“On the offense last year, they had great spacing. That’s what I remember. Great spacing, great shooters, like Nik Stauskas, who’s not there right now. But they always have someone to fill the roles. They have a cutting offense, kind of hard to guard.”
- Member for
- 6 years 14 weeks
|3 years 43 weeks ago||small note||
Kean isn't a HBCU. It's just a normal school.
|4 years 10 weeks ago||Lloyd wasn't close||
to their best defensive player. He's a two down MLB that moved to DE. Their best defensive players are the linebackers Lutrus and Wilson.
|4 years 20 weeks ago||Shuler||
that link doesn't say NW leads. Typical site fluff imo.
|4 years 24 weeks ago||UM has offered||
RB Savon Huggins (who I told Brian about his last week), and his teammate S Sheldon Royster.
|4 years 28 weeks ago||I've always seen||
Trey Parker and Matt Stone in Brian's humor and sentiment.
Point 3. above is a very good one, one that I struggle with constantly, especially since I don't really have time to edit my posts.
Along similar lines, there's a very good point about arguments that quickly gets beaten into you in analytic philosophy classes. Always, always, always try to suppress your urges to write a grand, overarching, universal argument and just keep everything this simple.
That makes your arguments better both in theory, and in practice (probability-wise, more complex and longer arguments create more opportunities for error and openings for counterargument). 99% of what I regret writing tends to be when I ignore this rule.
If I ever did a list like this, it'd probably be a compliation of my favorite social science studies.
|4 years 28 weeks ago||nitpicking, but||
I wrote "DFW", it was just linked here.
[i]Authority and American Usage[/i] has a fairly uninformed and inaccurate portrayal of descriptivism, fwiw.
|4 years 30 weeks ago||UConn||
totally depends on their QB. The underclassman Endres is pretty good. The ND transfer Frazer is HORRIBLE, but their coach loves him because of seniority.
|4 years 32 weeks ago||You should really||
read the stuff I linked.
|4 years 32 weeks ago||redundant, but||
nothing about Beilein on the RU end.
|4 years 32 weeks ago||Hey Pinkel||
it's easy to explain. The Big XII TV contract blows. You'll never get Texas to cede its dollars, so they're going to have to focus on increasing the overall pot.
|4 years 33 weeks ago||considering that||
Shuler's father posts on the RU Rivals site and is an admitted huge fan, draw your own conclusions.
Byrd's early leaders are RU and South Carolina.
|4 years 33 weeks ago||My insight||
1. Rutgers is a very good academic school that would slot in nicely in the Big Ten. It has no money from state support, and has had to lower its selectivity (hence, hurting the US News and whatever rankings) as a result by admitting a ton of students to make up the difference. However, anyone who tries to knock the overall quality of education there is ignorant and/or lying. They also run a squeaky clean athletic department and have an unparalleled academic support structure for football.
2. Rutgers would bring the BTN to basic cable in New Jersey. The question is whether or not they bring the other side of NYC metro across the Hudson. If the answer is yes, then the math works and they're in. Basically this all depends on getting the go-ahead from Time Warner and Cablevision in New York City. The new athletic director is a former television executive at ABC and CBS Sports. He's another Brandon, and doing wonders for fundraising and upgrading the overall stature of the athletic department (facilities, olympic sports, etc...)
A lot of the other comments about fan support, and quality of athletic programs are not exactly truthful. I'll leave it at that, but most of the popular perceptions on both topics are dead wrong.
|4 years 33 weeks ago||Haven't heard||
that Michigan was strongly linked to either Byrd or Shuler.
|4 years 37 weeks ago||Joe Susan||
Here is what I just emailed Brian.
He was very important to Rutgers, but mainly in terms of in-state recruiting. The staff's Florida recruiter was Brian Jenkins. I say was because he left over a month ago to take the HC job at Bethune-Cookman, and was recently replaced by P.J. Fleck from NIU. Fleck is an Illinois native but recruited Florida for them, and is expected to do that for Rutgers. Jenkins was very good and I think losing him hurt RU's efforts in Florida, Susan less so down there.
