|3 hours 14 min ago||You've got a good list for||
You've got a good list for pop. Here's rock, for a given definition of "the band that almost every band alludes to in describing their sound (par ejemplo: We're ManBall. We're like a Beatles meets Tool meets Radiohead meets the Strokes kind of sound)"
1970s: Led Zepplinn
1980s: Guns 'n Roses
2010s: Still up in the air, so far the Black Keys are winning, since all the garage and southern rock bands that dominate rock right now claim them in their meeting.
|1 day 3 hours ago||What about seniors Trey Burke||
What about seniors Trey Burke and Tim Hardaway?
|1 day 20 hours ago||What do a Michigan grad and||
What do a Michigan grad and MSU grad have in common? They both got into state.
|2 days 15 min ago||Oh like YOU guys can tell the||
Oh like YOU guys can tell the difference between middling ACC schools.
|2 days 4 hours ago||You really have no idea what||
You really have no idea what the families of these douchenozzles are doing about it. You should stop assuming.
|3 days 2 hours ago||You really expect us to||
You really expect us to believe you're a Gaylord townie and you have a fondness for Highlands? Everyone I know who's actually from anywhere northwest of the wedding ring skis Nubs and leaves Highlands to the fudgies.
|3 days 2 hours ago||It's a question of degree,||
It's a question of degree, yeah, but degree isn't solely the financial cost. Stealing $50,000 in laptops is precisely as awful as $50,000 in damages, but it's also not going to register with a lot of people here.
A one-night Bacchan destruction by UM students is of great interest to UM students and alums, and people in general. Tell me clothing stolen from a laundry room is more interesting than this?
Why give that group special treatment among greater umich sports fans this site serves? Like Detroiters or Ann Arbor residents, UM students and alumni and teachers are such a large contingent of our readership that big things of interest to them are allowed. If the Red Wings injured five Blue Jackets in a wanton brawl at the end of a 12-1 blowout the contingent of Red Wings fans would warrant a thread on it because they're going to be reading about it and talking to others about it.
|3 days 2 hours ago||UM student crime - What is newsworthy for MGoBlog?||
Moved a special snowflake back to the roadside.
Guy wanted to discuss the threadworthiness of a topic with two threads and avg 200 replies in those. That's fine but the threadworthiness discussion doesn't need a third thread, so I pasted his comment into the last thread discussing the topic.
Regarding future moderation on this topic, I'd advise allowing one or two more threads in the coming weeks when important information about the case is made public, but that's it. Relevence is to the school, which is within off-topic boundaries for offseason.
|3 days 3 hours ago||That same controversy was||
That same controversy was still going on in the late 1990s and early aughts. I was out voted on this on the Daily ed board but I think the university should only use academic recourse for off-campus/non-academic behaviors when there is a clear danger to the integrity of the school or the safety of other students.
A convicted rapist should be removed from the school as a danger to other students. Murder absolutely. Capital fraud (for example involvement in a points shaving scheme with the basketball team) yes. This kind of thing the university would have to show a trend, not one incident, to suggest other students' property was in danger were the perps to remain in school.
|3 days 11 hours ago||AEPi got kicked off campus||
AEPi got kicked off campus while I was in school. We had a song we sang about it to the tune of American Pie. It had many verses and I know them all still.
Bye Bye Alpha Epsilon Pi
|3 days 11 hours ago||I disagree; it's UM-related||
I disagree; it's UM-related and for the offseason it's fine. There are two threads on it.
The thing I find unproductive are those going "see this is why I don't join a frat" or "I'm sure their daddies will take care of it."
On the latter: we just got done eviscerating Dave Brandon for a similar comment.
On the former: I was in a fraternity in college. And my dad was in this frat--SAMmies--at MSU (which didn't have a chapter at UM when I was there). A fraternity is like any other organization--football team, Daily, whatever--by joining it you accept that your actions will reflect on the organization. If this was a football team who'd trashed a bowl hotel (which isn't unheard of) people will denigrate that program, that school, and football teams in general, although the more you generalize obviously the further you get from correct.
Is THIS frat full of douches? I mean, it's obvious they have a contingent. You can't create that kind of destruction without a surprising disregard of other people. If that was my hotel I'd absolutely pursue criminal charges.
But the only thing it says about others in their fraternity is they've chosen to associate with these douchenozzles. As for the thousand-odd members of fraternities at Michigan and million-odd across the country who never chose to hang with said douchenozzles, it doesn't really say anything except they joined a type of organization that some douchenozzles joined.
The perpetrators were Americans too, and given the specific fraternity, probably of my religion. They root for Michigan sports. Perhaps one or two were in the room when I spoke at Hillel last November, and three or four pass along this blog. Having things in common with me doesn't make them less douchnozzles to me, and doesn't make me a douchenozzle for those associations.
|3 days 13 hours ago||Built-in excel plus gimp||
Built-in excel plus gimp (free photoshop)
|3 days 14 hours ago||I saw that. The Freep is||
I saw that. The Freep is already using it in their online coverage.
|5 days 12 hours ago||Nobody gets 100% of things||
Nobody gets 100% of things right, but someone who gets 99.99% of things they report correct and can demonstrate why they were wrong for explicable reasons is a VERY good resource for knowlege. Someone who gets 90% right is untrustworthy but interesting, and someone who gets 80% right is basically useless. Someone who passes along everything without context is a mouthpiece, and is therefore serving whoever gave them information more than their audience.
Please don't throw the "nobody's perfect" thing out there again because it's fallacious. The question is what processes does a journalist use to provide their information.
|5 days 23 hours ago||AND Ohio State only has one||
AND Ohio State only has one player, and that a guy who barely played for them: Nate Ebner.
|1 week 1 day ago||No it's not the same thing||
No it's not the same thing and I tried to explain the difference.
Out of the general population, only a small % of people are going to have BOTH the talent and the will to become professional-level athletes. Being from a poor, shitty background increases the likelihood that you'll have the will to become an athlete capable of being recruited by Michigan. However once you're one of the top 500 players in the country you've already proven you have both the will and the talent.
So if you knew nothing about where to recruit other than how many people live in a certain state, then this information is helpful in identifying where you can get more bang for your buck. But recruiters have far more information already available to them.
What Foote was talking about was his personal motivating experience. But Foote played with Todd Howard, who grew up in the neighborhood adjacent to mine until we both moved, whereupon his neighborhood in Bolingbrook was as nice as mine in Bloomfield HIlls.
Todd was much less of an athlete than a lot of the guys he played with, but he had a profound intelligence for the game and an extraordinary will to make himself better. If Michigan had taken, say, another of Foote's classmates of equal talent from Detroit instead of Todd Howard, Michigan would have been out one three-year starter.
|1 week 2 days ago||derf. Fixed.||
|1 week 2 days ago||You'd be like the 200th||
You'd be like the 200th person to do so if you changed your avatar to something I drew.
180 of those are the Harbaugh in a michigan hat.
|1 week 2 days ago||(No subject)||
|1 week 2 days ago||Bacon's stories were great||
Bacon's stories were great but he totally teased us that there'd be a new book, then wouldn't tell us what he's writing it about.
|1 week 3 days ago||Just for the record, Brian is||
Just for the record, Brian is only older than me by a handful of months. Apparently the definition of "digustingly young" is not being born by the time Brian was sitting up.
|1 week 3 days ago||I remember not thinking he||
I remember not thinking he was very good. Keep in mind this was long before I ever diagrammed a play. But there was a play early in the season--Colorad or Baylor--when Mayes was in and Hendricks was frantically pointing at him to guard someone else.
Mayes did and Hendricks had an interception in the end zone, and I guess because Mayes had a number in a 20s we thought he was another defensive back, and my dad and I talked about how Hendricks is a good DB and Mayes isn't and were smug about how we'd identified this from one play.
Maybe I should stop talking about my 17-year-old football-watching idiot self because I think he'd probably get banned from this board.
|1 week 3 days ago||A-train wasn't feature back until 1999||
Click to big.
Here's your answer: A-Train shared carries with other guys until his junior season. Thomas got 28% of RB or FB carries in 1997, and 37% in 1998 before leaping to 79% in 1999.
In '97 it was Chris Howard getting the plurality of touches, though that was still just 41% (C-Will had 12% and the fullbacks, mostly Chris Floyd, accounted for 19%).
In '98 A-Train and C-Will were nearly even: 37% to 32% for little 33. Fargas took another 17% of carries, and Walter Cross got 8%, most of those while salting games away. The fullbacks got the remaining 6%. Thomas was a good enough back in '98 that I made him my background, i.e. he was my favorite player that year.
Only in 1999 did A-Train really become the feature back. The carries that C-Will and Fargas took the previous year all went to Anthony Thomas, with Cross getting the same 8% (backup carries). The fullbacks got 13% but a majority of that was B.J. Askew emerging.
|2 weeks 2 days ago||Found this in the student||
Found this in the student directory:
|2 weeks 2 days ago||Awesome series. I'm liking||
Awesome series. I'm liking his stuff better than any other fantasy since Sanderson righted the WoT ship.
Did you read the little side tale with Auri? It's basically The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time except set in a fantasy world, and having read the first I wasn't nearly as enthralled with it, though I would guess most of the people who read fantasy aren't going for mid-aughts bestsellers and vice versa.
Anyway Rothfuss is brilliant.
|2 weeks 2 days ago||I cannot read "Clint||
I cannot read "Clint Copenhaver" without Keith Jackson's voice saying it.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||I've been deep in the start||
I've been deep in the start data and there's all sorts of weirdness. Each season should have exactly as many starters as the number of games times 22 (unless we were playing 10 man football), but most years are off, meaning I gotta go find lots of little problems.
