a terrible blight on our fine country
- Member for
- 6 years 2 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|1 week 2 days ago||lol||
|6 weeks 5 days ago||Yea the words "tearing" and||
Yea the words "tearing" and "Drake Harris" in the same sentence were injurous for my brain to read.
|8 weeks 13 hours ago||Similarly you could do||
Similarly you could do fumbles returned for TDs by WRs, TEs, and RBs or even throw QBs in this one too.
|8 weeks 13 hours ago||Always wanted to have a QB||
Always wanted to have a QB bankruptcy rule where if the QB ever throws a pick 6 his points drop to 0 for that week. If it was at the end of the 1st half then the QB would still have the 2nd half to accumulate points, but if it was in the 4th quarter it could crush someone's soul. It would not come up very often, but when it did it definetly could swing a game which should at least keep people interested until certain QBs are done for the day.
|9 weeks 1 day ago||Your friend had a good||
Your friend had a good suggestion. I would add that the site you reference is getting more popular as it has very soft poker tables so it may draw the attention of those that seize (i.e, steal) player funds in the future.
|25 weeks 3 days ago||I am also no criminal law||
I am also no criminal law expert, but if girlfriend's testimony was a big part of the case, and now girlfriend changes her story, the prosecution will have to argue that she was telling the truth right after the incident but is lying now. It would definitely make it harder to prove the case, which could allow her to effectively "drop" the case.
|29 weeks 6 days ago||Unfortunately, this will be a||
Unfortunately, this will be a badge of honor for some employers. I live in Oklahoma and have heard the n word in professional settings multiple times.
|30 weeks 3 days ago||Powderpuff||
|30 weeks 3 days ago||This thread is not pointless||
This thread is not pointless at all. Hopefully this thread alerts the coaches to this issue. Both you and your friend have some life lessons to learn.
Punishing your friend makes for a good teaching point for years to come on protecting confidential information. It also teaches a lesson on carefully selecting who you can actually trust.
|32 weeks 42 min ago||Word on the street from an||
Word on the street from an anonymous internet poster who knows somebody who knows somebody is that Under Armor will be making a run at the M contract, but expects Adidas to ultimately offer more money. This anonymous internet poster made it very clear to the Under Armor person of interest that he viewed Under Armor as superior and thought the collective fanbase did as well.
|39 weeks 3 days ago||Am I crazy or does he say he||
Am I crazy or does he say he isnt using a source (other than his own brain) in the first 2 lines of the post?
|40 weeks 5 days ago||This is not the same thing||
This is not the same thing
|41 weeks 1 day ago||Oh no he didn't /snapsnap||
Oh no he didn't /snapsnap
|41 weeks 1 day ago||In before delete||
In before delete
|42 weeks 4 days ago||Rule #2: All bad news is a||
Rule #2: All bad news is a smokescreen.
|43 weeks 9 hours ago||If true, Carr's||
If true, Carr's comments regarding Harbaugh also occuring on 12/4 make for some interesting theories. For example, Harbaugh needed everyone pulling in the same direction if he were to come. Another theory is that Hackett's plan was make runs at Harbaugh from as many angles as possible, with Carr rallying support of former players who hold his opinion in high regard.
|43 weeks 2 days ago||Agree. This should not be on||
Agree. This should not be on this board.
|43 weeks 2 days ago||Disclaimer: anonymous||
Disclaimer: anonymous internet poster blah blah.
|48 weeks 5 days ago||He would start reading blogs,||
He would start reading blogs, which may include this one. Nobody wants that.
|1 year 7 weeks ago||Good point. A bunch of D||
Good point. A bunch of D lineman and a WR probably running screens "jumped out." Hopefully not an indication of where the OL is, but this is likely evidence the OL may still be struggling. As noted above, Glasgow could also be included in the DL category depending on which Glasgow he is talking about.
|1 year 7 weeks ago||That Brandon Graham guy was||
That Brandon Graham guy was pretty good.
|1 year 12 weeks ago||frech Pass?||
|1 year 13 weeks ago||Why cant we breach this shit||
Why cant we breach this shit contract again? Makes me want to start a clothing company if this is the competition.
|1 year 22 weeks ago||I bet you will be surprised.||
I bet you will be surprised. Stay tuned.
|1 year 26 weeks ago||Same here. I will add that I||
Same here. I will add that I hope he asks her what car she wants and refuses to buy that one under any circumstance.
|1 year 27 weeks ago||Exactly. I was trying to be||
Exactly. I was trying to be gentle because people are sensitive about baseball and it is blasphemy to say something like that in some circles. The "bad guys" will always stay in front of the law in this one, in large part because the law is not interested in catching the "bad guys" as much as they want people to think they did. The law profits off PEDs too. I would bet more profit was made off Barry Bonds and Mark McGwire than was made on all teams that played in the 1910s combined.
|1 year 27 weeks ago||I get the impression from||
I get the impression from people in my life who are currently (and another recently) trying to break into the bigs that steroids aren't so much out of the game as they are out of the public media. But then again, maybe I am a random internet poster who made that up. And if I didn't make that up, maybe they were lying to me or it was constrained within the teams they were on.
|1 year 27 weeks ago||The reason I eat Little||
The reason I eat Little Caesars more I should.
|1 year 27 weeks ago||Would imagine it is hard to||
Would imagine it is hard to turn down cash for better odds, especially somone in Scherzer's situation:
- Cash you can see, hold, spend, and use to blow lines off strippers. Odds are abstract and have subjective components.
- You and I understand measuring the odds as the outset to calculate and evaluate the best decision, regardless of result that in fact occurs. Most people don't. Examples of bad results that make your less cash decision look bad in hindsight include, but are not limited to: (1) Talking less cash and still not winning; (2) Team doesn't spend the cash you save them; (3) Team spends cash you save them on D-Train; (4) Team would have won the World Series anyway; (5) and the best one, team trades you and beats your new team in the World Series in part because of the cash they saved on you.
- There is always "I was the best pitcher in the AL last year why am I susposed to take less cash and player X is not. Why don't you ask him to improve our odds because he's not doing it with his play, as I am."
- Another point would be this whole thing assumes the tigers are operating within a budget-like thing where taking less cash is even a relevant consideration in calculating odds. This also assumes the reports are true regarding the negotiation.
|1 year 28 weeks ago||Would like to see the||
Would like to see the empirical evidence for "we know that there are a lot of kids with 34 ACT scores and high class rank that are rejected by the University of Illinois and wind up going to places like Kansas and Indiana . . ." Lol please.