at least it's not just us?
|14 weeks 2 days ago||Comparoni on the "Huge Show" right now attempting to explain||
And failing miserably. The gist of his explanation is that he "thought he was only talking to 300-or so hard-core spartan fans". As if sometimes that makes it OK. Several years ago some guy from a major oil company - Exxon maybe - was busted saying ridiculously racist comments in a board room. I don't remember the "I didn't think anyone was listening" defense worked then... or now. Loser.
|20 weeks 1 day ago||Perfectly stated||
My comment below expands on this a bit, but the skill set for a wolf and FS are blending together... Kind of like a Will and rush end are as well. The widening variety of offensive sets and the infiltration of spread concepts in every system makes versatility on D of paramount importance.
|20 weeks 1 day ago||"The strength of the pack is the wolf..."||
Very nice work up, Seth. I could read this stuff all freaking day. This is what truly makes this blog unlike any other...
Some historical commentary - the strong safety or "boundary" safety is internally known as the "wolf" in Michigan Bo/Lloyd/Moeller/Herrmann lore. ("the strength of the pack is the wolf, and the strength of the wolf is the pack")
Back in the 90s and early 2000s, there was a clear distinction in the position in terms of skill set - the wolf's general job description was to support the run, cover a tight end/RB/or slot in the passing game, and be able to shed a pulling guard. He was a faster linebacker, bulky and strong, and not as fast (i.e. Shonte Peoples). Incredibly rare was the day you walked an OLB out onto a H back in the slot. That was the wolf's job. The free safety was a faster, leaner athlete that could cover the post or pole route and run down a backside RB in a screen - a stronger corner... (i.e. Trippe Welbourne or Corwin Brown).
This is not news to any of our intelligent MGoBloggers here, but the reason it has evolved is due to the complexities of the offensive schemes we now face, and the fact that the safeties are more interchangeable because they need to cover the run more and the wolf no longer is as specialized because he might face a flood of recievers/RB/TEs in the flat, or a running QB on the outside. So I guess my point is that there is less specialization because the safeties, "free", "wolf" or whatever, need to be large corners instead of fast linebacker.
All I am saying is that if you asked Mattison who the wolf is, he'd still tell you he was the safety to the strong side. It's just that offenses use more field now, and are less predicated on purely formation strength. So 90% of the time in today's offenses the strong side is away from the boundary, regadless of formation.
To test my theory, I'll be watching us against a conventional offense like MSU. I bet you'll see a conventional defensive alignment of wolf and FS, sometimes into the boundary when the formation dictates...
|22 weeks 6 days ago||Nope...||
The guy to the left of Lloyd in that pic was a strength and conditioning assistant coach by the name of Ed O'dowd. I was a student manager on staff a couple years later.
Of most concern to me is why I have a playtex banner add on the MGoBlog page. Someone is getting ripped off for their advertising dollars. Playtex - the official feminine hygeine product of Michigan Football. What's next, MGoTampon? MGoMidol next?
|36 weeks 6 days ago||Physicalness||
|41 weeks 2 days ago||Bo Hat||
I can live with the evolution of Maize. I can barely live with yellow letters on yellow uniformZ, but the embroidered block M that's forbidden is the Bo Block M hat logo. What possible reason could there be for not allowing one of the most hallowed traditions in Michigan Gear History?
Depresses me just seeing it there, like a great dream you wake from wishing you could go back to...
|43 weeks 1 day ago||Wow. This must be bumped.||
Great, great work... It really brings into focus the mysterious, blurry world of the B1G's logic. At least now I know there might actually be some, even though I might disagree with it to some degree. We always hear phrases tossed around like "academic fit" and "research university" regarding expansion, but only a handful people understand that like you clearly do. Well done, sir. Well done.
|44 weeks 23 hours ago||One and done...||
...is the dumbest thing in college athletics. What a shame for this kid, who could be getting paid for rehabbing if he was able to play in the NBA this season.
Actually I take that back. "One and Done" is the SECOND dumbest thing. It was just passed in the rankings by the first name "Nerlens". Yes, Nerlens is the dumbest. Definitely.
|46 weeks 1 day ago||81-72 Meeeeshigan||
|48 weeks 3 days ago||Tap the brakes...||
We are still watching one of our best teams ever, I believe. But mostly we are watching one of the best coaches in the business... Sans Beilen, I would have watched this game with disgust assuming that the mental errors were a sign of immaturity and me-first NBA mentality garbage that would send us spiraling into a 3 game losing streak we've all seen so many times after a UM team with a promising start loses their first major test of the season.