Right now here's how it matches up (with 2012 repaired):
The 1993-96 data are incomplete--I forgot those were only there to show the historical starts for players on the 97 team.
|2 weeks 3 days ago||Yeah something go REALLY||
Yeah something go REALLY messed up with 2012. On Bentley too:
I'm gonna have to do some major scrubbing. Sorry. Here's the correct 2012 start data:
|2 weeks 3 days ago||Something got messed up with||
Something got messed up with my data for 2012 because these are the starts I had on defense:
|2 weeks 3 days ago||Oops. That was all just done||
Oops. That was all just done by hand so lemme fix.
|2 weeks 4 days ago||That's because peppers is a||
That's because peppers is a red shirt freshman. He was injured last year.
|2 weeks 4 days ago||He redshirted but not as a||
He redshirted but not as a true freshman. I thought I had that.
|2 weeks 4 days ago||^This. Here's a preview of||
^This. Here's a preview of the last paragraph in this year's upcoming HTTV roundtable.
|3 weeks 1 day ago||Mullen and then lots of unexplored||
I haven't listened to the podcast but since those who have said Brian brought it up already, Dan Mullen was in place as Plan B. Michigan had already vetted him and he was ready to come. I don't think negotiations with anybody else got that far and didn't need to because Michigan was apparently 90% sure by December 22 that Harbaugh would come, and 99.999% sure that Mullen would come if they didn't get Jim.
|3 weeks 2 days ago||Manning||
is CBs coach currently.
|3 weeks 3 days ago||Roy Manning rant||
Roy does know RBs. The OP mentioned his experience. I've also spoken to Roy and seen him at clinics and had his views on things passed down second-hand. He absolutely is qualified to coach running backs. Coaches wind up coaching things they didn't play all the time. Rich Rodriguez, inventor of spread to run offenses, was a defensive back.
Without betraying too much let me tell you who Roy is: he's an ace recruiter, yes (Jabrill PEPPERS, man!) but he's also a brilliant mind who was born to coach football. Every guy he played with and a lot of the guys he coaches have said the same thing: he's going to be a Power 5 or NFL head coach one day. The only other guy I ever heard such things so consistently about was Nick Sheridan.
Roy would make a great RB coach. I think he didn't make a great CBs coach because he hadn't ever coached that before, and it showed as Michigan transitioned to a defense that put its cornerbacks in tough situations that they weren't built for. RBs would be a much better fit than staying with the CBs, but even if you left him with the cornerbacks I almost guarantee this guy will be good at it sooner than most former CBs you could give the job to. He had a tough job to do but threw himself into that role very seriously. The reason I know this shit is, as you've probably noticed by now, we have a lot of friends of the blog from the CB depth chart of Roy's playing days. He's been talking to those guys a lot. They put a lot of stock in guys who can "COACH" by which they mean teach the fundamentals of football and life to his charges. At the very least I think Roy Manning has a lot of the qualities that made Brady Hoke such a beloved and accomplished DL coach that he got a shot at being a premier school head coach.
I'm guessing--I haven't gotten diddly since the coaching search began--that he doesn't have a relationship with Harbaugh, and that Harbaugh's building his staff with guys he knows. But it's also a good enough guess that by now somebody has told him keeping Manning in some way would be beneficial. The problem obviously is there are a lot of good RB coach candidates Michigan has access to--Hart, Wheatley, even retaining Fred "the unkillable" Jackson, who would probably be connected to the program in some way anyway since he's the key to in-state recruiting. And their new OC can coach RBs. And their new DC can coach LBs, and so can Mattison. So unless there's a role for SAM/WDE and recruiting dude, Manning may not have a role.
|3 weeks 3 days ago||I've seen that rumor but I'm||
I've seen that rumor but I'm very much waiting for some level of realness before taking it seriously. Reason being, it's notoriously difficult to get transfers past admissions at Michigan, and nobody has any idea right now whether our graduate school admissions process would consider a guy likely to come here for just one year.
The whole admissions-athletics relationship hasn't had to face that before, and the information we have on that operation is thus limited. The good news is so far the only transfers Michigan ever gets are really good students from Stanfords and the like. Here's the list:
If he wasn't from Stanford I wouldn't even be countenancing it. But who knows if Michigan's academics would even consider his athletic value in his admissions. And if Michigan can't guarantee admission, would he just move on to the large list of schools who do?
|3 weeks 4 days ago||Ads for other blogs||
if your local radio personality tells you to troll us, don't do that.
|3 weeks 4 days ago||He came. He wore khakis, and||
He came. He wore khakis, and a funny jacket, and a funny hat, and a fez under his hat, and reported that everybody wears a fez under their hats. We are investigating this now.
We had a staff meeting upstairs after the hoops game and didn't get to hang downstairs as much as we like (most of us have newish offspring) but we ran into a lot of fans who reported their wives/girlfriends are very much not fans of the site.
Also Vincent Smith came by for a bit.
|3 weeks 4 days ago||I like Jimmystats for the||
I like Jimmystats for the Excellish ones.
Would it be bothersome to HTTV readers if I stole section names from the mag?
|3 weeks 5 days ago||Booo pop songs.Yay Irving||
Booo pop songs.
Yay Irving Berlin songs.
Now that I've tried to make one of these things I've got a new appreciation for how much work goes into one of them. But I really do hate pop songs in hype videos.
|3 weeks 5 days ago||Harbaugh. Harbaugh Harbaugh:||
Harbaugh Harbaugh: Harbaugh, Harbaugh Harbaugh Harbaugh--Harbaugh Harbaugh Harbaugh Harbaugh Harbaugh--Harbaugh:
|3 weeks 5 days ago||Harbaugh or Harbaugh?||
Harbaugh or Harbaugh?
|3 weeks 6 days ago||Your scenario has him not||
Your scenario has him not even coaching the Ohio State game.
|3 weeks 6 days ago||I know it. Actually I first||
I know it. Actually I first found this song while looking for footage of the one you describe. Then the Irving Berlin song inspired the video.
|4 weeks 13 hours ago||Oh man FIND THIS MAN! I wanna||
Oh man FIND THIS MAN!
I wanna be there.
|4 weeks 13 hours ago||He's a one-source reporter.||
He's a one-source reporter. Guy got into an argument with me and BiSB earlier this year when he published that list of grievances from that he purported to be a thing signed by a bunch of players when it was an email one guy forwarded to a lot of people.
Being right is less important than being right for the right reasons. He called Harbaugh because he heard the same things from M people that we did: M people were pushing Jim hard to come back. But rather than put it in context he ran to be the first to say Harbaugh's coming.
I don't think that's the kind of journalism that deserves any kind of appreciation. It's guessing well.
|4 weeks 17 hours ago||And it wasn't a Photoshop it||
And it wasn't a Photoshop it was a Gimp, so Gimp has a case.
|4 weeks 1 day ago||Yeah if doesn't happen then||
Yeah if doesn't happen then they won't happen. I wouldn't put this up now if we weren't fairly certain. It was a question is do we care about jinxes vs the time it takes to get shirts made and shipped.
"It h4ppened" seems too short term to me. It's not like the hire fixes everything. Getting this program back to elite will be a long process and this shirt is meant to remain relevant throughout that.
|4 weeks 3 days ago||Morris. He was thrown into||
Morris. He was thrown into the fire this year but he still has an arm and a head.
I think there's a pretty strong consensus on this side already that no, there's no way in hell or Ohio he'll come here for a grad transfer season, and yes, if there was a chance we'd welcome him.
OSU's own QB situation may not warrant a transfer anyway. J.T. Barrett will be coming off of an injury that doesn't necessarily have you back in a year's time, and certainly won't have him back for spring practice. There will inevitably be "I'm 99%" quotes come fall practice that will be 78% bullshit because that's what football players do. Anyway Ohio State would very much appreciate having Braxton around, and Miller would have all of spring to take 1st team snaps. If I had to guess right now where he'll be come 9/1/2015, it's starting for the Buckeyes.
|4 weeks 4 days ago||What if Cam Newton discovered||
What if Cam Newton discovered by some quirk of NCAA rules he had one year left of eligibility? Would you take him?
|4 weeks 4 days ago||I changed thread name because||
I changed thread name because reasons today.
Two very disciplined defenses vs two offenses that screw with you cerebrally. SDSU does the things we thought Borges should have: packaged power plays. Navy is a 3O which SDSU has fared well against. Lots of smart guys playing football chess out there. Watch Navy's QB on his option reads. Best in the game.
|5 weeks 1 hour ago||0.0% chance of Beilein||
0.0% chance of Beilein getting fired even if this season is a post-season-less disaster, so all your thread could possibly accomplish would be to provide an example of how silly knee-jerk fans are with their hotseat bler, thereby pissing off the board and providing a bad example for other Michigan fans of the level of discussion on the board.
So let's weight: the potential for MGoBlog to look like a joke plus the potential to piss off our readers, versus the likelihood that a stupid question answerable in less than 5 characters generates a considered response.
|5 weeks 4 hours ago||At what point does Beilein's seat begin to get warm this season?||
Long after you've got your points back. Use the time till then to figure out what questions are worth asking.
|5 weeks 7 hours ago||It depends. Justice doesn't||
It depends. Justice doesn't get served by any standard solution; it is fitted to the exact circumstances of the crime and the criminal. You can say mercy is the better solution right up to the point where a criminal hurts people again.
Saban's justification is self-serving. The options are not always the street or starring. The competition for players means a football player cut loose by his school for criminal activity is likely to find a second chance elsewhere.
Saban of all people shouldn't be talking about this because he recruits kids already on their second chances, and metes out justice based on how much they can help his football team to a much greater degree than your average coach. If Mark Richt said this same thing I would be all "hell yeah." With Saban, it's Capone making a general argument for clemency. The truth is if Musin Muhammed couldn't have helped his team as much as another recruit, Saban would have cut his ass.
