LIST OF WWE PERSONNEL?!?
- Member for
- 5 years 28 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|2 days 10 hours ago||Obviously||
|3 days 13 hours ago||Congratulations on the new location||
But can you compete with these guys?
|3 days 13 hours ago||Eh.||
Is not good. Is not worst thing ever. Is just... eh.
|3 days 15 hours ago||I think the booth OVERTURNED it||
Which... how is that even possible? How can no one know how the pylon works?
|3 days 15 hours ago||That's the thing, though||
Dumb rule or no, it was the correct call. So while I think that SHOULD count as a catch in any rational world, the refs got it right.
|4 days 14 hours ago||Yes.||
|4 days 14 hours ago||No.||
|4 days 14 hours ago||No.||
|6 days 12 hours ago||Not that we're going down the political road...||
But you do realize that the University of Michigan is a state university, yes? And you know what that means, yes?
|1 week 2 days ago||Interesting||
Will there be a way to retroactively scratch out dumb predictions that don't turn out to be anywhere near accurate? Asking for a friend.
|1 week 4 days ago||(No subject)|
|1 week 4 days ago||FWIW||
Those numbers include three walk-ons who deserve scholarships.
|1 week 5 days ago||Also||
They're aren't in the Midwest right before the combine
|2 weeks 2 days ago||Bobby|
|2 weeks 2 days ago||I have a question||
About my dog's anal glands...
|2 weeks 2 days ago||You're just mad||
About what happened to Kate Mara.
I join you in that sentiment
|2 weeks 2 days ago||The whole series||
Or Rocky as in "Rocky I"
|2 weeks 2 days ago||I dunno||
Leviticus, 11:17 says that "He who shall Perform a Song which is not the Song of the Victorious in a Manner which intermingles it with the Song of the Victorious shall be put to Death."
Rules are rules.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||This.||
So very much this.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||That||
is a lot of sig figs.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||No...||
...if you put the big cooking spoon thing in like that, you'll never have room for the DAMMIT MOVE I'LL DO IT.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||Agreed||
See also: the colloquial (and objectively incorrect) use of "ironic" to mean "coincidental" has been added to some dictionaries. IT STILL AIN'T RIGHT, SON.
|2 weeks 4 days ago||I mean||
If your position is that we can't make fun of ANYTHING on the internet, that's cool. We'll just have to disagree. It's a perfectly fair position, just one that I happen to vehemently disagree with.
As for mistakes, I don't think I have a mistake to own here. I came in well after the fact here, and am just discussing the general point. I owned up to a mistake a couple of posts above, but beyond that I feel pretty blameless.
|2 weeks 4 days ago||I think he was saying style-wise||
Wheat doesn't appear to be a super-explosive TE type who can run like a WR and hit like a Fullback. He's more blocky than catchy. So while he can be a really useful weapon, he probbaly won't be the guy you highlight as a matchup nightmare. For that type of TE, you'll be looking more at the Ian Bunting-type TE.
|2 weeks 4 days ago||So NOTHING can be mean?||
No "Brian Kelly is an angry purple little man" jokes? No "Tom Izzo is a whiny little man" jokes? No "Branden Dawson punches inanimate objects" jokes? No "Anything related to Tom Crean" jokes?
Not every argument is made with the purest forms of logic and reason, and arguing otherwise is nuts. And if you're going to argue that this is a pure ad hominem, I think it's worth pointing out that the picture confirmed the same "vibe" as the proposal, which was... uh... not something we old folks were super amped to see brought forth.
|2 weeks 4 days ago||And you know what?||
I regret that post a great deal. In my mind at the time (and for a good while afterward), it was making fun of a really bad music video. But it was only "amusing" because of who made it... and it was a 17-year-old (I think) who made it. I didn't get that at the time. I get that now. But I'm not going to unpublish it, because hiding that stuff doesn't help, and the ability to wipe the slate clean in hindsight makes people less considerate when they originally hit "publish."
But here, we're talking about an adult. Perhaps the line is an arbitrary one, but it's a pretty broadly accepted one in our culture. Second-semester sophomores are 19 or 20. They've lived away from home for two years. They can drink in Canada. Besides, this is a guy who isn't getting pulled into this from the background. He put himself in the foreground, both by becoming a representative and by putting forward a really terrible proposal to that body. Was posting the picture mean and unneccesary? Maybe. Hell, probably. But does being "mean" make it inappropriate? I don't think so.
|2 weeks 4 days ago||Narrow block of text||
|2 weeks 4 days ago||Where I come from||
Saying "hey, this is the member YOU ELECTED to the governing body trying to do a stupid thing and asking for your money to do the stupid thing, so tell them to stop doing the stupid thing" is a pretty damn acceptable use of social media. If this was a state legislator or a Congressman, no one would say anything.
For the life of me I can't see why you think this individual is above people responding directly to them in a medium designed exactly for that purpose.
|2 weeks 4 days ago||I didn't||
But if I had, what exactly would have been wrong about that? Seriously, what information would I have been sharing that wasn't already freely available for anyone with 30 seconds and an Internet machine? Hell, what information would I have been sharing that I didn't find with 30 seconds and an Internet machine?
|2 weeks 4 days ago||Not sure what you mean||
I have no reason to be disingenuous here. I'm not receiving a nickel from the site. I'm not even writing for the site anymore, other than the occasional response to the This Weeks Obsession articles. I'm not trying to make inroads in the blogging community.
I don't always agree with Brian. I just happen to not think he did anything wrong here, and I get tired of people who don't understand how social media works..