- Member for
- 7 years 49 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|5 hours 26 min ago||Huh? If you werent so eager||
If you werent so eager to be contrarian, you would realize that the OP is asking for expectations for his first year, comparisons with others on the line given that he's a true freshman. Its possible to evaluate him based on expectations for his first year and in light of being a true freshman on a latented line. And he exceeded expectations.
|1 day 1 hour ago||I seriously doubt it. The||
I seriously doubt it. The first Lamar Jackson-type dude that popped up in September and October would quickly rise to the top. The award is just too offense-centric. Which, as a fan of good defense, I find offensive.
|1 day 1 hour ago||Not gonna worry too much||
Not gonna worry too much about recruiting until after I see who we get.
But, +1 for your handle, from both a Seinfeld and female form afficionado.
|1 day 18 hours ago||Please dont shoot me.||
Please dont shoot me.
|1 day 18 hours ago||Beilein needs a guard with||
Beilein needs a guard with some athleticism to play for him at a different school.
Fixed that for you.
|1 day 18 hours ago||"Not sure Texas isn't going||
"Not sure Texas isn't going to count as a good win this year but it would still be good to win."
English mother f*cker, do you speak it!!
|2 days 5 hours ago||He will be playing with the||
He will be playing with the opposition, but will he really be playing for the opposition? Might he really be playing for us as a covert operative?
|2 days 23 hours ago||I'm gonna go ahead and guess||
I'm gonna go ahead and guess teeth. Then bone. Not that difficult.
|3 days 2 hours ago||The threads on this blog do||
The threads on this blog do not seem to be improving. Management needs to manage better. Raise the bar for creating a thread. Or something.
|3 days 4 hours ago||The problem with this post is||
The problem with this post is that it suggests you dont really get who Harbaugh is, and you want us to discuss some fantastical version of him. Harbaugh believes in fair, fierce, open competition. It is inherent in who he is, how he coaches. Wanting him to settle for what he percieves to be unfair competition is just not an option for him. What you are basically asking is if it's ok if somebody other than Jim Harbaugh who dresses up as Jim Harbaugh, and calls himself Jim Harbaugh, can be our coach. Its just not really a debatable topic.
|3 days 4 hours ago||The uterus is one of the||
The uterus is one of the toughest parts of the human body, male or female. It is also the part that is life-giving. While the symbolic similarity is interesting, it is in no way derogatory to Texas. In fact, it is quite complimentary.
|3 days 20 hours ago||Disagree. "Publicity stunts"||
Disagree. "Publicity stunts" is almost always disparaging.
|4 days 1 hour ago||I'm excited to get another||
I'm excited to get another chance to watch this team play, and to see the maize and blue all over my TV screen. It inspires excitement like no other event. Beat FSU.
|4 days 1 hour ago||It's a big step down. But||
It's a big step down. But that doesnt mean you can't get excited for another UM football game, against another marquee program, and another chance to show off Michigan football to the world.
|4 days 7 hours ago||Damn dude, maybe its time to||
Damn dude, maybe its time to take some time off from Michigan football? When you "couldnt care less" about a game your favorite team is playing in, there is something very wrong in your fanhood. Maybe its time to direct attention elsewhere for a while?
|4 days 15 hours ago||"Has nothing to do with||
"Has nothing to do with anything else."
Just because you make an absolute statement doesnt make it anything more than absolutley bunk. Of course the committee takes other factors into mind. It would be unfair not to.
|4 days 15 hours ago||Quit being an effing pansie.||
Quit being an effing pansie. Harbaugh would bitch slap you if you questioned what this team should play for in his presence.
|4 days 15 hours ago||Nope. After the bitch slap||
Nope. After the bitch slap Harbaugh gave him, he aint slapping anybody in AA.
|4 days 15 hours ago||TWSS (in honor of the OP)||
TWSS (in honor of the OP)
|5 days 28 min ago||I've lost several IQ points||
I've lost several IQ points trying to figure out how on earth Michigan could ever get in and Washington not. I am now dumber for having done so. And that's something I really cannot afford. Thanks dude.
|6 days 41 min ago||Not sure if you read my post.||
Not sure if you read my post. I said OSU stands in our way to getting to the playoff. We might face Bama once every 4 to 7 years. We will face OSU every year.
|6 days 4 hours ago||As can OSU's coaches.||
As can OSU's coaches.
|6 days 4 hours ago||Huh? Why should we care about||
Huh? Why should we care about Bama? We dont play them every year. They will not regularly stand in the way of us getting to the Big Ten championship or the NCAA playoffs. I could not care less what Bama does. But how OSU fares has direct implications on how UM fares.
|6 days 15 hours ago||I dont really get into||
I dont really get into recruiting, but this is depressing. OSU has a really good coach and has been pullling in great talent. There is a gap between the two programs that I dont see closing any time soon. Which sucks.
|1 week 4 hours ago||Exactly. 10,000 well-spent||
Exactly. 10,000 well-spent dollars.
|1 week 16 hours ago||Clicked on yet another||
Clicked on yet another conferenct alignment thread thinking, 'maybe this one will be different, maybe it will be better than the million others.' Nope, it's worse.
|1 week 17 hours ago||Who else would it be on?||
Who else would it be on?
|1 week 17 hours ago||Did you copy and paste this||
Did you copy and paste this comment from discussions after just about every game last year?
|1 week 1 day ago||Great post. See Harbaugh's||
Great post. See Harbaugh's comments after the Illinois game for more evidence.
|1 week 2 days ago||Perhaps one approach, for||
Perhaps one approach, for this topic and others, is to distinguish between thought threads and new development threads. I can see wanting to put a hault on all the new threads people create just because they think they have an 'original' thought about existing material.
But I think that when new developments emerge (i.e., facts, data), such as Sam Webb's article or Manuel's (non)response, new threads should be allowed. If a new thread lacks new outside material or developments, the mods should delete it.
Just a suggestion for common ground than quashing discussion. That never goes well.