In general I don't think that severe punishment is more effective at justice than mercy and a chance for redemption. I think the pressure to succeed in football is a strong motivation for players to be given second chances and for them to use those opportunities. Giving criminals a chance to make up the damage they caused and move on with their lives is a hugely important aspect of justice. The more that decision is about football instead of the crime or the criminal, the less it is likely to be just. And Nick Saban is the first guy in college football I would name if asked who's making those decisions mostly on the football merits.
|5 weeks 2 days ago||This is what I was trying to||
This is what I was trying to avoid. I posted my political involvement because it's public (there are going to be articles with my byline and a bottom bio that says I work here) and can affect how people read what I write.
In fairness to the issue you bring up, I could point out that the other side, when it had the governor's seat, kept choosing to patch or replace with cheap stuff instead of springing for the expensive good stuff that our neighbors use, and that decision appeared to be influenced by wanting to keep road repair crews working. So on that issue having an operative republic may only return the fixing of roads into a pit of corruption.
|5 weeks 3 days ago||New Coach new Quarterback??||
Somewhere along the thought process of "Shane sucks, Tate Forcier was awesome," there was a notable lack of "is this thread-worthy?"
|5 weeks 4 days ago||I left out non Power 5||
I left out non Power 5 schools on purpose. Also nobody gets an NFL head coaching job after the Lions. Schwartz may break that. But we ruined even Moeller and Mariucci.
|5 weeks 4 days ago||Hakn is Yiddish for nag or||
Hakn is Yiddish for nag or badger. Hocking is a Jewish wife's favorite pastime.
Hakn rhymes with talkin' if you say it with a Michigander accent.
|5 weeks 4 days ago||SEO etc||
For those in digital media wondering why this article isn't titled "10 Coaches Who Went Back to School" or "10 Legit NFL Coaches Who Decided to Coach College" it's on purpose.
|5 weeks 4 days ago||Thx. I clarified it was the||
Thx. I clarified it was the Anaheim era I was speaking of. Robinson didn't inherit the Fearsome Foursome; he got the team that left half its fans to the Raiders.
|5 weeks 4 days ago||Predictive purposes: correct.||
Predictive purposes: correct. They're all over the board.
But at least you can respond to people who say guys with the prospect of an NFL job never take a college position that there 10 guys who did so, all for different reasons.
|5 weeks 5 days ago||Not 8 years||
Webb clarified this morning: he came up with 8 himself because his sources said it'll be an 8-year process.
|5 weeks 6 days ago||John has no interest in the||
John has no interest in the job and is solid with Baltimore. There was only a moment when it seemed he might shake loose from there and then speculation could begin but it never materiaized. We're NOT taking him from the Ravens.
|5 weeks 6 days ago||It lives.||
|6 weeks 22 hours ago||Football Scoop isn't out||
Football Scoop isn't out there just making crap up for clicks like Ace Williams, and they at least use sources instead of just releasing stuff from an email chain like Greg Henson.
Just consider their sources: NFL agents (or perhaps just one) who talk to NFL GMs and presidents. Those sources say no way and sure enough want to believe no way. They don't have the sources that, say, Sam Webb has, or even the far more tenuous sources from sources that I have. Those sources are way more positive and suggest Harbaugh's interest in the Michigan job is genuine, and so is his interest in finishing out this season, and the ball is in his court.
|6 weeks 1 day ago||it's nonsense.||
|6 weeks 1 day ago||I meant that's something the||
I meant that's something the bler folks seem to have a burr about, not that I do.
|6 weeks 3 days ago||Impersonating other accounts||
Instant and permanent ban. We used to have Misery for such things. Maybe we can bring that back. Nothing makes me sleep better than knowing a troll is unknowingly posting to a completely different server and getting auto "just stop" responses while that server's viruses busily burrow every Trojan and performance wrecker into the offender's registry.
|6 weeks 3 days ago||Shemy knew a different side||
Shemy knew a different side of his father than most. Bo wouldn't tell Harbaugh to come home; he would stare him down in the hairy eyeball, then stand up and punch the desk like he's about to climb right over it, and the other hand would point like a bullet that expects to gow through the nucal crevice right between the eyes, through the heart, and out the spine, and he'd say "You are going to coach for MICHIGAN!"
And Harbaugh would be signing his fourth recruiting class before he thought "Wait, why did I agree to that?"
|6 weeks 3 days ago||That post was literally||
That post was literally DELETED (not just taken down) so I'm guessing the fake account went bye-bye as well. I saw it pop up on the back end this morning and then it was gone a minute later.
|6 weeks 3 days ago||step 1: Hire Schiano's||
step 1: Hire Schiano's agent
step 2: Get my name inserted into every vacancy for every high-paid job in America
step3: Wait until someone's dumb enough to bite.
|6 weeks 3 days ago||SONOVA||
Can't we have ANYTHING good?
I just made this for an upcoming post too.
|6 weeks 3 days ago||Figured this was coming when||
Figured this was coming when they cut Green loose yesterday.
|7 weeks 20 hours ago||At the very least the part||
At the very least the part about the regents is false according to my source who knows a regent really well. Either they haven't been part of any Harbaugh deal, or they're not leaking it to people they leak other stuff to.
|7 weeks 1 day ago||Who's in the collage||
Top row from left: Lane Kiffin, Gary Andersen, Steve Addazio, Jim Mora Jr., Mike Gundy, Bret Bielema, [block M and Jim's hat], John Harbaugh
2nd row from left: Bob Stitt, Tom Herman, Dan Mullen, Pat Narduzzi, John Gruden, Butch Jones, Art Briles, JIM HARBAUGH, Mark Stoops, Kyle Whittingham
Front row from left: Greg Schiano, Les Miles, Bob Stoops, Gary Pinkel, Guz Malzahn, Paul Chryst
|7 weeks 1 day ago||Precisely.||
|7 weeks 1 day ago||I'm not adding Belichik to||
I'm not adding Belichik to the lead graphic. There's just no more gorram room.
|7 weeks 2 days ago||Different jobs entirely.||
Different jobs. Ablauf is in charge of the group that's responsible for how Michigan presents itself to the public. SID is a job Bruce Madej created in athletic departments: he's more like the curator of all history and knowledge and people etc., and acts as the liason between the media and the school. Derek wasn't a good liason--he was a Brandon flunky whose treatment of the media as the enemy helped expand the media's discontent with Brandon (and probably affected the coverage of him outside of this blog).
I would consider Greg Dooley the best candidate for SID. I would consider John U Bacon as the best candidate for Ablauf's job. Sense-make?
|7 weeks 2 days ago||Dreisbach was on the 1998||
Dreisbach was on the 1998 team, yes. Tom Brady beat him out for the job.
Henson wasn't back in 2001; he was in the Yankees' farm system, therefore his 2000 starts weren't returned in 2001. Navarre's 4 starts in 2000 are all that were returned in 2001; in 2002 Navarre's 2001 starts and 2000 starts were returned. Make sense?
|7 weeks 2 days ago||Yup. I did find some strong||
Yup. I did find some strong correlation though, especially with offense and offensive line.
The things I correlated them to are S&P+ rankings for O and D where available, and where not I averaged the scoring and YPP ranks. For AP rank when not available I used combined S&P+ and FEI rank from Football Outsiders.
The negative correlations are what we're looking for, since rank goes down (toward #1 overall) as the experience goes up. I highlighted where the R's were signficant, which was on offense, and offensive line specifically.
Defense didn't have such a strong correlation, especially at LB and DL age. I would guess those are two positions that were dramatically affected by the quality of coaching and other factors. Ezeh and Mouton starts the the main components from the biggest linebacker experience scores and you remember how awful their play was.
The DL has some major outliers, for example the 2010 DL was experienced but the secondary was such a shambles and we rushed so few guys all that talent and experience was wasted against double-teams. On the other hand Carr had three of the youngest DLs in 2000, 2001, and 2007 and got by. They got really lucky to not have major DL injuries in 00-01. You'll remember by 2002 Lazarus, Heuer and Bowman and Rumishek and Orr and Stevens and Kashama were a really solid DL. Those were also the seven best DL on the 2000 line--the only upperclassmen were Eric Wilson and Jake Frysinger. We got away with that in 2000 because of good linebackers and good young players. I'd guess on the aggregate, DL probably reach close to their ceilings as soon as they max out on their playing weight, sometime between sophomore and junior.
|7 weeks 3 days ago||That's correct. Basically all||
That's correct. Basically all he could do was snap the ball and try to hop in front of a guy, which was better than Khoury was doing. We got a nice preview of the OL troubles to come from that. Again I lament Christian Pace, a guy lost to injury who was more Molk 2.0 than anybody we've ever compared to Molk.
|7 weeks 3 days ago||Sam Webb nailed it on the||
Sam Webb nailed it on the radio this morning. Hoke and Mattison gave the defense an identity in 2011 and helped get those guys performing closer to their potential. The offense already had an identity, which began to get stripped away as their offensive coaches tried to instill a different one. Sam also said that Hoke, like Rodriguez, doomed himself by bringing Borges along. Ask yourself this: where would Michigan be right now if Hoke had retained Calvin Magee and left him to run the offense?
|7 weeks 3 days ago||There's considerable reason||
There's considerable reason to believe they will be fairly good, yes. Mason Cole will probably be great considering how good he's been as a true freshman.
