I'VE HAD JUST ABOUT ENOUGH OF YOU SONNY
- Member for
- 5 years 3 weeks
- View recent blog entries
- Karma value
|8 hours 13 min ago||I'm not even speaking about||
I'm not even speaking about the quality of the news, and it makes total sense for you to report both good things and bad things. However, that's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying, if recruits know the level of detail that you're willing to report on the blog, there's a chance they will be less likely to communicate with you - no matter what the news is.
I appreciate your hard work, and don't want you to think I'm being a prick. It just seems different from other people's methods of reporting.
|8 hours 16 min ago||Exactly.||
|8 hours 24 min ago||It seems that a number of||
It seems that a number of recruits know of and/or read this blog.
I'd think that posting text conversations or talking about their habits and responsiveness might not be the best thing to do with regularity.
|15 hours 3 min ago||Really? Because if they||
Really? Because if they thought he was guilty, and filed charges, I'd be absolutely fine with OSU playing against a Winston-less FSU team in the MNC game. Without a question.
|18 hours 21 min ago||Absolutely. First of all,||
Absolutely. First of all, he'll be a 5th year senior, his team's starting QB, and someone who's toughness and determination was obvious through a difficult season.
Second of all, why would you give your QB an honor and then take it away from him? "We thought you'd earned it, but we just think you'd better go back to being #12." You don't do that to your QB.
|2 days 6 hours ago||You know what...I hate Duke,||
You know what...I hate Duke, but that reverse was kind of dope.
|2 days 6 hours ago||Fixed it for you.||
All the Duke Plumlees are assholes.
All the Duke basketball players look like assholes.
|2 days 6 hours ago||I hate this freakin' Plumlee||
I hate this freakin' Plumlee kid.
|2 days 6 hours ago||Walton is faaaaaaast, guys.||
Walton is faaaaaaast, guys.
|2 days 6 hours ago||That looked like a complete||
That looked like a complete dive.
|2 days 7 hours ago||Spike'd.||
|2 days 7 hours ago||So...why is Beilein going||
So...why is Beilein going smaller when the two big guys already have fouls on them?
|2 days 14 hours ago||While I think some of this||
While I think some of this has some merit, you also have to account for the ability of a school to recruit high-quality talent. In other words, a loss at a program like SDSU wouldn't be nearly as damning as a loss as Auburn's OC.
I don't quite know how you plan on accounting for talent deficiencies and/or the state of the program at the time Borges was OC.
|3 days 12 hours ago||Maybe so - but we've all seen||
Maybe so - but we've all seen his wife. I think he wins.
|3 days 13 hours ago||Not for nothin' guys, but it||
Not for nothin' guys, but it seems a little odd to be making fun of Bielema for being overweight.
|4 days 12 hours ago||Frankly, I don't know why||
Frankly, I don't know why Taylor wouldn't be an "NFL" guy, either.
|2 weeks 17 hours ago||Another story about Hatch.||
Another story about Hatch. Don't know if this has been posted yet, but I couldn't find it:
|2 weeks 2 days ago||I've heard that about you.||
I've heard that about you.
|2 weeks 5 days ago||Illinois is pretty crappy.||
Illinois is pretty crappy.
|9 weeks 3 days ago||I think I missed something||
I think I missed something about why people were worried about a Campbell decommit...why would that be on our minds?
|11 weeks 5 days ago||Where did all my bourbon go?||
Where did all my bourbon go?
|12 weeks 6 hours ago||Muschamp, too...||
|12 weeks 1 day ago||I hear ya. I just had gotten||
I hear ya. I just had gotten through a bunch of posts of people saying I wanted less content, so I wasn't too keen on snark at the time. Your friendliness is duly noted.
|12 weeks 1 day ago||Fair enough, man. Thanks.||
Fair enough, man. Thanks.
|12 weeks 1 day ago||Or I could, as a loyal reader||
Or I could, as a loyal reader of the site, address the issue politely and reasonably in the public forum available to me, and open up a discussion for possible solutions.
I like my option better.
|12 weeks 1 day ago||Dude.||
Read the thread. I don't want less content.
"There's a ton of great content...this is a good thing." I said that.
I also said, "I love the site, and I want to see it continue to diversify and expand."
I'm saying I want a slightly more-efficient way to access the lot of great content.
|12 weeks 1 day ago||Absolutely. Again - I don't||
Absolutely. Again - I don't want less content. I am discussing a change being made to the site structure (be it small or large, I don't know) that enables readers of the frequent, varied, diverse content to view it more conveniently.
|12 weeks 1 day ago||You misunderstand. I don't||
You misunderstand. I don't want less stuff. I want it arranged in a way that lets me better enjoy all of the free stuff, and provide for the possibility of more awesome free stuff in the future.
|12 weeks 1 day ago||Sweet. Once I'm done with||
Sweet. Once I'm done with that, how do I get to the content I WANT?
You set yourself up for that.
|12 weeks 1 day ago||I don't think those are the||
I don't think those are the only options. If you include a "Today's posts" box like Space Coyote said, and put jump links (rather than click-through links) that take you right to the article, that could alleviate the problem without resorting to click-through.
If they really wanted to be fancy, they could try something like a favoriting system where users can tag their favorite content pieces and get alerts in a box off to the side when new posts come in.