- Member for
- 5 years 42 weeks
|1 year 49 weeks ago||Trend Model Predicts||
Trend model predicts we'll score 18 points (R-sq = .86). I think I would actually be okay with this offensive output.
|2 years 33 weeks ago||More like 0.1%||
More like 0.1% or 0.2% if you want probability of "at least 7 of 8".
THE NUMBERS HURT
|2 years 36 weeks ago||Oh wow||
Haven't heard that name in a while
|3 years 3 weeks ago||17-14 Blue||
Beat those Fig Things!
|3 years 4 weeks ago||24 - 9 Blue||
|3 years 37 weeks ago||In the words of Gus Johnson...||
|3 years 48 weeks ago||Mich 35 Neb 14||
|3 years 49 weeks ago||24-21 Michigan||
298 rushing yards.
|4 years 26 weeks ago||Closer to Boulder?||
Conor O'Neil's in Boulder is a much more low key version of Lodo's experience. Much better food too!
1922 13th Street, Boulder, CO
|5 years 19 weeks ago||"the turnover margin they||
"the turnover margin they enjoy one year has virtually zero predictive value for the turnover margin they will enjoy the next year. That means that on average, teams with substantially positive margins will see major decline in margin the next year, and teams with substantially negative margins will see major improvement the next year."
This is just plain wrong. If there was no predictive value for year over year turnover margin, then how can we predict major declines or improvement for teams with substantial margins? That would imply a high negative correlation. No correlation (or low as is 12%) means that it is random and unpredictable.