But it could all get screwed up with a bad hire. Weird as it may seem, retaining Darrell Funk might not be a bad idea. He's a zone dude who's doing better now that he's teaching it.
|7 weeks 3 days ago||Needs better data. So many of||
Needs better data. So many of the linebacker starts in there are Obi Ezeh and Jonas Mouton and lots of dudes not that bad but hardly as good as even Desmond Morgan as a true freshman. On the other hand the quarterback experience may be overblown because you have performances in there that are less about how many starts a guy's had, and more to do with the fact that TOM BRADY, DREW HENSON, CHAD HENNE, AND DENARD ROBINSON are good at footballs.
|7 weeks 3 days ago||I wonder if it's a trade. I||
I wonder if it's a trade. I wonder what the ramifications for either league would be in that case. I wonder if this might unravel the entirety of the NCAA's "student-athlete" privelege and officially make college sports another professional league. I wonder if this new professional league will compete with the NFL or create a farm system so drafted players can remain in school. I wonder if by doing this it will stabilize the economy while pumping NFL-like dollars into more research. I wonder if the result of all that research at the top universities will discover a cure for cancer and clean, renewable energy sources, and reverse the effects of global warming, both only after Michigan's climate is basically SEC country.
I wonder if Harbaugh will be able to recruit better than Ohio State once Ohio State is a swampy wasteland filled with retired people.
I wonder what's for dinner.
|7 weeks 3 days ago||Class year didn't seem to||
Class year did correlate with winning as much. I did run it, and had an entire section that took awhile to build that I just deleted because it was getting long.
YSHS="Years since high school" which is sophsx1+jrsx2 etc.
|7 weeks 3 days ago||True freshmen in a system --||
True freshmen in a system -- I wanted to show some guys closer to what we're guessing Morris is going to get.
|7 weeks 4 days ago||The server is flushing||
The server is flushing sessions. It happens whenever the load is getting so heavy that the page fails to load. Better 10 readers can read the site, though it's an inconvenience.
|7 weeks 5 days ago||He'll also be with us in||
He'll also be with us in Cleveland january 12. Look for details (thanks cleveland Alumni Association!)
|7 weeks 6 days ago||The sense, and it may not be||
The sense, and it may not be accurate, is that Harbaugh is one of the few young elite coaches out there. He has done enough to be an NFL coach for life--perhaps bouncing around a few places until he can find the kind of personnel control to make sure his approach doesn't clash with the professionals he coaches.
Michigan seems to think we can have him because this is still a potentially elite program and his alma mater. You don't see Florida or Nebraska pining for him, even though they are also great football schools, because they don't think he would go there. Harbaugh isn't a guaranteed home run. He's more like a 5-star recruit who could choose to be a lottery pick but if he did choose college it would only be Michigan.
|7 weeks 6 days ago||Just awful. My heart goes out||
Just awful. My heart goes out to Ohio State, his teammates and his family. I don't know why this one is getting me so much harder than other bad deaths, perhaps because of the text to his parents. To raise a boy, to have him earn a spot on the Ohio State football team, and then to get that text message followed by that news... It's awful.
The concussion discussion is bound to happen because severe depression is linked, but I would guess no doctor would support jumping to that conclusion. I want to have that discussion and jump to that conclusion anyway because I want to believe that a thing can be done. That there's a pattern we can understand. That sense can be made out of losing a life so worth living.
|8 weeks 13 hours ago||J.T. Barrett probably won't||
J.T. Barrett probably won't be able to play anyway. Who wants the Big Ten to be represented in the first playoffs by a team quarterbacked by Cardale Jones?
|8 weeks 13 hours ago||Jedi.||
That is all.
|8 weeks 1 day ago||My name is Seth. I'm really||
My name is Seth.
|8 weeks 1 day ago||Defensive line coach for John||
Defensive line coach for John Harbaugh and a leading candidate for the Western Michigan HC job.
|8 weeks 1 day ago||Derp. I blame the turkey and||
Derp. I blame the turkey and Dantonio.
|8 weeks 1 day ago||Drake burned his redshirt as||
Drake burned his redshirt as a freshman according to his mother. They're trying to get a medical for him.
Everything is debatable. And I'd forgive most of it if they didn't lose so much. We haven't even had to pay this particular price yet.
|8 weeks 2 days ago||Sorry to disappoint then. I||
Sorry to disappoint then. I do the same thing, and read 11Warriors regularly for the Michigan content and to get out of the echo chamber. So if you're trying to escape the things Eleven Warriors says about Buckeye football by coming here, I've failed you, since my Buckeye takes are pretty strongly colored by those guys.
|8 weeks 2 days ago||Nope, Brady Hoke's still the||
Nope, Brady Hoke's still the head coach. But keep trying!
|8 weeks 3 days ago||Thanks for the Apple note --||
Thanks for the Apple note -- we just missed that one.
I'm not ready to go there with Grant. From watching him play throughout his career, I think he's got the talent to be great, but there are a lot of Big Ten cornerbacks, including our Jourdan Lewis, whom I think have developed much further at this point. CB is one of the spots I'm most likely to trust my judgement, since the former players I speak to are mostly old cornerbacks.
You'll have to forgive me if I don't want to do a comparative study of Cam Johnson to determine if he gets a star or not. I gave one to MSU's Sadler, but that dude's by consensus better than half the guys in the NFL right now. I don't think Ohio State's punting will matter much.
|8 weeks 4 days ago||Taking suggestions for new||
Taking suggestions for new names.
|9 weeks 3 days ago||Politics stops here.||
Politics stops here.
|9 weeks 3 days ago||I've mentioned it before, but||
I've mentioned it before, but if you're not fishing for St. Clair smallies you haven't fished Michigan.
|9 weeks 3 days ago||You can't really point at||
You can't really point at David Terrell--one of the top overall high school prospects in his year--and say "wow look how much Lloyd did with so little." What David's NFL vs college careers suggest is that college players weren't able to exploit Terrell's weakness (because every guy has one) but NFL players were, therefore his strengths were able to really shine in college but not so much in the pros.
A metaphor: say a player is a medieval castle. This is a 5-star castle so it's got an impregnable moat around 3/4 sides and front is covered by two massive towers and a big oak door. So long as you're going against coastal raiders, they won't be able to break down that door unless they hack at it for an hour under a hail of your fire, so you can just keep picking them off from the towers all day long and then maybe have to do some bloody work against those who hacked their way in. Against such competition, your castle dominates. But later on this same castle gets attacked by Richard the Lionheart and his well-organized, hand-picked Plantagenet army, and those batards have themselves a battering ram that'll take your door down in one slam. Your towers and your moat are now rendered moot because the enemy will attack you at your weakest point: the door. This castle will thus have a huge disparity in production depending on whether it's facing the Raiders or the Lions.
Chris Perry was a huge recruit too and so was Walker. Braylon Edwards wasn't, but you saw his amazing athleticism. I think it's reasonable to assume that all of those guys would have had a similar measure of success wherever they went, with the caveat that nobody else had Tom Brady/Drew Henson to throw to them. Justin Fargas was in the same class as Walker and Terrell, had the talent to carve out a better pro career than A-Train, and Lloyd got mostly that Northwestern game out of him because Michigan didn't know what else to do but run him off the edge.
I honestly believe Carr had as good of athletes as anybody in college football at the time. Maybe FSU in the '90s, Miami at the turn of the century, and USC in the mid-aughts had better, but find me a program that was as strong as Michigan from 1996 to 2007 in pure talent? We compared favorably to Oklahoma and Nebraska and Florida and Ohio State and Penn State. The 1999 and 2000 and 2003 and 2006 teams were as talented as any roster in college football those years. Carr's staff recruited them well and generally developed them well, and that's what made him a great coach. He didn't particularly deploy them any better than an average coach, largely because his coordinators weren't the kind of strategic battlemasters who do that sort of thing. The castle had a lot of parts, and this article wasn't meant to assess the whole so much as talk about that door.
|9 weeks 3 days ago||"[Name of superstar] gets||
"[Name of superstar] gets negged" is the basis of everything I'm saying. Yes, great players have bad plays. But I bet you all the mgopoints that Ray Lewis would come out with a monster number of pluses, Suh would break Mike Martin's BEAST MODE record, and Tom Brady would have more "DO" passes than anyone since the UFR system settled into a standard. Play-by-play scoring won't say such-and-such superstar is perfect; it will say "wow, this guy is appreciably better than everybody else." If Peyton Manning comes out of a game with one bad read, three IN's and more CA and DO throws than anyone in UFR history, that is the strongest case you could make for why a few imperfections don't mar a body of work.
UFRs have diagnosed good and bad players in the past. They have been more predictive than things like tackles (I didn't even say tackle numbers are what I use to assess). No, I wouldn't use it as the be-all/end-all. I would trust it more than base stats, and more than the people who vote for players of the week in the Big Ten, because they've missed things that people who take a closer, objective-as-possible look have noticed a lot. Like the fact Mike Hull turned himself from a good coverage linebacker into a seek-and-destroy missile who's still a good coverage linebacker, and that has made Penn State's run defense perhaps the best in the country.
The thing is Ryan's only looked anything star-like this year in the last couple of games, which were against HORRIBLE offenses, not just bad ones. Specicially, the Indiana game made reading as easy as it's ever been, and we saw a performance likenable to the Ryan of old, since he was doing all the stuff in his wheelhouse.
I've been watching him carefully live because I'm looking for that progression. I think there is a great MLB in there, but I also think it's really hard to become one in a single offseason. I promise you, I'll use my best judgment and if I think Ryan is becoming the kind of player Maryland has to scheme around, he'll get the distinction. As of this moment, agree to disagree on whether he's there now.
|9 weeks 4 days ago||Great coaches all have||
Great coaches all have flaws--they mitigate them with their strengths. Lloyd Carr was a great coach. He had some great assistants whom he promoted until they weren't that anymore because he never recognized this flaw in himself.
NO coach is great in all aspects. The best coach who ever lived won despite some flaws he never got rid of, and covered others up with good help or dumb-ass luck or, as is often the case, lucking into good help.