HOWEVA' in this case, as stated by others, Beilein will take these kids to task for their bad shots, bad decisions, and lack of patience in film session. Watching Coach B speak firmly to Burke on the sideline was reallly illustrative to me. It was like a great teaching HS coach and his star player. Burke was attentive and nodding, and Coach was intense but calm. You just kind of KNOW that there was true learning happening. I don't think I've seen that on a college or pro basketball court in, like, forever. He still made some bad decisions late - the long step back three after a timeout in the second (or third?) to last possession was just mystifying to me - but I think he gets it.
Also HOWEVA' - Someone needs to slap Hardaway. He's the only guy on this team that, at times, just disregards the entire scheme, game situation, or his position on the court, and decides to jack up a three 10 seconds into the shot clock. Repeatedly. Dude is a seriously selfish player. He's better this year than last, but he should know better by now.
|49 weeks 6 days ago||In order of preference:||
1. Meteor. Obviously
2. Tide Blowout - Mostly for selfish reasons to confirm what I've been telling my ND alumni friends - that their season thus far has been essentially a 7-win season with some incredibly lucky breaks that have gone their way to make them undefeated.
3. ND narrow win - Giving the SEC a losing record and at least slightly tempering their god-aweful arrogance.
100. ND blowout - This would be the worst scenario because I'd have to listen to said ND alumni friends rant about how they're back, even though they are clearly not.
|50 weeks 4 days ago||Iowa?||
The biggest question raised in my mind after reading this post is "Why is there a town in Iowa called Coralville?" Is there an ocean in the midwest I was not aware of?
|1 year 3 weeks ago||Although I HATED the 4th and 3 call...||
...of a inside trap using Vincent Smith, Lewan flat out missed the block of the backside linebacker on the play. It actually would have worked. But not having the greatest offensive player is the winningest program's history sit out the 4th quarter in his last game against the hated rival is, simply, inexcusable.
|1 year 8 weeks ago||Never mind the Bulloughs!||
Max is the real deal, the best of the Bulloughs, and the youngest one will not play at MSU (I've seen them all play).
|1 year 8 weeks ago||Rivalry?||
This is EXACLTY why we will never see MSU as a rival equal to OHIO. Can any of you possibly, under any circumstance, see yourself saying the equivalent of "This game doesn't matter" or "nobody cares what happens in this game" about the school down south. No. Never.
Until Spartan fans start realizing this, they can't whine when we refuse to grant them the same level of rivalry of the suckeyes.
Now, then... Back to your end of the pool, Sparty. Go Blue!
|2 years 9 weeks ago||Whoa Tater!||
I think Hoke is a very good coach, and the coordinators are outstanding. Not looking for a coaching change. Just analyzing the game, and making a case that we were outcoached in one game. So settle down and take your 7000 MGoBlog points and take them to the counter at Chuck E Cheese and get yourself a rubber tomohawk.
Or you could actaully refute the points I made.
|2 years 9 weeks ago||Can someone explain||
the whole Tacopants reference to me? I've been reading this blog for a couple years now, and I still don't know where it comes from. Thanks.
|2 years 13 weeks ago||A couple points on which I disagree:||
1. The screen play was not lucky. It's a great play, especially when you have dilithium and everyone wants to overpursue him.
2. " Michigan ran 61.76% of its plays out of the shotgun. So this is still a 60% spread offense. " I really can't believe the silliness of this comment. Just because a play is run out of the shotgun doesn't mean it a spread offense play. I haven't studied the film, but I know there was plenty of pro-style shotgun plays, which is a very common formation when you have an undersized QB in a pro-style offense.
3. I still don't by that Denard can't run a prostyle offense (with heavy doses of shotgun for sure) We all know he'll never be the Grbac/Collins/Griese/Brady/Navarre/Henne archetype. On Saturday he made some horrific throws. Some of them were bad decisions, and the rest were horrible accuracy, and he got away with more of them than he should have due to great reciever play and lousy coverage (not to mention ND wackiness in red zone). The decision-making problem can be corrected in time, and the accuracy can be improved - of course he'll never be Brees or Brady. His biggest detriment is his height, but he more than makes up for it with his athleticism (this just in...). He has one of those "live arms" that is possessed by only a few men on earth (Michael Vick, Denard, Kordell Stewart, come to mind.). If he learns the reads, makes better decisions, and can improve his accuracy he has the basic tools for greatness. Remember he's not been running this offense very long. Borges has proven so far that he knows what he has. He just needs to coach him up on the offensive philosophy. I would like to see more rollouts to allow him to create and improvise more easily, but that doesn't mean you HAVE to run the spread. By the end of the year he's going to be Troy Smith or Michael Vick (college version).
