland, Rutgers and Ohio State. They survived Rutgers because they actually are a slightly better team and they had just enough offense, but Maryland and Ohio State without the ball isn't going to work out too well. I'm hopeful they can compete a little better for faceoffs in the next two weeks. Hopkins and Penn State are good there, but not like these last three.
If this team beats Penn State and makes the Big Ten tournament that's a success for this year. Everybody picked them to be last of six, and they already are positioned to be 4th or 5th.
|43 weeks 5 days ago||Release says attendance was||
Release says attendance was 800 and some change. To be expected I suppose on Easter Sunday.
I seem to recall that the date of the spring game was changed within the last couple of months, so I would guess that had something to do with it. That and the regime change with both new Jims taking over. Probably other factors too having to do with the Big Ten starting up. I suspect they have less flexibility with their own conference scheduling than they did with the ECAC. I'd love to see them do what Ohio State does with their spring game and lacrosse game combo. They play the lacrosse game first, then have a real game for the spring game, which helps draw huge crowds for both. Winning also helps I suppose.
Huge win yesterday though. Nice to have King back. They got dominated at faceoffs for the second straight week, but this time found a way to overcome that.
Ohio State looked great last night against Hopkins. Chances for an upset depends on which Buckeye team shows up on Sunday. The one last night or the one that laid a goose egg against ND and lost to Detroit. Hopkins, as much as they are struggling, will be a really tough out, especially on the road. That game is their homecoming (yes, they have their school homecoming in the spring at a lacrosse game). Penn State seems to be the best chance to get another win and hopefully lock down a tournament spot.
|44 weeks 5 days ago||Got to go to the game||
Got to go to the game yesterday. Maryland is a top 3 team for a reason. To be fair, three of Michigan's losses this season are to the current #1, #3 and #10. This is still a much improved team in its fourth year. They just don't have the horses and skill sets that the elite teams do yet.
A few thoughts from this one.
1. Maryland is loaded on offense, but they don't wow you there. They are very methodical. Where they kill you is on faceoffs, where Raffa is a complete animal, and defense/goalie. Michigan didn't get the ball much because of Raffa, and when they did they had a lot of trouble generating quality shots. The Maryland goalie ate up most of the shots they did manage. They are giving up less than 5 goals per game this season, which is insane.
2. Michigan really misses King. As I said, they had trouble getting good shots and then burying them. It can't help to be missing their one legitimate great player on that end, especially against the best defense in the country. I thought the Michigan players were athletic enough to make some things happen offensively, but their sticks let them down a lot with turnovers or bad shot placement, and Maryland jumped all over mistakes like a top-5 team should. Kyle Jackson made some things happen, but he can't do it alone. Shlosser is really fast and explosive, but his stick needs to improve.
3. It was a good crowd, maybe 3,000 or so. Lots of Michigan people. Byrd Stadium is too big for lacrosse, like Michigan Stadium, but they do a good job with the event there as you would expect at a school where lacrosse is really important.
|46 weeks 6 days ago||Here's the||
Here's the release;
I think your memory is a little sketchy. That was their second D1 scrimmage. They played Providence at home before that, losing 11-10 in OT. The score against St. Joe's was 9-5. They were down 5-3 at the half. Granted, that was not yet a good St. Joe's team back then. Both teams have been steadily improving since then, but obviously St. Joe's had a big head start as an older program.
They did get smoked 14-2 by Towson that day. Maybe you're remembering that one.
Either way, this was a good win for this team right now. St. Joe's was 11-4 last year and thumped us at home. They almost beat Virginia earlier this week. To win this one on the road without a guy like King after losing two in a row says a lot about their fortitude.