this week in unintentionally grim-sounding recruiting headlines
- Member for
- 4 years 36 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|2 days 21 hours ago||Yeah it's weird||
I kinda liked it too...brainless entertainment. So long as he didn't talk about Michigan in any way.
|3 days 4 hours ago||It looks more like texas tech to me||
It looks more like texas tech to me
|4 days 4 hours ago||And I hate||
The fact that people think he's guilty because they hate him. There's FAR more Brady haters than there are lovers out there. In Oklahoma sports radio they've adopted the "he definitely cheated cuz Wells says so!!!!" mantra, and they talk loudly about it every time Brady is mentioned. It makes me ill.
|4 days 4 hours ago||Which again gets at||
The dichotomy between how careless they treated the measurement process and how paltry punishments (if any) were to similar previous offenses (so clearly it's at all important)...compared with the actual punishment given to Brady on this issue (so clearly it's the most important thing ever)
|5 days 2 hours ago||Sweet Jeebus.||
A 250+ thread because a guy said he was "bummed"?
My God, stop the presses! I must start tut-tutting and elevating my RAGE level! HOW DARE ANYONE BE BUMMED AT ANYTHING MICHIGAN-RELATED?!?!? ESPECIALLY HARBAUGH?!?!??!?!? GOOD RIDDANCE, I SAY!!!!! Harrrumph.
|5 days 2 hours ago||Maybe worked up isn't the right word.||
But some people in this thread are getting might judgy and uppity about it.
|6 days 7 hours ago||Oh Lord||
My idiocy when it comes to car discussions just shines through here. By "how fast a car can go in 60 seconds" I meant "how quickly a car can go 0-60 mph". Sweet Jeebus that was just painful to read. Sorry, everyone.
|6 days 11 hours ago||Hate is a strong word||
But I've never understood the desire to fawn over cars and their specs and whatnot. Always felt odd around guys who do, and I had to make an awkward attempt to act like I care how fast that car can go in 60 seconds.
|4 weeks 3 days ago||Because it's the middle of summer||
There's literally nothing else to talk about right now in the world of sports.
Well, unless you count baseball. Which I don't.
|4 weeks 5 days ago||Everytime somebody misspells Lidstrom as Lindstrom...||
...a puppy dies. STOP KILLING PUPPIES.
|5 weeks 5 days ago||I don't know who those people are||
Or if you are even perceiving their workload fairly...
But they are the exception. Not the rule.
|5 weeks 5 days ago||Well, I agree that there are some really big issues||
I'm just vehemently against the idea that the instructors/professors are the problem with the ballooning costs, or anywhere near the primary concern on lists of problems.
|5 weeks 5 days ago||Surely you can't be serious.||
This is a lump of steaming hot bullshit. I expect better from you, M-Dog. You aren't the one I would think would tear down an entire profession based on nothing but your own perception of it that is nowhere rooted in reality.
|5 weeks 6 days ago||Cross that birdge when we get there||
If that happens, then the debate becomes real interesting.
But personally, I don't see it happening. LA hasn't been good enough to finish better than 5th in their conference since 2008, and one of thier cups was as an 8 seed (which, don't get me wrong, is quite a historic accomplishment...but in the discussion of "dynasty", it matters)...you'd think a dynasty-level team would have better regular season stats than that I doubt it suddenly changes in the next two years, especially when they couldn't even make the freaking playoffs this year.
|5 weeks 6 days ago||Le sigh...||
I didn't want Chicago to win for exactly this reason...the talk of dynasty.
But now that it's here...
Chicago very well may be the closest thing the NHL ever gets to a "dynasty" in the post-lockout parity era. It's amazing the run of playoff luck they seem to have when it comes to playoff overtimes. But luck aside, they were clearly playing at a level above every single opponent that came their way, and that difference really showed in games 5-7 of each series they played (if it got there). I've always admired them as a team...they seemed to build themselves around the Red Wings puck possession model that got them a cup in 2008 and nearly another in 2009. Shoot, they did it BETTER than Detroit ever did. It's hard for me to really "hate" them, even though my Detroit fandom practially demands it. Mostly because it's a hell of a lot better than seeing the Bostons and Anaheims of the league winning the cup.