|2 years 16 weeks ago||I like Pop Evil||
(they're from my home town of Muskegon). And I like "that type of music" in general. I just think this song is really unimaginative and uninteresting. A clear pub grab by a band that really doesn't need it. It reminds me of those lame NFL songs that get played on occasion (the lions have one that is horribly bad, and the Bears have their equally lame "Bear down, Chicago bears" anthem.
|2 years 16 weeks ago||Did GERG ghostwrite this piece||
I love this site. But this is a horrible assessment of Ann Arbor eating and drinking. Seriously, Touchdown's? How can you extensively research the benefits/drawbacks of the zone reach, but not walk down South U before posting a piece on Ann Arbor nightlife? That pla ce sucked from the day it opened (ca. 1993) and continued to suck the whole time it existed. And BW3?!?! The chainiest chain that ever demanded it's servers wear pieces of flair? Was Benningans not hip enough? Shame on you!
And Blimpy's is the same as it always has been. I have no problem with saying you don't like it because it's greasy (true 'dat) but don't say it is worse than it used
|2 years 18 weeks ago||OK I think I was unclear about a couple things||
Starting last to first. I was a skeptic, but by the time RR got fired I was 101% in agreement that the offense completely kicks a$$. Spectacularly good. I would accept your description of " unstoppable this year and next" completely. Not a teensy bit of argument from me. If RR had made even marginal progress on developing a defense that could, on occasion, stop somebody on 3rd and 5, I was in favor of keeping him on. He just never did. The Robinson hiring and subsequent forcefeeding of the 3-3-5 scheme to him was the tipping point and sent the RR regime circling the drain.
What I was trying to communicate, apparently ineffectively, was fairly simple:
|2 years 18 weeks ago||Welcome back!||
Truly great analysis, as always.
The "regression to the mean" perfectly describes what I've been trying unsuccessfully to say any time someone asks me "How is Michigan going to be this year?". Of course the Offense will be worse. And the defense will be better. By how much? That is the question. I tend to think the offense will be talented enough to regress less than the defense will improve. The drive-killing inability to convert a 3rd and 10 and the ability to have a 12 play drive will help the defense as well. And improvement in special teams (we hope) will mean no more going for it on 4th and 5 from the other team's 30 yard line. Also helping the defense.
Thanks again and keep up the great work.
|2 years 18 weeks ago||Much respect for owning the error...||
Easy for me to say, but I actually suspected the data really meant how the 1stdown was acquired, rather than 1stdown play calling… The tip off was the presence of “penalty” in the chart, which makes no sense related to play calling. It is a perfect example of cherry picking a stat that backs up your opinion, rather than letting the stats help to form your opinion. i.e. if the data had shown that Hoke liked to run on first down, we would never have seen it on this blog. Of course I was too lazy to actually research it myself…
I still don’t understand why the RR faction is so anti-Hoke. Any moron can admit, myself included, that the RR offense was flourishing… it was going to be magnificent in a couple more years. As a skeptic from the beginning I can be Manball enough to admit that the “Spread offense can work in the Big 10” is settled law. No more debate. But as great as the offense was, or was going t be, the defense was so pathetic that its remarkable crappiness actually more than offset the offense’s success.
In any case, I enjoyed the fundamentally flawed analysis. Keep up the (99.9% accurate) good work
|2 years 29 weeks ago||We get it||
We Bo desciples get how annoying it is that we hated Richrod because he was the anti-Bo. And we get it that we were wrong, or at least we were overly anti-Rodriguez than was fair to him and the program. And I will say for the record that I was totally, completely wrong about the offense being ineffective, not working in the Big 11, etc.
BUT. Our defense sucked arse. And was not in any danger of improving. And Rodriguez, as good as he was at offensive Xs and Os, just didn't get the Michigan Man thing. Curse me and all my brothers in winged helmets, but he just didn't.
