Rawls if he can hang onto it, I'd guesss
Hoke Saves Lives
History
- Member for
- 44 weeks 2 days
- Blog
- View recent blog entries
Karma
- Current value
- 1
Recent Comments
| Date | Title | Body |
|---|---|---|
| 27 weeks 5 days ago | Ace ... |
... I made a hype video for the basketball team awhile back. Not sure if it was before you got here or not, but nonetheless, I figured it only appropriate to bring it up given that the football team gets their own every year. Here's the link to the diary entry: http://mgoblog.com/diaries/video-diary-um-hoops-hype-video-2k11 And the link to the main video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laTDALJlA7k Do with it what you will sir. Keep up the good work. |
| 35 weeks 2 days ago | Does ... |
... anybody have a woodshed I can borrow? I need to take the OP out back for a second.
|
| 41 weeks 34 min ago | This is ... |
... the analytical equivalent of "taking a politican at their word" when their voting record "clearly indicates otherwise". Everyone says what they need to say to keep the press happy, please boosters, get elected and generally establish a mentality about themselves/their team. Instead of just interpreting the votes/playcalls, there's unnecessary backtracking to review meaningless statements to the press that could mean anything. Article Summary: Playcalling History = Indicates Personnel Based Flexibility Nothing else need be said. Anything else related to "MANBALL" references is nothing but inference, inferences that are inherently biased by one's own fears/proclivities. Nobody knows how Hoke will handle future offenses, but it's plainly obvious that he will defer to Borges and allow him to build it based on the roster personnel (for this season), and then rebuild/tweak the playbook depending on future recruiting. I highly doubt that with someone as talented as Shane coming in, we dip to 65% running plays regardless of down. That's just paranoid. |
| 41 weeks 6 days ago | This is a job for ... |
... well, Me, I guess. Hold on, let me get my cape. #facepalm |
| 42 weeks 1 day ago | Nice Find! |
Great to see a post on another website that simultaneously gives Denard some much-deserved pub (albeit by someone who calls him "shoelaces" *cringe*) while providing a link to a video that reminds OSU of their station in life. Solid find, thanks for the post!
|
| 42 weeks 2 days ago | The Rilo Kiley ... |
... ones were excellent. I loved those videos, both the original and the one shortsgoblue did last year. I don't have any intentions on doing a Rilo Kiley version right now, b/c as maineandblue said, shorts mentioned he was working one another version for this season and I didn't want to step on anyone's toes. When I did the hype video I posted last week w/ the Armageddon speech, I wanted to break the mold a bit and do my own version of the hype video, but if there's no Rilo version posted by the weekend before the Western game, I may put some work into it that week and see what I come up with. |
| 43 weeks 5 days ago | Thank You ... |
... again for all that great old footage you put together. It really made finding all those clips easy and it was in solid quality. YouTube's copyright policy is ever-evolving and now most things are "fair use" provided you're not trying to profit off of it, and are making the work transformative as opposed to directly ripping off someone's work without credit. YouTube has adopted a "copyright holder action" policy instead of a "YouTube action" policy, meaning that YouTube won't take things down unless the copyright holder has specifically said you can't use their material. After every upload, during the "processing" phase, YouTube is scanning your video for tagged material that has a digitally embedded tag. If it's already flagged, they let you know and your video is blocked. If the song/video copyright holder has allowed for YouTube use, provided ads are shown in the video, they let you know and flag your video accordingly. You can still post it, and use the song that you got from say iTunes, but you'll get the occassional ad. Hope that helps. Here are some articles about it: http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2007/09/04/why-fair-use-suffers-on-youtube/ http://socialtimes.com/fair-use-youtube_b61891 http://www.videomaker.com/community/videonews/2009/09/5719-viral-video-c... |
| 43 weeks 5 days ago | No worries ... |
(mis-replied ... see below) |
| 43 weeks 5 days ago | No worries ... |
... I didn't take it as you being a dick at all. If people never offered any constructive criticism, everyone would think their work is as perfect as it can be. I just wanted to make sure that all the correct people got credit for the film work that I used in the video. Thanks for finding that clip. Those shots were too good to go uncredited. |
| 43 weeks 5 days ago | So many ... |
... positive comments and feedback from everyone, I'm greatly appreciative. I'm glad to see that this hit the right spots with people (for the most part) and gets everyone appropriately amped up for the football season. Thanks for watching. |