We should discuss those flaws because they're viable criticisms, and in this case it was a flaw that continues to affect Michigan. The same thing I've been arguing with Magnus and Reader71 this thread applies to you too: don't read criticism of one aspect of Carr's career as a net negative assessment of Carr's career. He was a great coach at Michigan, and we should feel damn lucky and proud we had him.
|9 weeks 4 days ago||I'm not bashing him by saying||
I'm not bashing him by saying he's not a star since his move to MLB. I'm relaying my sense from watching every play this year at least twice, and being the guy who has to copy edit (and therefore read closely) every goddamn word in the UFRs.
I trust what I see and what that's saying, which for most of the season was that Ryan was still awesome once he diagnosed the play, but he misses chucks, gets out of his coverage often, and has a handful of plays per game when he's reading and gets blocked when he had somewhere to attack.
That's not bashing him. Middle linebacker is REALLY hard to do. Neither do I advocate replacing Jake, since that means drawing Gedeon into the lineup (since Ross seems solid now at both SAM and base nickel). Ryan had a great game against Indiana, but I didn't respect Indiana's passing game at all, and felt their obvious run bias made things as easy as they've ever been on Jake since the switch. That was the information I had when I made the last FFFF graphic prior to the NW'ern game. I'm reserving judgment until the UFR comes out and I do my second-watch.* Even then, I can only go so far because this was another bad offense we played. The only good one we played was MSU and they picked on Ryan.
I get kinda upset at this accusation because my bias is to give him the star, and I'm fighting that bias with what my eyese and my limited knowledge tell me. I was early to jump on the Ryan bandwagon. And I'm a fan of MLBs. For a year in college I had Larry Foote (and the scores of that year's games) as my wallpaper. David Harris was the first guy I proudly knew was good from my own observations (that was before I even read MGoBlog). Well, him and Manning and Reid. In these pages I've been effusive of Te'o, and Bullough, and Hull. Those are great MLBs, and when I compare the plays they make to the plays Ryan makes I have to honestly assess the difference that I observe, however much I want it to be otherwise. Ryan was a great SAM--better than Vic Hobson (don't kick my ass Vic), maybe in the LaVarr Arrington conversation. I won't say he's a great MLB until my eyes tell me so.
Frank Clark on the other hand was obviously blowing shit up. Obviously that's moot now since he doesn't play for Michigan anymore.
*Which I've been saving for when my buddy's in town later this week because he didn't see it and only knows people in the South were laughing about it and it's called the "M00N' game. If I'm gonna watch it again, I need a fresh face so I can capture the expressions that were probably on mine.
|9 weeks 4 days ago||There's a series I'd like to||
There's a series I'd like to write in the future: what happened to Michigan greats in the pros and why?
I think a lot of those are just the difference between the speed of defenders in the NFL vs college football. Edwards and Terrell and Walker were all kind of big leapy dudes, not dissimillar from the type Michigan was recruiting under Borges. Terrell had his own issues besides, but both he and Braylon were not used to defenders who could rise with them.
It's the Amara Darboh effect. He just can't get the kind of separation from better corners to make him a big threat. When facing guys who just don't have the athleticism to stay a step ahead, those big dudes are unstoppable weapons because you can't shove them off a route.
With the RBs, again you have dudes who whose flaws were just okay enough that their awesome parts could really shine, and once they got to the NFL those flaws were too exploitable. Mike Hart was small and didn't have great top speed, but against college defenses he was big enough and fast enough that his spectacular vision and technique in blocking made up for his deficiencies. Those deficiencies were exposed the second he had to pick up Ray Lewis.
A-Train and Perry were a similar type of player to Ron Dayne. They also both will admit they played hurt for most of their NFL careers. Anyway A-Train could push a 3-yard run into 5 yards by being a train, and Perry had just enough balance to break through college lines. In the NFL that became 3-yard runs and getting tripped up after 1 yard on draws. Wheatley and Biakabutuka before them had okay NFL careers, but neither tore up the league because of the same thing: big dudes who run high get chopped down too fast unless they're Adrian Peterson/Lawrence Maroney accelerators.
On Lloyd: Who's saying "eh, okay?" I started off with a whole paragraph about how he's great so I could discuss his flaw in detail. There's some dudes in this thread who treat all criticism as insult (and then either get offended or offensive depending on which faction they're in). You're egging them on.
|9 weeks 4 days ago||He was a grad assistant. I||
He was a grad assistant. I didn't include them because those guys come and go and it's hard to attach them to any one job unless you really knew the inner workings of that year. Technically I probably could do that from about 1998 to present with people I know from those teams, but it would be a lot of work for little effect.
|9 weeks 5 days ago||Because everything's not||
Because everything's not black and white, man. What's wrong with saying Lloyd was a great coach who had this flaw, then discussing how that flaw continues to have an affect on Michigan today?
Every article about Carr need not be either "he was the bestest!" or "he sucked boo!" The best coaches only find ways to cover their flaws; they all have them.
The discourse around Michigan's program has been poisoned by just this kind of party hackery: LLOYD'S BOYS vs RICHRODIGANS or whatever you wanna call them. Well fuck factionalism. The point of arguing anything is to reach a consensus, which will necessarily involve whatever praise is due and whatever criticism is due.
You sound like one of the hacks.
|9 weeks 5 days ago||He'd only be mediocre if he||
He'd only be mediocre if he coached a mediocre offense.
I think I just responded below with the same analogy, but it's like how i was ALL ABOUT Jake Ryan as a SAM, but when they made him an MLB I took his star away because he wasn't an awesome Mike and people got pissed at me.
Jerry Hanlon was an excellent OL coach and general assistant. Brady Hoke was an excellent DL coach and general assistant. Neither showed in that time they could be great at more CEO-type positions.
One of the best coaches in all of college football is Larry Johnson Sr. He is an excellent recruiter. He made PSU's defensive lines great for a generation and just built OSU's into a dominant unit. He has resisted every attempt to make him more than a DL coach because he knows he's awesome at that, and isn't the kind of organizer you need to be to run a program or a unit. I think Lloyd had some guys who weren't LJS but were close enough to produce some excellent units, but Carr promoted them beyond their capacity, and that's what this article delves into.
|9 weeks 5 days ago||I think a good staff has a||
I think a good staff has a balance. Carr had some excellent assistants, some of whom were in those roles for Bo and Mo, but promoted them to beyond their capacities, thus making them mediocre. It's like having a lot of Jake Ryans and making them middle linebackers.
I don't think every position coach should be a rising star. You should have a good mix of excellent position coaches--if they want to be promoted beyond that you let them do it elsewhere--and up-and-comers you steal from lesser programs and ride on their way to greater things. We had a lot of the former, and way too few of the latter except at DB (which is what Carr knew best).
|10 weeks 3 hours ago||I had to do it||
fixed the spelling, and then while i was in there I put a youtube.
|10 weeks 3 hours ago||I had to do it||
fixed the spelling, and then while i was in there I put a youtube.
|10 weeks 1 day ago||Not the only school this||
Not the only school this happens at. FSU seems to have been particularly bad of late, but I don't know if they're just under the microscope because of Winston.
Similar thing happened at MSU--cops were supposed to be cool, then couldn't take it anymore--and that set off the chain of events that led to Smoker's dismissal.
MSU isn't the only school in the Big Ten where that happens.
|10 weeks 1 day ago||Coasting means everything is||
Coasting means everything is going smoothly.
|10 weeks 2 days ago||This guy||
And Les would be the OL coach under Herman. After Harbaugh retains Hoke as DL coach and Mattison at LBs and Lloyd Carr comes back to coach the secondary, they'll pry Dantonio out of East Lansing to be DC. Urban Meyer will be OC; if he doesn't take the job then we offer it to Mullen.
All of that could happen. And Braxton Miller STILL isn't coming here.
|10 weeks 2 days ago||You can lose money off of||
You can lose money off of college basketball players too.
Not just this post; the spammers saw our numbers rocket upwards during the Brandon events and have been hitting us hard.
|10 weeks 2 days ago||Joe got the week off because||
Joe got the week off because no football game this week. But we're talking about making that a more regular series. I miss it too. I mean to make the caveman steaks next week.
|10 weeks 2 days ago||The Wheelan quote pretty much||
The Wheelan quote pretty much says it. UNC will fix it and the NCAA will issue something silly like games that happened didn't happen or whatever.
|10 weeks 2 days ago||They play Saturday. Wanted to||
They play Saturday. Wanted to get in the more fun league even though M's not in it.
|10 weeks 2 days ago||93-47 dick.||
|10 weeks 3 days ago||Larry Foote's Comments About Michigan Football||
|10 weeks 3 days ago||We were talking about 2012.||
We were talking about 2012. At Minnesota after the Bellomy game. You're talking about "Fritz"
|10 weeks 4 days ago||He's only telling you about||
He's only telling you about the 2nd half. There was a first half that was mostly "oh crap we're gonna lose to Minnesota oh crap we're gonna lose to Minnesota" and that might have been the case until Minnesota left Dileo all alone and Gardner did his Benny Hill thing then actually found the open guy (!!!!)
Mr. Burns photo ensued then Michigan won handily. But until that point...man.
|10 weeks 4 days ago||Google Alerts only covers||
Google Alerts only covers stuff that's posted.
|10 weeks 4 days ago||Right decision. Once in||
Right decision. Once in awhile if there's a REALLY good response in the thread we're losing, I'll transpose it. That means putting it in, changing the name of the poster, and copying over the timestamp.
|10 weeks 4 days ago||It was not a knee-jerk||
It was not a knee-jerk reaction. We were getting almost daily posts from him, then people see the thread posted about what Henson said, and say they heard it on MGoBlog that... and I had to make a call. Before doing so, I tried to have a conversation with him on Twitter (and BiSB chimed in as well), and it was that conversation, where Henson demonstrated he clearly didn't know the first thing about credibility and sourcing, that made the decision easy.