But here's my point... Bo, and Mo, and Lloyd had a philosophy, which was buried somewhere in the "Those who stay will be champions" mantra, that those outside the program have never quite understood. When a guy was ready to leave the program after having the crap kicked out of him as a Demo player during his redshirt year, or was ready to quit because a freshman running back took his spot he felt entitled to after three years of sweat, or was going to transfer because he was moved from tight end to guard to linebacker, no one ever asked him to stay. EVER. The coaches would tell them why it was good for THEM as a man and a person to stay in the program , but the philosophy was always "if you want to leave, we aren't going to ask you to stay. Those who stay will be champions. Period." I was at Michigan during the Moeller years, and when guys transferred (Jon Ritchie, Trevor Pryce, Eric Boykin, etc.) Coach Moeller would explain it yet again to us all.
And I know that is what Desmond was saying - He wasn't judging whether the program would be better or not if Denard stayed or left; we all know that him leaving would hurt like hell. But the point was that a sophomore who had a great year is still not larger than the program; and what Bo or Mo or Lloyd would have said to him is "Son, you are welcome here, but if you are going to leave, then godspeed." And they would have absolutely meant it , too.
And I was one of the old Bo guys who at least understood what Richrod was trying to do at the Bust with the Josh Grobin thing. He was trying to capture that same spirit that the "those who stay" era seemed to easily explain - We are men of michigan first, whether on the bench, or being drafted in the first round - and with that comes a certain measure of pride that only a Michigan Man can really understand.
I know how many of you hate the whole "Michigan Man" arrogance, and I completely understand why. I really do. But it is still what makes the place special. And if Richrod had understood that, he would still be our coach...
|2 years 49 weeks ago||This story is total crap||
Count on it.
|2 years 50 weeks ago||Sorry bro -||
I was using it mostly as a literary device... he mentioned in his post that he was and engineer and wants data, so I was appealing to that side of him, while also notiing that it can't be all about data.
No angst intended towards my MLB, Angell Hall, and Frieze (sp?) Building brothers in arms... Go blue.
|2 years 50 weeks ago||Count me as anti-RR||
and a huge fan, alumnus, letter winner, whatever. I have never and will never "not support (my) own team" because of RR or any other coach. I would have loved for RR to be 9-3 this year and getting an extension, because that would have meant our defense was marginal and our special teams were passable. But they got worse, and not by a little bit; by a TON.
This is big-boy football, and he gets paid a great deal of money, with a potential for nearly unmatched fame and adoration, if he's into that. But with great reward comes great responsibility.
|2 years 50 weeks ago||Thanks||
And your response is likewise great.
I guess my point of the GE analogy is to point out that Bill Martin is the guy who hired RR, essentially as a last resort before absolute armageddon (a.k.a Mike Debord), and appears to have disregarded the "Michigan Culture" aspect to the detriment of all.
Or more succinctly than I previously posted - UM has factions and politicking, just like every large, old, successful organization. If RR had been sensitive to and respectful of the factions he would have probably survived, but he seemed, through it all, to not give a damn.
Thanks for the great analysis - keep it coming!
|2 years 50 weeks ago||Two sided reply||
To the "engineer" in you (I am BSME '96, btw):
It's almost a given that he had more talent on D than he had on O when he took over (even with mallet and boren inthe fold). RR has stacked the offense with "his guys" and had incredible success. Why has there been such regression on D and specials? I agree with you - results speak louder than LSA wishy washy crap. Apart from great progress on offense, what measurables can you give me in support of guy?
Now to the practical side of you:
All great, longstanding organizations have a certain culture ingrained in them. General Electric, Apple, The US Government, The Catholic Church. Choosing a leader of those organization without considering the culture is idiotic. Jack Welch leading Apple or Steve Jobs leading GE would be equally catestropnic for each organization - both men are considered geniuses in their own right. Rich Rod will succeed somewhere, but pretending that a coach from one program can be plugged into another without any consideration of the "fit" is naive at best and stubborn at worst. This isn't UCF or Northwestern, where the football tradition is nonexistant an needs to be constructed from the bottom up.
This is why he failed - he didn't respect the tradition, and didn't act like he cared that we cared. This doesn't make him a bad leader - that would be a great attribute in someone taking over Indiana or SMU. But it makes him a bad choice for Michigan. Most RR supporters want to blame the "arrogant alumni" or "Bo disciples" for their "backstabbing". Instead of wishing that UMFB was a bastion of impartiality and unified support of the future instead of the past, Bill Martin should have acknowledged the REALITY of the organization he was hiring into and chosen a candidate appropriately based on many factors - Xs and Os, History of Success, penchant for innovation and *gasp* respect for the traditions of the university. RR had three of those four. We need a clean sweep.