Having said all that...fuck man, their fans don't deserve that shit. Like, at all.
|7 weeks 7 hours ago||Wut||
I had the exact opposite reaction. The first Hannibal episode was very underwhelming to me, and the GOT episode was excellent.
|7 weeks 4 days ago||Exactly what I saw||
Way too many called strikes. Far too content to watch pitches early in the count. But even then, they had chances to get back in it. They just couldn't get the hits to bring the runners home...I recall at least 8 stranded runners.
I think the umps weren't perfect, but they never are. Honestly, Michigan deserved the loss...they just did not look like themselves at all.
|7 weeks 4 days ago||I was in a perfect position to see that||
At the game, in section 22 (left field) close to the foul line. It looked clearly foul from where I was sitting. Close, sure, but clearly foul.
|7 weeks 4 days ago||INteresting||
I was at the game, and sitting out in left field. I am nowhere near a softball expert, but even I could tell that it seemed like there were quite an odd number of Florida players getting hit...and that they didn't seem too concerned about getting out of the way. Definitely a couple times I was like "wait...she got hit?" because the batter wouldn't move but all of the sudden take a base. I could tell from 250 feet away. I don't know the rules but common sense would seem to me that you should make SOME attempt to get out of the way... but instead it almost looked like they were purposefully getting their elbows in the way of pitches.
|9 weeks 5 days ago||Great summation||
You are a bit critical of 2008, but you didn't even mention one of the biggest parts of the cup run that was frustrating - game 5 of the SCF was an adventure that ended up in yet another one of those can't-close-it-out data points that became a pattern since then. Wings go down 2-0 in first period, so play from behind to close out the cup. But they battle back and score in the 2nd and twice in the third, steal ALL of the momentum, have ALL BUT WON the cup...and with 35 seconds left, Pittsburgh ties it up. Three overtimes later...3 OTs of being literally on the brink of winning everything with just one shot...but instead we're headed to game 6. Now, they DID close it out (thank god) in Pittsburgh after that crushing loss, but this is just another example of that annoying pattern that kept showing up on a yearly basis in the playoffs.
That can't be all Babcock's fault of course, but maybe a new coach will bring a much needed breath of fresh air into what seemed like was a stale environment. Babcock was brilliant in the way he approached Tampa this year with an inferior roster...and yet, paradoxically, I wonder how much of the reason why Detroit collapsed in the series had to do with Babcock and this recurring pattern of "can't close out pivotal games at home"
|9 weeks 6 days ago||Damn||
I only hope Harbaugh can dominate as well on the field as he is apparently doing off the field.
|10 weeks 3 hours ago||I mean||
I can somewhat get why a coahc may not want their player to transfer in conference. "Oh yeah, sure kid! Transfer over to Ohio State! That sounds great!"
But...this is not that situation. This is singling out exactly one school out of conference. It's totally out of spite. Way to take the high road, Gus...
It's all about the student athletes. I'm sure.
|10 weeks 4 days ago||Oh yes||
Please let that be true. He's just awful.
|10 weeks 4 days ago||Yup||
Which is why I visit mgoblog often. Now, that percentage isn't 0 here, but it's significantly lower than 65% that's for sure.