The problem with Henson is he posts EVERYTHING his sources tell him, with no context or filter except what Henson wants to happen. It's also who the sources are. Around Michigan there are sources, and then there's the low-hanging fruit: some former players with strong opinions, a couple of big donors, and then some HS coaches around the Midwest whose players get recruited and hear "things." I personally don't spend a lot of time cultivating sources--most who want their thing known email Brian not me--so I have a fair sense of the people who REALLY want to share something, because I end up CC'ed on the thing to Brian that Brian doesn't post. A lot of what Henson's posting is stuff that we don't put up because we can tell rigth off that it has no good basis.
The guy is a rumormongerer, as designed to promote himself via threads on message boards as Drew Sharp is. We're not gonna play along.
I didn't use the insta-ban rule like I did for Ace Williams posting. People are welcome to throw Henson's crap into threads, e.g. the one about Foote's comments. But no threads just for Henson rumors, because Henson rumors are a dime a dozen and don't meet any reasonable standard of credibility.
|10 weeks 4 days ago||Just gonna put this here.||
Just gonna put this here. Even the tagger is making statements:
|10 weeks 4 days ago||And "D" for the dunces who||
And "D" for the dunces who believe it!
I wish I could have met Doc Losh. It's weird to think before Title IX there just were precious few women around the athletic department at all.
|10 weeks 4 days ago||It Seems Larry Hasn't Read Gregg Henson's Latest||
nor should you.
|10 weeks 5 days ago||I have a HUGE appreciation||
I have a HUGE appreciation for veterans; they fought in wars so I wouldn't have to. They put their lives at stake to accomplish things that the country at large wants done, whether it's economic or humanitarian or the future of Democracy (they don't get to pick). What more selfless act could somebody do? What good is a better country if they're not alive for it?
I don't get what a "Freedom Trophy" has to do with it, and why criticizing the use of the American flag for something that is extremely tangential to America would have anything to do with appreciation for veterans.
I do think the people who made the trophy don't see what's wrong with arbitrarily slapping universal values on a piece of hardware. The American flag is a symbol of the concept of our United States: that we can take a bunch of sovereign states and unify them for common purpose, and by the colors show that each level will be controlled by democratic rule. They aren't using the flag to represent this; they're using it because everyone likes the flag. Similarly, Freedom is the concept of self-governance, that individuals and groups should be able to make decisions about their lives, and their liberty to so may extend indefinitely except where it might infringe on another person's rights or threaten the integrity of our society. Again, the only part of all of that which is represented in the trophy is the fact that we all like it.
They would create as much meaning if they used ice cream. And it's a denigration to both the flag and the concept of freedom to use them so, because it's suggestive that the actual meaning of those things is irrelevant, i.e. that the important thing about freedom and America is their popularity.
I have the same problem with it as I have with coercing Nick Saban into mumbling some words about "Protecting our Freedom" in that NCAA commercial, for no other reason than the NCAA marketing people know that appearing patriotic is good for business. Feigning appreciation of veterans doesn't increase appreciation for veterans; it scares people into pretending to appreciate veterans, which is not at all the same thing.
That thing, if you can't tell, infuriated me, because Saban was the perfect guy to have a frank conversation about why everyone SHOULD be appreciative of vets, but instead they had him repeat the jingoist lines that make everyone feel they MUST be appreciative of vets. Saban was playing at Kent State when other kids from his hometown who didn't get into college were being sent to the Vietnam War. He and his fellow players were strongly against the war, and attended anti-Vietnam protests on campus. Nick and a teammate decided to eat lunch first before planning to go to one of them, and that's how he narrowly avoided being present when those students were shot.
Why should we care what Nick Saban has to say about vets? Because he was of an age to be drafted into a war the last time there was a draft, but because he was in college, and married, and given an assistant's job when he graduated, SOMEBODY ELSE got drafted in his stead. And his appreciation for how awful war is was such a part of him that he risked his football career in political activism for the cause of stopping an unnecessary war.
Saban's success as a football coach makes him somebody NCAA fans will listen to on non-NCAA topics, even though we really shouldn't because one doesn't have much to do with the other. Fine, whatever. But if they're going to have him talk, there's a strong, convincing argument he can make that won't resonate with those who say "Support our Troops because Support our troops," but will resonate very strongly with those who think "Why is 'appreciate the vets' any different than 'support our troops?'" The dumb people have fallen in line already, and speaking to them is nothing but cynical marketing. The smart people take convincing, and Saban has a convincing argument he wasn't allowed to share because it wasn't as good for marketing.
Likewise, nothing's gained for freedom or the USA by the Nebraska-Wisconsin trophy. All it does is try to capitalize on sentiments that everybody already has, and which Nebraska-Wisconsin can take zero credit for.
|10 weeks 5 days ago||Actually sequels and||
Actually sequels and formulaic music are prime examples of entertainment demand. People go see sequels because they liked the original, and are expecting the second move to give them more of the thing they already know they like. They get their music from the same bands putting out albums with the same sound because the fan brain has already okay'ed it.
Truly there is lots of good stuff out there that isn't created by a major label or major motion picture studio. But if it doesn't have access to the mass market engines people won't bother to try it. Michael Bay gets to keep putting out big budget splosion movies because the studios will promote the shit out of those movies, and people are willing to trust that a big budget flick with all that marketing had to pass a threshold of entertainment quality in order to be worthy of all that money.
The exception to the rule are the uberfans, the fetishizers. Instead of thinking "this entertainment is popular, therefore I will probably like it," they are picking out a certain quality that they personally adore, and don't really expect anyone else to care.
Cult films come from the same place that college fandom does. Rocky Horror Picture Show is a great example. The acting is terrible, the plot difficult to follow, and the cross-dressing theme is certainly not for all audiences. But the film has a cult following that grows every year because of traditions that have sprung up around it, specifically the annual interactive Ann Arbor Halloween showing. I'm a pretty mainstream dude (sports fans usually are, says the marketing information) but I got dragged once to the Rocky Horror thing once and was just enthralled by the sheer weirdness. It's not my particular type of weirdness, but it did make me reconsider my Michigan fandom as its own kind of weirdness, and helped me grow an appreciation for things that are special as oppposed to generally strong in calculated entertainment principles.
I have to be close to my self-imposed weekly Infinite Jest reference limit already, but if you've read that book it has a lot in there about generally pleasing versus personally pleasing. Generally pleasing is taken to extremes: "The Entertainment" which is so universally pleasing that people who view it go insane. "The Prettiest Girl of All Time" has to hide her face as a disfigurement to be treated as a normal person. And drugs, of course, are there constantly to remind you of the consequences of the real-life extremity of manufactured happiness. The successful people in IJ are those who go all-in on something weird. The best tennis player is the kid who has little but love for tennis. Hal's father created a successful tennis academy and The Entertainment itself out of passion for tennis and flimmaking. The Wheelchair Assassins are the most successful group of all, and sacrifice their legs first. Hal, by nature of his fungally induced inability to feel emotions, is a blank slate, while his brothers are two extremes: the popularly adored Orin of popular NFL fame who is going to help the Wheelchair Assassins destroy the world, and Mario, who is physically grotesque yet 100% sincere and beloved by the small circle of people who know him at Enfield. DFW's lesson is severe: entertainment that YOU like is great; entertainment that PEOPLE like is dangerous.
I won't go that far, but I will happily apply this dichotomy to college football vs NFL, and fetish cultures versus mass entertaiment in general.
|10 weeks 5 days ago||Coincidentally, the very||
Coincidentally, the very class you were in was noted in the Carty article that precipitated the Harbaugh quote.
Wanna add that Ablauf is THE BEST. If you need to reschedule the integrity in sports speech you could do far worse than him. He's the guy who walked me through all the Title IX numbers when I found discrepencies between how various schools do their accounting. He didn't say a thing about other schools, but knew Michigan's accounting of their participation numbers and public financial records so well that I was able to understand what was what and figure out how, e.g., MSU could claim their women's basketball team generated more than most football teams.*
A thing about journalism is the stories you don't write are as important to establishing your integrity as those you do. Ablauf helped me avoid making a critical error in reporting at a time when I was convinced I had something I actually didn't. I binned my "most schools are overtly violating Title IX" article because once I understood the numbers I understood that wasn't true.
* Donations toward the basketball arena if you're wondering.
|10 weeks 5 days ago||Actually i have a pair of||
Actually i have a pair of tickets to the Maryland game to give away, so I may run a basketball one this week.
|10 weeks 5 days ago||Insta-ban.||
No, no, and fuck no.
My Penn State odyssey indeed sucked nearly as much as that effin' game but we also had a tailgate with the PSU bloggers that day which I had to track back to from the opposite side of the erector set, and once I got there I had to down a couple of shots because WHY DO I HAVE TO EXPLAIN THIS, while Brian and his friends launched directly from the Michigan section (ie correct side of the building).
For the record, Brian's friend parked right by the hospital (northeast) and I'd walked up that northwest road before calling them to say "just go; I'll catch a ride with the photographers." Campus is one way, but every other direction from Beaver Stadium is complete fucking wilderness.
In conclusion the Jerry thing dies NOW.
And no Brian, you are not getting a Hokepoints analyzing which game was worse between M00N and Penn State-Indiana. In fact I think I will write one tomorrow on the very subject you wanted to to write when you started the blog, but were always too pissed off about it to do so...
|10 weeks 5 days ago||I updated it last night||
I thought the banana ought to high-five Frank Clark instead of just flying off screen.
|11 weeks 1 day ago||Brian Cook Alex Cook Everett||
Everett Gholston Puppett Cook
Brian Cook (NTBC)
|11 weeks 2 days ago||I didn't expect you to get||
I didn't expect you to get moderated. If you're generating the Hokey quotes naturally you need to find a generator. Or become one.
|11 weeks 3 days ago||Because Carr was loyal to||
Thanks for the Hokepoints idea. I'll expand in a future week.
The answer is because Carr was way too loyal to mediocre assistants, and that prevented him from doing the kind of rising star shopping to fill his ranks that coaching trees are made from.