I'm tired of people saying that RR's failure at UM is a symptom of some intrinsic defect in UMs culture. We're still the greatest football program ever. Until that changes, I would like a coach that respects that tradition as well as can coach like a mutha'. Godspeed David Brandon. Godspeed
|2 years 50 weeks ago||OK...||
You nor I will ever know the motivations of these two guys. But I (perhaps wrongly) filed your post under the "Lloyd left the cupboard bare" excuse/tripe/drivel which absolutely steams me. You can't have it both ways - if Lloyd really left the cupboard bare then our offense shoud suck as badly as our defense right now. RR has stocked the offense with great talent ("his guys", why has he been incapable of doing so on defense and specials? If you actually look at the roster, there was probably more talent left to RR on D than on O, but he hasn't done anything... and I mean ANYTHING positive on defense in 3 years. Why would we imagine he would start now?
|2 years 50 weeks ago||I know we've argued this point...||
... but I assume mean the worst QB selection int he modern era would have otherwise included Ryan Mallet, and you're referring to Justin "All Big 10" Boren. Do you think RR had every heard the phrase "Those who stay will be champions" before his first tour of the Stadium locker room?
|2 years 50 weeks ago||Beautifully Written||
I can't say I 100% agree with you, but your passion and thoughtfulness is appreciated. The theme, though, is indisputeable - RR is a good coach; maybe a great one. But it was a bad fit here. Not because the offense won't work in the Big Twelveleventen (of course it will), but because his personality was a bad fit with the Michigan culture. We can argue whether that culture is counterproductive, or annoying, or arrogant, or whatever, but we can't argue that it exists. Regardless of whether we LIKE the culture, or agree with it, you cannot IGNORE it when hiring the next guy. Which is why Martin gagged on the biggest decision of his tenure, and why the blame for the current state of affairs must rest 90% with him, and only 10% with the coach himself. And it's why Harbaugh is the obvious fit - he gets it.
I've met Harbaugh a couple times at some UM functions, and talked to him. I'm telling anyone who is unsure if he's the right guy or not - he is. He is old enough to understand and embrace the Bo legacy and the significance of Bo v. Woody, and at the same time young enough to understand that college football, as currenty constructed, is can no longer be exclusively about Bo v Woody.
I'm sure Richrod will succeed elsewhere. Just not here. And it's not his fault, but he has to go. With one caveat - if Brandon doesn't land Harbaugh and have the deal done already, he needs to keep Richrod for one more year, make him hire a real DC, fully realizing he will probably never get Harbaugh at that point..
|3 years 2 weeks ago||Love RR or hate him, the whole thing was odd||
Like odd enough fro Jim Rome (again, love him or hate him) to spend a full half hour on it today. Definitely cringworthy, and shows a certain lack of understanding of outsiders perceptions
Not that he HAS to care what others think. If he wins 10 games every year he could play "wind beneath my wings". He's got to realize where he is right now, in terms of public perception, and play it a little safer than this. Wait, isn't "wind beneath my wings" pretty much the same thing as that Josh Whoeveryouare crap?
Not good. Reminds me of John L smacking himself. Bizarre.
|3 years 6 weeks ago||Great, great post.||
|3 years 6 weeks ago||Accomplishment||
If the major accomplshment for this coaching staff is a "Heisman condender" you can keep it. I want 10 wins.
|3 years 6 weeks ago||Big ten vs preseason||
No one disputes the "Richrod is an offensive genius" point or "Denard is really good".
The one point that is consistantly lost in the "save RR" camp is the fact that our performance in conference is dismal. I think it has been established that the offense can score points in the conference. No dispute there.
But the quick-strike offense has defensive implications. 4 play 45 second drive is great - unless you are a defensive tackle and we don't blitz. We get worn down. Our 3 or 4 man rush becomes a 2 or 3 man rush by the 4th quarter because we are gassed. The opposing RB is at 110 yards with 8 minutes to play. Walk-on QB's have an eternity in the pocket. And the result is last Saturday's 3rd down fiesta at the hands of someone named Goiter.
It is a philosophical problem. At the base of it RR thinks he can outscore everybody. And he probably can in nonconference play. Everyone longs for the days of 9-3. Well if we go 4-0 in nonconfernece play, that means you are 5-3 in conference, losing every year to OSU and losing 2 of 3 to MSU, Iowa, and Wisconsin. Does that sound like Michigan Football to you?