Everytime I hear a local sports guy (I live in Oklahoma,) talk about deflategate and how "THEY CHEATED" and all this stuff about how they deserve it and blah blah blah...I just...can't. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. What is wrong with you people?!?
|10 weeks 4 days ago||Quite the conclusion to make||
Considering there is a hell of a lot of assumptions and faulty experimental procedures going on there. Just imagine the types of anonymous reviews an official peer-reviewed journal would give that "scientific experiment".
|10 weeks 4 days ago||This is easily the dumbest scandal in all of sports.||
It's rivaled only by stretchgate/Freep's jihad. But since this is a much more national headline involving a hall-of-fame QB who just won the superbowl (you know, the single most watched sporting event in this country), it elevates the dumbness to a whole new level. Not to mention taht at the very least, stretchgate turned into you basic slap-on-the-wrist punishment. What makes deflategate even dumber is Goodell gave into the PR pressure and handed out a comically dumb, insanely ridiculous punishment. Somehow he made the issue even dumber than it already was. And the story won't end because of that. Which is perhaps the dumbest part of this thing...it would be done with if they gave them a paltry fine and moved on. But no. They had to make an "example" out of the Patriots because they know it will make them LOOK tough without actually being tough (and they also know that most of the country hates the Patriots).
When the worst thing you can say about the infraction is "But...he cheated!" (which I'm not even sure was really proven even by the circumstantial evidence in the Wells report), to then levy ALL THE PUNISHMENT is, frankly, absurd. It's like sentencing someone to jail for 25 years for driving 5 over the speed limit in an area that had never been monitored before. Then saying "Well, you deserve it because you BROKE THE LAW." And then bringing up an incident that happened 10 years ago to call it a "pattern of breaking the law." Because "PATTERN OF CHEATING" sounds a hell of a lot worse than "probably deflated a few footballs maybe 0.5 psi below the league minimum, which looked a lot worse because the ideal gas law caused further deflation of 1 psi during the game".
The bottom line is the NFL is insanely hyprocritical. On one hand, they clearly did not care about this AT ALL. See: previous incidents where actual provable tampering with footballs resulted in a small fine or less. Plus that game Brady was mad at the refs for overinflating the football SHOCK HORROR 2.5 psi above the league max. And then being SO CONCERNED about the whole thing that they...barely even did due diligence at the time it occurred to measure all the balls (oops, no time I guess!). Or didn't even bother warning the Patriots that they were going to monitor it more closely before the game. So on the one hand, they clearly didn't care. But then, what does the punishment do other than send the signal that the Patriots just cheated in the most nefarious of ways possible? These messages are clearly in direct conflict with each other, and I for one am happy to see the Patriots fighting the league like this.
This is so dumb that it makes the word dumb look dumb.
|10 weeks 4 days ago||I chuckle everytime someone says||
that they're "just a realist".
Dismissing the lawsuit out of hand doesn't make you a realist. You're jumping to a conclusion that nobody from the outside of the situation can realistically make at this point. You have no freaking clue what is the appropriate amount for damages.
|11 weeks 2 hours ago||Right||
2 games is good for Ray Rice beating his wife.
|11 weeks 4 days ago||So...||
What is glossed over is the fact that Brady complained about balls being like, WAY overinflated during the Jets game, as high as 16 psi. This is a full 2.5 psi over the league's own stated max, and certainly NOT what Brady wanted. So you mean to tell me that despite their clear carelessness in prior games for the inflation level of the footballs, Brady is guilty here for probably maybe telling someone to deflate balls to his liking (which doesn't even say whether he specifically asked for/wanted them to be below the league's minimum of 12.5 psi)? That this is somehow an example of RAMPANT CHEATING? And I'm supposed to care ?
|11 weeks 4 days ago||It might have everything to do with it.||
It's not hard to think up a reason why they would not be objective...is it surpsising to think that the NFL would want this as a big story to distract from the myriad other stories like domestic abuse? I mean, look at the reactions from it's talking piece ESPN. They all say it's a huge deal. Is it? Is it really?
It doesn't read as damage control...in fact it raises quite a few legit issues in my mind. How can they possibly say that Brady's refusal to hand over his cell phone is evidence of his guilt? This is one example of the "multiple interpretations" that Brady's agent raised as an issue.