Here's the tables from the future article:
|11 weeks 4 days ago||Won't know until Wayne Cty is||
Won't know until Wayne Cty is in.
|11 weeks 4 days ago||An interesting side note is||
An interesting side note is to wonder what would become of the career of Lloyd Carr? Passed over as Michigan head coach and unlikely to see Moeller leaving anytime soon, Carr has to become a hot candidate for the coaching jobs that open up. Figuring he'd go to a place where his ties matter (ie not West Coast or SEC), possible destinations were:
1997: Illionis (Ron Turner), Purdue (Joe Tiller), Indiana (Cam Cameron), Minnesota (Glen Mason) and Kansas (just lost Glen Mason). Also Maryland (Ron Vanderlinden) and UNC replaced Mack Brown (Carl Torbush).
1998: Nothing really. Osborne gave Nebraska to a handpicked successor. I imagine however after a national championship defense that Bo's other top assistant would now be among the hottest candidates out there.
1999: Northwestern (Randy Walker) MSU (Bobby Williams), and Iowa but again Ferentz was Fry's chosen one. Oklahoma hired Florida DC Bob Stoops; I imagine he and Carr would have had similar resumes at that point, with Stoops younger and with more recent ties to the Midwest from his KSU days.
2000: Seriously not a lot opens up. At this point Carr is 55, and longevity starts to seem like an issue.
2001: His alma mater Missou opens up (they got Pinkel, who was a lot younger). Ohio State.
|11 weeks 4 days ago||That rumor with Les is so||
That rumor with Les is so baseless and yet so persistent, probably because Les just missed becoming Michigan's coach one time. Via a guy who talks to Carr a lot, this one is pure fiction.
|11 weeks 4 days ago||He dominated his level, and||
He dominated his level, and did so in the heart of the PSU/OSU recruiting territory, shooing off lots of DI programs for talent he wanted (thanks to lots of extra benefits that PSU couldn't match but that wasn't ever a problem for OSU).
I wasn't laughing at the time. YSU was a power that I wouldn't have wanted Michigan to face.
|11 weeks 4 days ago||Rumor...||
Sources close to the situation are telling me that Harbaugh to Michigan is REALLY not a sure thing.
The situation I speak of, of course, is the mess that wasn't entirely contained just now by my daughter's diaper.
And the sources are me talking to myself and my interpretation of the hand gestures just made by the peek-a-boo bear.
But a rumor is a rumor so there must be some truth to it.
|11 weeks 4 days ago||Google docs will give you||
Google docs will give you embed code if you go to publish on the web
|11 weeks 5 days ago||wud||
|11 weeks 5 days ago||Ahem...right...so what I||
Ahem...right...so what I meant was after I go vote/harass some peasants.
|11 weeks 5 days ago||Interims who made it 1 year||
Interims who made it 1 year (e.g. Fickell at OSU) counted because they technically had their opportunities to win the job permanently.
|11 weeks 5 days ago||Again we're in gray realm:||
Again we're in gray realm: Pitt was a bigger program (ie could afford to pay more) than UConn. Certainly the Big East was slipping over the course of the aughts, but I wouldn't expect Colorado to have such significant advantages over Pittsburgh that it could regularly raid its coaches, while there's enough disparity between UConn and Colorado that we'd consider any successful guy at UConn a candidate for most jobs that pop up.
|11 weeks 5 days ago||I'm plussing things like this||
I'm plussing things like this because I plan to change a few of these en masse this afternoon (after I go vote).
So far given the large samples of wins and losses in the study I don't think the conclusions will change.
|11 weeks 5 days ago||Actually that has now been||
Actually that has now been added to the article. Again, you'll have to just wonder whether I am inside your head or just really fast at generating research papers.
|11 weeks 5 days ago||Gregg Henson's Source Says Gravity May Not Exist||
Or something--whatever; Henson's source is the same former player who talks to everybody and knows diddly doo.
|11 weeks 5 days ago||I'm trying to avoid hindsight||
I'm trying to avoid hindsight with these. There was nothing major about Bielema succeeding Alvarez, and from a guy who knows Alvarez, the grooming and hand-picking is a bit overstated.
Les at Okie State I put as Strong because he was on a lot of radars despite not having the resume of most other "Strong" hires. He was big enough that Gundy (the next candidate for them) agreed to be his OC. I dunno--this is another gray one.
|11 weeks 5 days ago||That was one I was on the||
That was one I was on the fence about. He was unemployed but also a hot coaching name in a lot of searches. I could reclassify as "average" if you can find me a weaker "STRONG" hire. The strongest of the "AVERAGE" hires was RR when he was a hot coordinator.
|11 weeks 5 days ago||you have your answer||
you have your answer now.
|12 weeks 12 hours ago||Game Review||
Belongs in snowflakes thread, not a diary.
|12 weeks 1 day ago||David Foster Wallace. From||
David Foster Wallace. From Infinite Jest:
"That evil people never believe they are evil, but rather that everyone else is evil."
|12 weeks 2 days ago||Thank you. Fixed.||
Thank you. Fixed.
|12 weeks 2 days ago||What do you mean? Views for||
What do you mean? Views for this article are blowing up today. I'm sure that has nothing to do with what it's sharing the front page with.
|12 weeks 2 days ago||Let the man have his||
Let the man have his opinion.
You do realize how much Dave Brandon did for Elliott and his family, right? He's got a good reason to be biased.
|12 weeks 2 days ago||So now you're onto ad hominem||
So now you're onto ad hominem and argument from ignorance. You've been thoroughly answered and presented with consensus statements that don't dispute your primary thesis (that Rodriguez sucked at coordinator hiring and therefore had to go).
I think we're all done here.
|12 weeks 2 days ago||By the way I think you can||
By the way I think you can make your argument without getting accusatory and defensive. The consensus on Rich Rodriguez, then and now, was that he deserved to be fired because he made awful hires for defensive coordinator.
The question remained why was he such a failure at Michigan, because that is most relevant to Michigan right now. We aren't hiring Rodriguez back, but we are VERY interested in not making the same mistakes over again.
It does seem that Rodriguez had a hole in his ability in that he couldn't manage a defense well enough even to pick the right coach for it, and he apparently lucked out by having Casteel fall into his circle at West Virginia. It's well to remember that the "Keep Rodriguez" plan circia 1/1/2011 was absolutely to get him Casteel, and give the pair one year to turn it around, but that would have been a year of recruiting with a noose around their necks and a team that had apparently given up on him by the bowl game. So if you're asking me do I still think it was the right move to fire RR at that time: yes. He should have been gone after the Ohio State game.
I think we should recognize that EVERY candidate we could hire has some things he's bad at. Unfortunately for Michigan, RR's was apparently revealed only here, and only when it was too late.
I also think Michigan probably would have been better off had we kept Rodriguez, but that's less of a positive for RR and mostly a damning statement about how bad Hoke was.
|12 weeks 2 days ago||From Three and||
From Three and Out:
That comes from Rodriguez and RR's director of football ops, Mike Parrish.
Madej: I'm searching for the board post now. He brought it up to me and a group of people on a tour of Schembechler after the remodel.
Martin: An interview after 3&O came out asking him about whether various things were true. He said they had Casteel, and for the same contract assistants always got, but then he was flipped by more money. Martin appears to have his facts not entirely straight since $10k probably wasn't as big of a deal as the surety.
|12 weeks 2 days ago||You make a good||
You make a good circumstantial case, but this was no myth; it's the story both Rodriguez and Casteel told, respectively, to John U. Bacon and Bruce Madej, and if I could find it I'm pretty sure Martin corroborated it. There was still a sense in 2008 of fighting the good fight to tamp down escalating coaching salaries, and Michigan was certainly capable at that time of the hypocrisy you described above, where they'd pay millions for Rodriguez but not another $50,000 a year for one of his assistants.
With coaching changes you have to leave room for an extraordinary amount of people not acting in a manner you would identify as rational, or perhaps sane. Only in the afermath can some of the ridiculous stuff get sorted out, if it ever can.
Shit happens quickly and with a level of informality that is terrifying to those of us who feel so much is at stake. Casteel wasn't going to uproot at that time unless Michigan offered him a substantial raise, and they wouldn't, and Rich Rod tried to convince him to come anyway and Casteel said no he'd rather not, and people got on a plane.
|12 weeks 3 days ago||We were at 700 S. State for||
We were at 700 S. State for my whole time. I made room 7 into 007.
|12 weeks 3 days ago||The friend is Mike Pettigano.||
The friend is Mike Pettigano. He used to be the Brian Cook for Penn State, now he works for a newspaper that covers Central New Jersey, so he always has stuff for me about Peppers from their sports desk.
|12 weeks 3 days ago||New Jersey Catholic Schools||
New Jersey Catholic Schools are dirtier than Ohio's Catholic League. I've worried that Michigan's CL will start going that direction; until lately it was so dominated by Bo guys (and the Bo-like but non-Bo guy Al Fracassa) that things have stayed fairly clean.
When this stuff started coming out I asked a guy who should know if Peppers might have anything follow him and he said no unless Michigan decides to do something on their own. Basically his old school was PISSED when he transferred, and has been trying ever since to sink him and smear him.
|12 weeks 4 days ago||Not sure if serious.||
Not sure if serious.
|12 weeks 4 days ago||It was getting too||
It was getting too complicated by separating all those thigns out. So instead I decided to just count all wins and losses as equal no matter what level, figuring if you are in the MAC you do get to play against MAC teams but you also have MAC problems all over your team.
Then I made up the difference by giving bonuses that scale with the level you're at. So Les Miles didn't get big builder points because he inherited a Saban team, but he wracked up 33 points in Power 5 bonuses.
|12 weeks 4 days ago||Oops. I thought I gave him a||
Oops. I thought I gave him a 3 in both of those. Maybe I accidentally overtyped it at one point. I'm looking over the metrics again and don't see any other weird things.