My question to all the desciples is simple, and sincere - how much longer do we need to tolerate being ranked 100 or worse in the nation in defense before RR deserves to be fired?
|3 years 7 weeks ago||Oregon? Auburn?||
You mean the one's that have respectable defenses? The one's who shut out the baby seals on their schedule instead of allowing UMass and UConn and Seton Hall and Providence to stay in the game with them?
I don't want to talk to Oregon or Auburn, but I'd love for Brandon to talk to their coaches.
|3 years 7 weeks ago||I have come by my pitchfork begrudgingly.||
I was a believer in the hire. I was willing to wait and be patient while we tolerated the attrition and acquired the right personnel to run this offense. RR has proven that this offense is what everyone hoped it could be – phenomenal, overpowering, once-in-a-generation, breathtaking. The development of the offense is ahead of schedule.
But here is the bottom line:
Who do you want to be, the 1993 Denver Nuggets or the Chicago Bulls? The 1987 Cleveland Indians or the Detroit Tigers? With no hope for the defense going forward, there is no hope for any championships going forward, either.
And finally, if our expectations have sunk to “As long as we get our 15 practices I could give a shit less who or where we play,” then we have become Indiana. How does that feel? Yes a new head coach willbe a very painful experience, but I'd rather start the pain now, because the pain will come. The pain will come.
|3 years 7 weeks ago||15 minutes of fame||
In case anyone cares, that's me holding Coach Moeller's cords in the 1994 videos.
|3 years 7 weeks ago||Details||
Having worked in the 90s with the film and support staff, I can tell you this:
The head coach decides whether or not to have practice based on the on-field conditions, not the safety of the video staff. While I was on staff there we had several high wind outdoors - BUT the video staff would recognize that being up in the lift was unsafe and either not video that day's practice or take it from the filed-level.
I specifically remember one occasion when Coach Moeller yelled out in the middle of an outdoor practice "Where's my video guys?!?" and one of the GAs telling him it was too windy, to which he replied "if I'd have known that I would've had practice in the building". What this illustrates is that the head coach is not thinking of every single detail about the decision to have indoor or outdoor practice and what the implications are.
Ultimately it is the Video Coordinator - the person who that video camera operator reports to - that is responsible for the safety of his staff. He needs to speak up to Kelly on such an important matter as the safety of his guy. If he did, and Kelly insisted on taping the practice, then the responsibility is solely Kelly's
|3 years 7 weeks ago||Detroit media||
You also had to be living in Ann Arbor at the time. I think Moeller would have survived, if not for the emergence of the audio tape from the police car. I don't remember the exact timing, but it was about 3-5 days between the initial reports of him "getting beligerant in a restaurant" and the WJR playing the actual audio of the "do you know who I am" and "you can't do this to ME" drunken rampages. At that point, I don't believe anyone could've saved his job. Now, if he had won the National Championship the year before...
|3 years 7 weeks ago||Loeffler||
And Loeffler didn't play hardly at all, and never was top 3 on the depth chart because he was injured very early in his career.
|3 years 7 weeks ago||Sort of -||
But many of the recruits from '90 - '92 were, in fact, his recruits as much as they were Bo's - and they fit his system since it was mostly the same system. He was one of the main recruiters for high-profile recruits, expecially in Ohio and the Chicago area. And yes Lloyd's guys were mostly Mo's, but the same holds true - Lloyd was a main recruiter for Mo.
The difference is that Rodriguez truly had nothing at all to do with any of his players recruitment, and the offensive system change was so dramatic that you knew you were going to lose guys who didn't fit the system. Now, on the defensive side of the ball, there's no excuse. And there was plenty of talent left over from Lloyd on the defense, but Shaffer and Robinson squandered it.
Not sure I agree with the attition comment. There were a few - Jon Ritchie transferred back "home" to Stanford - he was a hippy to begin with. Eric Boykin was a head case and didn't really fit the system. And there were a few incidental guys with discipline problems, but I wouldn't call it " a lot of attrition" unless I'm forgetting a few of them.
|3 years 7 weeks ago||Grbac - not MO||
For the record that was an audible that Grbac called. We ran the no-huddle and Elvis had great lattitude as to what he could call.
|3 years 7 weeks ago||Insider's perspective||
I was on the support staff for 4 of the years Mo was there (Student Manager), including in every practice, many meetings, and on the field for every game, standing next to him in many cases. Here's my take:
The not so good -
So on balance I believe he was a great coach, a very good adminstrator, and a pretty lousy media/alumni relations guy. I still think he could've had a long successful career and might have won that 1997 championship.
But of course I am biased...