Hockey pet peeve: "when a teammate tips a puck in on you, which is exactly how my first collegiate goal against happened. Thanks, Copper."
- Member for
- 3 years 36 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|6 weeks 6 days ago||I really don't think so....||
One of the Dakota State schools rushed for 250+ yards against a team we went for negative against. Miserable miserable teams without 2 5th year senior NFL tackles would rush for 2 yards per carry against the likes of Alabama.
Our O-line would have redefined bad had some of those performances been against give time programs. The fact that some of these games were against complete sieve defenses makes my statement less of a hyperbole.
|7 weeks 8 hours ago||Who cares.....||
Last year we had plenty of starts and had the worst O-Line in the history of college football.
|7 weeks 5 days ago||Paying coaches the most....||
Doesn't seem to be the solution either.
See Hoke, Mattison, and Borges.
|7 weeks 6 days ago||Doesn't matter||
I honestly don't think Adrian Peterson would have averaged more than 3.5 yards per carry behind last year's O-Line....and that had 2 NFL tackles.
|9 weeks 9 hours ago||Why negativity???||
Because we just had two fifth year NFL tackles, a stable of 2nd year 4-5 stars, and proceeded to have without question, the most underachieving line in America a a sieve of a defense. We have plenty of defensive talent and it seems as though a non-blitzing sack, a pass breakup, or an interception is a dream come true. A lot of us will not be optimistic again about talent until these coaches show that they can do something with it.
|10 weeks 5 days ago||Negative recruiting.....||
I have a hard time calling it negative if it's true. These coaches have been atrocious at developing talent. Even if you want to believe that it takes 2-3 years to get top talent to play at a serviceable level, this is not the case at many peer programs and no 4-5 star wants to believe that it's going to take him that long to be decent.
|14 weeks 10 hours ago||Do you watch other games???||
Have you seen SEC student sections? They are bare. LSU plays conference night games and you'd think it was an hour before kickoff against Tennessee-Chattanooga.
It's more of a function of wanting to drink and the ability to watch games on TV while having sex with sorority girls at half time rather than sweating / freezing your nuts off to watch games that are broken up by TV timeouts ad nauseam all while paying $300 bucks. Students come out for the big games, but for the blow hard games? I can't blame them.
|17 weeks 2 days ago||"I'll spare the long response"||
|17 weeks 2 days ago||Spring optimism....||
I always bought into this stuff, but after last spring's "Frank Clark is the next Michael Strahan" and "Ben Braden is the second coming of Taylor Lewan," I just can't get too excited over this.
|20 weeks 8 hours ago||NBD....||
He just wanted to get out of the brutal winter that Southern California is experiencing this year.
|20 weeks 2 days ago||See my below comment....||
Michigan has a really high number of people who are looking to do things other than big law.
|20 weeks 2 days ago||Value...||
I'd say MLaw is worth the 50k price tag. Except for Harvard, it places around the country in big law better than any. As long as you can interview and get decent grades, there are so many awesome alumni around the country that those seeking out law firms / finance jobs do very very well out of MLaw. Most of the other top law schools tend to be regional heavy.
|20 weeks 2 days ago||MLaw Employment issues....||
The problem is not that people look to stay in Michigan. That is a small portion that generally does well on the employment front. The problem (at least in regard to statistics) is that the law school self selects a higher proportion of public interest / government leaning people. This leads to 1) poor employment given government budget issues and 2) a higher proportion of anti-social holier than thou fartsniffers that can't tuck in their shirt and shine in an interview.
MLaw Grad in Big Law
|29 weeks 1 day ago||Odd correlation....||
Whenever my phone is inexplicably buzzing out of control, MGoServers crash....Crazy.
|29 weeks 2 days ago||No...||
Besides coaches doing bad jobs, there's a reason teams change up at least some of their coaches after crappy seasons: new voices and optimism. System changes, mentality shifts, motivation to play for new coaches, etc. If you're a player, you see a lot of guys getting one year older. While you're not losing much, given that the ONLY changes are one year of age and the addition of some freshmen (granted, one is Peppers), would you be really optimistic as a player that the team will go from whatever the hell that was in 2013 to a serious contender?
|29 weeks 3 days ago||Weren't ready...||
For not being able to hit a hole, break a tackle, or pick up a block? I'm pretty confident that we'd be in a far better spot as a program and have a similar 2013 record had Green / Smith been out there all season.
My point isnt that Peppers won't be contributing by the end of the year. My point is that given how many times these coaches will bang their heads against walls before realizing that the wall is winning, I have a hard time seeing them run Peppers out there right away. They'll claim some sort of horse shit like "consistency" or "technique" and we won't see much of him outside of a formation rotation until the end of the season.
If you have great freshmen and shitty upper classmen that can't push around / burn Akron and UConn by their 3rd / 4th / 5th years in the program, then you should be playing your freshmen even if they are a little raw. Given Hoke's unfathomable loyalty to his assistant coaches, it's obvious that he would have some loyalty to upper classmen as well.
|29 weeks 3 days ago||Ummm....||
You're overcounting quite a bit there. Most of these happened after A) an injury or B) the previous staff literally did not recruit that position or C) upper classmen were so so so bad that we were setting historic records in futility.