Hoke was known for execution. When he came here the positives were all "he teaches you fundamental football." Sometimes the things we think are positives don't translate. I could add Hoke as a candidate for 2015 right now if you like but it won't be pretty.
|12 weeks 4 days ago||Capping the top category does||
Capping the top category does damage Miles, but I think it also allows us to draw conclusions from other factors than "has won a boatload of games on this level."
From the start my goal was to reperesent the level to which factors, not specific coaches, weighed on the decision of the new coach. Every other category was rated on a scale, while I let relevant coaching success tally up points until it hit a threshold of perfect.
Miles got a -3 for ethics and a -4 for being too old to be around for a long time. Those are things that people talk about as immediate grounds for disconsideration, and I made them relatively small things. In my ratings Les makes up for being an oversigner and a dirty recruiter simply by being really good at coaching offensive linemen. Because of that he rates a 50--exactly as much confidence as my ratings put on Gary Moeller circa January 1990. It makes him my 4th candidate, which is higher than Brian (not in top 7) and Ace (6th) had him in the podcast.
|12 weeks 4 days ago||I tried to show what Bo was||
I tried to show what Bo was coming out of Miami (NTM). Moeller wasa 50, which is really high on this scale, despite our misgivings about the fact that he'd only been a head coach for a tiny bit of time and that didn't go well.
This isn't a "is he a better coach" matrix. It's a "what did he look like as a coaching candidate on the day he was hired" matrix. And here's what it looked like when Bo was hired:
That is Don Canham, AD for all of seven months, with a facial expression that is anything but "I just made the defining coaching hire for the next 40 years."
Rodriguez was FAR more established at his hiring than Bo and his two assistants.
|12 weeks 4 days ago||It was a BCS league at the||
It was a BCS league at the time, albeit a weaker one. Winning the Big East of that day wasn't appreciably different than the Big Ten now.
|12 weeks 4 days ago||I gave that to RR so I'd||
I gave that to RR so I'd better be as tough on guys I suspect a lot more dirt from.
Herman is Urban Meyer's recruiting superstar, and Urban Meyer is perhaps the dirtiest recruiter in the game other than Freese. Meyer is the master of the well-timed fib.Also, Ohio State escaped the Tressel stuff, but the cars and the apartments that come fully loaded, and the blatant lies have to trickle down to a guy on Herman's level.
MSU's problems are of a different nature. They recruit a lot of guys (not all of their guys) who have problems respecting fellow human beings. The result is a lot of violent and negative behaviors both on and off the field that the football staff ignore or even tacitly encourage. Dantonio, like Tressel, bases his moral code on obedience and loyalty, not right and wrong. He's a damn good coach but not a coach Michigan would have been able to tolerate, and Narduzzi has been there every step of the way.
If either of these guys were to be hired at Michigan, there would be a real fear of either of those program cultures being transmitted here, where you can't get away with that kind of stuff. If we're importing a rival's program by hiring a rival's assistant, we should recognize the bad parts of that program could come too.
|12 weeks 4 days ago||-2 is a "So what." I probably||
-2 is a "So what." I probably should have had a better title for it. I was trying to capture the zeitgeist of the fanbase at the time of his hire. RR recruited a lot of guys to WVa that he couldn't have to Michigan. Rodriguez wasn't a Beilein and we knew it. I wanted to beat my biases on this.
Only a -3 is a problem.
|12 weeks 4 days ago||I mentioned to Brian when||
I mentioned to Brian when reviewing this that it needed some context and he said he'd give it later. If Brandon's been firing off one of these hate messages once a week or so since he got here, that's alienating about 300 people, i.e. 1/1,000th of the 300,000-strong waitlist Michigan used to have and has no longer thanks to Brandon's leadership.
Of all the things we have against him, "sometimes gets mad on the internet" is hardly his greatest fault. It absolutely does give a window into his personality when he's challenged.
The thing I find far more appalling is the criminal FOIA dodging by deleting emails. Public employees' work emails are public because the public is ultimately responsible for their employees' actions. Not only is he breaking the law, he's charging more than the cost of the fine to the media the fine is supposed to be paid to.
I would find that grounds for immediate dismissal, and there ought to be a lawsuit against the university that forces it to take fees off of FOIA requests, and pay a punitive fine in lieu of however many potential public records were destroyed. It seems to me a classic case of a public employee thinking he's above the law, and a public institution granting an official the power to thwart the people.
|12 weeks 4 days ago||In Defense of the Emails||
|12 weeks 5 days ago||I was CC-ed on the email||
I was CC-ed on the email chain for a bit as we had an outside consultant doing some high-level tracking stuff. I got lost on the details between computer engineers but I think this was a much more involved confirmation than a forwarded email--from a non-computer geek it did appear the original emails had been transferred in some unalterable state, and were being tested with IP pings and such.
|13 weeks 1 day ago||I found a way to get us more||
I found a way to get us more tiny flags. There were banners of Big Ten West teams all around Michigan Stadium so i ran up there and grabbed them. Maybe Wisconsin will complain in like 20 years when they visit next but who thinks there will be a Big Ten or football or a world in 20 years?
So: we have tiny flags again. Tiny flag shortage over. Sorry some of them are purple.
|13 weeks 2 days ago||1386...||
|13 weeks 2 days ago||Notre Dame has released a||
Notre Dame has released a statement assuring the public that this one is at least 82% real.
|13 weeks 2 days ago||If you guessed this is why we||
If you guessed this is why we stopped playing you...don't win because there is no more winning, just the darkness.
|13 weeks 2 days ago||3 Players taking medicals?||
Edited it because crazy speculation from misunderstood context, and I find speculation on players who won't be here next year distasteful.
|13 weeks 3 days ago||Well we planned to kill it||
Well we planned to kill it off but now the thread has infinite lives, god mode enabled, holds every item in Castlevania II, and skipped to the last boss.
[EDIT: Okay so on googling I got the castlevania code confused with the fake ending one]
|13 weeks 3 days ago||ADC: DB-less Domino's on the rise||
We look stupid when a bunch of people criticize Brandon's tenure at Domino's and get key facts incorrect. I've let the threads stick but it's getting ridiculous, and there are not enough people with knowledge of the pizza business around to refute falsehoods properly.
Since it's super OT just gonna nix the thread this time. DB's old business isn't off limits because his success there absolutely has informed his approach to Michigan, but considering all the calls to fire him from the board and this site in general I'd like to at least be able to say we didn't encourage false crap like "Domino's is so great now that he's gone" to be attached to him.
|13 weeks 3 days ago||This is just false, man. He||
This is just false, man. He wasn't forced out. He turned that business from a family-owned business with a too-strong culture (and a nut at the top) to a successful IPO. He brought a professional culture to a company sorely in need of it. It's probably accurate to say that trying to duplicate that success at a non-profit was the key to his failure at Michigan, but you can't argue his tenure as CEO was anything less than anyone with an interest in that company (including as a consumer) would want.
They've got a whole different corporate culture now: instead of being this closed off cheap pizza factory who make their delivery people wear stupid clothes they focus on being super transparent.
Give credit where due. It makes the criticism more believable.
|13 weeks 3 days ago||Are you sure he's||
Are you sure he's gone?
|13 weeks 3 days ago||I'm close to nixing this||
I'm close to nixing this thread because so many others like it have popped up. Also contributing Domino's success to losing Brandon is just incorrect. You know I'd take an opportunity to knock DB if it was worthwhile, but the fact is that Brandon was involved in their decision to revamp the core product and took the Michigan job right after they launched it. As for profitability, that has a lot to do with their CFO (who was there when Brandon was), who is one of the smartest dudes out there. Wheat has been at historic lows for 4 years, and that's helping all pizza businesses but that CFO got way out in front of the market in 2010. There was a WSJ article about it a few months later because it was one of the biggest examples of major futures moving at a long term high.
|13 weeks 3 days ago||IDDQD||
|13 weeks 3 days ago||Fun fact: if you type that||
Fun fact: if you type that into Mike Tyson's garage door keypad he'll come out and fight you.
|13 weeks 3 days ago||Just a heads up: if you go||
Just a heads up: if you go into sportswriting you may find yourself professionally bound to watch Appalachian State games that don't involve Michigan, and Michigan State games that do.
|13 weeks 3 days ago||http://mgoblog.com/mgoboard/m|
|13 weeks 3 days ago||the wife and I still show||
the wife and I still show people the 29/31 and "this party took a turn for the douche" videos at like every YouTube-enabled social event.
|13 weeks 3 days ago||Well played, internet. Well||
Well played, internet. Well played.
|13 weeks 3 days ago||Fooorrrward down the||
Fooorrrward down the fiiiiiieeeeeld....
|13 weeks 3 days ago||Sorry it was me. I shoulda||
Sorry it was me. I shoulda noted it in here. I moved it to the board because it wasn't diary material.
|13 weeks 3 days ago||Post||
Let's all talk about how posts are cool. Posts have swag. I'd like it if posts were actually titled with reference to what's in the thread, and not just some player's name you want to talk about.
|13 weeks 4 days ago||They'll support a new guy.||
They'll support a new guy. With Rodriguez some of them (certainly not all) felt their former assistant coaches weren't treated well. Ron English was particularly vocal in his disdain of Rodriguez, and you can't exactly fault all the defensive backs who played for English for agreeing that Tony Gibson didn't know what the hell he was doing.
That situation was handled so badly internally. Rodriguez figured former players were behind him; he didn't realize he needed to reach out to them specifically, and normally he wouldn't have except for other forces working on them.
Todd (and that's who you're talking about) is an awesome dude who wants Michigan to be awesome more than anything. Maybe lighten up on a guy who supported a former assistant he knew and respected personally.