I don't think it's that relevant as pertains to Knight. I had heard some rumblings about him for a while, which is why I asked TomVH a few weeks back when Knight hadn't been mentioning Rutgers that much. RU actually pulled ahead for Knight more recently after Jenkins had left. Also, the DB coach is still on staff even though doesn't do much recruiting. So yeah, don't think Susan will have any impact on Knight, and not sure why TomVH was harping on that on Twitter.
|4 years 39 weeks ago||A lot of those Marshall commits||
weren't going to qualify. I.e., Brian Robinson.
|4 years 41 weeks ago||Couple points||
Leave Rutgers and Michigan out of it. It's my blog, not Schiano's. I went out of my way to be as complimentary to UM as possible. Michigan's unparalleled combination of athletic prowess and strong research academics ought to be the model for any university in the country. If anyone actually is curious about the history of the Rutgers athletic department beyond stupid, incorrect cliches I'm happy to link some additional material.
I was just responding to Brian's post about the Big Ten and explaining where the anti B-10 sentiment comes from. All in the spirit of discussion of course. It was candid, but that's the way I handle a lot of things. The site is basically one non-stop outrage mill.
You probably disagree, but that's where the other side is coming from. Of course I'm jealous - that's the entire point. When we actually have a decent season we still have to go to a 4th tier bowl not just because of the big bad Big Ten, but because the Big East is run by incompetent morons. When you see Sparty and that complete imbecile Brewster going to better bowls (and subsequently losing), that's beyond frustrating.
Oh ya - my post was solely concerned with the post 2005 realignment. I don't think anyone is going to pretend that the transition year in 2004 wasn't a nightmare. Once the BE was at full capacity again, and had time to regroup and rebuild, their track record isn't bad at all. That's why I have a chip on my shoulder about the conference always taking a beating from the media.
|4 years 50 weeks ago||his solo work was far more popular in America||
what are you, some kind of limey wanker?
There is no room for debate here. Your Arsenal and Viva Hate were the best things that he was ever involved in. Whyte>>>>>>Marr
|4 years 50 weeks ago||so pleased||
that you cited solo Moz, instead of his far inferior work with The Smiths.
|5 years 4 weeks ago||disagree completely on the sprad||
What about Graham Harrell and Chase Daniel? Alex Smith's cautionary tale is scaring teams off Tebow.
I think that the spread certainly does hurt players at certain positions when it comes to their NFL stock. There isn't enough data yet from the its recent popularity, but there could be an affect there over time.
What I don't understand is why Michigan fans are all that concerned about this anyway. Is Rich Rod going to have to sell the next Matt Barkley on the program? What matters first and foremost is winning games on the college level.
|5 years 6 weeks ago||GRob's defense||
that first year at Cuse was actually very good. Take into account how miserable the offense was. I was very impressed with that group at the time. Dude's a miserable HC though.
|5 years 9 weeks ago||timeline doesn't work||
for a NYC bowl. Few years away from getting off the ground. When it does happen, it may not be a marquee matchup, and no guarantee that B10 is involved.
|5 years 10 weeks ago||Recruiting study||
I don't believe that the study is that informative. There was a similar thing in the new Football Outsiders almanac. The problem with both of them is that they do not use a regression analysis.
|5 years 11 weeks ago||it's not like||
UConn is a doormat. They're a poor man's MSU. With a stout defense, and an offensive playbook roughly consisting of three different off-tackle runs, it's best to just think of this as that mythical ninth Big Ten conference game.
|5 years 13 weeks ago||Witherspoon was eligible||
per NCAA standards. If that's what the APR uses, you're in the clear. AFAIK Michigan was worried about his credits.
|5 years 18 weeks ago||Thanks for this post||
and the earlier one about BWB, both of which (unfortunately) reinforced my preconceived notions about the topic.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||it's a good site||
A ton of non-UM fans read this site. I haven't asked about it, but probably more than any other team blog.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||Varsity Blue is wrong||
Arie Kouandjio has a profile on Rivals, and looks like a pretty big recruit. I have heard of all five players, but then again I am an East Coast guy and not a UM fan.
Not necessarily disagreeing that some of these are conditional offers though.
|5 years 39 weeks ago||I remember GRob's first year||
his defense was actually really good, considering how pathetic their offense was. I think most of their failings recently have more to do with talent and Robinson being a terrible head coach.
I'd say this is a fairly good hire.
|6 years 2 weeks ago||Marcus Witherspoon||
He's not eligible as per NCAA transfer rules. He did finally pass the clearinghouse. His story is that there was a snafu recognizing credits from an online class he took, but it was finally taken care of.
He would not be allowed to enroll without fully qualifying. He's on the roster, so he's qualified.
|6 years 6 weeks ago||News||
According to http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080904/SPORTS/809040329, Witherspoon will likely end up at Rutgers or Tennessee.