that is nice bonus change
- Member for
- 4 years 11 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|1 year 21 weeks ago||As a former resident of a||
As a former resident of a Flint suburb; you, sir, are as obtuse as they come. Nothing compares to Flint, save Detroit. And pound-for-pound, Flint hold's its own there. There are no areas of Ann Arbor I wouldn't tread down the street at any hour of the day. There are places in Flint I wouldn't drive through in broad daylight.
|1 year 41 weeks ago||Brian Griese seems to think||
Brian Griese seems to think Gardner is better. I trust his opinion more than all of yours, plus Brians, combined.
|2 years 19 weeks ago||You guys are amazing||
It's actually gender correct to refer to the MSU Softball team as "Little Sister."
|2 years 19 weeks ago||delete||
|2 years 45 weeks ago||two legitimate||
two legitimate questions:
1.) Will it benefit Michigan more in the long run to switch to Devin now or continue with Denard?
I believe the answer is yes. Denard is a great talent. But he is more akin to Percy Harvin than Tim Tebow. He was last year's silver lining. He has an amazing skill set but I believe he has reached the peak of his potential as a Quarterback. We have a true Quarterback with lots of eligibility left. We aren't going to win the MNC this year and we probably won't win our division, let alone the B1G. Develop the QB that matches the Coaches direction for the team and work Denard into a Harvin type role. If Devin is struggling, pull him to be sure, but we have to stop thinking of Michigan as one guy.
2.) If you're totally opposed to the thought of benching Denard, did you think it was wise to play Denard over Tate last year? If so, recognize that Denard is playing worse than Tate did last year and we have another Quarterback in the same position Denard was in in 2010.
|3 years 19 weeks ago||I got negged immediately||
I got negged immediately after posting that. I'm assuming it's an RR sympathizer. Not a massive leap of logic.
|3 years 19 weeks ago||I'm sorry RichRod went 15-22.||
I'm sorry RichRod went 15-22. I really am.
|3 years 19 weeks ago||i'd rather look terrible in||
i'd rather look terrible in the spring game and great in the season. unlike the past few seasons.
|3 years 23 weeks ago||go blue!!!||
|3 years 25 weeks ago||Nike is old. UnderArmour is||
Nike is old. UnderArmour is better, or at least it was till fat people started wearing it. Fat people in fitted UA is pretty god awful.
|3 years 25 weeks ago||I'll only give you half of a||
I'll only give you half of a demerit for being not quite as condescending as some other posters.
|3 years 28 weeks ago||I bet your really gonna lay||
I bet your really gonna lay it on your wife tonight, eh? After that masterpiece I hope she's ready.
|3 years 31 weeks ago||Great minds think alike||
I never have to post. You pretty much hit the nail on the head every time.
|3 years 31 weeks ago||I disagree. With our||
I disagree. With our offensive talent, a legitimate backfield threat other than our Quarterback will allow our offense to get over the hump and actually score points instead of churn yardage. Do you have an actual opinion on this?
|3 years 31 weeks ago||His "mental toughness" led to||
His "mental toughness" led to a lot of stupid penalties.
|3 years 31 weeks ago||1000 yards rushing out of a||
1000 yards rushing out of a single running back. This will give us 9 to 10 wins.
|3 years 31 weeks ago||It worked so well last year,||
It worked so well last year, right?
|3 years 31 weeks ago||You like a Michigan team||
You like a Michigan team better than any of RR's WVU teams? TO BOLIVIA WITH YOU, HEATHEN!!
|3 years 32 weeks ago||Since when is 900 APY||
Since when is 900 APY considered a benchmark as a stud RB at Michigan? If he had 900 yards rushing alone, sure. But 900 APY with more fumbles in one season than Mike Hart's entire career? I think not. Welcome to the scout team, Mr. Smith.
|3 years 32 weeks ago||We could rue this day. If he||
We could rue this day. If he ends up at a competing school, starting at QB I would put my money on him out performing Denard that day.
|3 years 32 weeks ago||Because it has problems||
Because it has problems scoring points on quality opponents. You need those to win.
|3 years 32 weeks ago||Thanks. I'll rest a lot||
Thanks. I'll rest a lot easier tonight now that I know the correct spelling of a former Defensive Coordinator from two seasons ago. Next time I'll be sure to google that before I post.
|3 years 32 weeks ago||I've got some structural||
I've got some structural drawings from the Stadium Expansion, infill seating, and light supports.
|3 years 32 weeks ago||Don't blame anyone for||
Don't blame anyone for RichRod's downfall but RichRod. He chose Gerg and Schaeffer. And it looks like Schaeffer wasn't too bad from his body of work at Syracuse.
|3 years 33 weeks ago||I totally concur. Reminds of||
I totally concur. Reminds of me of my 16 year old stepdaughter talking about how cute Tate is.
|3 years 33 weeks ago||Why Nike when you could have||
Why Nike when you could have UnderArmour instead?
|3 years 33 weeks ago||I'd like to ask the anti-Hoke||
I'd like to ask the anti-Hoke crowd how they think the 2010 Michigan Wolverines would've fared against Missouri, Utah, and TCU. Do you think we would've beaten any of them? Or even been competitive with them? With more recruited talent than the lowly SDSU Aztecs?
|3 years 33 weeks ago||I can't agree more without||
I can't agree more without veering into talking negatively about an athlete. Something I don't like to do.
|3 years 33 weeks ago||I believe that Denard can||
I believe that Denard can make Percy Harvin look like a no-talent scrub. But I don't see him as a QB, never did. Our offense was a one trick pony and good teams could contain Denard. If Hoke doesn't want Denard at QB, I hate to say it, but thems the breaks, Shoelace....
|3 years 33 weeks ago||Well, they could go back to||
Well, they could go back to Tony Dungy.... HEY THAT'S OUR GUY!!!