That does not lend itself to "the best players play." See: Fitz.
|29 weeks 3 days ago||Let's hope....||
that the coaches actually use him as opposed to playing upper classmen due to "better technique" and "consistency." The fact that Dymonte played so little on this crappy team with hardly a speck of offensive or defensive athleticism still chaps me.
Given that Fitz got 90% of the carries through week 8, I think these coaches have a stubborn ass element to them that will prevent Peppers from having a huge impact.
|29 weeks 6 days ago||It's cold....||
It's cold / cloudy for 6 of the 9 months of the school year. The girls aren't as hot. Football isn't nearly as king for the vast majority of the conference.
Please spare me the academic BS. Besides Northwestern, name me one school that rejects 4-5 star players who are clearinghouse eligible. Note: Demar Dorsey couldn't even get into Louisville.
|30 weeks 5 days ago||Screw all of them....||
Even Wellman. These are the most overpaid blowhards in the country.
|30 weeks 5 days ago||Toussaint....||
The fact that he's playing tonight shows that hoke puts senior loyalty over winning/player development. Good luck recruiting great skill positions in the future.
|30 weeks 5 days ago||Coaches....||
They've lost this team. One month to prepare and we get this crap. If no position coaches get axed after this season, then Hoke is a stubborn ass that puts winning 2nd to loyalty.
|30 weeks 5 days ago||No question.....||
Worst coached team in America. Id love to see our kickoff coverage v. return stats.
|30 weeks 5 days ago||This team....||
Literally does nothing well.
|31 weeks 1 day ago||Fallacy....||
Do you watch other teams play or just tune into Michigan games every week? So do all of those 2012 recruits not count since they've only been in the program for 2 full seasons? If you don't think that most other programs would have at least one of those stud 2012 or even 2013 offensive line recruits playing at a level that could at least push around the sieve defenses of Akron, UConn, or Nebraska, you're nuts.
Pipkins was the top DT in the country. Those guys contribute as freshmen and are monsters by their second years at other schools. I know he got hurt early, but the guy was not a monster. What about every other d lineman besides Clark in 2-3 games?
We have a crap ton of drops and have zero people who can get open against a good secondary....and there is a lot of talent in there at a WR position that traditionally contributes in years 1-2.
We have zero running backs who can pick up a blitz (sorry, but good coaching can teach a tough walk on to do this proficiently by year 2), and outside of two highly touted true freshmen, I don't see one running back that can punish someone....what has Jackson been doing for the last 2-3 seasons with Rawls and Hayes.
Our secondary gives up too many head scratching gains against crappy offenses. Again this is jot a position that requires 3-4 seasons and 100% four stars to smother the god awful pass attacks of the big 10.
There's your specificity. I also think wellman has stayed too clean throughout this. We're recruiting players that could be playing at top programs, and when I watch those games, the speed and size differentials are noticeable.
|31 weeks 3 days ago||?????||
You guys are just naming names of guys who play. I'm not sure if we have anybody besides Lewan that would be a key player on a top 15 team.
The point is that we have stables of 4 star talent every year and are in no way playing close to their equally recruited counterparts at other schools. Does it really take all 4/5 stars to be in their 4th and 5th years to not have the most under achieving offensive line in the history of football? UCLA would certainly say no.
Does it take all 4/5 stars to be in their 4th and 5th years to be able to get penetration on a decent OL? Other schools would say no.
Same applies for RBs, WRs, and DBs. Gross under achievement all around. Youth makes things less than optimal. Youth does not mean playing Akron / UConn as tough as OSU. That's just horrendous coaching.
|33 weeks 5 days ago||Sorry....||
But this is crap. A large reason that this university has its insanely loyal alumni network is historic athletic superiority. Michigan is not as fine of a school as the top Ivies, but it historically went out and competed athletically on an elite basis too. It gave a unique "we're awesome at both" well deserved arrogance that made UM unique and merited the "leaders and best" tag.
Given the continued and sustained mediocrity of the football program, it's almost laughable that you can sit here and say that we're the "leaders and best" when we're not the best academic institution and have been continually getting slapped around for the last decade with our flagship athletic program. We're basically a top 20 institution with a top 20 athletic program (major sports that the public ever notice). This is fine, but this smelling-our-own-farts superiority complex has roots in football superiority, so you can't keep up this leaders and best nonsense while getting embarrassed on national TV 3-4 times per year without sounding silly.
Then again, our alumni network is 2nd to maybe Harvard, so as long as the alumni keep smelling their own leaders and best farts, I'm happy.
|33 weeks 5 days ago||GR3||
is going to really carve up the Houston Baptists of the NBA.
|34 weeks 2 days ago||Yup....||
GR3 is still grossly overrated. That's a lot of talent for not being able to do anything in a moderately pressure situation. And please spare us some 10 minute stint over the course of last year's tournament where he actually did something.
|34 weeks 4 days ago||Smokey.....||
This isn't Nam. It's bowling. There are rules.